Skip to main content

Missiles, Gas, and Oil

The third US Gulf War has entered its fourth week. Fatih Birol, director of the International Energy Agency (IEA), was quick to describe it as the largest supply disruption in the history of the global oil market, due to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. In normal times, 20 million barrels per day (Mb/d) of crude oil and refined products flow through the Strait of Hormuz. 80% of the total flow is destined for Asia, rising to 90% in the case of liquefied natural gas (LNG). Iran claims that the Strait is closed only to its enemies, but, for all practical purposes, the risk of crossing it is such that insurance premiums for oil tankers not explicitly authorised to do so are prohibitively high. With no storage capacity for the extracted crude and hoping to reduce the number of targets, the Gulf States have cut their oil production by at least 10 Mb/d. According to Daniel Yergin, by far the biggest disruption in world history is also such in terms of daily oil production.

The blockade of the Strait is the spearhead of Tehran’s forward defence, which has responded to intensive Israeli-American bombing and the targeted assassination of its leaders by expanding the conflict across the entire region, striking US bases, oil wells, energy terminals, and the petro-monarchies’ data centres. Despite Donald Trump’s boasts, Iran’s arsenal does not appear to have been obliterated at all. The Economist denounced Trump’s adventurism across its last three covers in March: A war without strategy that unleashes an attack on the global economy in what it calls Operation Blind Fury. The first attack on the global economy was launched by Trump on April 2nd, 2025, with tariffs imposed on all countries, friend and foe alike. The Supreme Court declared those tariffs unlawful on February 20th this year. Eight days later, the assault on Iran began.

Hormuz and the IEA

The closure of Hormuz removes 20% of global consumption from the world market. According to Michael Froman, president of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the 1973 Arab oil embargo deprived the world market of 4 Mb/d, equivalent to 7% of global consumption at the time. The 32 consumer countries belonging to the IEA have unanimously decided to release 400 million barrels of strategic emergency reserves over 120 days — just over 3 Mb/d — the largest release in the Agency’s history but insufficient to fill the gap. According to the Agency, consumer countries hold stocks and reserves amounting to 8.2 billion barrels, roughly equivalent to 80 days of global consumption, but none intend to release them onto the market lightly.

Birol has proposed a set of energy-saving guidelines that brings together a range of measures adopted since the 1973 crisis, including odd-even number-plate restrictions and remote working. Some governments are adopting emergency measures, involving tax breaks and cautious subsidies, given the low growth rates and tight fiscal margins, which are residual compared to rearmament commitments. Energy crises expose the vulnerabilities of systems. In Europe, the controversy between the champions and the naysayers of the green economy is resurfacing over the ETS, the carbon market, which is unpopular with energy-intensive industries that would like to scrap it or at least overhaul it. In India, still in a phase of delayed modernisation, restaurants have closed their doors due to a shortage of cooking gas: only 5% of households are connected to the mains, while the vast majority rely on LPG cylinders. ASEAN is alarmed by the energy bottleneck, and this was enough for Indonesia — which had joined Trump’s Board of Peace — to announce its intention to reconsider its membership. The most indebted countries fear energy price hikes that are devouring their foreign currency reserves.

As was the case at the start of the Ukraine crisis, the supply issue is not limited to energy. Food is the first casualty, and hunger is the most pervasive weapon against the civilian population. In Iran, food inflation has risen by 40% over the past year; the price of rice has increased sevenfold, and that of vegetable oil threefold. Natural gas and its derivatives are vital for agrochemicals. Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Oman, and Qatar are major exporters of urea, ammonium phosphates, and pure ammonia. The war is putting a third of the trade in nitrogen-based fertilisers at risk, severely compromised by the collapse in natural gas supplies.

Energy inflation

Prices are the main driver of the energy crisis. On March 20th, Texas crude (WTI) cost $98 per barrel, a 48% increase compared to the end of February, while Euro-Middle Eastern crude (Brent) stood at $112 (+57%). Liquefied natural gas in Europe (Amsterdam) cost €63 per megawatt-hour (+91%), in Asia $74 (+100%), and in the United States (Henry Hub) $10.60 (+1%). In the production of natural gas and LNG in America, shale gas has a formidable advantage as a source of competitiveness and differential rent vis-à-vis Europe, which is forced to import US LNG. Coal has reached $147 per tonne (+27%), reflecting the increase in stocks destined for coal-fired power stations. It remains to be seen whether this will be an opportunity for Germany to reactivate its nuclear power stations, which have been in the process of being phased out following the Fukushima accident in Japan.

