Skip to main content

Europe Tries the Mercosur Test Again

Ursula von der Leyen justified the concessions made to Donald Trump in the Turnberry agreement at the end of July with two main arguments: it was a necessary move to avoid worse tariffs, and the EU has other cards to play. While the United States is the primary destination for European trade, wrote the president of the Brussels Commission in Le Figaro, it accounts for only about 20% of our exports of goods. That is why Europe will continue to strengthen and diversify its trade links with countries around the world.

America and Asia

This attempt is underway. On September 3rd, the von der Leyen Commission proposed to the European Council, the intergovernmental body of the 27 States, to ratify both the trade agreement with the Latin American bloc, Mercosur, and a modernisation of the existing agreement with Mexico. In the EU, the Commission has centralised trade policy in a federal power that negotiates international agreements. However, in order to implement them, approval is required from the Council, with a majority of at least fifteen governments representing 65% of the European population, and from the Strasbourg Parliament by a simple majority.

On September 23rd, in Bali, EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič announced the conclusion of free trade negotiations with Indonesia, following agreements reached in recent years with Singapore and Vietnam. In the days that followed, in Kuala Lumpur, Šefčovič highlighted the ongoing negotiations with Thailand, the Philippines, and Malaysia and also recalled the original project, shelved in 2010, for a region-to-region agreement between the EU and ASEAN, the Association of ten economies in Southeast Asia. Could the recurring hypothesis of European convergence with the Japanese-led Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) be accompanied by EU cooperation with RCEP, the major Asian trade agreement based precisely on ASEAN? Beijing might perhaps welcome a solution to bring it closer to Brussels, as an alternative or complement to the Euro-Chinese CAI treaty, which has been on ice for too long.

Openness and protection

On October 8th, the Commission proposed further regulation to strengthen safeguards for the agricultural sector in the agreement with Mercosur. The agreement already provides for a strengthening of the compensation funds of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and a quota system that limits openness for certain particularly sensitive products, such as beef. The new mechanism would ensure that, in the event of an excessive increase in imports or a fall in prices, a European investigation would quickly assess the extent of the economic damage and could temporarily withdraw the preferential conditions granted to Mercosur countries. We have listened to our farmers, we have reflected and now we have acted, in their interests, said Commissioner Šefčovič, expressing his confidence that with this cast-iron legal guarantee it will be possible to overcome the sector’s long-standing opposition, which for years, especially in France, has been the main obstacle to the agreement with Mercosur.

The Commission hopes that its two co-legislators – the Council and the European Parliament – will approve this new regulation by December, so that it can be formalised before the agreement is signed at the last Mercosur summit under the Brazilian presidency. It should be remembered that in December 2024, immediately after the fall of Michel Barnier’s government in Paris, von der Leyen flew to Montevideo to celebrate a preliminary political agreement with the leaders of Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay, defying the open opposition of French President Emmanuel Macron.

Will this be the right time?

The same goal was achieved in 2019 by the Commission chaired by Jean-Claude Juncker, flanked by Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel. European ratification was then blocked by agricultural resistance in the EU and, mainly, by the French political veto. Will the new guarantees proposed by Brussels be enough this time? Will France's political instability, with one prime minister after another resigning, be an advantage or an obstacle to European consensus? With Giorgia Meloni’s Italian government leaning towards approval, Paris no longer seems able to prevent a qualified majority in the European Council. Will the Commission proceed by putting France in the minority, as former French Trade Commissioner Pascal Lamy suggested? A year ago, before von der Leyen’s push in Montevideo, a multi-party front of more than 600 French MPs, senators, and French members of European Parliament, launched a dramatic appeal not to ignore Paris’s opposition, evoking the risk of an anti-European populist drift in the political heart of the continent. Recently, unofficial statements from government sources have suggested that Paris may not oppose the approval of the agreement, voting in favour or abstaining.

