Skip to main content

Discussion in St. Petersburg on Economic Policy

This article was originally published in our Russian comrades’ newspaper Proletarskij Internatzionalism.

On June 20th, at the plenary session of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF), Russian President Vladimir Putin explained that wherever the foot of a Russian soldier steps, it is Russian land [Kremlin.ru, June 20th, 2025]. This statement was made in the context of discussions about the state of the Russian economy. It clearly reflects the Kremlin’s intention to keep the occupied territories of Ukraine, but perhaps it also conceals the desire to take advantage of the situation to expand. It is indicative that the demands from the hawks’ camp in Russia for a final solution to the Ukrainian issue are becoming increasingly louder. Then there is the usual capitalist question of price: how much will it cost?

The state of the Russian economy is not rosy. Let us look at some statements made at the SPIEF. Minister of Economic Development Maksim Reshetnikov emphasised that according to current business sentiment, [...] we are already on the brink of entering a recession. German Gref, president of the savings bank Sberbank, lamented the cessation of all serious investments.

Government and central bank

The same forum hosted a debate between the government’s economic bloc and the Central Bank of Russia (CBR). At the moment, military Keynesianianism seems to be gaining ground, and its supporters are calling for the CBR to abandon its target of reducing inflation to 4% a year. Addressing Elvira Nabiullina, president of the central bank, Reshetnikov stated: I support the idea that, in addition to believing in the 4% [target], one should also love the economy and its growth. Since the sectors of the economy related to war are growing faster than the production of civilian goods, some might conclude that the minister is encouraging a love of weapons. There is some truth in this: Russia is still at war, and global imperialist confrontation continues. However, it is likely that the supporters of military Keynesianism are guided by an idea expressed at the time by one of the theorists of Russian economic nationalism, Yuri Yaremenko [1935-1996]: In my opinion, the point of industrial conversion is not to use defence companies to produce goods for civilian use, but to try to use the resources concentrated in the defence sector to restructure our entire economy. In this respect Russia, the successor of the USSR, has only partially succeeded.

Meanwhile, voices of hope from the liberal camp are raising that the struggle between the siloviki (politicians whose background is from the military or government security forces) and the technocrats will intensify by autumn, when the preparation for the 2026 budget begins. One of the key points will undoubtedly be military spending. By the end of 2025, it will amount to around $172 billion, including defence and national security expenditures – approximately 7.7% of GDP. The 2025-27 plan places military spending at about 7% of GDP for the entire period. According to liberal-camp commentators, changes should not be expected. Alexandra Prokopenko, in an article of June 16th for the Carnegie Centre, wrote: Putin is determined to replenish stockpiles and equip his military with the most modern kit informed by wartime innovation. This will take several years [...]. The Kremlin relies on the inertia of militarisation: it will help maintain employment, the utilisation of factories’ capacity and macroeconomic stability, while the government smoothly transitions to a peace economy.

We will see if this plan can be implemented and, above all, if it was what the Kremlin leaders have in mind. Responding to journalists’ questions on June 27th, after the conclusion of the Eurasian Economic Union summit in Minsk, Putin acknowledged that Russia’s military spending is considerable, emphasising that this is obviously one of the problems, including for the budget, that we must address. Putin admitted that Russia has funded its high military expenses through inflation which we are making efforts to counter: We are determined to send our economy to a ‘soft landing’ in some areas [Kremlin.ru, June 27th, 2025]. This statement could be read as a kind of support for Nabiullina, who, despite attacks from almost all fronts, remains at the helm of the CBR.

Meanwhile, amid the demographic crisis and the effects of the war in Ukraine, Russian capital is increasingly attracted to the struggle for low-cost foreign labour. According to the Ministry of Labour, 47,000 migrant workers from distant countries were employed in Russian factories in 2024. This is an utterly insignificant figure, less than one thousandth of the total employed in the Russian economy. Most are migrants from countries with which Russia has a visa exemption regime: China, India, Turkey, and Serbia.

Demographic crisis and need for immigrants

While the bourgeoisie attracts immigrants to fill the gaps in the labour market and proposes to conclude an agreement with India to train workers for the Russian economy, anti-migrant hysteria continues to pour xenophobic statements from the walls of the State Duma and the offices of law enforcement agencies. Last year’s terrorist attack at the Crocus concert hall in Moscow led to the xenophobic decision to exclude from schooling immigrant children that do not speak Russian. This year, the Duma expressed concern that there are thousands of children who are not attending school and proposed to solve this self-created problem by expelling from the country the parents of children who do not attend school. Communist Party MP Mikhail Matveyev has called for the immediate expulsion of these foreigners: There will only be one option: expulsion along with their children. Back to their native villages! [Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 11th].

At the same time, the leading experts of Russian imperialism are aware of the importance of the demographic problem and the related issue of the struggle to attract migrant labour. When asked about his attitude towards long-term economic forecasts in a lengthy interview given to the government newspaper Rossiyskaya Gazeta on June 22nd, Aleksandr Dynkin, president of the Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), gave an unequivocal answer: The most reliable basis for long-term assessments is demographic statistics, from which estimates on the future economic strength of States can be obtained. Demography in capitalism is above all a question of surplus value production and, secondly, as Marx emphasised in Capital, a market issue, since the bourgeoisie needs workers to buy the goods that they themselves produce.

