Skip to main content

A New “Delors Plan” for EU Imperialism?


From the series European news


Battlelines for a new world order based on power are being drawn right now. [...] This must be Europe's Independence Moment. So said Ursula von der Leyen in her annual State of the Union address to the European Parliament on September 10th. On the military front, the Commission president praised the historic progress made in recent years in building a European Defence Union. She referred to Readiness 2030, the programme launched in early 2025, which aims to mobilise up to €800 billion in defence investment, and the SAFE programme, which provides €150 billion in European loans for joint military purchases. The Commission also wants to create a drone wall along the Union's eastern borders and an Eastern Flank Watch.

Von der Leyen announced that a clear roadmap for getting new common defence projects off the ground, setting clear goals for 2030, and creating a European Defence Semester would be presented at the next European Council meeting. The Commission's current periodic review of national budgets, known as the European Semester, would therefore be extended to include more detailed scrutiny of defence budgets by the EU executive.

The times of European rearmament

In this newspaper, we have focused on the time factor in European rearmament. By invoking the spectre of the Russian threat, Europe seeks not only to build an effective deterrent against Moscow, but also to negotiate on equal terms with the US and other powers. Yet, within the timeframe required for this process, Europe's military dependence on the US means it must work to restrain American vacillation and avoid a rupture, even at the price of short-term concessions. Sabine Weyand, head of the European Commission's Directorate-General for Trade, has described the tariff agreement with Trump as an exercise in strategic patience.

In an interview with La Stampa on September 7th, European Commissioner for Defence and Space Andrius Kubilius explained: Washington is looking at China and intends to shift part of its strategic focus to the Indo-Pacific. That is why we must immediately strengthen our capabilities. In short: two objectives. First, to be ready to deter Russian aggression. [...] Second, to define with Washington how and when the Americans will reduce their presence, and how we will fill that gap. Thus – asked La Stampadeterrence now and autonomy tomorrow? Exactly was Kubilius' reply. The Lithuanian commissioner has a three-stage plan: First: increase European production of equipment that is already available. Second: develop technologies that we currently import, such as long-range missiles. Third: modernise by learning from the drone war.

Another step towards European deterrence

Although Brussels is strengthening its role in coordinating and financing the arms industry, defence issues remain primarily a matter for the States. It is therefore not surprising that defence was one of the central themes at the last meeting of the Franco-German Council of Ministers on August 29th. Affirming that nuclear deterrence is the foundation of the Alliance's security and recognising the contribution of France's independent strategic nuclear forces, it was announced that Germany and France will launch a strategic dialogue under the leadership of the German Chancellery and the French Presidency, with the participation of the foreign and defence ministries.

On July 10th, the Northwood Declaration announced the creation of a UK-France Nuclear Control Steering Group. A week later, the Kensington Treaty, signed on July 17th, committed the United Kingdom and Germany to pursue deep exchanges on strategic aspects of security policy, including deterrence and defence, [and] nuclear issues. It is now confirmed that confidential discussions on European deterrence are underway between Paris, London, and Berlin.

Manhattan Projects and common debt

At the request of the Paris and Berlin governments, the Franco-German Council of Economic Experts prepared a report for the summit with strategic proposals in five areas: defence, energy, productivity and growth, labour markets, and trade with China. In the defence sector, the experts propose the creation of a single market and the rapid development of joint defence resources that allow for interoperability and operational efficiency of European forces without US strategic support, such as satellite-based intelligence, surveillance and communication infrastructure, strategic air transport [...], military mobility, and air defence systems. To close the acute capability gaps in high-tech – the report states – Europe needs to launch large-scale European 'Manhattan projects' to catch up with the US and China.

Since the major European countries have highly unequal fiscal capacities, the solution is to finance common defence resources through debt issuance at the same [European] level that owns those resources, while asking all European countries that benefit from them to contribute to the debt servicing in relation to their GDP. It is proposed that the obstacle of Article 346 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which exempts the defence industry from single market rules, be overcome by an intergovernmental treaty similar to the European Stability Mechanism. The advantage of such an approach is that not all countries would be obliged to participate, but that it could and should include both Ukraine and the United Kingdom.

Chinese investments

While the chapter on defence is motivated by Russia's aggressive war and a decline in confidence in transatlantic security guarantees, the chapter on China seeks answers to the global imbalances caused by the latter's rise to the status of a global industrial superpower. The authors write that the success of China is not based solely on State aid and 'unfair' industrial policies, but is intrinsic to the Chinese development model. In a manner similar to the suggestions of the Draghi Report, they propose striking a balance between preventing unfair competition and maintaining the benefits of openness.

