Skip to main content

The Party and the Unprecedented crisis in the World Order: A Crucial Decade

This first quarter-century has seen an epochal turning point in inter-power relations, triggered by China's very rapid imperialist development. Arrigo Cervetto recognised this process from the very early 1990s: Today history has sped up its pace to an unpredictable extent. [...] Analysis of the sixteenth century, as the century of accelerations and rift in world history, is a model for our Marxist vision (La mezza guerra nel Golfo [The Half War in the Persian Gulf], January 1991). The course of imperialism was speeding up, and China's very rapid rise was opening up a new strategic phase with the new century. The United States, the leading power in the world, is being challenged by an antagonist with comparable economic strength which, moreover, openly states that it wants to provide itself with a "world class" military force within the next decade.

Favoured by the 2008 global crisis and also by the pandemic crisis, China has forged ahead with its rapid rise for more than twenty years. Chinese imperialism has put a strain on the previous balances of power and has launched the second half of the new strategic phase characterised by the crisis in the world order. And not only this: Beijing's military development plans have triggered a huge rearmament race in the world, with massive investments on the part of the states.

Wars of the crisis in the world order

Faced with the full manifestation of the crisis in the world order, we have formulated two possible developments in these pages: either a series of concatenated regional conflicts, or the explosion of a major war between great powers. We do not believe that the moment for the breakdown of the world order has arrived yet; we therefore believe that a war between great powers is very unlikely today, although it cannot be ruled out. Meanwhile, the local wars stemming from the crisis in the world order are now underway.

In Ukraine, the war of imperialist division between Russian imperialism and the Western powers, with Europe in the front line, continues to reap victims among the Ukrainian and Russian youth, despite the fact that the hypotheses of negotiations for a truce are becoming more insistent. In Gaza, the war threatens to escalate to a regional level, while the massacre of civilians carried out by the Israeli army in response to the terrorist attack of the Hamas Islamist forces is odious. We're now talking about 40,000 victims, most of them women, children and senior citizens. If this shameful massacre will leave an indelible mark on the Israeli bourgeoisie, which is also responsible for having favoured Hamas's Islamist entrenchment in Gaza, the war also reveals the failure of every national solution.

We deal with our internationalist battle over the Gaza War on another page of our newspaper. Here, we limit ourselves to reiterating our firm conviction that a solution to the crisis in the Middle East and to the Palestinian question is now possible only with the unity of the Israeli, Arab and Palestinian proletariats and of the tens of thousands of immigrant workers there. The alternative of national ways and of nationalisms, polluted by religious fanaticism on both sides, has only led to enormous destruction and to an immense number of lives cut short, above all among the Palestinians. The only way out is to be found in the class unity of the area's vast proletariat and in a militant internationalism against the Israeli bourgeoisie and against those of Iran and of the various Arab countries, with which the Palestinian bourgeoisie is closely linked.

A path for internationalism

Our young people have refused to take part in a campaign to boycott research activities with Israeli universities, their researchers and their students - a campaign encouraged more by the media and the most important newspapers than by real student participation. First of all, we don't understand why relations with the Israeli world of research should be boycotted while, on the contrary, work is continuing on much more numerous and profitable contracts with the universities of European and American imperialism, which bear a huge responsibility for the disasters in the Middle East. Moreover, we should like to have many Israeli students in our universities; we should like to speak with them and to involve them in our solidarity volunteering in support of the Palestinian families who have been victims of the bombings in Gaza. We should like the more aware among them to be convinced that the only way is internationalism, the struggle against their bourgeoisie in their own country carried on with our full support and the solidarity of the European proletariat.

Last year, a study was published by two Chinese researchers, Kaixuan Liu and Wenrui Bi, "Learning Marxism in Paris: Chinese Communist Students in France (1919-25)" [in Marx: A French Passion, eds Ducange and Burlaud (Brill, 2023)]. In the early 1920s, China sent to Paris and Europe about 2,000 students with a "study and work" programme, a kind of forerunner of today's Erasmus Programme. The authors maintain that about 100 of those 2,000 students studied and embraced Marxism.

There is no doubt that the Stalinist counterrevolution and the social-nationalist populism of Mao subsequently appropriated that result of our school, to such an extent that from those 100 students there emerged the leaders of China's state capitalist party, among them Zhou Enlai and Deng Xiaoping. But this is another story. Our reflection is another: if, at that time, adherence to Marxism was possible, why shouldn't it be possible today, with Israeli students or those of any other nationality? This is an already ongoing phenomenon in the major European universities, from Rome to Paris, and from Milan to London or Berlin. And why should we not work hard to make sure that those young people can take Marxism and internationalism back to their countries? This is an aspect to bear in mind in our effort to entrench our party in Europe.

