Skip to main content

The Party and the Unprecedented crisis in the World Order: A Crucial Decade

This first quarter-century has seen an epochal turning point in inter-power relations, triggered by China's very rapid imperialist development. Arrigo Cervetto recognised this process from the very early 1990s: Today history has sped up its pace to an unpredictable extent. [...] Analysis of the sixteenth century, as the century of accelerations and rift in world history, is a model for our Marxist vision (La mezza guerra nel Golfo [The Half War in the Persian Gulf], January 1991). The course of imperialism was speeding up, and China's very rapid rise was opening up a new strategic phase with the new century. The United States, the leading power in the world, is being challenged by an antagonist with comparable economic strength which, moreover, openly states that it wants to provide itself with a "world class" military force within the next decade.

Favoured by the 2008 global crisis and also by the pandemic crisis, China has forged ahead with its rapid rise for more than twenty years. Chinese imperialism has put a strain on the previous balances of power and has launched the second half of the new strategic phase characterised by the crisis in the world order. And not only this: Beijing's military development plans have triggered a huge rearmament race in the world, with massive investments on the part of the states.

Wars of the crisis in the world order

Faced with the full manifestation of the crisis in the world order, we have formulated two possible developments in these pages: either a series of concatenated regional conflicts, or the explosion of a major war between great powers. We do not believe that the moment for the breakdown of the world order has arrived yet; we therefore believe that a war between great powers is very unlikely today, although it cannot be ruled out. Meanwhile, the local wars stemming from the crisis in the world order are now underway.

In Ukraine, the war of imperialist division between Russian imperialism and the Western powers, with Europe in the front line, continues to reap victims among the Ukrainian and Russian youth, despite the fact that the hypotheses of negotiations for a truce are becoming more insistent. In Gaza, the war threatens to escalate to a regional level, while the massacre of civilians carried out by the Israeli army in response to the terrorist attack of the Hamas Islamist forces is odious. We're now talking about 40,000 victims, most of them women, children and senior citizens. If this shameful massacre will leave an indelible mark on the Israeli bourgeoisie, which is also responsible for having favoured Hamas's Islamist entrenchment in Gaza, the war also reveals the failure of every national solution.

We deal with our internationalist battle over the Gaza War on another page of our newspaper. Here, we limit ourselves to reiterating our firm conviction that a solution to the crisis in the Middle East and to the Palestinian question is now possible only with the unity of the Israeli, Arab and Palestinian proletariats and of the tens of thousands of immigrant workers there. The alternative of national ways and of nationalisms, polluted by religious fanaticism on both sides, has only led to enormous destruction and to an immense number of lives cut short, above all among the Palestinians. The only way out is to be found in the class unity of the area's vast proletariat and in a militant internationalism against the Israeli bourgeoisie and against those of Iran and of the various Arab countries, with which the Palestinian bourgeoisie is closely linked.

A path for internationalism

Our young people have refused to take part in a campaign to boycott research activities with Israeli universities, their researchers and their students - a campaign encouraged more by the media and the most important newspapers than by real student participation. First of all, we don't understand why relations with the Israeli world of research should be boycotted while, on the contrary, work is continuing on much more numerous and profitable contracts with the universities of European and American imperialism, which bear a huge responsibility for the disasters in the Middle East. Moreover, we should like to have many Israeli students in our universities; we should like to speak with them and to involve them in our solidarity volunteering in support of the Palestinian families who have been victims of the bombings in Gaza. We should like the more aware among them to be convinced that the only way is internationalism, the struggle against their bourgeoisie in their own country carried on with our full support and the solidarity of the European proletariat.

Last year, a study was published by two Chinese researchers, Kaixuan Liu and Wenrui Bi, "Learning Marxism in Paris: Chinese Communist Students in France (1919-25)" [in Marx: A French Passion, eds Ducange and Burlaud (Brill, 2023)]. In the early 1920s, China sent to Paris and Europe about 2,000 students with a "study and work" programme, a kind of forerunner of today's Erasmus Programme. The authors maintain that about 100 of those 2,000 students studied and embraced Marxism.

There is no doubt that the Stalinist counterrevolution and the social-nationalist populism of Mao subsequently appropriated that result of our school, to such an extent that from those 100 students there emerged the leaders of China's state capitalist party, among them Zhou Enlai and Deng Xiaoping. But this is another story. Our reflection is another: if, at that time, adherence to Marxism was possible, why shouldn't it be possible today, with Israeli students or those of any other nationality? This is an already ongoing phenomenon in the major European universities, from Rome to Paris, and from Milan to London or Berlin. And why should we not work hard to make sure that those young people can take Marxism and internationalism back to their countries? This is an aspect to bear in mind in our effort to entrench our party in Europe.

