Skip to main content

Historic Electoral Mandate for Japanese Rearmament

In the columns of The Nikkei on October 21st, foreign policy commentator Hiroyuki Akita wrote that the new Japanese prime minister’s mandate would be defined by a far more consequential challenge: forging a system of government capable of functioning under the duress of war. For Akita, emphasising the need to prepare for a ‘wartime’ regime serves to highlight that Japan is under severe stress. Tokyo has enjoyed a long period of peace and has been able to deal with peacetime crises, even largescale ones such as the pandemic of the century. The war in Ukraine has ushered in a turbulent global situation, reminiscent of the uncertainty of the 1930s. To confront this, Tokyo needs a government structure capable of rapidly shifting from peacetime routines to an emergency footing. This is a dilemma that does not concern Japan alone, but Japan finds itself in an even more perilous position than Europe [...], hemmed in by the nuclear arsenals of China, Russia, and North Korea and lacking the protective shield of a collective defence framework like NATO.

According to Akita, history clearly shows that military force alone cannot guarantee stability. In 1941, Tokyo possessed formidable land and naval forces, but a reckless national policy led the country to the brink of total destruction. Japan was unable to subordinate the military to political power and safeguard the national interest. Eighty years later, in the event of war, the prime minister must be a commander-in-chief capable of leading the nation through crisis. In this context, various Japanese governments since 2010 have passed a series of security laws to strengthen the alliance with Washington and establish a National Security Secretariat. Nevertheless, citing the assessment of Shinichi Kitaoka – a diplomat and conservative realist historian who has advised both Yasuhiro Nakasone and Shinzo Abe – Japan continues to carry the unhealthy traits of the prewar period. Among these is the precedent principle, i.e., the tendency to stick rigidly to established policy, which prevents Tokyo from responding to crises with flexibility.

The context of Akita’s commentary was the transfer of power between Shigeru Ishiba and Sanae Takaichi at the helm of the executive, following the latter’s victory as leader of the LDP. The first woman to head a Japanese government, Takaichi took office without a parliamentary majority and, shortly thereafter, was forced to deal with the decision of Komeito, a centrist Buddhist-inspired party, to break its political-electoral alliance with the Liberal Democrats, in place since 1999. This coalition was replaced by one with the Japan Innovation Party (JIP), a regionalist party based in Osaka with national-liberal positions.

A mandate for Japanese realism

According to the Financial Times, during the 110 days of her government before the early elections called for February 8th, Takaichi showed a sure political touch, despite the diplomatic crisis with China that erupted last November. She then made history a second time. Not only is she the first woman to lead the country, but she is also the first political leader to obtain a super-majority in the lower house: 316 seats, and 352 for her coalition, out of 465 contested. The Economist dedicated a flattering cover to the victor, titled The World’s Most Powerful Woman, hailing her achievement as a once-in-a-generation chance to remake the Land of the Rising Sun – an opportunity Takaichi must seize in order to face the new world disorder.

The British weekly describes as healthy the prime minister’s willingness to break taboos, including discussing nuclear weapons and increasing defence spending to 2% of GDP. But this is only part of the work: she will have to manage Donald Trump’s return to the White House and position Tokyo at the forefront of efforts to link the CPTPP and the European Union, the Trans-Pacific and European areas, creating a trade bloc covering over 30% of global output. Finally, she will have to implement deregulation measures, attract migrants and not demonise them, and avoid fiscal populism.

The formula that sums up the assessments expressed by both the Japanese and international press is a mandate for political realism, with an emphasis on pragmatism. This is also evident in the fact that the new Takaichi government is unchanged from the previous one.

For the liberal Mainichi Shimbun, while the election debate focused on inflation, the real issues are the revision of the three non-nuclear principles and rearmament. In her election speeches, the prime minister clearly stated: If we want to strengthen our defence capabilities, we need to expand the economic pie. For a senior government official, this is a pedagogical formula: Under the banner of the economic growth we will strengthen our defence capabilities and will get the understanding of the public opinion.