The issue of migration is the subject of a detailed report of last June by Andrei Kortunov, director of research at the Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC). Let us look at the expert’s key forecasts: The total labour force in the countries of the Global North will decrease by at least 100 million people by 2050 if current demographic trends continue, even despite the active involvement of increasingly older age groups in economic activity. At the same time, in the countries of the Global South, the total labour force will increase by about 1.5 billion people, although still lagging behind the North in terms of average active life expectancy. This forecast is sufficient to understand where the epicentre of economic power is shifting globally. From this, considering the current demographic dynamics in Russia, we can make a projection on the further decline of the economic weight of Russian imperialism.

An important fact must be added, for Russia and from a strategic point of view: while Russia’s population is expected to decrease to 135 million by 2050, that of the Central Asian countries will increase to 94 million; in a quarter of a century, the difference will be reduced by over 20 million. In this context, this statement by Dynkin is eloquent: If the Russian population were to magically grow by 50 or, better still, by 100 million people, then we could talk about alternatives to migration.

Technological delay

Dynkin himself draws attention to a simple economic rule: It is the price of labour that forces the introduction of technology. If labour is cheap, there is no point in introducing technology. It is relatively cheap labour, along with the economies of scale of production, which enables the Russian military-industrial complex to produce shells at a price four times lower than that of the German manufacturer Rheinmetall.

The low cost of labour is associated with social passivity and the absence of workers’ organisations. The presence of a large layer of labour aristocracy on the one hand, and, on the other, the self-exploitation of workers in their own plots of land at home or in second part-time jobs, preserves the current social contract and the resulting low wages.

At the same time, if labour remains relatively cheap, there is no reason to expect a serious technological breakthrough in the national economy. If we add to this the international sanctions and other economic problems, the claims of a technological breakthrough can be regarded, for the time being, as unfounded dreams.

Here it is worth recalling the statement by the Russian president mentioned at the beginning. The relative weakness of the economy, even before the start of the invasion of Ukraine, led experts close to the Kremlin to discuss the advantages of hard power in solving problems and to praise the wonderful world of power politics.

We do not intend to give lectures to those who sit in the Kremlin. The lesson should be learned by our class. The Russian State has always paid generously with the blood and sweat of our comrades for the annexed territories. If we do not want to be once again an instrument in the hands of the ruling class, we have no alternative but to become an autonomous force with an internationalist revolutionary strategy.

S.S.

Popular posts in the last week

The EU Commission Plans for Rearmament and a Clean Industrial Deal

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series European news Following the European elections which took place on June 6th - 9th, the leaders of the Member States met on June 27th at the European Council. Ursula von der Leyen was nominated as president of the next European Commission, after she was chosen as the European People’s Party’s (EPP) Spitzenkandidat (“leading candidate”). The agreement also included the election of former Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio Costa as president of the European Council, and the appointment of former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas as High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Subsequently, on July 18th, Parliament elected von der Leyen as president of the Commission by an absolute majority, with 401 votes out of 719 MEPs. On September 17th, von der Leyen presented her team of commissioners to the European Parliament and, two days later, the Council adopted this list of...

Libertarian Communism: A Different Kind of Communism

Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM   An examination of the debate within the groups that were to create GAAP (Anarchist Groups of Proletarian Action) gives a vivid picture of the problems that between 1948 and 1951 had to be slowly and painfully faced. Three major confrontations, progressively more serious, took place between Cervetto and Masini in the autumn of 1949 and again in the spring and autumn of 1950. As preparations were being made for the National Conference at Pontedecimo – from which GAAP would be born – debate on the nature of the organisation and on theories of the State and imperialism began to define the characteristics of the new political group, but also revealed the differences. The first step had been to look for ‘a different kind’ of communism in anarchism. Along this road Cervetto , with an ever-surer grasp, would raise the issue that had been first posed by Marx and Lenin : our militant...

Lotta Comunista: The Origins 1943-1952

Guido La Barbera Contents 9. Preface to the English Edition 13. Preface 19. Useful dates 21. Chapter One «ONE OUGHT TO KNOW WITH WHOM ONE IS DEALING» 25. The balance-of-power theory 27. Theory and the ‘strategy-party’ 29. Chapter Two THE FOUNDRY AND THE PARTISAN STRUGGLE 31. The Savona group 39. Passion disciplined by reason 40. Never again a tool in the hands of others 41. The Genoa group 46. The Sestri Ponente group 48. The groups in Rome and Tuscany 52. The strength of GAAP: ‘only a handful’ 55. Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM 58. Reckoning with Bordiga...

