Skip to main content

European Rearmament Driven by Berlin

From the series European news

We are not at war, but we are no longer at peace either, said Friedrich Merz at the end of September, commenting on Russian drones and fighter jets flying over European territory. The German Chancellor's comment confirms what we have observed: the political currents of imperialist Europeanism are attempting to leverage the wars of the crisis in the world order to accelerate continental rearmament.

German-led rearmament

According to the European Commission's Defence Readiness Roadmap and the September report by the European Defence Agency (EDA), EU countries' military spending has increased from €218 billion in 2021 to €343 billion in 2024, reaching 1.9% of GDP; €392 billion in spending is forecast for 2025. This is only the beginning of European rearmament, because at the NATO summit at the end of June, the allies committed to increasing military spending to 3.5% of their GDP by 2035, and to dedicating another 1.5% to defence-related infrastructure spending. To reach the 3.5% target, the EU would need to spend an additional €288 billion each year, bringing the total to €680 billion. According to other estimates that take into account the likely increase in GDP over the next ten years, EU military spending could reach €800 billion, equal to four-fifths of that of the United States and five times that of Russia in 2024.

On the other hand, many States have limited fiscal headroom and have so far been unable to present a credible path to achieving the NATO target. Germany is not in this situation, and its response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine has been massive: the Scholz government's Zeitenwende (€100 billion for the armed forces); the European Sky Shield Initiative (ESSI), an air defence project which includes anti-ballistic systems; the purchase of American F-35 fighter jets; and the agreement to install American medium-range missiles, pending the development of a European missile capability, initiated with the ELSA (European Long-Range Strike Approach) programme.

Under the shockwaves of the first moves of the new Trump administration, the newly elected Chancellor Merz eased the debt brake, freeing up German military spending; he also deepened the strategic dialogue on nuclear deterrence with France and the United Kingdom. Between 2021 and 2025, Germany's military spending rose from €47 billion to €86 billion, and it plans to exceed €150 billion in 2029, probably reaching 3.5% of GDP ahead of schedule. This financial effort is estimated to increase German public debt from the current 62.5% to 70-80% of GDP in 2029 [Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, June 27th].

The weight of debt

By comparing military expenditure items in national budgets, the definition of which varies from country to country, the extent of German rearmament can be clarified. France has gone from €39 billion in 2021 to €62 billion in 2025 and is aiming for €80 billion in 2030. However, to reach 3.5% of GDP, it is estimated that around €120 billion will be needed. The other European nuclear power, the United Kingdom, has gone from €53 billion in the 2021-22 fiscal year (using current pound-euro exchange rates) to €76 billion in 2024-25; but reaching 3.5% would also require military spending in the order of €120 billion.

Poland has the fourth largest military budget in Europe. At the Warsaw Security Forum in late September, the Polish defence minister said that his country aims to spend €43.8 billion this year, or 4.7% of its GDP. However, he was honest enough to add that it remains unclear whether this goal will be achieved by the end of the year. Italy, with the fifth largest budget, spends €31 billion on defence, representing 1.5% of its GDP.

Among these five major European military forces, France, the United Kingdom, and Italy have public debt close to or exceeding 100% of their GDP and already spend more on debt interest than on defence.

European rearmament

The lack of resources to match their ambitions is forcing European countries to collaborate. This explains the success of the SAFE (Security Action For Europe) programme, which provides €150 billion in low-interest loans, guaranteed by the EU budget, for joint purchases of military equipment, with a preference for European products. Non-EU countries such as Norway, Liechtenstein, Iceland, and Ukraine can also participate in these joint procurements, and negotiations are underway between the European Commission and both the United Kingdom and Canada regarding their participation.

SAFE was approved at the end of May by the European Council and payments are scheduled to begin in early 2026. It was the first pillar of the ReArm Europe plan, which was then incorporated into the March white paper on European defence, Readiness 2030. The other pillars were the exemption of military spending from the constraints of the Maastricht criteria and the approval of the diversion of European funds – such as cohesion funds – to defence. At the European Council summit in June, the heads of state and government then tasked the Commission with the analysis of Readiness 2030. The result was presented on October 16th in the form of a roadmap called Preserving Peace – Defence Readiness Roadmap 2030, according to which, within five years, Europe must be ready, meaning capable of responding to any aggression, and have a defence posture strong enough to credibly deter its adversaries.

To achieve this goal, four flagship projects are to be implemented urgently: the European Drone Defence Initiative, to develop both defensive and offensive drone capabilities; the Eastern Flank Watch, which will integrate anti-drone capabilities with air, land, and maritime defence systems to protect the eastern flank, which is exposed to hybrid attacks from Russia; a European Air Shield; and a European Space Shield. In addition, the Commission calls on States to form coalitions to strengthen military capabilities in nine areas: air and missile defence, strategic enablers (such as radar aircraft, air-to-air refuelling, and intelligence capabilities), military mobility, artillery systems, artificial intelligence and cyber warfare, missiles and ammunition, drones and anti-drones, land combat, and maritime combat. Targets for joint procurement quotas are also set out to stimulate the development of the arms industry on a continental scale.