An unprecedented test

In July, on the occasion of the Third Plenum of the CCP, the state-party of Chinese imperialism, Xi Jinping wrote: Great changes never seen in a century are accelerating all over the world; regional wars and disorders continue to emerge; global issues are becoming more acute and external attempts to contain China are intensifying. China has entered a period in which opportunities, risks and strategic challenges coexist and uncertainties and unpredictable factors are increasing. The challenging rising power fixes the characteristics of the next decade marked by the crisis in the world order and its wars. We are called to an unprecedented test, to a new development cycle of our party. We will have to do this starting from a renewed connection with the younger generations, one that is wider and more incisive in the field of militancy and life choices. The times require this.

We need to return to the reflection made after the 1970s of the restructuring crisis, amidst general confusion, the retrenchment of the workers' struggles, and even the moral degradation of imperialist maturity. At the end of 1986, Cervetto urged the need for a connection with young people, stressing how they could be attracted by Lotta Comunista as the party of scientific order, of a clarity which has no myths. Young people could be attracted by a scientific newspaper, which is certainly not easy to read but is a scientific paper that does not shut itself up in an ivory tower, to be read only by a chosen few, but which is distributed among the masses. Science translated into militancy, to become struggle.

40 years ago, these were the work hypotheses and directions; in the decades since then, they have become a very concrete political phenomenon. Year after year, new generations of young people have come to our party and strengthened it, and we have met those students again in the factories and among the vast wage-earning stratifications. We need to start again from there in order to face the next very stormy years, and we need to do this by bearing in mind how much has changed with the new strategic phase.

Young people and war

Two basic features will mark the next years - we may well say brand them with a red-hot iron. The first is undoubtedly the crisis in the world order and its wars, with the huge rearmament underway: these are phenomena that cannot but touch the feelings of young people and particularly of students, as Lenin was to stress in the tensions of the early 20th century. No one today can any longer say that a war between great powers is impossible because there are nuclear weapons and therefore the risk of mutual destruction. Today a war between great powers is considered among the possibilities, and attention to the nuclear deterrent and its possible use is universal. Sometimes, the adjective tactical is added to nuclear deterrence: it is just worth remembering that the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were of that type.

Therefore, on the agenda there is an intransigent internationalist battle among the new generations against unitary imperialism, against our own bourgeoisies, and against all nationalisms, homelands and borders, with a ceaseless denunciation of the frantic rearmament cycle in which the youth is involved. In fact, it is young people who will be the future soldiers, the future conscripts, as has been the case with their Ukrainian and Russian peers. Not for nothing is a revision of military conscription being debated in order to pave the way for a future mass conscription.

Demographic abyss

The second basic feature of the next decade is to be found in the demographic winter, and here our multi-decade analysis is precisely the confirmation of a "science which becomes struggle". The reader will find material on the general decline in fertility on another page. Last year, we provided documentary evidence of how China has passed to a negative demographic balance and of how its population has inexorably begun to diminish. We also dealt in these pages with the European situation, with a negative balance since 2015, leading to an annual loss in population of about one million. In Italy, the temperatures of the demographic winter are freezing: 1.8 million residents have been lost in eight years. And this in spite of the incoming migration flows, which, nevertheless, no longer make up for the decreased birthrate.

Capitalism, having reached full imperialist maturity, is no longer able to guarantee the development of the human species.

But there is another implication, more in the short-to-medium term. If we consider the population between 30 and 59 years of age in four key countries of Europe France, Germany, Italy and Spain - we are now about 105 million individuals. In ten years, without the contribution of immigrants, this would drop to 94 million, i.e., 11 million less. Who will replace them? The loss in Italy would be about 4 million, 3 million in Spain, 6 million in Japan, and 70 million in China. All the states will desperately need immigrants, millions of immigrants. The ruling classes will have to increase the incoming flows and will inevitably have to reckon with the fears of wide segments of the petty bourgeoisie and intermediate strata, grown old and rich in property assets. This is their traditional mass power base: social strata fearful of seeing their social status questioned, afraid of the winds of war, and alarmed by migration flows.