Japanese-style Zeitenwende

A comment published shortly before the elections in the German newspaper Die Zeit seems significant. According to the paper, Prime Minister Takaichi has sparked an internal debate in Japan on security policy, similar to the German discussion on the Zeitenwende, the epochal turning point: a country burdened by the guilt of war, which for decades has hidden militarily in the shadow of the US, now finds its pacifist image suddenly shaken. Die Zeit cites the opinions of former diplomat and LDP parliamentarian Rui Matsukawa, for whom the three major challenges to Japan’s security are China, China, and China, followed by North Korea and, finally, Russia. Matsukawa also raises the unthinkable: nuclear deterrence requires Tokyo’s involvement in American decisions on the matter. She also suggests an approach similar to that of South Korea and proposes adapting the Constitution to allow the deployment of American submarines in Japanese waters. The reference is to abandoning the third of the three non-nuclear principles, which stipulates that no atomic weapons should be introduced into Japan.

This is not a constitutional provision, but a guideline, as Takaichi herself points out; on the other hand, according to Kitaoka’s assessment, the three principles fall under the precedents whose continued observance undermines strategic flexibility. We have already noted in the past how Tokyo looks to the German and European debate, and not only to that of Seoul, although it refers to it only obliquely. The reference to the Constitution concerns Article 9, which theoretically prohibits Japan from possessing armed forces and the means to wage war, limiting its external projection.

The thousand deaths of Chudo

According to Jio Kamata, Tokyo correspondent for The Diplomat, February 8th marks the end of the long debate on Japanese pacifism. The discussion has shifted from mere possession of military sufficiency to the quality and effectiveness of defence capabilities. This is also pointed out by Yuichiro Tamaki, leader of the Democratic Party for the People (DPP) for whom the era of the DPJ has come to an end, i.e., the era of a centre-left party advocating constitutional pacifism. The successor to the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) which governed from 2009 to 2012 is the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan (CDPJ) led by Yoshihiko Noda, who served as prime minister between 2011 and 2012. He launched the Centrist Reform Alliance (known as Chudo) with Komeito.

Although oriented towards more realistic positions on defence and nuclear energy, this alliance’s electoral debut on February 8th was disastrous: from a pre-election parliamentary strength of over 160 seats, it retained just 49, including 28 held by Komeito, thanks to the loyalty of its urban electorate, which carries weight in proportional voting. In 2024, the CDPJ won 11.5 million votes; Komeito, then allied with the LDP, won almost 6 million. Today, the alliance has won just 10.4 million votes. Before resigning, Noda admitted that one plus one does not make two and that he deserved one thousand deaths for the electoral defeat.

Among voters aged 18 to 30, Chudo obtained just 4% of the vote. The JDP won 33%, thanks in part to Takaichi’s media savvy and personality, which allowed her to come across as frank and deliver simple and concise messages, encapsulated in the election slogan a strong and prosperous Japan (a clear echo of the Meiji Restoration slogan Enrich the Country, Strengthen the Armed Forces). It also proved effective to present the election as a direct election, a choice between Takaichi and Noda (who are personally acquainted). In Japanese political circles, Noda was nicknamed unagi, or river eel – prized for its meat, but elusive, hunting at the bottom of lakes and rivers. In 2012, faced with internal fragmentation within the DPJ and the Senkaku crisis with China, he decided to call early elections, which Abe won in a landslide. In effect, he performed an honourable seppuku, the ritual samurai suicide, to put an end to the factionalism within the Democratic Party and steer it towards the centre.

The Burmese tuna

There is no doubt that Takaichi also gambled on her personal popularity and used populist rhetoric, as seen in the nervous reaction of the markets – especially the bond markets – to her proposed tax cuts, particularly the cut in VAT on food. According to the government, this proposal was put forward to sterilise an issue taken up by the opposition. The same can be said of immigration. The Asahi Shimbun notes that the issue occupied barely 1% of the prime minister’s campaign rallies. Nor did the rhetoric adopt the Japanese first tone used by Sanseito, which won 15 seats in the Diet but was forced to ride the Sanae wave.

According to Stephen Nagy, a Canadian political analyst, commentator for the Japan Times, and researcher at the JIIA, a think tank of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japanese voters knew who and what they were voting for: realism in a Japanese foreign policy grappling with a dangerous neighbourhood. This perception has been heightened by diplomatic tensions with China and Beijing’s muscle-flexing after Takaichi’s statements about a possible Japanese military role in a conflict in the Taiwan Strait. The immigration issue proved to be something of a non-issue, as public opinion is aware of the need for immigrant labour, and the government is reviewing some regulations for granting residence and work permits.