European coordination

The plan has attracted criticism from the most pro-European commentators. Compared to the draft presented by the Commission at the informal summit of heads of State and government in Copenhagen on October 1st, the final version reduces the role of European institutions, emphasising instead that of member States and NATO. It could be argued that full federal centralisation of defence can only proceed on a de facto basis; it will never be purely Community-based or purely intergovernmental, but a combination of the two approaches. It is no coincidence that the roadmap presented by the Commission is, rather than a centralised plan, a collection of various national initiatives, or initiatives by groups of member States and their respective arms industries.

The broad outlines correspond to those of the document Economic Principles for European Rearmament, written in August by the Franco-German Council of Economic Experts at the request of the two governments, and suggest a strategic alignment with the Franco-German axis. The idea of a drone wall to strengthen surveillance on NATO's eastern flank was already supported in 2024 by Poland, the Baltic countries, and the Nordic countries. As for the ESSI, launched by the German government in August 2022, this project has now also been integrated into the EU's roadmap.

The role of the European institutions is mainly focused on coordination. The European Defence Agency will act as secretariat and the EU Military Staff will conduct an annual assessment of the implementation of the rearmament plan. However, the question of financing remains open. SAFE, which is only a temporary instrument, will not be sufficient, while the European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP) currently has only €1.5 billion at its disposal.

Debt and counter-insurance

Since 2022, Berlin has been the frontrunner in rearming; now it remains to be seen how much this will be anchored to the European rearmament and what form the counter-insurance against German military strength will take. The prospect of Germany spending almost twice as much on the military as France obviously fuels old fears. In an interview with the FAZ on October 21st, Emmanuel Macron saw Merz's support for the idea of creating reparation loans, guaranteed for the time being by national budgets, as proof that Germany is ready to take on joint debt for Ukraine. The French president concluded the interview by stating that Paris's nuclear umbrella has had a European dimension since 1962 and that he will deliver a policy speech on nuclear doctrine in early 2026. These statements fuel speculation that Macron may be aiming for an agreement that includes a swap of the Europeanisation of France's nuclear umbrella for a common European military budget similarly financed by a common debt.

Lotta Comunista, October 2025
Labels:

Popular posts in the last week

The EU Commission Plans for Rearmament and a Clean Industrial Deal

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series European news Following the European elections which took place on June 6th - 9th, the leaders of the Member States met on June 27th at the European Council. Ursula von der Leyen was nominated as president of the next European Commission, after she was chosen as the European People’s Party’s (EPP) Spitzenkandidat (“leading candidate”). The agreement also included the election of former Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio Costa as president of the European Council, and the appointment of former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas as High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Subsequently, on July 18th, Parliament elected von der Leyen as president of the Commission by an absolute majority, with 401 votes out of 719 MEPs. On September 17th, von der Leyen presented her team of commissioners to the European Parliament and, two days later, the Council adopted this list of...
Read more

Lotta Comunista: The Origins 1943-1952

Guido La Barbera Contents 9. Preface to the English Edition 13. Preface 19. Useful dates 21. Chapter One «ONE OUGHT TO KNOW WITH WHOM ONE IS DEALING» 25. The balance-of-power theory 27. Theory and the ‘strategy-party’ 29. Chapter Two THE FOUNDRY AND THE PARTISAN STRUGGLE 31. The Savona group 39. Passion disciplined by reason 40. Never again a tool in the hands of others 41. The Genoa group 46. The Sestri Ponente group 48. The groups in Rome and Tuscany 52. The strength of GAAP: ‘only a handful’ 55. Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM 58. Reckoning with Bordiga ...
Read more

LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM

Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM   An examination of the debate within the groups that were to create GAAP (Anarchist Groups of Proletarian Action) gives a vivid picture of the problems that between 1948 and 1951 had to be slowly and painfully faced. Three major confrontations, progressively more serious, took place between Cervetto and Masini in the autumn of 1949 and again in the spring and autumn of 1950. As preparations were being made for the National Conference at Pontedecimo – from which GAAP would be born – debate on the nature of the organisation and on theories of the State and imperialism began to define the characteristics of the new political group, but also revealed the differences. The first step had been to look for ‘a different kind’ of communism in anarchism. Along this road Cervetto , with an ever-surer grasp, would raise the issue that had been first posed by Marx and Lenin : our militant...
Read more

Historical Constants and Strategic Surprise

The Strategic Surprise of the Agreement between Beijing and Tehran and the Suggestion of a Six-Power Concert The agreement between Beijing and Tehran falls under the definition of strategic surprise , i.e., events that entirely appertain to the political realm and mark a change or an about-turn in the balance among the powers. New alliances, the breakdown of alliances, the overturning of coalitions, diplomatic openings or unexpected military sorties: these are the regular novelties of international politics that Arrigo Cervetto wrote about. However, if the agreement was an unforeseeable event in itself, the long-term objective economic and political trends. that have determined it and made it possible are entirely investigable. The invasion of Afghanistan by the USSR at the end of December 1979 was interpreted by the United States as a potential threat to the oil routes of the Persian Gulf, and it was a contemporary revival of the Great Game , which had set the British Empire agai...
Read more

