Skip to main content

The Challenge in Greenland Deepens the Atlantic Crisis

From the series European news

The irritation expressed by Denmark on December 21st, after Donald Trump appointed a special envoy for Greenland, turned into widespread alarmism across Europe within a few weeks. Especially after the American military intervention in Venezuela on January 3rd, Europeans have been wondering how far the Trump administration will push its claim for hemispheric dominance. The day after the raid on Caracas, the American president declared: We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security. The White House then made it known that it would not rule out the use of military force to grab hold of the island, a semi-autonomous territory of the Kingdom of Denmark, despite it being part of the Atlantic Alliance.

The first formal European reaction was the statement of January 6th, signed by the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, and Denmark, which states that security in the Arctic must be achieved collectively through collaboration between NATO allies, including the United States; but it is for Denmark and Greenland, and them only, to decide on matters concerning Denmark and Greenland. European indignation is hypocritical when it defends Danish possession of Greenland, ignoring the fact that the island’s population has been calling for independence for decades — a claim now openly seized upon in the dispute between European and American imperialism. Greenland was incorporated into the Kingdom of Denmark in 1953, and its population has suffered severe linguistic and cultural marginalisation, forced displacement, and even sterilisation programmes: almost half of young women were subjected to the forced insertion of intrauterine coils. The relationship between Greenland and Denmark has never been particularly warm, let alone equal.

Troops and tariffs

Although a 1951 treaty with Denmark already grants the Americans the right to build military bases in Greenland, Trump has emphasised that ownership of the island is psychologically necessary [The New York Times, January 8th]. All the more so because this land is, according to Trump, vital for the Golden Dome, the new missile shield he wants to build [Truth Social, January 14th]. Among other reasons for American designs, the press mentions the island's mineral wealth and control of new maritime shipping routes emerging in the Arctic due to global warming.

Some commentators also seek an explanation in Trump's irrationality. The world is dealing with a Trump unbound, wrote the Financial Times, a president who feels unconstrained at home and is asserting America's right to act internationally as it sees fit [January 10th]. According to Marc Jacobsen of the Royal Danish Defence College, Trump's enormous ego is the main driving force behind this affair; he wants to be the president who restored the United States to its former greatness by enlarging its territory [Le Figaro (online), January 12th].

A further stage in the escalation of the Atlantic crisis was reached when, on January 17th, Trump threatened to impose new tariffs on Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, after these nations supported the deployment of military personnel to Greenland for the Arctic Endurance mission. Involving small numbers of military personnel, according to Le Monde the mission was an inter-allied operation decided urgently by the Kingdom of Denmark, without any connection to NATO command [January 17th].

Calls for European rearmament

The crude and brutal expression of American power in the Trump II era is a violent shock that is finally opening the eyes of Washington's allies, wrote Sylvie Kauffmann in Le Monde [January 9th]. After the threat of new tariffs, Le Figaro wrote peremptorily: The time has come to react or disappear. To choose between sovereignty and vassalage [January 19th]. The assertive French comments contrast with the more cautious German ones. All channels of communication with Washington must be kept open, warned the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, because Trump can threaten not only with tariffs, but also with the withdrawal of support for Ukraine and troops from Europe, and would even be capable of announcing overnight that extended nuclear deterrence no longer applies to certain unruly countries. To respond, Europeans need unity, economic strength, and military power [January 20th].

Among the comments attempting to rationalise the American president's behaviour, Peter Mandelson's stands out. Trump will not invade Greenland, says the man who was Tony Blair's adviser and British ambassador to Washington between February and September 2025. What will happen — he predicts — is that the threats to Arctic security posed by China and Russia will crystallise in European minds, performative statements about sovereignty and NATO's future will fade and serious discussion will take over. Subsequently, the United States, Denmark, and other allies will address how the Arctic region is properly secured with a beefed-up role, status, and military deployment by America. Trump, says Mandelson, is not a populist intent on destroying the post-war rules-based order. This order ceased to have meaning before he was elected, because it started to evaporate two decades ago when China emerged as a great power contesting the US-led unipolar world. Mandelson criticises European leaders who, in his view, should bring hard military power and diplomatic muscle to the table, rather than expressing their outpourings about a sheriff president who does not follow conventional practice or a traditional diplomatic rulebook [The Spectator, January 7th].

