Skip to main content

Coalition of Guarantors for Gaza

The Gaza Declaration, signed on October 13th in Sharm El-Sheikh in the presence of Donald Trump and around twenty heads of State and government from European and Islamic countries, established a fragile truce in a conflict that had gradually spread throughout the region, from Lebanon to Syria, Iran, and, finally, Qatar, with the Israeli raid on September 9th.

The attack on Qatar represented a turning point in the war, calling into question Washington's security guarantees to its Arab regional allies. Just a week later, Riyadh announced a military pact with Pakistan, which implies that Islamabad will provide its nuclear umbrella to the Saudi monarchy.

Euro-Islamic coalition for Trump's plan

Since last spring, Saudi Arabia, together with France, has been promoting a diplomatic initiative for the recognition of a Palestinian State at the UN, with the aim of providing a political framework for the truce in Gaza, linked to a relaunch of the two-State solution. Both London and Paris, members of the UN Security Council, have recognised the Palestinian State. On the sidelines of the General Assembly in New York, a coalition of Arab and Islamic countries, including Turkey, Indonesia, and Pakistan, endorsed the twenty point Trump's Gaza peace plan. The American president's double visit to Israel and Egypt, carried out in the hyperbolic and spectacular manner dear to Trump, sealed the deal.

According to Le Monde, in the shadow of Trump's spectacle—who did not pass up on the opportunity to remind everyone of the US's military power in the region, evoking its participation in the clash between Tel Aviv and Tehran in June—Europeans, Arabs, Turks, and other participants engaged in intense discussions aimed at filling the gaps in Washington's plan, going beyond the American president's search for immediate results. Paris has made it known that it is working in a complementary, not competitive, manner. It is said to have succeeded in bringing PNA President Mahmoud Abbas back into the family photo in Sharm El-Sheikh, despite Trump's reluctance. It is also said to be working with London on a draft resolution that would give the plan for Gaza a UN framework, predicated on an abstention rather than opposition from Washington at the Security Council.

Before his visit to the region, Trump received Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House, forcing the Israeli prime minister to make an official apology to Qatar by telephone, directly from the Oval Office, with photos to prove it. At the same time, the American president signed an executive order extending formal US security guarantees to Doha. According to former Israeli ambassador to Paris Eli Barnavi, Trump used Tel Aviv's military gamble in Qatar to reaffirm Israel's condition of vassalage to the US, and thus as leverage to obtain the commitment of Turkey, Qatar, and Egypt to exert pressure on Hamas to accept the truce.

According to Bruno Tertrais, a leading expert on deterrence, uncertainty remains about the true potential of the American plan. It is premised on both a weakened Hamas, which wants to ensure its survival, and on signs of fatigue from Israel, which was struggling to mobilise reservists. Added to this is the fact that Israeli military authorities crossed a red line with the attack on Qatar, certainly impressing regional States, but also irritating the occupant of the White House. Tertrais doubts that the final outcome will produce a fully sovereign Palestinian State. Not only would this require a different political majority in Israel, but it cannot be ruled out that Tel Aviv may work to create one in Gaza alone, excluding the West Bank.

Bazaar tradition and art of the deal

According to Paul Webster Hare, a former senior Foreign Office official, Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE have conducted astute transactional diplomacy. This led Trump to accept the Saudi vision of a new Middle East, which limits the extent of Israeli interests in the region and opposes further Jewish annexations in the West Bank, obtaining a broad commitment to the two-State solution, which was removed from the Abraham Accords in 2020. In those agreements, the Palestinian question was downgraded to a simple real estate issue. In particular, the petro-monarchies leveraged the interests of the Trump clan and its private cabinet, which are closely linked to Saudi and Qatari capital, insisting that the US president take personal responsibility for the key elements of the agreement over the next three years.

In essence, according to the former diplomat, the Saudis and Qataris have ensured that Trump is indebted to them for numerous favours. This makes an extension of the Abraham Accords without the recognition of a possible Palestinian State unlikely. It should be remembered that the Arab tradition of the bazaar is no different from the art of the deal: low ball deals are always possible, without losing face.