In the midst of the election campaign, the Sankei Shimbun, the most right-wing of Japan’s daily newspapers, highlighted the issue of Burmese tuna: in hundreds of fish processing companies, including tuna, 15 to 20% of the workforce is now of Burmese, South Vietnamese, or Indonesian origin, and the workforce from Southeast Asia exceeds that of Chinese or South Korean origin. According to the Mainichi Shimbun, the same is true for agricultural businesses, where the majority of workers are Vietnamese.

Lotta Comunista, February 2026

Popular posts in the last week

Reckless Bets on Migrants in California

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 11 From the series Chronicles of the new American nationalism The tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump on allies, partners and opponents of the United States have opened a phase of negotiations with the affected countries and caused reactions from some key States. The legal opposition from almost all areas of the US poses a test: whether States, courts, and Congress can influence trade policy and constrain the expansion of executive powers. Amid conflicting rulings, the tariffs have been reinstated – an outcome that, The New York Times remarks, has “left Washington, Wall Street, and much of the world trying to discern the future of US trade policy”. California’s dispute with the federal government has expanded to immigration policy and the domestic use of military force. The political, economic, and power struggles overlap with the electoral dimension. The establishment remains critical of or ...

The EU Commission Plans for Rearmament and a Clean Industrial Deal

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series European news Following the European elections which took place on June 6th - 9th, the leaders of the Member States met on June 27th at the European Council. Ursula von der Leyen was nominated as president of the next European Commission, after she was chosen as the European People’s Party’s (EPP) Spitzenkandidat (“leading candidate”). The agreement also included the election of former Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio Costa as president of the European Council, and the appointment of former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas as High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Subsequently, on July 18th, Parliament elected von der Leyen as president of the Commission by an absolute majority, with 401 votes out of 719 MEPs. On September 17th, von der Leyen presented her team of commissioners to the European Parliament and, two days later, the Council adopted this list of...

Show Warfare?

Internationalism No. 86, April 2026 Page 16 After show politics and show diplomacy , have we sunk to the obscenity of show warfare ? On the surface, this is true. The Pentagon’s video game-style communications, where airstrikes, missile launches, and deadly explosions are set to music for social media clips, certainly suggest so. It matters little that a hundred schoolgirls were also blown to bits as artificial intelligence took centre stage on the battlefield. In reality, war propaganda has always showcased destruction and mocked the enemy; today in Washington, in the era of the high-tech groups of television and social media democracy , the only thing that has changed is the style and the means used to inflame fanaticisms and stuff people’s brains. In Tehran, dominated by a parasitic bourgeoisie that feeds on oil revenues and is intertwined with the militias and hierarchies of t...

THE UNITARY IMPERIALISM ISSUE

Chapter Six   In 1951 Europe, and the world, was shrouded in mist. The ‘Cold War’ ideology ruled, and the war in Korea made a world conflict between the USA and the USSR seem a real possibility. In France, Great Britain, Germany and Italy, the talk was of rearmament. Europe, at that time urged by the USA, was planning the EDC (European Defence Community) to keep step with German rearmament. The concept of a ‘ unitary imperialism ’ was the strategic choice that helped the small GAAP group remain politically independent. But translating this into an ‘Internationalist Third Front’ slogan was unfortunate. It facilitated a link with French libertarian communists, but could also cause confusion with its suggestion of a ‘Third Force’ between the USA and the USSR, which in Europe was supported by important bourgeois currents. Although opposition to unitary imperialism consolidated the internationalist struggle, the theory required to be developed and per...

LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM

Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM   An examination of the debate within the groups that were to create GAAP (Anarchist Groups of Proletarian Action) gives a vivid picture of the problems that between 1948 and 1951 had to be slowly and painfully faced. Three major confrontations, progressively more serious, took place between Cervetto and Masini in the autumn of 1949 and again in the spring and autumn of 1950. As preparations were being made for the National Conference at Pontedecimo – from which GAAP would be born – debate on the nature of the organisation and on theories of the State and imperialism began to define the characteristics of the new political group, but also revealed the differences. The first step had been to look for ‘a different kind’ of communism in anarchism. Along this road Cervetto , with an ever-surer grasp, would raise the issue that had been first posed by Marx and Lenin : our militant...