An unprecedented test

In July, on the occasion of the Third Plenum of the CCP, the state-party of Chinese imperialism, Xi Jinping wrote: Great changes never seen in a century are accelerating all over the world; regional wars and disorders continue to emerge; global issues are becoming more acute and external attempts to contain China are intensifying. China has entered a period in which opportunities, risks and strategic challenges coexist and uncertainties and unpredictable factors are increasing. The challenging rising power fixes the characteristics of the next decade marked by the crisis in the world order and its wars. We are called to an unprecedented test, to a new development cycle of our party. We will have to do this starting from a renewed connection with the younger generations, one that is wider and more incisive in the field of militancy and life choices. The times require this.

We need to return to the reflection made after the 1970s of the restructuring crisis, amidst general confusion, the retrenchment of the workers' struggles, and even the moral degradation of imperialist maturity. At the end of 1986, Cervetto urged the need for a connection with young people, stressing how they could be attracted by Lotta Comunista as the party of scientific order, of a clarity which has no myths. Young people could be attracted by a scientific newspaper, which is certainly not easy to read but is a scientific paper that does not shut itself up in an ivory tower, to be read only by a chosen few, but which is distributed among the masses. Science translated into militancy, to become struggle.

40 years ago, these were the work hypotheses and directions; in the decades since then, they have become a very concrete political phenomenon. Year after year, new generations of young people have come to our party and strengthened it, and we have met those students again in the factories and among the vast wage-earning stratifications. We need to start again from there in order to face the next very stormy years, and we need to do this by bearing in mind how much has changed with the new strategic phase.

Young people and war

Two basic features will mark the next years - we may well say brand them with a red-hot iron. The first is undoubtedly the crisis in the world order and its wars, with the huge rearmament underway: these are phenomena that cannot but touch the feelings of young people and particularly of students, as Lenin was to stress in the tensions of the early 20th century. No one today can any longer say that a war between great powers is impossible because there are nuclear weapons and therefore the risk of mutual destruction. Today a war between great powers is considered among the possibilities, and attention to the nuclear deterrent and its possible use is universal. Sometimes, the adjective tactical is added to nuclear deterrence: it is just worth remembering that the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were of that type.

Therefore, on the agenda there is an intransigent internationalist battle among the new generations against unitary imperialism, against our own bourgeoisies, and against all nationalisms, homelands and borders, with a ceaseless denunciation of the frantic rearmament cycle in which the youth is involved. In fact, it is young people who will be the future soldiers, the future conscripts, as has been the case with their Ukrainian and Russian peers. Not for nothing is a revision of military conscription being debated in order to pave the way for a future mass conscription.

Demographic abyss

The second basic feature of the next decade is to be found in the demographic winter, and here our multi-decade analysis is precisely the confirmation of a "science which becomes struggle". The reader will find material on the general decline in fertility on another page. Last year, we provided documentary evidence of how China has passed to a negative demographic balance and of how its population has inexorably begun to diminish. We also dealt in these pages with the European situation, with a negative balance since 2015, leading to an annual loss in population of about one million. In Italy, the temperatures of the demographic winter are freezing: 1.8 million residents have been lost in eight years. And this in spite of the incoming migration flows, which, nevertheless, no longer make up for the decreased birthrate.

Capitalism, having reached full imperialist maturity, is no longer able to guarantee the development of the human species.

But there is another implication, more in the short-to-medium term. If we consider the population between 30 and 59 years of age in four key countries of Europe France, Germany, Italy and Spain - we are now about 105 million individuals. In ten years, without the contribution of immigrants, this would drop to 94 million, i.e., 11 million less. Who will replace them? The loss in Italy would be about 4 million, 3 million in Spain, 6 million in Japan, and 70 million in China. All the states will desperately need immigrants, millions of immigrants. The ruling classes will have to increase the incoming flows and will inevitably have to reckon with the fears of wide segments of the petty bourgeoisie and intermediate strata, grown old and rich in property assets. This is their traditional mass power base: social strata fearful of seeing their social status questioned, afraid of the winds of war, and alarmed by migration flows.

