Skip to main content

Europe Tries the Mercosur Test Again

Ursula von der Leyen justified the concessions made to Donald Trump in the Turnberry agreement at the end of July with two main arguments: it was a necessary move to avoid worse tariffs, and the EU has other cards to play. While the United States is the primary destination for European trade, wrote the president of the Brussels Commission in Le Figaro, it accounts for only about 20% of our exports of goods. That is why Europe will continue to strengthen and diversify its trade links with countries around the world.

America and Asia

This attempt is underway. On September 3rd, the von der Leyen Commission proposed to the European Council, the intergovernmental body of the 27 States, to ratify both the trade agreement with the Latin American bloc, Mercosur, and a modernisation of the existing agreement with Mexico. In the EU, the Commission has centralised trade policy in a federal power that negotiates international agreements. However, in order to implement them, approval is required from the Council, with a majority of at least fifteen governments representing 65% of the European population, and from the Strasbourg Parliament by a simple majority.

On September 23rd, in Bali, EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič announced the conclusion of free trade negotiations with Indonesia, following agreements reached in recent years with Singapore and Vietnam. In the days that followed, in Kuala Lumpur, Šefčovič highlighted the ongoing negotiations with Thailand, the Philippines, and Malaysia and also recalled the original project, shelved in 2010, for a region-to-region agreement between the EU and ASEAN, the Association of ten economies in Southeast Asia. Could the recurring hypothesis of European convergence with the Japanese-led Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) be accompanied by EU cooperation with RCEP, the major Asian trade agreement based precisely on ASEAN? Beijing might perhaps welcome a solution to bring it closer to Brussels, as an alternative or complement to the Euro-Chinese CAI treaty, which has been on ice for too long.

Openness and protection

On October 8th, the Commission proposed further regulation to strengthen safeguards for the agricultural sector in the agreement with Mercosur. The agreement already provides for a strengthening of the compensation funds of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and a quota system that limits openness for certain particularly sensitive products, such as beef. The new mechanism would ensure that, in the event of an excessive increase in imports or a fall in prices, a European investigation would quickly assess the extent of the economic damage and could temporarily withdraw the preferential conditions granted to Mercosur countries. We have listened to our farmers, we have reflected and now we have acted, in their interests, said Commissioner Šefčovič, expressing his confidence that with this cast-iron legal guarantee it will be possible to overcome the sector’s long-standing opposition, which for years, especially in France, has been the main obstacle to the agreement with Mercosur.

The Commission hopes that its two co-legislators – the Council and the European Parliament – will approve this new regulation by December, so that it can be formalised before the agreement is signed at the last Mercosur summit under the Brazilian presidency. It should be remembered that in December 2024, immediately after the fall of Michel Barnier’s government in Paris, von der Leyen flew to Montevideo to celebrate a preliminary political agreement with the leaders of Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay, defying the open opposition of French President Emmanuel Macron.

Will this be the right time?

The same goal was achieved in 2019 by the Commission chaired by Jean-Claude Juncker, flanked by Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel. European ratification was then blocked by agricultural resistance in the EU and, mainly, by the French political veto. Will the new guarantees proposed by Brussels be enough this time? Will France's political instability, with one prime minister after another resigning, be an advantage or an obstacle to European consensus? With Giorgia Meloni’s Italian government leaning towards approval, Paris no longer seems able to prevent a qualified majority in the European Council. Will the Commission proceed by putting France in the minority, as former French Trade Commissioner Pascal Lamy suggested? A year ago, before von der Leyen’s push in Montevideo, a multi-party front of more than 600 French MPs, senators, and French members of European Parliament, launched a dramatic appeal not to ignore Paris’s opposition, evoking the risk of an anti-European populist drift in the political heart of the continent. Recently, unofficial statements from government sources have suggested that Paris may not oppose the approval of the agreement, voting in favour or abstaining.