Meanwhile, in the Strasbourg Parliament, some MPs are calling for an assessment by the EU Court of Justice of the rebalancing mechanism provided for in the agreement, which promises compensation to Mercosur countries if future European laws hinder their exports. Critics argue that this undermines European sovereignty and the effectiveness of its rules, in the field of environmental protection, for example.

Advance or delay?

Despite this resistance, there is broad consensus in Europe and among the main economic fractions in France itself in favour of the agreement with Mercosur, after negotiations that have now lasted more than a quarter of a century. In recent weeks, big economic groups have increased the pressure. Now is the time is the title of a campaign launched in September by BusinessEurope, which brings together the German BDI, the French Medef, and other major national industrial associations. On October 13th, 26 European lobbies from a variety of sectors launched a joint appeal to the institutions, calling for the rapid ratification of the Mercosur agreement: A beacon in the EU’s diversification strategy. Among the signatories was the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA), which expects to triple its exports to Mercosur over the next fifteen years thanks to the gradual elimination of the current high tariffs.

An economic study by the Commission highlights that the large Mercosur market, with around 270 million inhabitants and a GDP of €2.7 trillion in 2024, one sixth of that of the European Union, has few free trade agreements (FTAs) with other partners and no FTAs with any other major industrialised economy, which gives the EU a first-mover advantage. On the other hand, the same report admits that the goal is to reverse the deterioration of EU market shares in Mercosur imports, which has fallen from almost 30% in 2000 to the current 19%, overtaken by China, which in the same period has risen sharply from less than 5% to over 27%.

Strategic review

David Henig, a British analyst at the ECIPE research centre in Brussels, has written that the battle for ratification of the agreement with Mercosur is a make-or-break moment for the EU. This is an exaggerated assessment, which we obviously cannot share, but it is true that this is a trade operation that has become increasingly strategically important for the Union over the years. Both to keep pace with the imperialistic maturation of China, which has already broken through with its goods and capital on the South American market, and to respond to the unilateralist turn of the United States and Trump’s tariff war. For the Financial Times, the approval of the agreement with Mercosur represents a test of EU’s decisiveness, which the block should not fail at this time of maximum pressure against the rules-based international cooperation.

Meanwhile, Trump is acting in the region with his characteristic disruptive and contradictory style. He is putting pressure on Brazil with heavy tariffs, motivated by the legal fate of former President Jair Bolsonaro. This presumably increases the importance of the agreement with the EU for President Lula, who could accept the new guarantees offered by Brussels to European farmers. In recent weeks, the White House has thrown a multi-billion-pound lifeline to Argentina in its chronic financial crisis, openly conditional on a confirmation of President Javier Milei’s policies. In Latin America, the capital, goods, and spheres of influence of all great powers – the US, the EU, Japan, and China – intersect and clash: it is a centuries-old imperialist game in which Europe’s claim to make the first move sounds curiously formal.

Goods and missiles

In a speech entitled Trade Wars and Central Banks: Lessons From 2025 on September 30th in Helsinki, ECB President Christine Lagarde spoke of a new world in which politicians must combine financial reflection with geoeconomics. This term, coined by Edward Luttwak in 1990, does not refer to protectionism in the old sense of sheltering vulnerable industries. Instead, it is trade deployed as a tool of power, a strategy of influence and dominance. Luttwak’s formula has been circulating again for some time, as we witnessed in these pages ten years ago. The real novelty, according to the ECB governor, is that Europe finds itself for the first time on the receiving end of this approach, hit by Trump’s tariffs and forced into the asymmetrical agreement in July. However, the economic impact has so far been less severe than expected – Lagarde claims – thanks to a two-pronged response: the EU has pushed ahead with new trade agreements and, above all, governments in Europe have committed to the largest increase in rearmament in decades.

This is not a new world, it is the world of imperialism, which has existed for more than a century. What is new is the crisis in the world order, and a fundamental political fact is the strategy Europe has chosen to address it: accelerating free trade agreements and strengthening its defence. Literally, the armed liberism that we hypothesised a couple of years ago could be the sign of a cycle in which, for the moment, multilateralism and global rearmament coexist.