First, openness to trade and investment should be maintained, but handled more strategically. Second, one should let European buyers reap the benefits of low Chinese prices in non-strategic sectors. Third, in important sectors where Europe is lagging behind, such as electric car batteries, Chinese and other foreign direct investment in Europe, preferably linked to technology transfers and joint ventures should be encouraged. It is an involuntary demonstration of the uneven development of imperialism that European experts are resorting to this recipe, which China itself has been using for decades.

The fourth point is to strengthen competitiveness through industrial and trade policies in sectors where Europe has important industries of its own that operate at the technological frontier. Finally, it will be necessary to counter Chinese policy on strategic raw materials.

Challenges and deadlines

The European Policy Innovation Council think tank estimates that, one year after the publication of the Draghi Report, 11% of its 383 recommendations have been fully implemented, 20% only partially, and 46% are in progress. To speed up the implementation of the reports by Mario Draghi (on competitiveness) and Enrico Lettta (on the completion of the single market), in her speech von der Leyen urged that clear political deadlines be set. To this end, she will present a Single Market Roadmap to 2028 for the single market. That year will mark the expiry of the EU's next multiannual budget.

The president is effectively echoing a recent speech by François Villeroy de Galhau, governor of the French Central Bank, delivered on May 14th during a hearing of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the French National Assembly: I call for a deadline for mobilisation, as Jacques Delors did in the past with January 1st, 1993, for the single market, and January 1st, 1999, for the single currency. It is up to the Commission to propose this deadline and the Council to approve it, but why not January 1st, 2028?. Enrico Letta echoes this: For me, 2028 is a new 1992, the year in which all energies were mobilised for the birth of the single market [Il Sole-24 Ore, September 14th]. Will the Draghi Report become the new Delors Plan?

Lotta Comunista, September 2025

Popular posts in the last week

The EU Commission Plans for Rearmament and a Clean Industrial Deal

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series European news Following the European elections which took place on June 6th - 9th, the leaders of the Member States met on June 27th at the European Council. Ursula von der Leyen was nominated as president of the next European Commission, after she was chosen as the European People’s Party’s (EPP) Spitzenkandidat (“leading candidate”). The agreement also included the election of former Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio Costa as president of the European Council, and the appointment of former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas as High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Subsequently, on July 18th, Parliament elected von der Leyen as president of the Commission by an absolute majority, with 401 votes out of 719 MEPs. On September 17th, von der Leyen presented her team of commissioners to the European Parliament and, two days later, the Council adopted this list of...

Libertarian Communism: A Different Kind of Communism

Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM   An examination of the debate within the groups that were to create GAAP (Anarchist Groups of Proletarian Action) gives a vivid picture of the problems that between 1948 and 1951 had to be slowly and painfully faced. Three major confrontations, progressively more serious, took place between Cervetto and Masini in the autumn of 1949 and again in the spring and autumn of 1950. As preparations were being made for the National Conference at Pontedecimo – from which GAAP would be born – debate on the nature of the organisation and on theories of the State and imperialism began to define the characteristics of the new political group, but also revealed the differences. The first step had been to look for ‘a different kind’ of communism in anarchism. Along this road Cervetto , with an ever-surer grasp, would raise the issue that had been first posed by Marx and Lenin : our militant...

Lotta Comunista: The Origins 1943-1952

Guido La Barbera Contents 9. Preface to the English Edition 13. Preface 19. Useful dates 21. Chapter One «ONE OUGHT TO KNOW WITH WHOM ONE IS DEALING» 25. The balance-of-power theory 27. Theory and the ‘strategy-party’ 29. Chapter Two THE FOUNDRY AND THE PARTISAN STRUGGLE 31. The Savona group 39. Passion disciplined by reason 40. Never again a tool in the hands of others 41. The Genoa group 46. The Sestri Ponente group 48. The groups in Rome and Tuscany 52. The strength of GAAP: ‘only a handful’ 55. Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM 58. Reckoning with Bordiga...

Socialism and Nationalism in the History of France

The collapse of French socialism at the outbreak of the First World War is considered by many historians to be the most significant case of its kind. We must go back in time to find its origins. The dramatic repression of the Paris Commune in 1871 was followed by a decade of shootings and the deportation of tens of thousands of revolutionary militants. Reactionary monarchical legitimism attributed the decline of France to the Revolution of 1789, but by then the nouvelles couches sociales , the new classes produced by capitalism, as Leon Gambetta defined them, demanded a politics free from economic, social and clerical ties. The Radical Party, a turning point of French politics, was its expression. The same taditional Catholic Judeophobia dating back to the Middle Ages — according to Michel Dreyfus’, research director at the CNRS in Paris, Anti-Semitism on the Left in France [Paris, 2009] — gradually transformed into the image of the Jews associated with money and modernity who des...