CFR economist Brad Setser estimates that, even taking into account emergency reserves and oil that can be transported via the two pipelines from the Arabian Peninsula to the Red Sea and the Gulf of Oman, a prolonged closure would still deprive the market of 10 Mb/d, equivalent to 10% of global consumption. Setser cites the old rule of oil arithmetic, whereby a 1% drop in supply leads to a $10 per barrel increase. It follows, according to Setser, that current price rises do not exhaust the upward momentum, which may be heading towards $170 per barrel. A comparison with historical peaks in Brent prices, adjusted for inflation, was made by James Mackintosh in The Wall Street Journal: $179 per barrel following the 1979 Iranian Revolution, $155 at the time of Iraq’s invasion of Iran in 1980, $180 during the Arab Spring of 2011, and $130 following the invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The current price sits at the lower end of the range because the starting price was low ($72), but its rise has been among the most significant.

The crucial issue is the time factor: the duration of the war. In early March, the British geo-economic analysis firm Capital Economics outlined three scenarios: a two-week conflict, a scenario now obsolete; a three-month conflict with limited long-term damage, resulting in losses of 5-6% of global energy exports by 2026; and a three-month conflict, but with greater losses resulting from the destruction of facilities on Kharg Island, Iran’s central hub, with losses of 8-9% in global oil and LNG exports. The impact would last until 2027 and the price of oil would rise to $150 per barrel, while the price of gas in Europe would reach €120 per megawatt-hour. The study emphasises that only this third scenario is comparable to the global shock that occurred between the late 1970s and the mid-1980s. This observation serves to put Birol and Yergin’s rhetoric about destructive records into perspective.

Central banks and the IMF

All the major central banks that have met since the start of the bombing — the Fed, the ECB, the Bank of England, and the Bank of Japan — have kept interest rates on hold, while expecting inflation to rise by roughly 0.5%. Across the board, a repeat of the virulent inflation seen in 2022 — which surged following the war in Ukraine when the average rate exceeded 10% — has been ruled out. Everywhere, it has been stated that inflationary expectations remain firmly anchored to the monetary authorities’ targets. For now, there are no fears of stagflation. Central banks are prioritising their role in reassuring the markets, but do not rule out further fragmentation to supply chains in the event of a prolonged war.

Kristalina Georgieva, head of the IMF, was more alarmed during her visit to Tokyo. Her rule of thumb regarding inflationary risk states that every 10% increase in oil prices, if persistent, translates into a 40-base-point rise in global inflation. This means that, if current oil prices persist, additional inflation would be 2%, a significant problem for central banks, which would have to intervene swiftly with rate hikes. Georgieva has the disenchanted air of someone who, in her six years at the IMF, has done nothing but face one crisis after another, without respite: And if, as we all hope, the conflict ends soon, then be sure that, before long, some new shock will come. My advice to policymakers everywhere [...]: think of the unthinkable and prepare for it. What will be unthinkable in a post-war Middle East? Do the Abraham Accords stand any chance of survival? Will America be able to re-establish its reputation as an indispensable power? What form will the need for deterrence among the region’s major States — including Turkey — take?

A lesson from the 1920s

Five days after the outbreak of the Iranian conflict, at a conference in Bologna, Christine Lagarde offered some reflections on the nature of the new world order: The defining feature of this moment is not simply that risks are rising. It is that we are leaving a world where risk can be measured and modelled, and entering one of genuine uncertainty. Until now, risk represented a stable enough system that past outcomes could guide future decisions. Over the last 30 years, the trading system was anchored by multilateral rules. The monetary framework rested on credible central banks. The geopolitical order provided a predictable backdrop. According to Lagarde, the series of events triggering this shift began with the pandemic, which highlighted the fragility of global supply chains and triggered a lasting shift towards reshoring, and continued with the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the transformation of the global trading system into a site of conflict, where dependencies are exploited as a weapon.

This picture of geopolitical fragmentation is accompanied by the technological transformation of artificial intelligence (AI). These two forces [...] pull in opposite directions. AI can drastically increase growth potential, while fragmentation can drastically reduce it. This picture has a striking parallel with the 1920s. Back then as well, there was a massive technological wave — the internal combustion engine, assembly lines that revolutionised production, and electricity grids. Productivity per worker almost doubled between 1919 and 1929. This technological optimism spilled into stock markets. [...] But in parallel, the international environment was fracturing. [...] For much of the 1920s, technology and fragmentation appeared to develop on separate tracks. Confidence collapsed with the crash of 1929, the Smoot-Hawley tariffs, and the rise of economic nationalism.