Lotta Comunista, October 2025

Popular posts in the last week

The EU Commission Plans for Rearmament and a Clean Industrial Deal

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series European news Following the European elections which took place on June 6th - 9th, the leaders of the Member States met on June 27th at the European Council. Ursula von der Leyen was nominated as president of the next European Commission, after she was chosen as the European People’s Party’s (EPP) Spitzenkandidat (“leading candidate”). The agreement also included the election of former Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio Costa as president of the European Council, and the appointment of former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas as High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Subsequently, on July 18th, Parliament elected von der Leyen as president of the Commission by an absolute majority, with 401 votes out of 719 MEPs. On September 17th, von der Leyen presented her team of commissioners to the European Parliament and, two days later, the Council adopted this list of...

Libertarian Communism: A Different Kind of Communism

Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM   An examination of the debate within the groups that were to create GAAP (Anarchist Groups of Proletarian Action) gives a vivid picture of the problems that between 1948 and 1951 had to be slowly and painfully faced. Three major confrontations, progressively more serious, took place between Cervetto and Masini in the autumn of 1949 and again in the spring and autumn of 1950. As preparations were being made for the National Conference at Pontedecimo – from which GAAP would be born – debate on the nature of the organisation and on theories of the State and imperialism began to define the characteristics of the new political group, but also revealed the differences. The first step had been to look for ‘a different kind’ of communism in anarchism. Along this road Cervetto , with an ever-surer grasp, would raise the issue that had been first posed by Marx and Lenin : our militant...

Lotta Comunista: The Origins 1943-1952

Guido La Barbera Contents 9. Preface to the English Edition 13. Preface 19. Useful dates 21. Chapter One «ONE OUGHT TO KNOW WITH WHOM ONE IS DEALING» 25. The balance-of-power theory 27. Theory and the ‘strategy-party’ 29. Chapter Two THE FOUNDRY AND THE PARTISAN STRUGGLE 31. The Savona group 39. Passion disciplined by reason 40. Never again a tool in the hands of others 41. The Genoa group 46. The Sestri Ponente group 48. The groups in Rome and Tuscany 52. The strength of GAAP: ‘only a handful’ 55. Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM 58. Reckoning with Bordiga...

Socialism and Nationalism in the History of France

The collapse of French socialism at the outbreak of the First World War is considered by many historians to be the most significant case of its kind. We must go back in time to find its origins. The dramatic repression of the Paris Commune in 1871 was followed by a decade of shootings and the deportation of tens of thousands of revolutionary militants. Reactionary monarchical legitimism attributed the decline of France to the Revolution of 1789, but by then the nouvelles couches sociales , the new classes produced by capitalism, as Leon Gambetta defined them, demanded a politics free from economic, social and clerical ties. The Radical Party, a turning point of French politics, was its expression. The same taditional Catholic Judeophobia dating back to the Middle Ages — according to Michel Dreyfus’, research director at the CNRS in Paris, Anti-Semitism on the Left in France [Paris, 2009] — gradually transformed into the image of the Jews associated with money and modernity who des...

The Spider Web of OpenAI Agreements

Internationalism No. 83, January 2026 Page 14 From the series The telecommunications battle There are two interwoven and contrasting trends in the American economy. On the one hand, we are witnessing steady growth in the value of securities linked to the furious race towards artificial intelligence (AI), which could lead to a financial bubble; on the other, an increase in GDP, precisely due to the huge investments in this field, is taking place. In the first week of November, a downward correction saw many technological securities devalue by $1.2 trillion on the stock exchange. Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, the biggest American bank, predicts that there is a one-in-three probability of a collapse, albeit not imminently. As I see it — he states — artificial intelligence is real and, all in all, it will pay off [...] just as happened in the past in the case of automobiles and television sets . Products which, however, have also seen many...