Socialism and Nationalism in the History of France

The collapse of French socialism at the outbreak of the First World War is considered by many historians to be the most significant case of its kind. We must go back in time to find its origins. The dramatic repression of the Paris Commune in 1871 was followed by a decade of shootings and the deportation of tens of thousands of revolutionary militants. Reactionary monarchical legitimism attributed the decline of France to the Revolution of 1789, but by then the nouvelles couches sociales , the new classes produced by capitalism, as Leon Gambetta defined them, demanded a politics free from economic, social and clerical ties. The Radical Party, a turning point of French politics, was its expression. The same taditional Catholic Judeophobia dating back to the Middle Ages — according to Michel Dreyfus’, research director at the CNRS in Paris, Anti-Semitism on the Left in France [Paris, 2009] — gradually transformed into the image of the Jews associated with money and modernity who des...

The Spider Web of OpenAI Agreements

Internationalism No. 83, January 2026 Page 14 From the series The telecommunications battle There are two interwoven and contrasting trends in the American economy. On the one hand, we are witnessing steady growth in the value of securities linked to the furious race towards artificial intelligence (AI), which could lead to a financial bubble; on the other, an increase in GDP, precisely due to the huge investments in this field, is taking place. In the first week of November, a downward correction saw many technological securities devalue by $1.2 trillion on the stock exchange. Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, the biggest American bank, predicts that there is a one-in-three probability of a collapse, albeit not imminently. As I see it — he states — artificial intelligence is real and, all in all, it will pay off [...] just as happened in the past in the case of automobiles and television sets . Products which, however, have also seen many...

The Theoretical and Political Battles of Arrigo Cervetto: V

Internationalism No. 81, November 2025 Pages 8 and 9 From the introduction to Arrigo Cervetto’s Opere Scelte ("Selected Works") , recently published in Italy by Edizioni Lotta Comunista. V The Leninist tactic in the educational crisis and the union tactic on the prospects of trade unionism had already produced results in Genoa that alarmed the Italian Communist Party (PCI). With the restructuring crisis , when opportunism began to side with austerity policies and the Leninists with the defence of wages, however, the reaction of opportunism became furious, following the Stalinist script of slander and intimidation. In those years, I worked to ensure that what was a tradition for my generation would become a common heritage for the new generation. We needed to select, discipline, and amalgamate. We needed to assert ourselves to do so. In 1974, the spontaneous movement of students and workers, unable to find a tra...

The Myth of Cooperation

From the series Vaccines and world contention There are by now ten authorised vaccines already in use against SARSCoV-2, and there are 77 countries in which vaccinations are taking place. By mid-February, 173 million doses had been administered and the campaign is proceeding at an average rate of six million a day, calculated on the basis of last week’s figures. At this pace, it would take 5 years to vaccinate 75% of the world population with two doses [ Bloomberg , February 15 th ]. More than half of the injections have been carried out in the United States, the UK, and the European Union which, together, account for 11% of the world population. In at least one third of the 77 surveyed countries, less than 1% of the population have received their first dose of the vaccine, and, in the rest of the world, vaccines have not yet arrived. Imperialist globalisation Individual states are pursuing autonomous solutions to a global problem. Epidemiologists believe that, while a vast propo...

Show Warfare?

Internationalism No. 86, April 2026 Page 16 After show politics and show diplomacy , have we sunk to the obscenity of show warfare ? On the surface, this is true. The Pentagon’s video game-style communications, where airstrikes, missile launches, and deadly explosions are set to music for social media clips, certainly suggest so. It matters little that a hundred schoolgirls were also blown to bits as artificial intelligence took centre stage on the battlefield. In reality, war propaganda has always showcased destruction and mocked the enemy; today in Washington, in the era of the high-tech groups of television and social media democracy , the only thing that has changed is the style and the means used to inflame fanaticisms and stuff people’s brains. In Tehran, dominated by a parasitic bourgeoisie that feeds on oil revenues and is intertwined with the militias and hierarchies of t...

Democratic Defeat in the Urban Vote

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series Elections in the USA A careful analysis of the 2022 mid-term elections revealed the symptoms of a Democratic Party malaise which subsequently fully manifested itself in the latest presidential election, with the heavy loss of support in its traditional strongholds of the metropolitan areas of New York City and Chicago, and the State of California. A defeat foretold Republican votes rose from 51 million in the previous 2018 midterms to 54 million in 2022, a gain of 3 million. The Democrat vote fell from 61 to 51 million, a loss of 10 million. The Republicans gained only three votes for every ten lost by the Democrats, while the other seven became abstentions. In 2022, we analysed the elections in New York City by borough, the governmental districts whose names are well known through movies and TV series. In The Bronx, where the average yearly household income is $35,000, the Democrats lost 52,0...

The National Gamble of Poland

Internationalism No. 33, November 2021 Page 3 From the series European News In a lawsuit brought by Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki, the Constitutional Tribunal, which is composed of judges chosen by the government, ruled that fundamental parts of the EU Treaty are incompatible with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. This ruling thus denies the primacy of European law over national law, undermining both the political assumption of continental integration and the supranational character of the EU . Vectors of Polish history We can shed light on this event if we consider the four field vectors that cross Poland: its traditional ethnic-religious nationalism, its marked Atlantic tropism, the objective attraction exerted by the European force field, and the looming threat of Russia. The general picture is global collisions: China’s irruption and the crisis in the world order have put pressure on Warsaw to define its st...