The conclusion of all these comments coincides with the slogan pronounced by Mario Draghi when receiving the Charlemagne Prize: Europe must become stronger militarily, economically, and politically.

Pragmatic federalism

The path towards this goal is increasingly taking the form of the pragmatic federalism advanced by Draghi. The €90 billion for Ukraine, a substantial part of which will be spent on the European arms industry, was approved by the EU Council in December, despite only 24 of the 27 member States formally approving it. According to the FAZ, this is a historic decision because it involves new Eurobonds through which the Commission gains further political influence [January 15th]. The signing of the EU-Mercosur agreement was then approved by the European Council on January 9th, despite votes against by France, Poland, Austria, Hungary, and Ireland.

On the military front, the sticking point was the coalition of the willing in support of Ukraine, comprising France, the United Kingdom, and Germany, around which flexible military cooperation has been established. At the summit of the willing on January 6th, at which London and Paris expressed their intention to send troops to Ukraine after a possible ceasefire, Madrid abandoned the low profile it had previously maintained on this subject. After the summit, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez announced that his government is determined to deploy peacekeeping troops not only in Ukraine, but also in Palestine [El País, January 8th]. Shortly afterwards, Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares said that it is important for us Europeans to take a leap towards sovereignty, as we did with the single currency, and that we must ensure that deterrence is in our hands. This implies, Albares continued, moving towards a European army and using a coalition of the willing, as we have done so many times in history [El País, January 14th]. Defence Minister Margarita Robles added that she does not rule out Spain's participation in the European mission in Greenland [El País, January 15th].

Meanwhile, the storm over the Atlantic is pushing London closer to the continent. In December, the first meeting of the Franco-British nuclear control group created last summer was held, and the British participated for the first time in the French Strategic Air Forces' Poker exercise, a simulation of a nuclear attack. France has also held discreet discussions with other European countries on how to join forces in expressing French deterrence. For example, the possibility of stationing Rafale aircraft capable of carrying atomic bombs in Germany or Poland is being considered [L'Opinion, December 24th].

Spectre of the German bomb

The shock suffered by European Atlanticism has also reopened the debate in Germany on the reliability of the American nuclear umbrella. In an interview with the Süddeutsche Zeitung, Roderich Kiesewetter explained that he had shared on the Internet, only as a food for thought, the personal opinion of a German general, according to whom Germany needs its own nuclear weapons. The CDU foreign and security policy expert and former Bundeswehr officer made it clear that he himself is opposed to a German bomb, if only because it would mean cancelling the 1990 Two Plus Four Treaty and reopening the question of reparations. However, Kiesewetter argues that we should go beyond the idea of merely extending Paris's nuclear umbrella, on the one hand because it is insufficient, and on the other because of the political uncertainty of a far-right victory in the French presidential elections. The CDU member of the Bundestag, known for his Atlanticist convictions and his hard-line stance against Russia and China, proposes a German financial contribution to the development of a nuclear arsenal in alliance with other States, but without Germany taking the lead. Countries such as Sweden, Finland, and Poland are also said to be debating the issue [Süddeutsche Zeitung, January 12th].

Eckhard Lübkemeier, former deputy director of the European Affairs Department of the Federal Chancellery, sees the suggestion of a German bomb as a possible lever to obtain the extension of British or French deterrence. The spectre of a German bomb, he says, is something that even a French president from Le Pen's party would find difficult to ignore [Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung, January 4th]. For Berthold Kohler, one of the editors-in-chief of the FAZ, regardless of how many counterarguments there are, Berlin must seriously consider its own nuclear armament [January 16th].