Meanwhile, in the Strasbourg Parliament, some MPs are calling for an assessment by the EU Court of Justice of the rebalancing mechanism provided for in the agreement, which promises compensation to Mercosur countries if future European laws hinder their exports. Critics argue that this undermines European sovereignty and the effectiveness of its rules, in the field of environmental protection, for example.

Advance or delay?

Despite this resistance, there is broad consensus in Europe and among the main economic fractions in France itself in favour of the agreement with Mercosur, after negotiations that have now lasted more than a quarter of a century. In recent weeks, big economic groups have increased the pressure. Now is the time is the title of a campaign launched in September by BusinessEurope, which brings together the German BDI, the French Medef, and other major national industrial associations. On October 13th, 26 European lobbies from a variety of sectors launched a joint appeal to the institutions, calling for the rapid ratification of the Mercosur agreement: A beacon in the EU’s diversification strategy. Among the signatories was the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA), which expects to triple its exports to Mercosur over the next fifteen years thanks to the gradual elimination of the current high tariffs.

An economic study by the Commission highlights that the large Mercosur market, with around 270 million inhabitants and a GDP of €2.7 trillion in 2024, one sixth of that of the European Union, has few free trade agreements (FTAs) with other partners and no FTAs with any other major industrialised economy, which gives the EU a first-mover advantage. On the other hand, the same report admits that the goal is to reverse the deterioration of EU market shares in Mercosur imports, which has fallen from almost 30% in 2000 to the current 19%, overtaken by China, which in the same period has risen sharply from less than 5% to over 27%.

Strategic review

David Henig, a British analyst at the ECIPE research centre in Brussels, has written that the battle for ratification of the agreement with Mercosur is a make-or-break moment for the EU. This is an exaggerated assessment, which we obviously cannot share, but it is true that this is a trade operation that has become increasingly strategically important for the Union over the years. Both to keep pace with the imperialistic maturation of China, which has already broken through with its goods and capital on the South American market, and to respond to the unilateralist turn of the United States and Trump’s tariff war. For the Financial Times, the approval of the agreement with Mercosur represents a test of EU’s decisiveness, which the block should not fail at this time of maximum pressure against the rules-based international cooperation.

Meanwhile, Trump is acting in the region with his characteristic disruptive and contradictory style. He is putting pressure on Brazil with heavy tariffs, motivated by the legal fate of former President Jair Bolsonaro. This presumably increases the importance of the agreement with the EU for President Lula, who could accept the new guarantees offered by Brussels to European farmers. In recent weeks, the White House has thrown a multi-billion-pound lifeline to Argentina in its chronic financial crisis, openly conditional on a confirmation of President Javier Milei’s policies. In Latin America, the capital, goods, and spheres of influence of all great powers – the US, the EU, Japan, and China – intersect and clash: it is a centuries-old imperialist game in which Europe’s claim to make the first move sounds curiously formal.

Goods and missiles

In a speech entitled Trade Wars and Central Banks: Lessons From 2025 on September 30th in Helsinki, ECB President Christine Lagarde spoke of a new world in which politicians must combine financial reflection with geoeconomics. This term, coined by Edward Luttwak in 1990, does not refer to protectionism in the old sense of sheltering vulnerable industries. Instead, it is trade deployed as a tool of power, a strategy of influence and dominance. Luttwak’s formula has been circulating again for some time, as we witnessed in these pages ten years ago. The real novelty, according to the ECB governor, is that Europe finds itself for the first time on the receiving end of this approach, hit by Trump’s tariffs and forced into the asymmetrical agreement in July. However, the economic impact has so far been less severe than expected – Lagarde claims – thanks to a two-pronged response: the EU has pushed ahead with new trade agreements and, above all, governments in Europe have committed to the largest increase in rearmament in decades.