The room for fear-mongers will inevitably grow, and here the signals which come from the xenophobic riots in England are significative. At that point, our struggle against racism and xenophobia will become essential, and our ties with immigrant workers which our workers' clubs are forging in working class districts and workplaces will become crucial. Our solidarity volunteering will be precious: it will become our immediate political struggle against racism and will be a stronghold against xenophobia and in favour of solidarity and inclusion. This is a commitment to which to call not only young people, but all the comrades and volunteers of our clubs.

A historic necessity

The world order crisis and its wars highlight the extent to which this mode of production is historically a thing of the past. Capitalism can survive only at the cost of the periodical destruction of immense productive forces. On the other hand, the demographic crisis actually demonstrates that capitalism is no longer even able to guarantee the continuity of the species. What is needed is a superior society, in an organic relationship between the human race and nature.

The struggle for a social revolution, the struggle for communism, is more than ever a historic necessity. It is our battle for a decade which will be crucial.

Lotta Comunista, July-August 2024

Popular posts in the last week

Opportunities for the Euro and Yuan

Internationalism No. 77, July 2025 Page 13 Estimates by international institutions for April to June confirm the slowdown in global output and trade. The World Bank forecasts a decline in GDP growth from 2.8% in 2024, to 2.3% in 2025, and a sharp fall in trade from 3.4% to 1.8%. The main cause of the new slowdown is the tariff war declared by Donald Trump, who has so far imposed a universal minimum tariff of 10%. The uncertainty arising from his peculiar art of the deal , consisting of lunges, postponements, relaunches, U-turns, and pauses, makes the policy of the world's leading power unpredictable. It is also paying the highest price, with US growth halving, from 2.8% to 1.4%. The Eurozone has been floating at a rate of less than 1% since 2023 and, according to the World Bank, will remain below this level in 2025 and 2026, while the OECD and the ECB predict a return to 1% in 2025. Chin...

Libertarian Communism: A Different Kind of Communism

Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM   An examination of the debate within the groups that were to create GAAP (Anarchist Groups of Proletarian Action) gives a vivid picture of the problems that between 1948 and 1951 had to be slowly and painfully faced. Three major confrontations, progressively more serious, took place between Cervetto and Masini in the autumn of 1949 and again in the spring and autumn of 1950. As preparations were being made for the National Conference at Pontedecimo – from which GAAP would be born – debate on the nature of the organisation and on theories of the State and imperialism began to define the characteristics of the new political group, but also revealed the differences. The first step had been to look for ‘a different kind’ of communism in anarchism. Along this road Cervetto , with an ever-surer grasp, would raise the issue that had been first posed by Marx and Lenin : our militant...

Lotta Comunista: The Origins 1943-1952

Guido La Barbera Contents 9. Preface to the English Edition 13. Preface 19. Useful dates 21. Chapter One «ONE OUGHT TO KNOW WITH WHOM ONE IS DEALING» 25. The balance-of-power theory 27. Theory and the ‘strategy-party’ 29. Chapter Two THE FOUNDRY AND THE PARTISAN STRUGGLE 31. The Savona group 39. Passion disciplined by reason 40. Never again a tool in the hands of others 41. The Genoa group 46. The Sestri Ponente group 48. The groups in Rome and Tuscany 52. The strength of GAAP: ‘only a handful’ 55. Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM 58. Reckoning with Bordiga...

Capitalist Chaos and Artificial Intelligence

Internationalism No. 88, June 2026 Page 1 From the series Artificial Intelligence It may seem curious that the Franciscan friar Paolo Benanti refers to neuroscience and the theories of David Eagleman, which reflect a materialistic conception of consciousness. The explanation probably lies in Eagleman’s self-definition as a possibilian , a not particularly clever neologism that seeks to distinguish itself from atheism, but also from agnosticism: we know too little, so science must keep multiple possibilities open at once. In Engels’ view, agnosticism is shamefaced materialism . The scientist, as such, is a materialist. However, outside his own field, he translates his ignorance into Greek and calls it agnosticism . Eagleman is even more circumspect, so it is understandable that religion sees an opening for itself in the possibilities left open. In Die Zeit , Benan...