Lotta Comunista, January 2026

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

India’s Weaknesses in the Global Spotlight

Farmers’ protests around New Delhi have been going on for four months now. A controversial intervention by the Supreme Court has suspended the implementation of the new agticultural laws, but has raised questions about the dynamics between the judiciary and the executive, and has failed to unblock the negotiations between government and peasant organisations. The assault by Sikh farmers on the Red Fort during the Republic Day parade as India was displaying its military might to the outside world — the Chinese Global Times maliciously noted — paradoxically widened the protest in the huge state of Uttar Pradesh. The Modi government has been trying to revive India’s image with the 2021 Union Budget: it announced one hundred privatisations and approved the increase to 75% of the limit on direct foreign investment in insurance companies. For The Indian Express ( IEX ) this is a sign of the commitment to push ahead with reforms despite the backlash from rural India. Also for The Economi...
Read more

Armed Negotiations between the Gulf and the Mediterranean

David Petraeus, Commander of the US forces in Iraq and the Gulf in 2007-2008, then director of the CIA in 2011-12, described the elimination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani on January 3 rd in Baghdad as a defensive action , with which the Trump presidency restored a US deterrence , which was weakened by recent Iranian actions . This is a reference to the attacks conducted indirectly, unclaimed by Tehran, against the Saudi oil infrastructures on September 14 th 2019. In March 2008, when the forces under Petraeus’ command supported the Iraqi Army in the fight against local Shite militias, Soleimani sent a message to the American general: informing him that he was the person in charge for Iranian policies in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Gaza therefore the channel through which to define an agreement to resolve the various issues with Tehran. Petraeus holds the advisors of the Quds Force, the spearhead of the Pasdaran asymmetric operations, responsible for the killing of around 600 ...
Read more

In the Depth of Our Class

The pandemic of the century is a storm that does not subside; it returns to its rampage after 40 million infections and more than a million official victims, perhaps two million according to estimates on the excess deaths. In the contention between powers, China stands as the winner: it seems to have tamed the virus, and industry and services are up and running; the USA and Europe, on the other hand, are moving towards a new wave of infections that casts yet more shadows on the economic cycle. Political structures and health systems are at the height of tension. In America, the elections have judged Donald Trump’s rash demagogy on the basis of the opposite reasons for containing the pandemic and the intolerance of small and large producers; in Europe the executives are attempting to steer between the surge in infections, increasingly stringent confinement measures and the threats of fiscal jacquerie in the tourism and catering sectors. Almost everywhere, in the Old Continent, governm...
Read more

Democratic Defeat in the Urban Vote

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series Elections in the USA A careful analysis of the 2022 mid-term elections revealed the symptoms of a Democratic Party malaise which subsequently fully manifested itself in the latest presidential election, with the heavy loss of support in its traditional strongholds of the metropolitan areas of New York City and Chicago, and the State of California. A defeat foretold Republican votes rose from 51 million in the previous 2018 midterms to 54 million in 2022, a gain of 3 million. The Democrat vote fell from 61 to 51 million, a loss of 10 million. The Republicans gained only three votes for every ten lost by the Democrats, while the other seven became abstentions. In 2022, we analysed the elections in New York City by borough, the governmental districts whose names are well known through movies and TV series. In The Bronx, where the average yearly household income is $35,000, the Democrats lost 52,00...
Read more

The Unstoppable Force: Capital’s Demand for Migrant Labour

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 16 “Before Giorgia Meloni became Italy’s prime minister, she pledged to cut immigration. Since she has been in government the number of non-EU work visas issued by Italy has increased”. This is how The Economist of April 26th summarises the schizophrenia of their politics; and this is not only true in Italy: “Net migration also surged in post-Brexit Britain”. The needs of the economic system do not coincide with the rhetoric of parliamentarism. And vice versa. Schizophrenia and imbalances in their politics Returning to Italy, the Bank of Italy has pointed out that by 2040, in just fifteen years, there will be a shortage of five million people of working age, which could lead to an estimated 11% contraction in GDP. This is why even Italy’s “sovereignist” government is preparing to widen the net of its Immigration Flow Decree. The latest update, approved on June 30th, provides for the entry of almost ...
Read more

