Skip to main content

Europe’s Armed Non-Belligerence in the Gulf

On February 28th, the attack launched by the United States and Israel against Iran ignited the third Gulf War. Already dealing with the conflict in Ukraine on its eastern flank, Europe now finds itself facing a second war on its borders, this time to the south. Unlike in 1991 and 2003, in the current conflict Washington has made no effort to build a coalition. No European or NATO country, nor any regional power, has been formally involved in the plans for intervention.

European exclusion and the Atlantic crisis

Europe’s initial exclusion – despite now being called upon to bear the energy, economic, and political consequences of Washington’s new war of choice – is the latest chapter of the Atlantic crisis. The issue has been at the centre of the European press’s commentary. Particularly in the early days, Brussels’ delays and impotence were highlighted. The Europe that isn’t there ran the headline of the Corriere della Sera. For Stefano Lepri, Europe’s absence constitutes one of the most disturbing aspects of this crisis that risks setting the world ablaze. This lament is steeped in the crocodile tears of imperialist Europeanism. For the Corriere, without Europe, one of the key players would be missing – one that has always striven to defend the values of freedom and justice – given that obligations exist and that Iran must be stopped at all costs [March 3rd].

In June 2025, moreover, it was Friedrich Merz himself who stated on TV that Israel is doing the dirty work for all of us, referring precisely to the targeted military operations against Iran’s nuclear programme. This stance already reflected the goal, shared by Rome, of mitigating friction, as much as possible, with Washington.

Dramatising Europe’s absence may serve as an invitation to accelerate its process of political, economic, and military rearmament. This prospect emerges clearly from the realist perspective featured in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. For Nikolas Busse, the fact that the war against Iran is the first major war the United States has fought without Europe’s direct involvement reflects a harsh strategic reality: American and European interests are no longer aligned, neither in the Middle East nor in Europe [March 12th]. For Berthold Kohler, one of the four editors of the FAZ, Europe cannot afford to remain a bystander. If anything, it must reduce its dependence, not only on oil and gas from the Persian Gulf, but also on the United States for defence [March 17th]. Caroline de Gruyter, writing in the Dutch liberal daily NRC Handelsblad, directly calls for action. With every bomb dropped on Iran and with every costly mistake by Trump, she writes, European strategic autonomy is taking shape [March 7th].

European delay and forward deterrence

European imperialism’s delay in centralising its foreign and security policy is certainly a matter of fact. This is nothing new. In the past, we have already observed how, during the second Gulf War, American interference ended up freezing for two decades the substantial steps that Europe was taking in the field of common defence. The third Gulf War has struck Europe in the midst of a colossal rearmament process, which has its foundation in the crisis in the world order. It is underpinned by massive industrial and spending programmes, which now also explicitly include a nuclear dimension.

In this context, the French have declared a policy of forward deterrence in the wake of the Israeli-American attack and established an embryonic nuclear directorate within the E3 (France, Germany, Britain). This also represents a substantial political response, in the name of continental strategic autonomy, to the unilateralism of the current American administration and of any which may later follow suit.

A coordinated European defensive game

On the one hand, the Old Continent is playing a defensive game, given the impossibility of speaking with a single voice from the outset. At the same time, this is also how European imperialism’s projection of power is expressed: on this occasion, one can at least note the relative speed with which, from the very first days of the conflict, a common line has been taking shape.

On February 28th, the first day of the war, there was a joint statement by the E3, followed by a second on March 1st. In the first, Friedrich Merz, Emmanuel Macron, and Keir Starmer reiterated Europe’s non-participation in the US and Israeli intervention, criticised Iranian attacks on countries in the region, and called for the resumption of negotiations. In the second, in the name of defending European interests and those of regional allies, non-belligerence became active, with the E3 pledging logistical support to the US and Israel for actions aimed at striking Iran’s offensive capabilities.

Within 24-48 hours, the core of the European line was thus defined; while subsequently subject to further adjustments, in substance it was confirmed and accepted without significant distinctions across the continent. A Europe that claims not to be a co-belligerent – it is not our war – but whose defensive stance does not rule out logistical and military support for Washington’s intervention. Furthermore, it seeks to be a committed player in the diplomatic solution, without, however, positioning itself as a neutral party between its Atlantic ally and the Iranian theocracy.