The Unitary Imperialism Issue

Chapter Six   In 1951 Europe, and the world, was shrouded in mist. The ‘Cold War’ ideology ruled, and the war in Korea made a world conflict between the USA and the USSR seem a real possibility. In France, Great Britain, Germany and Italy, the talk was of rearmament. Europe, at that time urged by the USA, was planning the EDC (European Defence Community) to keep step with German rearmament. The concept of a ‘ unitary imperialism ’ was the strategic choice that helped the small GAAP group remain politically independent. But translating this into an ‘Internationalist Third Front’ slogan was unfortunate. It facilitated a link with French libertarian communists, but could also cause confusion with its suggestion of a ‘Third Force’ between the USA and the USSR, which in Europe was supported by important bourgeois currents. Although opposition to unitary imperialism consolidated the internationalist struggle, the theory required to be developed and per...

An Italianised Europe

Internationalism No. 88 - June 2026 Page 2 In almost four years in government, Italy’s renewed stability has been a key asset for Giorgia Meloni, also encouraging the European adaptation of the italian-style immigrants . However, the backlash from the referendum defeat, a real own goal, has opened a glaring rift that runs through both the end of the current legislature and the prospects for the next. There is debate over the political exhaustion of her government, forced to navigate the narrow path of budgetary statistics and under the threat of what the Financial Times has termed a “coming energy crisis” triggered by the blockade of the strait of Hormuz. At the referendum polls, the left-wing broad coalition “discovered” that it could compete with the centre-right, but no poll shows any substantial changes in the balance of power. The scenario of a “deadlock”, or a narrow majority for one...

The Four Petrochemical Giants

Internationalism No. 86, April 2026 Page 15 From the series Major industrial groups in China When the People's Republic of China was founded in 1949, oil extraction in the country was practically non-existent, and the country was completely dependent on imports. The exploration and development of domestic oil resources required a major effort. As Jin Zhang reports in his book Catch-up and Competitiveness in China [Routledge, 2004]: The required massive human resources were supplied by the People's Liberation Army (PLA). In 1952, Mao Zedong ordered the reorganisation of the 57 th Division of the 19 th Army of the PLA into the 1 st Division of Oil . The effort led to the discovery of several oil fields, the most significant of which was in Daqing, Heilongjiang Province, in northeastern China, in 1959. It became operational the following year, reaching a ...

The EU Commission Plans for Rearmament and a Clean Industrial Deal

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series European news Following the European elections which took place on June 6th - 9th, the leaders of the Member States met on June 27th at the European Council. Ursula von der Leyen was nominated as president of the next European Commission, after she was chosen as the European People’s Party’s (EPP) Spitzenkandidat (“leading candidate”). The agreement also included the election of former Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio Costa as president of the European Council, and the appointment of former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas as High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Subsequently, on July 18th, Parliament elected von der Leyen as president of the Commission by an absolute majority, with 401 votes out of 719 MEPs. On September 17th, von der Leyen presented her team of commissioners to the European Parliament and, two days later, the Council adopted this list of...

Europe’s Armed Non-Belligerence in the Gulf

Internationalism No. 86, April 2026 Page 6 On February 28 th , the attack launched by the United States and Israel against Iran ignited the third Gulf War . Already dealing with the conflict in Ukraine on its eastern flank, Europe now finds itself facing a second war on its borders, this time to the south. Unlike in 1991 and 2003, in the current conflict Washington has made no effort to build a coalition. No European or NATO country, nor any regional power, has been formally involved in the plans for intervention. European exclusion and the Atlantic crisis Europe’s initial exclusion – despite now being called upon to bear the energy, economic, and political consequences of Washington’s new war of choice – is the latest chapter of the Atlantic crisis . The issue has been at the centre of the European press’s commentary. Particularly in the early days, Brussels’ delays and impotence...

The Foundry and the Partisan Struggle

Chapter Two   What forces were there for starting again, at the end of the 1940s? At the beginning of that road, you could count the core groups on the fingers of one hand: Genoa, its Sestri Ponente district, Savona, Rome. Of course, there were also Turin, Vicenza, Bologna, Milan, Bolzano, Trieste, Livorno, and a few sympathisers down South, but that was all it amounted to. Although there were periodic attempts at ‘linking up’ along the whole length of the peninsula, apart from the three Ligurian groups and the Tuscany-Lazio one, there wasn’t much more than a network of individual sympathisers. The Savona group Arrigo Cervetto , founder of Lotta Comunista and its undisputed leader until his death in 1995, was born in Buenos Aires in 1927, to a family who had emigrated from Savona. Returning to Liguria, he started work when still a boy, and in 1943 was taken on as an apprentice at the Ilva steel-making plant in Savona. The party ar...