The lesson Lagarde draws is: What looked like two independent forces were actually a single, compounding risk. Technology and the international order were deeply interconnected, yet policymakers of the 1920s acted as if they were separate domains.

This is Lagarde’s version of the unity and scission of the world order. The spiral of imperialism forces her, unwittingly, to conceive the basic idea of Unitary Imperialism. Arrigo Cervetto opens the preface of July 1981 with two sentences from the Draft Resolution of the Zimmerwald Left, written by Lenin in 1915: The whole world is merging into a single economic organism; it has been carved up among a handful of Great Powers.

Translated from the original work by , published in Lotta Comunista, , p. 21.

Popular posts in the last week

The EU Commission Plans for Rearmament and a Clean Industrial Deal

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series European news Following the European elections which took place on June 6th - 9th, the leaders of the Member States met on June 27th at the European Council. Ursula von der Leyen was nominated as president of the next European Commission, after she was chosen as the European People’s Party’s (EPP) Spitzenkandidat (“leading candidate”). The agreement also included the election of former Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio Costa as president of the European Council, and the appointment of former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas as High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Subsequently, on July 18th, Parliament elected von der Leyen as president of the Commission by an absolute majority, with 401 votes out of 719 MEPs. On September 17th, von der Leyen presented her team of commissioners to the European Parliament and, two days later, the Council adopted this list of...

Lotta Comunista: The Origins 1943-1952

Guido La Barbera Contents 9. Preface to the English Edition 13. Preface 19. Useful dates 21. Chapter One «ONE OUGHT TO KNOW WITH WHOM ONE IS DEALING» 25. The balance-of-power theory 27. Theory and the ‘strategy-party’ 29. Chapter Two THE FOUNDRY AND THE PARTISAN STRUGGLE 31. The Savona group 39. Passion disciplined by reason 40. Never again a tool in the hands of others 41. The Genoa group 46. The Sestri Ponente group 48. The groups in Rome and Tuscany 52. The strength of GAAP: ‘only a handful’ 55. Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM 58. Reckoning with Bordiga...

Historical Constants and Strategic Surprise

The Strategic Surprise of the Agreement between Beijing and Tehran and the Suggestion of a Six-Power Concert The agreement between Beijing and Tehran falls under the definition of strategic surprise , i.e., events that entirely appertain to the political realm and mark a change or an about-turn in the balance among the powers. New alliances, the breakdown of alliances, the overturning of coalitions, diplomatic openings or unexpected military sorties: these are the regular novelties of international politics that Arrigo Cervetto wrote about. However, if the agreement was an unforeseeable event in itself, the long-term objective economic and political trends. that have determined it and made it possible are entirely investigable. The invasion of Afghanistan by the USSR at the end of December 1979 was interpreted by the United States as a potential threat to the oil routes of the Persian Gulf, and it was a contemporary revival of the Great Game , which had set the British Empire agai...

The WTO Between Crisis and Reform

Internationalism No. 86, April 2026 Page 13 The United States has been arguing for the need to reform the WTO since well before Donald Trump unleashed his world tariff war. In 2015, Michael Froman, President Barack Obama’s trade representative, denounced the failure of the Doha Round, a major negotiation underway since 2001 but bogged down in its own ambition to reach a comprehensive agreement among all countries on every aspect of world trade. Froman’s solution was pragmatic multilateralism , capable of proceeding through sectoral agreements or between small groups of nations. Behind the arcane formulations of international law, Washington’s real accusation against the WTO, then as now, is that it has facilitated the spectacular rise of China’s industrial power. Longstanding issues Decisions on WTO reform can only come from its Ministerial Conference, held every two year...

The deep strata of workers in an opulent Europe

The inauguration of the Draghi government has revived top trade union leaders anxious to be involved by the government of all , all the more so in the era of the Recovery Fund. The word consultation has been the most used in some recent trade union comments. Annamaria Furlan, of the CIS [Italian Confederation of Trade Unions] is explicit in calling for a great consultative pact [ Il Messaggero , 8 th February]. Pierpaolo Bombardier, secretary of the UIL [Italian Labour Union], adds that the consultation must become a method to help the country restart . Maurizio Landini, of the CGIL [Italian General Confederation of Labor] sees the novelty in the fact that social partners have been involved in the establishment of the new government [ Conquiste del lavoro , 11 th February]. The two phases of European imperialist politics In this sense there are many comparisons to the Ciampi govemment of 1993, omitting that consultation was functional to limiting the costs of labour. There ...