European shield in Cyprus

On March 2nd, after a drone attributed to Hezbollah struck the British base at Akrotiri in Cyprus, the European response also took the form of an air and naval mission in the name of defending a member State. Paris deployed the Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier group. Rome sent the frigate Martinengo. Further naval units were dispatched by Greece, the Netherlands, and Spain, including the frigate Cristóbal Colón, the jewel of the Spanish Navy. London, in coordination with the European mission, diverted the destroyer HMS Dragon to the area. Alongside these naval units, the Europeans deployed air assets and anti-missile systems. A European Shield for Cyprus, headlined Il Messaggero on March 6th. Il Foglio described it as a new coalition of the willing, in this case directed towards the eastern Mediterranean [March 9th].

Paris has taken the lead in the mission. On March 9th, the French president visited Cyprus and then boarded the Charles de Gaulle. When Cyprus is attacked, it is Europe that is attacked, Macron proclaimed. For the president, the military deployment demonstrates France’s power, its capacity for projection, but at the same time is intended as a means of contributing to de-escalation. Macron, Le Monde further reports, believes that a blueprint for European defence might emerge around the defence of Cyprus [March 11th].

The French deployment has not been limited to Cyprus. Covering the eastern Mediterranean to the Persian Gulf, via the Red Sea, Paris has mobilised eight frigates and two helicopter carriers, in addition to the Charles de Gaulle. As Le Figaro points out, the French aircraft carrier has taken the place of the American USS Ford, moved by Trump to the Persian Gulf [March 10th]. Looking ahead, Macron sees the French naval force potentially taking part in a future international mission to protect freedom of navigation in the Persian Gulf, but only once the conflict has subsided, and within the framework of an intergovernmental mission involving various countries beyond Europe, including India [Le Monde, March 11th].

Coinciding with the European Council summit, a proposal by France, Germany, Britain, Italy, and the Netherlands – extended beyond the EU to include Japan and Canada – has taken shape, envisaging a UN-mandated initiative in the Gulf once a ceasefire has been agreed with Tehran. At the time of writing, according to Defence Minister Guido Crosetto, the initiative is aimed not only at India but also at China.

The timing of continental rearmament

The collective refusal of Europeans to join the war against Iran, despite Donald Trump’s threat of a bad future for NATO, comments the Financial Times, was remarkable for its force and unanimity. Europe has found a common voice that contrasts with the deep divisions over George W. Bush’s war in Iraq two decades ago [March 19th]. The difference is indeed striking. Today, Paris and Berlin are avoiding a head-on confrontation with Washington, as happened with the no to Bush in 2003, but are distancing themselves from the intervention by the United States and Israel. London is not only declining to follow the US, as Tony Blair did, but is operating within the E3 framework and accelerating its retreat from Brexit. Spain has changed tack with respect to 2003, moving from Aznar’s Atlanticism to a European recalibration which is more critical towards Washington, while remaining within the framework of armed non-belligerence. Although an idol of European social-imperialists, Sánchez’s Spain is fully participating in continental rearmament, and the Cristóbal Colón is there to remind us of it.

Finally, despite the war in Ukraine and the Russian threat, no New Europe seems to be emerging in the East or the Baltics to stand behind Trump, although – as the Financial Times observes – it is here that new cracks may open if the conflict should continue. The question, for the City’s newspaper, is how long the unity will last: whether Europe is effectively on the way to strategic autonomy, or whether divisions will begin to emerge. Dependence on American security is shaping up as a race against time. Although European countries are dramatically increasing their defence spending, notes the Financial Times, even the most optimistic assessments reckon it will take at least a decade to get anywhere near a position of self-sufficiency.

Italy with the E3

As for Rome, the Meloni government has moved with extreme caution, emphasising its distance from Trump’s interventionism. Whereas in 2003 the then Prime Minister Berlusconi wavered between Washington and Brussels – ultimately being brought back into line with the European position by the intervention of the Quirinale and the Euro-Vatican party – today Giorgia Meloni has sought and even flaunted coordination with the continent’s major capitals, finding allies in the Quirinale and the Euro-Vatican party. In her first speech, on March 5th, Meloni emphasised her stance that we are not at war, we do not want to go to war, a message she repeated on several occasions.

