Skip to main content

NEED FOR COALITION AMONG TECH WORKERS

In the book You Deserve a Tech Union, Ethan Marcotte addresses workers in the tech sector, urging them to form unions and offering examples and suggestions for building a coalition.

The development of recent digital technologies is compared to the rise of the sewing machine. When first introduced in the 1800s, this new technology was presented as a tool that would end poverty. Jumping ahead to a 1910 manual by the leading sewing machine company, Singer, any vision of a machine that “frees its users” was gone; the focus was solely on the pragmatic description of an efficient tool that increased labor productivity. In Marcotte’s book, the introduction of modern technologies—like the internet—is discussed in a similar way. Initially presented as a tool to connect humanity and reduce poverty and conflict, it has taken a very different turn.

The book’s central thesis is that we are seeing a shift in the tech labor market, particularly after the massive layoffs by Big Tech companies (see chart). Until a few years ago, tech workers mainly sought to improve their conditions by switching from one company to another. Now, there's a growing awareness of the need to act collectively by forming unions. In the U.S., companies that once resisted even the idea of unionization—like Kickstarter, software houses such as Glitch, and independent tech media like NPR, The Atlantic, and The New York Times—are seeing union movements. Even non-profit organizations such as Code for America, Change.org, and NAVA, as well as giants like Alphabet and Apple, are part of this shift.

The key issues these employees have raised—despite often being paid above average—include growing workloads, pay disparities for similar roles, fears of layoffs and restructuring, discrimination, and a lack of growth opportunities.

Marcotte’s definition of tech worker includes not only content moderators and software developers, but also call center workers in low-wage countries like India, Kenya, and Morocco. Rather than artificial intelligence algorithms, companies like Meta challenge workers through disunity, disrupting collective opposition and organizing efforts—including on platforms like TikTok. In addition to inequality, layoffs, and limited internal mobility, many tech workers have also reported racial and gender discrimination and sexual harassment.

Looking at the U.S. situation—where only 10% of private sector workers are unionized—Marcotte encourages workers to organize, including remote workers, to look at what can be done and how to overcome negative aspects.

His response is clear: no single employee can have certainty, only hope that things don’t get worse. Individually, there is no power to enact structural changes in working conditions. That’s why unions are the only path to real bargaining power, through three tools: collective contracts, the right to strike, and negotiations. A well-organized strike is crucial. A union's power also lies in forcing companies to transparently differentiate roles and pay, and manage layoffs fairly.

If power is divided between capital and labor, only an organization that represents workers will always have a voice. Executives are often well-compensated and in direct contact with ownership. That’s why building a union with contractual power to protect salaries is so important. Hence the answer is coalition: in the U.S., in Europe, in Kenya—everywhere in the world.


This is a translation of Necessità di Coalizione tra i Tech Workers from Bollettino del Coordinamento Ingegneri Tecnici, March 2024.

Popular posts from this blog

Leapfrogging: The Chinese Auto Industry’s Leap Forward

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 15 From the series The world car battle It is predicted that next year in China the sales of electrified vehicles (mainly battery-powered or hybrid) will for the first time overtake those of cars with an internal combustion engine. This development will mark a historic about turn which will put the world's biggest auto market years ahead of its Western rivals [Financial Times, December 26th]. Meanwhile, the growth in sales of electric vehicles in Europe and the United States has slowed. BYD's leap forward Another important development in 2024 was the record sales of Chinese brands in China: they rose from 38% of the total in 2020 to 56%, a sign of the maturation of the national auto industry which is now able to challenge the Japanese, American, and European manufacturers. BYD's leap forward is impressive, comparable to that of Ford Motors after the First World War, when with the Model T, introduc...

Cryptocurrencies, Tariffs, Oil and Spending in Trump’s Executive Orders

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 8 Douglas Irwin, economist and historian of American trade policy, writes for the Peterson Institute that the tariffs announced by Donald Trump, if implemented, would constitute a “historic event in the annals of US trade policy” and “one of the largest increases in trade taxes in US history. One has to go back almost a century to find tariff increases comparable”. Irwin limits himself to providing us with a historical dimension to the planned duties. But the bewilderment and turmoil created, especially among Washington’s allies, derives from the fact that the tariffs being brandished are accompanied by a hail of presidential decrees and declarations that mark a profound political discontinuity, both in the balance of internal institutional powers and in the balance of power between nations. The watershed was expected, but the speed and vehemence of the White House’s assaults are setting the scene for a change of era i...

The Works of Marx and Engels and the Bolshevik Model

Internationalism Pages 12–13 In the autumn of 1895 Lenin commented on the death of Friedrich Engels: "After his friend Karl Marx (who died in 1883), Engels was the finest scholar and teacher of the modern proletariat in the whole civilised world. […] In their scientific works, Marx and Engels were the first to explain that socialism is not the invention of dreamers, but the final aim and necessary result of the development of the productive forces in modern society. All recorded history hitherto has been a history of class struggle, of the succession of the rule and victory of certain social classes over others. And this will continue until the foundations of class struggle and of class domination – private property and anarchic social production – disappear. The interests of the proletariat demand the destruction of these foundations, and therefore the conscious class struggle of the organised workers must be directed against them. And every class strugg...

The Party and the Unprecedented crisis in the World Order: A Crucial Decade

This first quarter-century has seen an epochal turning point in inter-power relations, triggered by China's very rapid imperialist development. Arrigo Cervetto recognised this process from the very early 1990s: Today history has sped up its pace to an unpredictable extent. [...] Analysis of the sixteenth century, as the century of accelerations and rift in world history, is a model for our Marxist vision ( La mezza guerra nel Golfo [The Half War in the Persian Gulf], January 1991). The course of imperialism was speeding up, and China's very rapid rise was opening up a new strategic phase with the new century. The United States, the leading power in the world, is being challenged by an antagonist with comparable economic strength which, moreover, openly states that it wants to provide itself with a "world class" military force within the next decade. Favoured by the 2008 global crisis and also by the pandemic crisis, China has forged ahead with its rapid rise for ...

Science Against Time

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 14 From the series Industry and pharmaceuticals The surge in China’s biopharmaceutical industry over the last decade is part of its broader scientific and technological ascent and therefore deserves our attention. Such growth presents a challenge to other imperialist powers. The Biosecure Act’s intention, to reduce the ties between American and Chinese biotech firms, has been branded by The Economist as “old-fashioned protectionism”. The British weekly recognises, however, that the clash goes well beyond a trade war. The stakes are higher. In a lengthy cover story [“The rise of Chinese science”], it writes that “China is now a leading scientific power”. Just five years ago, this was still considered only a possibility. The current question is whether this is “welcome or worrying” [June 15th, 2024]. Unity and scission The viewpoint of that publication, an authoritative voice of one of the power-houses of imperia...