Nuclear Energy and the Power Grid

Internationalism No. 85, March 2026 Page 8 From the series The world energy battle Electricity is at the heart of modern economies and the demand for electricity is growing much faster than the overall consumption of energy in every scenario [ Electricity 2025 , International Energy Agency report]. Overproduction and power grid bottlenecks Electricity represents just 21% of energy consumption at a global level, but it is the main source for the sectors which represent more than 40% of the economy. A fundamental issue for the security of the electricity system is the modernisation of the power grid, which is currently lagging behind the expansion of production capacity. Although global investment in the production of electricity has increased by almost 70% since 2015, reaching $1,000 billion a year, annual spending on the grid has increased at less than half this rate, reaching $400 billion. This is also a European problem. Accordin...
Read more

The Defeat in Afghanistan — a Watershed in the Cycle of Atlantic Decline

In crises and wars there are events which leave their mark on history because of how they make a decisive impact on the power contention, or because of how, almost like a chemical precipitate, they suddenly make deep trends that have been at work for some time coalesce. This is the case of the defeat of the United States and NATO in Afghanistan, which is taking the shape of a real watershed in the cycle of Atlantic decline. For the moment, through various comments in the international press, it is possible to consider its consequences on three levels: America’s position as a power and the connection with its internal crisis; the repercussions on Atlantic relations and Europe’s dilemmas regarding its strategic autonomy; and the relationship between the Afghan crisis and power relations in Asia, especially as regards India’s role in the Indo-Pacific strategy. Repercussions in the United States Richard Haass is the president of the CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations; despite having ...
Read more

The deep strata of workers in an opulent Europe

The inauguration of the Draghi government has revived top trade union leaders anxious to be involved by the government of all , all the more so in the era of the Recovery Fund. The word consultation has been the most used in some recent trade union comments. Annamaria Furlan, of the CIS [Italian Confederation of Trade Unions] is explicit in calling for a great consultative pact [ Il Messaggero , 8 th February]. Pierpaolo Bombardier, secretary of the UIL [Italian Labour Union], adds that the consultation must become a method to help the country restart . Maurizio Landini, of the CGIL [Italian General Confederation of Labor] sees the novelty in the fact that social partners have been involved in the establishment of the new government [ Conquiste del lavoro , 11 th February]. The two phases of European imperialist politics In this sense there are many comparisons to the Ciampi govemment of 1993, omitting that consultation was functional to limiting the costs of labour. There ...
Read more

The Works of Marx and Engels and the Bolshevik Model

Internationalism Pages 12–13 In the autumn of 1895 Lenin commented on the death of Friedrich Engels: "After his friend Karl Marx (who died in 1883), Engels was the finest scholar and teacher of the modern proletariat in the whole civilised world. […] In their scientific works, Marx and Engels were the first to explain that socialism is not the invention of dreamers, but the final aim and necessary result of the development of the productive forces in modern society. All recorded history hitherto has been a history of class struggle, of the succession of the rule and victory of certain social classes over others. And this will continue until the foundations of class struggle and of class domination – private property and anarchic social production – disappear. The interests of the proletariat demand the destruction of these foundations, and therefore the conscious class struggle of the organised workers must be directed against them. And every class strugg...
Read more

The Comprehensive Agreement on Investment Strengthens the ‘European Party’ in China

From the series News from the Silk Road “Chinese people treat [US democracy] as a variety show which is much more interesting than House of Cards’ [...]”. Beijing does not feel the same embarrassment as the old democracies of the West faced with the grotesque scenes of demonstration against the Capitol organised by the president of the United States. Zhao Minghao from the Chongyang Institute spelled out the obvious in his analysis some time earlier: “the political farce by the incumbent president and some Republican lawmakers is reflecting the profound crisis on US domestic politics.” The Global Times is serving a hefty bill to the ideologies of liberal interventionism: “the ‘beacon of democracy’, and the beautiful rhetoric of ‘City upon a Hill’ [...]” are undergoing a serious debacle or in other words, a “Waterloo of US international image”. It will be a while before the US can “interfere in other countries’ domestic affairs with the excuse of ‘democracy’[...]”. Attention is also...
Read more