The Spider Web of OpenAI Agreements

Internationalism No. 83, January 2026 Page 14 From the series The telecommunications battle There are two interwoven and contrasting trends in the American economy. On the one hand, we are witnessing steady growth in the value of securities linked to the furious race towards artificial intelligence (AI), which could lead to a financial bubble; on the other, an increase in GDP, precisely due to the huge investments in this field, is taking place. In the first week of November, a downward correction saw many technological securities devalue by $1.2 trillion on the stock exchange. Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, the biggest American bank, predicts that there is a one-in-three probability of a collapse, albeit not imminently. As I see it — he states — artificial intelligence is real and, all in all, it will pay off [...] just as happened in the past in the case of automobiles and television sets . Products which, however, have also seen many...

The Theoretical and Political Battles of Arrigo Cervetto: V

Internationalism No. 81, November 2025 Pages 8 and 9 From the introduction to Arrigo Cervetto’s Opere Scelte ("Selected Works") , recently published in Italy by Edizioni Lotta Comunista. V The Leninist tactic in the educational crisis and the union tactic on the prospects of trade unionism had already produced results in Genoa that alarmed the Italian Communist Party (PCI). With the restructuring crisis , when opportunism began to side with austerity policies and the Leninists with the defence of wages, however, the reaction of opportunism became furious, following the Stalinist script of slander and intimidation. In those years, I worked to ensure that what was a tradition for my generation would become a common heritage for the new generation. We needed to select, discipline, and amalgamate. We needed to assert ourselves to do so. In 1974, the spontaneous movement of students and workers, unable to find a tra...

The Myth of Cooperation

From the series Vaccines and world contention There are by now ten authorised vaccines already in use against SARSCoV-2, and there are 77 countries in which vaccinations are taking place. By mid-February, 173 million doses had been administered and the campaign is proceeding at an average rate of six million a day, calculated on the basis of last week’s figures. At this pace, it would take 5 years to vaccinate 75% of the world population with two doses [ Bloomberg , February 15 th ]. More than half of the injections have been carried out in the United States, the UK, and the European Union which, together, account for 11% of the world population. In at least one third of the 77 surveyed countries, less than 1% of the population have received their first dose of the vaccine, and, in the rest of the world, vaccines have not yet arrived. Imperialist globalisation Individual states are pursuing autonomous solutions to a global problem. Epidemiologists believe that, while a vast propo...

Show Warfare?

Internationalism No. 86, April 2026 Page 16 After show politics and show diplomacy , have we sunk to the obscenity of show warfare ? On the surface, this is true. The Pentagon’s video game-style communications, where airstrikes, missile launches, and deadly explosions are set to music for social media clips, certainly suggest so. It matters little that a hundred schoolgirls were also blown to bits as artificial intelligence took centre stage on the battlefield. In reality, war propaganda has always showcased destruction and mocked the enemy; today in Washington, in the era of the high-tech groups of television and social media democracy , the only thing that has changed is the style and the means used to inflame fanaticisms and stuff people’s brains. In Tehran, dominated by a parasitic bourgeoisie that feeds on oil revenues and is intertwined with the militias and hierarchies of t...

Democratic Defeat in the Urban Vote

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series Elections in the USA A careful analysis of the 2022 mid-term elections revealed the symptoms of a Democratic Party malaise which subsequently fully manifested itself in the latest presidential election, with the heavy loss of support in its traditional strongholds of the metropolitan areas of New York City and Chicago, and the State of California. A defeat foretold Republican votes rose from 51 million in the previous 2018 midterms to 54 million in 2022, a gain of 3 million. The Democrat vote fell from 61 to 51 million, a loss of 10 million. The Republicans gained only three votes for every ten lost by the Democrats, while the other seven became abstentions. In 2022, we analysed the elections in New York City by borough, the governmental districts whose names are well known through movies and TV series. In The Bronx, where the average yearly household income is $35,000, the Democrats lost 52,0...

The National Gamble of Poland

Internationalism No. 33, November 2021 Page 3 From the series European News In a lawsuit brought by Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki, the Constitutional Tribunal, which is composed of judges chosen by the government, ruled that fundamental parts of the EU Treaty are incompatible with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. This ruling thus denies the primacy of European law over national law, undermining both the political assumption of continental integration and the supranational character of the EU . Vectors of Polish history We can shed light on this event if we consider the four field vectors that cross Poland: its traditional ethnic-religious nationalism, its marked Atlantic tropism, the objective attraction exerted by the European force field, and the looming threat of Russia. The general picture is global collisions: China’s irruption and the crisis in the world order have put pressure on Warsaw to define its st...