The Internationalism

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 The fall of the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad, with the president, in power since 2000, fleeing to Moscow, took international chancelleries by surprise. The conflict had appeared frozen since 2020, the year of the last Russian-Turkish agreements, which marked a de facto partition of spheres of influence and territorial control in the country. Since 2023, a normalisation of relations between Damascus and the Arab capitals had been underway, to the point that just a few days before the offensive, unleashed by Islamist rebel militias supported by Turkey and Qatar, the Syrian presidency had been a guest at an. Arab League conference in Riyadh. The “death knell” of Doha The astonishment of analysts and commentators at the sudden collapse of the regime was accompanied by widespread disquiet, summed up in the formula of “catastrophic success” evoked by David Ignatius, columnist of The Washington Post and close to A...

F**k that, we don’t have to worry about that. We did it in Vietnam, Nixon and Kissinger got away with it. This is what eleven years ago Joe Biden, an advocate of an unconditional withdrawal from Kabul, told Richard Holbrooke who feared for the Afghan women who had been pushed back into the darkness. Today, newspapers around the world are wringing their hands over the bad impression made by the liberal order and its values, and weeping crocodile tears for the girls of Kabul, who have been kicked out of schools and handed back to a dark, reactionary fanaticism. But the commander in chief of a West which claims to be an alliance for democracy has always considered freedom and human rights in Afghanistan to be myths for the deluded, not worth the lives of its soldiers. A hypocritical and impotent Europe has followed him, and today seems to fear only receiving a new wave of refugees. Let us take notes and learn this lesson. The bourgeoisie has written glorious pages, when its revolutions...

From the series News from the Silk Road The international tensions which China will face on the seas in the next fifteen years could find a buffer in the expansion of China’s influence on land in Central, Southern and Western Asia. Wang Jisi is the dean of the School of International Studies at the University of Beijing and a major figure of the American party in China. His unexpected foray into ‘geopolitics’ has reignited the old clash between different American currents — a phenomenon we analysed more than twenty years ago. At the time, Robert Manning, the author of The Asian Energy Factor and adviser to the State Department in 1991, viewed Asia’s growing dependence on the Persian Gulf for its energy requirements in the light of geoeconomics and geostrategy and foresaw a possible convergence between the USA and China. From a geoeconomic standpoint, both trade and the funding and development of the infrastructure necessary for Asia’s energy needs were more important than terri...