Turkish-Qatari guarantees for Hamas

The Gulf's financial muscle is combined with the role of Ankara and Cairo as guarantors—not only towards Hamas. According to Haaretz, Turkey and Qatar, who are committed to consolidating their influence in Syria, may induce the Sunni Syrian regime, led by the redeemed former jihadist Ahmed al-Sharaa, to sign security agreements with Israel. According to the Israeli newspaper, Trump's peace plan does not envisage the dissolution of Hamas, but the dismantling of its military arsenal, leaving the door open to a political role for the Islamist group in the Strip. For the Saudi newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat, which is close to the monarchy, this is a return to its original roots as a religious force committed to providing social assistance. With American backing, Hamas is once again performing the function of law-enforcement in the enclave, notably by controlling the delivery of humanitarian aid to the population. At the same time, it is also restoring its power of deterrence against local clans and militias which, since last spring, have been acting with Israeli support. It is worth remembering that relations between Palestinian factions, even within the PLO, were defined on the basis of military strength, as well as relations with the various regional powers.

According to British sources, a delay in disarming Hamas may come from the Iraqi experience of 2003: Washington's decision to dissolve the armed forces and the Baath Party opened the door to Sunni insurgency and civil war. Hamas does not rule out handing over its weapons to a Palestinian force, which suggests that it is willing to negotiate a relative disarmament in exchange for entry into the PLO as a component of Palestinian nationalism. The role of British figures in drafting Trump's plan, such as Tony Blair and Jonathan Powell, chief of staff to the former prime minister and national security adviser to Keir Starmer, may introduce London's experience in the peace agreements with the IRA in Northern Ireland.

Ankara, as it has already done so in Syria, can bring a pacified model of political Islam to the table, but also its agreement with the Kurdish separatism of the PKK. Both Doha and Ankara have, Haaretz points out, powerful leverages: on the one hand, Qatari financial subsidies and, on the other, the presence of companies listed on the Istanbul Stock Exchange owned by Hamas leaders with Turkish passports. Even Cairo, despite its hostility towards the role of the Muslim Brotherhood, has a long history of cooperation with Hamas as part of its anti-jihadist operations in the Sinai. Moreover, the Hamas-Israel contention allows it to maintain a diplomatic role between the US, the Gulf capitals, and those of Europe.

The Saudi message of Pakistani deterrence

Historically, the Palestinian question has been as much an element of pan-Arab and pan-Islamic mobilisation as it has been a card played by regional and great powers to further their interests. For Ayham Al-Aswad, today it is becoming an element in redefining the balance of power, whose centre of gravity is shifting towards the Gulf States, Turkey, and, perhaps, Egypt, if it can overcome its economic crises and strengthen internal stability. Iran's plans have been scaled back and Israel, despite its military superiority, cannot impose full control due to demographic and political limitations, while Washington remains the driving force capable of shaping the region.

The INSS in Tel Aviv, a think tank linked to the army's intelligence services, sees Saudi Arabia's timing in presenting the defence pact with Pakistan a week after the attack on Doha as a political statement—primarily to Washington, but implicitly also to Tel Aviv, with the entry of a nuclear actor willing to extend its defensive umbrella to Arab States. At the very least, Israel must signal its non-hostility to the Gulf States, as well as to Islamabad, including through its operational military conduct. Riyadh, in any case, is strengthening its negotiating position with Washington: by negotiating a formal military security agreement regarding assistance for its civil nuclear programme, but also by making any expansion of the Abraham Accords conditional on a commitment to a Palestinian State.

As reported by the Financial Times, Saudi Arabia's immediate goal is to obtain a Qatar plus agreement from Washington: formal security commitments, such as those offered to Doha, but broader in scope. This may explain the absence from the Egyptian summit of both the Saudi crown prince and the emir-president of the United Arab Emirates, Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan. It may also reveal a desire to maintain a degree of distance from Hamas.

The realpolitik of Indonesian multi-alignment

At the UN General Assembly, Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto declared his willingness to recognise Israel in exchange for the recognition of a Palestinian State, as well as suggesting the possible deployment of 20,000 troops for the international stabilisation force in Gaza. For The Jakarta Post, this is an exercise in realpolitik by the presidency, which strengthens the international profile of the archipelago's multi-alignment, in conjunction with the Gulf capitals, but also with the US, Europe, and Turkey. Both the Turkish and Indonesian press interpret support for Trump's plan as an attempt by their governments to offer their political umbrella to the American project, rather than a force representing Palestinian interests.