This is not a new world, it is the world of imperialism, which has existed for more than a century. What is new is the crisis in the world order, and a fundamental political fact is the strategy Europe has chosen to address it: accelerating free trade agreements and strengthening its defence. Literally, the armed liberism that we hypothesised a couple of years ago could be the sign of a cycle in which, for the moment, multilateralism and global rearmament coexist.

Lotta Comunista, October 2025

Popular posts in the last week

China’s Electromechanical Champions

Internationalism No. 85, March 2026 Page 9 From the series Major industrial groups in China Analysing the WTO data for 2023, it emerges that China exported goods worth $3,379 billion, surpassing the European Union and the United States. Industrial machinery accounted for over 7% of exports and electrical machinery 9%. In the same sectors, Chinese imports did not reach 40% of the value of exports, indicating that these are among the pillars of Beijing’s export economy. Sany Heavy Industry In this newspaper we have already examined the Chinese mechanical engineering giant Sinomach. But in the field of machine construction, Sany Heavy Industry also holds a prominent position, particularly in excavators, cranes, industrial elevators, and cement machinery. The company, based in Changsha (Hunan) since 1991, was founded by Liang Wengen, who had previously been an executive at a State-owned arms factory, and is its main shareholder. Sany had a 2023 turnover...

The EU Commission Plans for Rearmament and a Clean Industrial Deal

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series European news Following the European elections which took place on June 6th - 9th, the leaders of the Member States met on June 27th at the European Council. Ursula von der Leyen was nominated as president of the next European Commission, after she was chosen as the European People’s Party’s (EPP) Spitzenkandidat (“leading candidate”). The agreement also included the election of former Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio Costa as president of the European Council, and the appointment of former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas as High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Subsequently, on July 18th, Parliament elected von der Leyen as president of the Commission by an absolute majority, with 401 votes out of 719 MEPs. On September 17th, von der Leyen presented her team of commissioners to the European Parliament and, two days later, the Council adopted this list of...

The Munich Soviet Republic

Internationalism No. 87, May 2026 Page 9 From the series Pages from the history of the workers' movement The Munich Soviet Republic With the Munich Soviet Republic, the German Revolution, which began on November 9 th , 1918, seemed to be flickering its last. In the Bavarian capital, after the fall of the Wittelsbachs, power had fallen into the hands of Kurt Eisner, a pacifist intellectual, member of the USPD, and contributor to the revisionist newspaper Münchner Post since 1910. Eisner had managed something unheard of in Germany – to gain the support of the farmers, in particular Karl Gandorfer, head of the Bavarian Peasants' League. Workers, soldiers, and peasants "Traditionally a stronghold of Catholicism and reaction" , Bavaria "had declared early for the November Revolution, largely because its people hated the Prussians and re...

The Court: From Civil Rights to Individual Rights

Internationalism No. 87, May 2026 Page 11 From the series Chronicles of the new American nationalism Edward Lazarus, a clerk for Justice Harry Blackmun at the Supreme Court in 1988–89 and chief of staff at the Federal Communications Commission during Barack Obama's administration, published Closed Chambers in 1998, an account of the work of the Supreme Court under Chief Justice William Rehnquist. Lazarus considers that it is history and geography that have shaped the character of the Court. The author identifies four decisive battles in its history: in 1937, the bitter clash over the powers and economic policy of the New Deal; in 1954, the fierce battle over the civil rights of Black Americans; in 1973, the struggle for individual rights; and in 1974, the ruling that marked the end of Richard Nixon's presidency. Lazarus's supreme regionalism ...

American Convulsion and the Crisis in the World Order in Hormuz

Internationalism No. 87, May 2026 Pages 4 and 5 With the war against Iran and the naval blockade of Iranian ports in response to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the United States has plunged the energy artery of the Persian Gulf into chaos. This has triggered economic, social, and political upheavals from East to West, the full extent and uneven distribution of which have yet to be fully assessed. That the third Gulf War of American imperialism would have unintended consequences had long been written into the laws of politics. Every political action, all the more so if conducted by military means, is part of a parallelogram of forces, the result of which can never correspond to the intention of any individual actor involved. The objective each power pursues is either hindered or aided by the others. Therefore, the course of the conflict will correspond, to a greater or lesser extent, ...