The room for fear-mongers will inevitably grow, and here the signals which come from the xenophobic riots in England are significative. At that point, our struggle against racism and xenophobia will become essential, and our ties with immigrant workers which our workers' clubs are forging in working class districts and workplaces will become crucial. Our solidarity volunteering will be precious: it will become our immediate political struggle against racism and will be a stronghold against xenophobia and in favour of solidarity and inclusion. This is a commitment to which to call not only young people, but all the comrades and volunteers of our clubs.

A historic necessity

The world order crisis and its wars highlight the extent to which this mode of production is historically a thing of the past. Capitalism can survive only at the cost of the periodical destruction of immense productive forces. On the other hand, the demographic crisis actually demonstrates that capitalism is no longer even able to guarantee the continuity of the species. What is needed is a superior society, in an organic relationship between the human race and nature.

The struggle for a social revolution, the struggle for communism, is more than ever a historic necessity. It is our battle for a decade which will be crucial.

Lotta Comunista, July-August 2024

Popular posts from this blog

Cryptocurrencies, Tariffs, Oil and Spending in Trump’s Executive Orders

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 8 Douglas Irwin, economist and historian of American trade policy, writes for the Peterson Institute that the tariffs announced by Donald Trump, if implemented, would constitute a “historic event in the annals of US trade policy” and “one of the largest increases in trade taxes in US history. One has to go back almost a century to find tariff increases comparable”. Irwin limits himself to providing us with a historical dimension to the planned duties. But the bewilderment and turmoil created, especially among Washington’s allies, derives from the fact that the tariffs being brandished are accompanied by a hail of presidential decrees and declarations that mark a profound political discontinuity, both in the balance of internal institutional powers and in the balance of power between nations. The watershed was expected, but the speed and vehemence of the White House’s assaults are setting the scene for a change of era i...

The Works of Marx and Engels and the Bolshevik Model

Internationalism Pages 12–13 In the autumn of 1895 Lenin commented on the death of Friedrich Engels: "After his friend Karl Marx (who died in 1883), Engels was the finest scholar and teacher of the modern proletariat in the whole civilised world. […] In their scientific works, Marx and Engels were the first to explain that socialism is not the invention of dreamers, but the final aim and necessary result of the development of the productive forces in modern society. All recorded history hitherto has been a history of class struggle, of the succession of the rule and victory of certain social classes over others. And this will continue until the foundations of class struggle and of class domination – private property and anarchic social production – disappear. The interests of the proletariat demand the destruction of these foundations, and therefore the conscious class struggle of the organised workers must be directed against them. And every class strugg...

The Unstoppable Force: Capital’s Demand for Migrant Labour

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 16 “Before Giorgia Meloni became Italy’s prime minister, she pledged to cut immigration. Since she has been in government the number of non-EU work visas issued by Italy has increased”. This is how The Economist of April 26th summarises the schizophrenia of their politics; and this is not only true in Italy: “Net migration also surged in post-Brexit Britain”. The needs of the economic system do not coincide with the rhetoric of parliamentarism. And vice versa. Schizophrenia and imbalances in their politics Returning to Italy, the Bank of Italy has pointed out that by 2040, in just fifteen years, there will be a shortage of five million people of working age, which could lead to an estimated 11% contraction in GDP. This is why even Italy’s “sovereignist” government is preparing to widen the net of its Immigration Flow Decree. The latest update, approved on June 30th, provides for the entry of almost ...

Tokyo’s Balancing Act over Rearmament for a Stormy Fifteen Years

Internationalism No. 33, November 2021 Page 4 The taifu shizun , Japan’s typhoon season, last from May to October and is especially intense between August and September. Straits Times , a prestigious Singaporean newspaper, recently used the metaphor, invoking the rumbling of thunder and lightning bolts in relation to the announcement of the AUKUS deal (Washington’s strategic relaunch in the Indo-Pacific), and the immediate Chinese economic response, with China applying to join the CPTPP , the equivalent trading bloc to the RCEP in the Pacific. A hot autumn in the Indo-Pacific Other events have contributed to upsetting the Asian waters: the American withdrawal from Kabul, which has raised doubts about American credibility among its allies and Asian partners; a succession of North Korean ballistic tests, with the novelty of a Pyongyang cruise missile being deployed; the test conducted by Seoul of a ballistic missile aboard a conve...