To a certain extent, this is the trustee formula evoked in 2023 by Ankara's Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan. Turkey, alone or in combination with Arab Islamic countries, would become the trustee of the Palestinians, and the US, along with other Western countries, would be the trustee of Israel. For Media Indonesia, the country's second largest media group, a Palestinian State could be useful to US security interests in preventing Arab and regional countries from moving closer to Beijing. It would also promote Tel Aviv's long-standing dream of integration in Middle East. That is, of course, if the throng of actors does not once again, as has often happened in the region, end up setting its wheel of fire in motion.

Lotta Comunista, October 2025

Labels:

Popular posts in the last week

China’s Electromechanical Champions

Internationalism No. 85, March 2026 Page 9 From the series Major industrial groups in China Analysing the WTO data for 2023, it emerges that China exported goods worth $3,379 billion, surpassing the European Union and the United States. Industrial machinery accounted for over 7% of exports and electrical machinery 9%. In the same sectors, Chinese imports did not reach 40% of the value of exports, indicating that these are among the pillars of Beijing’s export economy. Sany Heavy Industry In this newspaper we have already examined the Chinese mechanical engineering giant Sinomach. But in the field of machine construction, Sany Heavy Industry also holds a prominent position, particularly in excavators, cranes, industrial elevators, and cement machinery. The company, based in Changsha (Hunan) since 1991, was founded by Liang Wengen, who had previously been an executive at a State-owned arms factory, and is its main shareholder. Sany had a 2023 turnover...
Read more

The EU Commission Plans for Rearmament and a Clean Industrial Deal

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series European news Following the European elections which took place on June 6th - 9th, the leaders of the Member States met on June 27th at the European Council. Ursula von der Leyen was nominated as president of the next European Commission, after she was chosen as the European People’s Party’s (EPP) Spitzenkandidat (“leading candidate”). The agreement also included the election of former Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio Costa as president of the European Council, and the appointment of former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas as High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Subsequently, on July 18th, Parliament elected von der Leyen as president of the Commission by an absolute majority, with 401 votes out of 719 MEPs. On September 17th, von der Leyen presented her team of commissioners to the European Parliament and, two days later, the Council adopted this list of...
Read more

The Munich Soviet Republic

Internationalism No. 87, May 2026 Page 9 From the series Pages from the history of the workers' movement The Munich Soviet Republic With the Munich Soviet Republic, the German Revolution, which began on November 9 th , 1918, seemed to be flickering its last. In the Bavarian capital, after the fall of the Wittelsbachs, power had fallen into the hands of Kurt Eisner, a pacifist intellectual, member of the USPD, and contributor to the revisionist newspaper Münchner Post since 1910. Eisner had managed something unheard of in Germany – to gain the support of the farmers, in particular Karl Gandorfer, head of the Bavarian Peasants' League. Workers, soldiers, and peasants "Traditionally a stronghold of Catholicism and reaction" , Bavaria "had declared early for the November Revolution, largely because its people hated the Prussians and re...
Read more

The Court: From Civil Rights to Individual Rights

Internationalism No. 87, May 2026 Page 11 From the series Chronicles of the new American nationalism Edward Lazarus, a clerk for Justice Harry Blackmun at the Supreme Court in 1988–89 and chief of staff at the Federal Communications Commission during Barack Obama's administration, published Closed Chambers in 1998, an account of the work of the Supreme Court under Chief Justice William Rehnquist. Lazarus considers that it is history and geography that have shaped the character of the Court. The author identifies four decisive battles in its history: in 1937, the bitter clash over the powers and economic policy of the New Deal; in 1954, the fierce battle over the civil rights of Black Americans; in 1973, the struggle for individual rights; and in 1974, the ruling that marked the end of Richard Nixon's presidency. Lazarus's supreme regionalism ...
Read more