Marx’s Political Method

Internationalism No. 85, March 2026 Special Issue, Page II From the series Principles of Marxism The Grundrisse require a sustained effort of attention from the reader. Marx uses scientific abstractions and conceptual connections as analytical tools. In the Grundrisse , we shall follow the guiding thread of Marx’s method. Some critics, including those within the Marxist camp, see traces of Hegelian thought in Marx’s procedures in this work. Marx and Engels responded to these jibes, clarifying their relationship with Hegel. In the Afterword to the second edition of Capital , Marx wrote: My dialectic method is not only different from the Hegelian but is its direct opposite. To Hegel, the [...] process of thinking, which, under the name of ‘the Idea’, he even transforms into an independent subject, is the demiurgos of the real world [...]. With me, on the contrary, the ideal is nothing else than the material world reflected by the human mind, and transl...

Forward Deterrence for European Imperialism

Internationalism No. 86, April 2026 Page 3 From the series European news The next half-century will be the age of nuclear weapons . This was the grim prediction with which Emmanuel Macron concluded his speech on nuclear deterrence, delivered on March 2 nd at the Île Longue submarine base. Standing before Le Téméraire , the nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine that carries a strike force equivalent to the sum of all the bombs dropped on Europe during the Second World War , the president announced a significant evolution in French nuclear doctrine. The emergence of new threats and the realignment of American priorities make it necessary, according to Macron, not only to strengthen deterrence by increasing the number of nuclear warheads, but also to rethink the deterrence strategy deep inside the European continent . His proposal is the gradual implementation o...

Lotta Comunista: The Origins 1943-1952

Guido La Barbera Contents 9. Preface to the English Edition 13. Preface 19. Useful dates 21. Chapter One «ONE OUGHT TO KNOW WITH WHOM ONE IS DEALING» 25. The balance-of-power theory 27. Theory and the ‘strategy-party’ 29. Chapter Two THE FOUNDRY AND THE PARTISAN STRUGGLE 31. The Savona group 39. Passion disciplined by reason 40. Never again a tool in the hands of others 41. The Genoa group 46. The Sestri Ponente group 48. The groups in Rome and Tuscany 52. The strength of GAAP: ‘only a handful’ 55. Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM 58. Reckoning with Bordiga...

The National Gamble of Poland

Internationalism No. 33, November 2021 Page 3 From the series European News In a lawsuit brought by Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki, the Constitutional Tribunal, which is composed of judges chosen by the government, ruled that fundamental parts of the EU Treaty are incompatible with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. This ruling thus denies the primacy of European law over national law, undermining both the political assumption of continental integration and the supranational character of the EU . Vectors of Polish history We can shed light on this event if we consider the four field vectors that cross Poland: its traditional ethnic-religious nationalism, its marked Atlantic tropism, the objective attraction exerted by the European force field, and the looming threat of Russia. The general picture is global collisions: China’s irruption and the crisis in the world order have put pressure on Warsaw to define its st...

THE FOUNDRY AND THE PARTISAN STRUGGLE

Chapter Two   What forces were there for starting again, at the end of the 1940s? At the beginning of that road, you could count the core groups on the fingers of one hand: Genoa, its Sestri Ponente district, Savona, Rome. Of course, there were also Turin, Vicenza, Bologna, Milan, Bolzano, Trieste, Livorno, and a few sympathisers down South, but that was all it amounted to. Although there were periodic attempts at ‘linking up’ along the whole length of the peninsula, apart from the three Ligurian groups and the Tuscany-Lazio one, there wasn’t much more than a network of individual sympathisers. The Savona group Arrigo Cervetto , founder of Lotta Comunista and its undisputed leader until his death in 1995, was born in Buenos Aires in 1927, to a family who had emigrated from Savona. Returning to Liguria, he started work when still a boy, and in 1943 was taken on as an apprentice at the Ilva steel-making plant in Savona. The party ar...