Equally significant was the openness, however cautious and understated, to Paris’s forward deterrence, described as an important contribution to the debate on security in Europe. The following day, Meloni initiated a consultation with the E3, extended to Rome. This E4 agreed on the need to coordinate closely on the situation in the Strait of Hormuz. The storms of Trumpian activism, writes Flavia Perina, are pushing Rome towards Brussels [La Stampa, March 6th]. Euro-soluble sovereignty is confirmed as one of the forms of imperialist Europeanism. It remains to be seen to what extent the Meloni formula will emerge weakened by the defeat in the referendum.

The wars of European rearmament

Ultimately, what has gradually emerged from this complex, multifaceted, and, for Europe, defensive game is what former ambassador Giampiero Massolo has called the Europe of the possible: a Europe sometimes caught off guard by an interventionist America, yet committed to demonstrating pragmatism [Corriere, March 4th].

Let us add two observations. The first is that in differentiating itself from the Trump line, the profile of a balancing Power-Europe is taking shape, able to turn to Asia and the Gulf, where alarm bells are ringing over the economic consequences of a crisis that appears dominated by American strategic confusion. The second is that over the last four years, European imperialism has armed Ukraine in order to arm itself. In the Gulf, a new war of European rearmament has begun.

Translated from the original work by , published in Lotta Comunista, , p. 3.

Labels:

Popular posts in the last week

The EU Commission Plans for Rearmament and a Clean Industrial Deal

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series European news Following the European elections which took place on June 6th - 9th, the leaders of the Member States met on June 27th at the European Council. Ursula von der Leyen was nominated as president of the next European Commission, after she was chosen as the European People’s Party’s (EPP) Spitzenkandidat (“leading candidate”). The agreement also included the election of former Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio Costa as president of the European Council, and the appointment of former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas as High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Subsequently, on July 18th, Parliament elected von der Leyen as president of the Commission by an absolute majority, with 401 votes out of 719 MEPs. On September 17th, von der Leyen presented her team of commissioners to the European Parliament and, two days later, the Council adopted this list of...
Read more

Libertarian Communism: A Different Kind of Communism

Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM   An examination of the debate within the groups that were to create GAAP (Anarchist Groups of Proletarian Action) gives a vivid picture of the problems that between 1948 and 1951 had to be slowly and painfully faced. Three major confrontations, progressively more serious, took place between Cervetto and Masini in the autumn of 1949 and again in the spring and autumn of 1950. As preparations were being made for the National Conference at Pontedecimo – from which GAAP would be born – debate on the nature of the organisation and on theories of the State and imperialism began to define the characteristics of the new political group, but also revealed the differences. The first step had been to look for ‘a different kind’ of communism in anarchism. Along this road Cervetto , with an ever-surer grasp, would raise the issue that had been first posed by Marx and Lenin : our militant...
Read more

Lotta Comunista: The Origins 1943-1952

Guido La Barbera Contents 9. Preface to the English Edition 13. Preface 19. Useful dates 21. Chapter One «ONE OUGHT TO KNOW WITH WHOM ONE IS DEALING» 25. The balance-of-power theory 27. Theory and the ‘strategy-party’ 29. Chapter Two THE FOUNDRY AND THE PARTISAN STRUGGLE 31. The Savona group 39. Passion disciplined by reason 40. Never again a tool in the hands of others 41. The Genoa group 46. The Sestri Ponente group 48. The groups in Rome and Tuscany 52. The strength of GAAP: ‘only a handful’ 55. Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM 58. Reckoning with Bordiga...
Read more

Socialism and Nationalism in the History of France

The collapse of French socialism at the outbreak of the First World War is considered by many historians to be the most significant case of its kind. We must go back in time to find its origins. The dramatic repression of the Paris Commune in 1871 was followed by a decade of shootings and the deportation of tens of thousands of revolutionary militants. Reactionary monarchical legitimism attributed the decline of France to the Revolution of 1789, but by then the nouvelles couches sociales , the new classes produced by capitalism, as Leon Gambetta defined them, demanded a politics free from economic, social and clerical ties. The Radical Party, a turning point of French politics, was its expression. The same taditional Catholic Judeophobia dating back to the Middle Ages — according to Michel Dreyfus’, research director at the CNRS in Paris, Anti-Semitism on the Left in France [Paris, 2009] — gradually transformed into the image of the Jews associated with money and modernity who des...
Read more