American Convulsion and the Crisis in the World Order in Hormuz

Internationalism No. 87, May 2026 Pages 4 and 5 With the war against Iran and the naval blockade of Iranian ports in response to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the United States has plunged the energy artery of the Persian Gulf into chaos. This has triggered economic, social, and political upheavals from East to West, the full extent and uneven distribution of which have yet to be fully assessed. That the third Gulf War of American imperialism would have unintended consequences had long been written into the laws of politics. Every political action, all the more so if conducted by military means, is part of a parallelogram of forces, the result of which can never correspond to the intention of any individual actor involved. The objective each power pursues is either hindered or aided by the others. Therefore, the course of the conflict will correspond, to a greater or lesser extent, ...
Read more

Innovation Incubators

Internationalism No. 87, May 2026 Page 7 From the series Industry and pharmaceuticals II South San Francisco is considered the birthplace of biotechnology. Here, in 1976, the biochemist Herbert W. Boyer of the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), and the venture capitalist Robert Swanson founded Genentech, commonly considered the first biotech company in the world. Swanson had studied at MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), then moved to San Francisco and cultivated a passion for molecular biology. Genetic engineering was about to take off in Californian universities, starting with the pioneering DNA manipulation experiments carried out by Boyer in collaboration with Stanley N. Cohen, a geneticist at Stanford University. At the time, observes Nature , leading scientists proposing involvement with industry was considered heresy . Swanson and Boyer...
Read more

The Social Brain and Artificial Intelligence

Internationalism No. 87, February 2026 Page 1 From the series Artificial Intelligence There is an anthropological question linked to the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on human consciousness, analogous – though at a higher level – to the effects of online communication and even television. We consider three aspects of this. Physical , concerning changes in the brain’s neural connections as a social product. Functional , concerning capacities that are stunted or developed by the internet and the use of artificial intelligence. Epistemological , concerning the implications for the theory of knowledge and the very notion of an objectively defined principle of reality . The Church, as it has already done with biotechnologies capable of intervening in human DNA, is developing its own reflection on artificial intelligence and its anthropological impli...
Read more

Rearmament and State Policies in the Battle for Minerals

Internationalism No. 88, June 2026 Page 13 In 2025, China was the only power to respond decisively to Donald Trump's trade war, forcing him into an autumn truce through tariffs and, primarily, by blocking exports of some critical minerals. According to the White House, Beijing made a mistake in using the nuclear weapon of its near-monopoly on rare earths, as it triggered a global rush to diversify supplies. That process is indeed underway, but given its high costs and long timescales, it does not seem able to neutralise, at least in the short term, the powerful mineral deterrent established by the Chinese government. A multilateral Trump The US government's counteroffensive is underway both domestically, in an attempt to rebuild an industrial sector for the extraction and processing of these substances in the US, and internationally, through a series of agreements. Among the mo...
Read more

Revolutionary Spain

Internationalism No. 86, April 2026 Page 8 From the series Spain 1936 Spain, Marx observed in 1854 in the article Revolutionary Spain , was the first European feudal State to develop absolutism in its most unmitigated form , but political and fiscal centralisation never really took hold there. Similarly, it was Spanish caravels that opened up the era of the world market, and the Kingdom of Spain was the first great bourgeois maritime-trading empire. Yet that early and rapid rise ended up transforming itself from a favourable precondition for development into the cause of Spain's subsequent failure. In fact, the maritime overextension of the empire, combined with the failed political and fiscal centralisation of the Iberian heartland, resulted in stagnation and a subsequently inglorious and protracted putrefaction . While the economic and social arteries were becoming scl...
Read more

Libertarian Communism: A Different Kind of Communism

Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM   An examination of the debate within the groups that were to create GAAP (Anarchist Groups of Proletarian Action) gives a vivid picture of the problems that between 1948 and 1951 had to be slowly and painfully faced. Three major confrontations, progressively more serious, took place between Cervetto and Masini in the autumn of 1949 and again in the spring and autumn of 1950. As preparations were being made for the National Conference at Pontedecimo – from which GAAP would be born – debate on the nature of the organisation and on theories of the State and imperialism began to define the characteristics of the new political group, but also revealed the differences. The first step had been to look for ‘a different kind’ of communism in anarchism. Along this road Cervetto , with an ever-surer grasp, would raise the issue that had been first posed by Marx and Lenin : our militant...
Read more