Europe Passes the Mercosur Test

Internationalism No. 85, March 2026 Page 10 On January 9 th , the European Council authorised the signing of the agreement with Mercosur, the customs union comprising Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay. The decision by the 27 member States, taken by majority vote, overrode strong opposition from France, with Poland, Austria, Hungary, and Ireland also voting against and Belgium abstaining. Ratification by the European Parliament is still pending, as it has requested a legal opinion from the Court of Justice in Luxembourg, but both the Council and the Commission seem inclined to apply the agreement provisionally, as urged by the German and Italian governments. Meanwhile, on January 17 th , Presidents Antônio Costa and Ursula von der Leyen flew to South America to seal the deal, moving to close a 30-year political battle. False breakthroughs and ultimatums The EU’s strategic interest in Mercosur was already evident in the mid-199...

Libertarian Communism: A Different Kind of Communism

Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM   An examination of the debate within the groups that were to create GAAP (Anarchist Groups of Proletarian Action) gives a vivid picture of the problems that between 1948 and 1951 had to be slowly and painfully faced. Three major confrontations, progressively more serious, took place between Cervetto and Masini in the autumn of 1949 and again in the spring and autumn of 1950. As preparations were being made for the National Conference at Pontedecimo – from which GAAP would be born – debate on the nature of the organisation and on theories of the State and imperialism began to define the characteristics of the new political group, but also revealed the differences. The first step had been to look for ‘a different kind’ of communism in anarchism. Along this road Cervetto , with an ever-surer grasp, would raise the issue that had been first posed by Marx and Lenin : our militant...

The Works of Marx and Engels and the Bolshevik Model

Internationalism Pages 12–13 In the autumn of 1895 Lenin commented on the death of Friedrich Engels: "After his friend Karl Marx (who died in 1883), Engels was the finest scholar and teacher of the modern proletariat in the whole civilised world. […] In their scientific works, Marx and Engels were the first to explain that socialism is not the invention of dreamers, but the final aim and necessary result of the development of the productive forces in modern society. All recorded history hitherto has been a history of class struggle, of the succession of the rule and victory of certain social classes over others. And this will continue until the foundations of class struggle and of class domination – private property and anarchic social production – disappear. The interests of the proletariat demand the destruction of these foundations, and therefore the conscious class struggle of the organised workers must be directed against them. And every class strugg...

The Four Petrochemical Giants

Internationalism No. 86, April 2026 Page 15 From the series Major industrial groups in China When the People's Republic of China was founded in 1949, oil extraction in the country was practically non-existent, and the country was completely dependent on imports. The exploration and development of domestic oil resources required a major effort. As Jin Zhang reports in his book Catch-up and Competitiveness in China [Routledge, 2004]: The required massive human resources were supplied by the People's Liberation Army (PLA). In 1952, Mao Zedong ordered the reorganisation of the 57 th Division of the 19 th Army of the PLA into the 1 st Division of Oil . The effort led to the discovery of several oil fields, the most significant of which was in Daqing, Heilongjiang Province, in northeastern China, in 1959. It became operational the following year, reaching a ...

The Foundry and the Partisan Struggle

Chapter Two   What forces were there for starting again, at the end of the 1940s? At the beginning of that road, you could count the core groups on the fingers of one hand: Genoa, its Sestri Ponente district, Savona, Rome. Of course, there were also Turin, Vicenza, Bologna, Milan, Bolzano, Trieste, Livorno, and a few sympathisers down South, but that was all it amounted to. Although there were periodic attempts at ‘linking up’ along the whole length of the peninsula, apart from the three Ligurian groups and the Tuscany-Lazio one, there wasn’t much more than a network of individual sympathisers. The Savona group Arrigo Cervetto , founder of Lotta Comunista and its undisputed leader until his death in 1995, was born in Buenos Aires in 1927, to a family who had emigrated from Savona. Returning to Liguria, he started work when still a boy, and in 1943 was taken on as an apprentice at the Ilva steel-making plant in Savona. The party ar...