China’s Electromechanical Champions

Internationalism No. 85, March 2026 Page 9 From the series Major industrial groups in China Analysing the WTO data for 2023, it emerges that China exported goods worth $3,379 billion, surpassing the European Union and the United States. Industrial machinery accounted for over 7% of exports and electrical machinery 9%. In the same sectors, Chinese imports did not reach 40% of the value of exports, indicating that these are among the pillars of Beijing’s export economy. Sany Heavy Industry In this newspaper we have already examined the Chinese mechanical engineering giant Sinomach. But in the field of machine construction, Sany Heavy Industry also holds a prominent position, particularly in excavators, cranes, industrial elevators, and cement machinery. The company, based in Changsha (Hunan) since 1991, was founded by Liang Wengen, who had previously been an executive at a State-owned arms factory, and is its main shareholder. Sany had a 2023 turnover...
Read more

AI Bubble and Debt Fuse

Internationalism No. 83, January 2026 Page 11 The artificial intelligence (AI) bubble is receiving a growing amount of attention. The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) , in its December quarterly magazine, offers both reassurance and caution. It appreciates the strong earnings of the sector, which, in reality, presented mixed results in the third quarter, with a few business groups advancing and others treading water, while one of the frontrunners, OpenAI, forecasts losses until 2030. It was Nvidia, with its strong profits, that revived the sector's euphoria. After three years of acceleration, which raised the weight of the Magnificent Seven from 20% to 35% on Wall Street, the BIS sees signs of a retrenchment due to wariness about stretched valuations and episodes of volatility . It considers the optimistic expectations to be well-founded and, in this respect, the AI trend – which the bank never refers to as a bubble – is d...
Read more

Democratic Defeat in the Urban Vote

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series Elections in the USA A careful analysis of the 2022 mid-term elections revealed the symptoms of a Democratic Party malaise which subsequently fully manifested itself in the latest presidential election, with the heavy loss of support in its traditional strongholds of the metropolitan areas of New York City and Chicago, and the State of California. A defeat foretold Republican votes rose from 51 million in the previous 2018 midterms to 54 million in 2022, a gain of 3 million. The Democrat vote fell from 61 to 51 million, a loss of 10 million. The Republicans gained only three votes for every ten lost by the Democrats, while the other seven became abstentions. In 2022, we analysed the elections in New York City by borough, the governmental districts whose names are well known through movies and TV series. In The Bronx, where the average yearly household income is $35,000, the Democrats lost 52,0...
Read more

Forward Deterrence for European Imperialism

Internationalism No. 86, April 2026 Page 3 From the series European news The next half-century will be the age of nuclear weapons . This was the grim prediction with which Emmanuel Macron concluded his speech on nuclear deterrence, delivered on March 2 nd at the Île Longue submarine base. Standing before Le Téméraire , the nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine that carries a strike force equivalent to the sum of all the bombs dropped on Europe during the Second World War , the president announced a significant evolution in French nuclear doctrine. The emergence of new threats and the realignment of American priorities make it necessary, according to Macron, not only to strengthen deterrence by increasing the number of nuclear warheads, but also to rethink the deterrence strategy deep inside the European continent . His proposal is the gradual implementation of forward deterrence , which will initially offer t...
Read more

The Works of Marx and Engels and the Bolshevik Model

Internationalism Pages 12–13 In the autumn of 1895 Lenin commented on the death of Friedrich Engels: "After his friend Karl Marx (who died in 1883), Engels was the finest scholar and teacher of the modern proletariat in the whole civilised world. […] In their scientific works, Marx and Engels were the first to explain that socialism is not the invention of dreamers, but the final aim and necessary result of the development of the productive forces in modern society. All recorded history hitherto has been a history of class struggle, of the succession of the rule and victory of certain social classes over others. And this will continue until the foundations of class struggle and of class domination – private property and anarchic social production – disappear. The interests of the proletariat demand the destruction of these foundations, and therefore the conscious class struggle of the organised workers must be directed against them. And every class strugg...
Read more

The Four Petrochemical Giants

Internationalism No. 86, April 2026 Page 15 From the series Major industrial groups in China When the People's Republic of China was founded in 1949, oil extraction in the country was practically non-existent, and the country was completely dependent on imports. The exploration and development of domestic oil resources required a major effort. As Jin Zhang reports in his book Catch-up and Competitiveness in China [Routledge, 2004]: The required massive human resources were supplied by the People's Liberation Army (PLA). In 1952, Mao Zedong ordered the reorganisation of the 57 th Division of the 19 th Army of the PLA into the 1 st Division of Oil . The effort led to the discovery of several oil fields, the most significant of which was in Daqing, Heilongjiang Province, in northeastern China, in 1959. It became operational the following year, reaching a production capacity of 6 million tons (mt) per year within three years. This was f...
Read more