Innovation Incubators

Internationalism No. 87, May 2026 Page 7 From the series Industry and pharmaceuticals II South San Francisco is considered the birthplace of biotechnology. Here, in 1976, the biochemist Herbert W. Boyer of the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), and the venture capitalist Robert Swanson founded Genentech, commonly considered the first biotech company in the world. Swanson had studied at MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), then moved to San Francisco and cultivated a passion for molecular biology. Genetic engineering was about to take off in Californian universities, starting with the pioneering DNA manipulation experiments carried out by Boyer in collaboration with Stanley N. Cohen, a geneticist at Stanford University. At the time, observes Nature , leading scientists proposing involvement with industry was considered heresy . Swanson and Boyer...

The Vatican and the American Crisis

Internationalism No. 87, May 2026 Page 2 In Washington, they haven't understood the conclave. They don't understand this new phase of Catholicism . According to Massimo Franco, this is the view inside the Vatican regarding Donald Trump's attack on the Pope [ Corriere della Sera , April 14]. The day before, Trump had targeted Robert Prevost, dedicating a lengthy post to him on his own social media platform, Truth Social . At the heart of his criticism was papal opposition to the third Gulf War. I don't want a Pope who thinks it's OK for Iran to have a nuclear weapon – he had written – I don't want a pope who criticises the president of the United States or who meets with Obama sympathisers . All accompanied by an AI-generated image in which Trump appeared in the guise of a healing Jesus. Americanism and US imperialist expansion The forms are those of show and s...

The Social Brain and Artificial Intelligence

Internationalism No. 87, February 2026 Page 1 From the series Artificial Intelligence There is an anthropological question linked to the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on human consciousness, analogous – though at a higher level – to the effects of online communication and even television. We consider three aspects of this. Physical , concerning changes in the brain’s neural connections as a social product. Functional , concerning capacities that are stunted or developed by the internet and the use of artificial intelligence. Epistemological , concerning the implications for the theory of knowledge and the very notion of an objectively defined principle of reality . The Church, as it has already done with biotechnologies capable of intervening in human DNA, is developing its own reflection on artificial intelligence and its anthropological impli...

The Islamic Quartet and China in the New Equilibrium in the Gulf

Internationalism No. 87, May 2026 Page 6 At the time of writing, the third Gulf War , which began on February 28 th and escalated in April with a fresh Israeli intervention in Lebanon against Hezbollah, has reached an uncertain truce. Brokered by Pakistan's diplomats, it was agreed as part of a four-way Islamic agreement – bringing together Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Turkey – and backed by China. According to the Japanese newspaper Nikkei , the diplomatic initiative's origins date back to the extraordinary summit of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), of which Iran is also a member, and was sealed at the March 24 th summit of the Islamic Quartet in Islamabad. First came the meeting between the foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt, and Pakistan; then came Chinese backing and Sino-Pakistani talks, which produced a five-point proposal for a ceasefire. The proposal ...

The Invisible Sword of Nuclear Latency

Internationalism No. 83, January 2026 Page 6 According to the Kyodo news agency, on December 17 th a senior government official involved in the revision of the three national security documents adopted in 2022 expressed his personal stance on the need for Japan to equip itself with nuclear weapons. In light of the severe security situation surrounding the archipelago and the questionable reliability of the American nuclear deterrent , Tokyo must recognise that it can only rely on itself . Although the creation of a national arsenal is unrealistic and difficult , given that the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) recognises only five nuclear States de jure , nonetheless this discussion must take place within the government . The official denies having discussions with Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi about the revision of the three non-nuclear principles (not to possess, manufacture, or permit the introduction of nuclear weapons into Japan) est...