The Spider Web of OpenAI Agreements

Internationalism No. 83, January 2026 Page 14 From the series The telecommunications battle There are two interwoven and contrasting trends in the American economy. On the one hand, we are witnessing steady growth in the value of securities linked to the furious race towards artificial intelligence (AI), which could lead to a financial bubble; on the other, an increase in GDP, precisely due to the huge investments in this field, is taking place. In the first week of November, a downward correction saw many technological securities devalue by $1.2 trillion on the stock exchange. Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, the biggest American bank, predicts that there is a one-in-three probability of a collapse, albeit not imminently. As I see it — he states — artificial intelligence is real and, all in all, it will pay off [...] just as happened in the past in the case of automobiles and television sets . Products which, however, have also seen many...
Read more

The Theoretical and Political Battles of Arrigo Cervetto: V

Internationalism No. 81, November 2025 Pages 8 and 9 From the introduction to Arrigo Cervetto’s Opere Scelte ("Selected Works") , recently published in Italy by Edizioni Lotta Comunista. V The Leninist tactic in the educational crisis and the union tactic on the prospects of trade unionism had already produced results in Genoa that alarmed the Italian Communist Party (PCI). With the restructuring crisis , when opportunism began to side with austerity policies and the Leninists with the defence of wages, however, the reaction of opportunism became furious, following the Stalinist script of slander and intimidation. In those years, I worked to ensure that what was a tradition for my generation would become a common heritage for the new generation. We needed to select, discipline, and amalgamate. We needed to assert ourselves to do so. In 1974, the spontaneous movement of students and workers, unable to find a tra...
Read more

The Myth of Cooperation

From the series Vaccines and world contention There are by now ten authorised vaccines already in use against SARSCoV-2, and there are 77 countries in which vaccinations are taking place. By mid-February, 173 million doses had been administered and the campaign is proceeding at an average rate of six million a day, calculated on the basis of last week’s figures. At this pace, it would take 5 years to vaccinate 75% of the world population with two doses [ Bloomberg , February 15 th ]. More than half of the injections have been carried out in the United States, the UK, and the European Union which, together, account for 11% of the world population. In at least one third of the 77 surveyed countries, less than 1% of the population have received their first dose of the vaccine, and, in the rest of the world, vaccines have not yet arrived. Imperialist globalisation Individual states are pursuing autonomous solutions to a global problem. Epidemiologists believe that, while a vast propo...
Read more

Show Warfare?

Internationalism No. 86, April 2026 Page 16 After show politics and show diplomacy , have we sunk to the obscenity of show warfare ? On the surface, this is true. The Pentagon’s video game-style communications, where airstrikes, missile launches, and deadly explosions are set to music for social media clips, certainly suggest so. It matters little that a hundred schoolgirls were also blown to bits as artificial intelligence took centre stage on the battlefield. In reality, war propaganda has always showcased destruction and mocked the enemy; today in Washington, in the era of the high-tech groups of television and social media democracy , the only thing that has changed is the style and the means used to inflame fanaticisms and stuff people’s brains. In Tehran, dominated by a parasitic bourgeoisie that feeds on oil revenues and is intertwined with the militias and hierarchies of t...
Read more

Democratic Defeat in the Urban Vote

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series Elections in the USA A careful analysis of the 2022 mid-term elections revealed the symptoms of a Democratic Party malaise which subsequently fully manifested itself in the latest presidential election, with the heavy loss of support in its traditional strongholds of the metropolitan areas of New York City and Chicago, and the State of California. A defeat foretold Republican votes rose from 51 million in the previous 2018 midterms to 54 million in 2022, a gain of 3 million. The Democrat vote fell from 61 to 51 million, a loss of 10 million. The Republicans gained only three votes for every ten lost by the Democrats, while the other seven became abstentions. In 2022, we analysed the elections in New York City by borough, the governmental districts whose names are well known through movies and TV series. In The Bronx, where the average yearly household income is $35,000, the Democrats lost 52,0...
Read more

The National Gamble of Poland

Internationalism No. 33, November 2021 Page 3 From the series European News In a lawsuit brought by Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki, the Constitutional Tribunal, which is composed of judges chosen by the government, ruled that fundamental parts of the EU Treaty are incompatible with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. This ruling thus denies the primacy of European law over national law, undermining both the political assumption of continental integration and the supranational character of the EU . Vectors of Polish history We can shed light on this event if we consider the four field vectors that cross Poland: its traditional ethnic-religious nationalism, its marked Atlantic tropism, the objective attraction exerted by the European force field, and the looming threat of Russia. The general picture is global collisions: China’s irruption and the crisis in the world order have put pressure on Warsaw to define its st...
Read more