The Theoretical and Political Battles of Arrigo Cervetto: V

Internationalism No. 81, November 2025 Pages 8 and 9 From the introduction to Arrigo Cervetto’s Opere Scelte ("Selected Works") , recently published in Italy by Edizioni Lotta Comunista. V The Leninist tactic in the educational crisis and the union tactic on the prospects of trade unionism had already produced results in Genoa that alarmed the Italian Communist Party (PCI). With the restructuring crisis , when opportunism began to side with austerity policies and the Leninists with the defence of wages, however, the reaction of opportunism became furious, following the Stalinist script of slander and intimidation. In those years, I worked to ensure that what was a tradition for my generation would become a common heritage for the new generation. We needed to select, discipline, and amalgamate. We needed to assert ourselves to do so. In 1974, the spontaneous movement of students and workers, unable to find a tra...

The Myth of Cooperation

From the series Vaccines and world contention There are by now ten authorised vaccines already in use against SARSCoV-2, and there are 77 countries in which vaccinations are taking place. By mid-February, 173 million doses had been administered and the campaign is proceeding at an average rate of six million a day, calculated on the basis of last week’s figures. At this pace, it would take 5 years to vaccinate 75% of the world population with two doses [ Bloomberg , February 15 th ]. More than half of the injections have been carried out in the United States, the UK, and the European Union which, together, account for 11% of the world population. In at least one third of the 77 surveyed countries, less than 1% of the population have received their first dose of the vaccine, and, in the rest of the world, vaccines have not yet arrived. Imperialist globalisation Individual states are pursuing autonomous solutions to a global problem. Epidemiologists believe that, while a vast propo...

Show Warfare?

Internationalism No. 86, April 2026 Page 16 After show politics and show diplomacy , have we sunk to the obscenity of show warfare ? On the surface, this is true. The Pentagon’s video game-style communications, where airstrikes, missile launches, and deadly explosions are set to music for social media clips, certainly suggest so. It matters little that a hundred schoolgirls were also blown to bits as artificial intelligence took centre stage on the battlefield. In reality, war propaganda has always showcased destruction and mocked the enemy; today in Washington, in the era of the high-tech groups of television and social media democracy , the only thing that has changed is the style and the means used to inflame fanaticisms and stuff people’s brains. In Tehran, dominated by a parasitic bourgeoisie that feeds on oil revenues and is intertwined with the militias and hierarchies of t...

Democratic Defeat in the Urban Vote

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series Elections in the USA A careful analysis of the 2022 mid-term elections revealed the symptoms of a Democratic Party malaise which subsequently fully manifested itself in the latest presidential election, with the heavy loss of support in its traditional strongholds of the metropolitan areas of New York City and Chicago, and the State of California. A defeat foretold Republican votes rose from 51 million in the previous 2018 midterms to 54 million in 2022, a gain of 3 million. The Democrat vote fell from 61 to 51 million, a loss of 10 million. The Republicans gained only three votes for every ten lost by the Democrats, while the other seven became abstentions. In 2022, we analysed the elections in New York City by borough, the governmental districts whose names are well known through movies and TV series. In The Bronx, where the average yearly household income is $35,000, the Democrats lost 52,0...

The National Gamble of Poland

Internationalism No. 33, November 2021 Page 3 From the series European News In a lawsuit brought by Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki, the Constitutional Tribunal, which is composed of judges chosen by the government, ruled that fundamental parts of the EU Treaty are incompatible with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. This ruling thus denies the primacy of European law over national law, undermining both the political assumption of continental integration and the supranational character of the EU . Vectors of Polish history We can shed light on this event if we consider the four field vectors that cross Poland: its traditional ethnic-religious nationalism, its marked Atlantic tropism, the objective attraction exerted by the European force field, and the looming threat of Russia. The general picture is global collisions: China’s irruption and the crisis in the world order have put pressure on Warsaw to define its st...