Political Battles of European Leninism

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 1 Thirty years after the death of Arrigo Cervetto , we are publishing here the concluding passages of the introduction to his Opere Scelte (“Selected Works”) for the series Biblioteca Giovani (“Publications for young people”), soon to be published in Italian. The 1944-45 partisan war in Italy. The political battle within libertarian communism. The Korean War, and the watchword of “neither Washington nor Moscow”. The layoffs at the Ilva and Ansaldo factories, the political battle and trade union defence in the struggles of post-war restructuring. From 1953 onwards, the crisis of Stalinism, the 1956 Suez crisis, the Hungarian uprising, the 1957 Theses and the challenge of theory and strategy vis-à-vis the tendencies of unitary imperialism. The political struggle within Azione Comunista (“Communist Action”) and the Movimento della Sinistra Comunista (“Movement of the Communist Left”). From the 1950s to the early 1970s, t...

The Theoretical and Political Battles of Arrigo Cervetto I

From the introduction to Arrigo Cervetto’s Opere Scelte (“Selected Works”), soon to be published in Italy by Edizioni Lotta Comunista. I Arrigo Cervetto was the founder, theorist, and leader of Lotta Comunista. From his first involvement in the partisan war in 1943-44 until his death in February 1995, his more than 50 years of political activity can be summarised in around twenty key battles. It goes without saying that those struggles - aimed at the restoration and develop ment of Marxist theory on economics, politics, social change, and international relations - are the common thread running through this selection of his writings. His memoirs, Quaderni 198I82 (“Notebooks 1981-82”), provide an account of those battles up to 1980. First battle: the factory and the partisan war The son of emigrants to Argentina from Savona in Italy, Cervetto was born in Buenos Aires in April 1927, a circumstance that would later influence his thinking about international politics. His early for...

The Drone War

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 13 From the series War industry and European defence The Economist provides an illustration of how the use of unmanned and remotely piloted systems in warfare is expanding. In Africa, 30 governments are equipped with UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles), or drones. In 2024, they were deployed 484 times in local wars in thirteen different countries, twice as frequently as the previous year, causing 1,200 deaths. The most widely used drone on the continent is the TB2, produced by the Turkish company Baykar, which has seen a decade of extensive use in conflicts across Syria, Azerbaijan-Armenia, and Ukraine. LBA Systems and MALE drones At the Paris Air Show in mid-June, an agreement was signed to establish LBA Systems, a joint venture between Baykar and Leonardo. The aim is to produce the Akinci and TB3 drones, the latter of which will be capable of taking off from helicopter carrier decks. The aircraft wil...

Reckless Bets on Migrants in California

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 11 From the series Chronicles of the new American nationalism The tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump on allies, partners and opponents of the United States have opened a phase of negotiations with the affected countries and caused reactions from some key States. The legal opposition from almost all areas of the US poses a test: whether States, courts, and Congress can influence trade policy and constrain the expansion of executive powers. Amid conflicting rulings, the tariffs have been reinstated – an outcome that, The New York Times remarks, has “left Washington, Wall Street, and much of the world trying to discern the future of US trade policy”. California’s dispute with the federal government has expanded to immigration policy and the domestic use of military force. The political, economic, and power struggles overlap with the electoral dimension. The establishment remains critical of or ...

Price War in the US and EU

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 7 From the series Industry and pharmaceuticals The contention in the biopharmaceutical field between the two sides of the Atlantic addresses the issue of costs, in two different ways. In a letter to the Financial Times published on April 23rd, Vas Narasimhan and Paul Hudson, the CEOs of Swiss company Novartis and French company Sanofi respectively, presented a harsh diagnosis of the state of European biopharmaceuticals compared to their major competitors, the United States and China. Narasimhan, an American son of immigrants from Tamil Nadu, and Hudson, a Briton, head two of the world's ten largest pharmaceutical multinationals. The two executives see "a strong outlook for the US – thanks to policies and regulations conducive to fast and broad patient access to innovative medicines". In contrast, Europe, "while home to some of the most important biopharma companies in the world"...

German Socialism in 1917

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 6 From the series Pages from the history of the worker’s movement  According to Arrigo Cervetto [ Opere , Vol. 7], “paracentrism” is “the biggest obstacle to the formation of the worldwide Bolshevik party”. The Spartacists at Zimmerwald and Kiental Cervetto was analysing Lenin’s battle against centrism for the creation of the Third International, a battle which saw him isolated at Zimmerwald. He wrote down one of Zinoviev’s quotations from Histoire du parti communiste russe . “We were in the minority at Zimmerwald [1915]. […] In the years 1915 and 1916, we were nothing but an insignificant minority”. “But what is more serious?” – observed Cervetto – “is that the Zimmerwald Spartacists also said they were opposed to us”. In the strategic perspective of the “two separate halves” of socialism – the political conditions in Russia and the economic, productive, and social conditions in Germany – “for ...