Skip to main content

The American Establishment Faces the Trump Conundrum

From the series Chronicles of the new American nationalism

The American establishment faces a truly difficult conundrum. On the one hand, it is confronted with Donald Trump, who has been gripped by show politics to the point of delirium: a recent tragic example was the president’s comments on social media about the murder of Rob Reiner and his wife, which he blamed on the director’s anti-Trump hatred. On the other hand, there is the attempt to uncover a rationale behind the policies of the Trump presidency, insofar as the measures aimed at countering American decline partially represent continuity with the lines of previous administrations, or with certain currents within them.

In recent months, this second approach has been taken by Michael Froman, president of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), and several Biden administration officials, including Kurt Campbell. In their view, there are some elements of continuity between the second Trump administration’s policy line and that of their predecessor.

The CFR, a bipartisan forum for establishment discussion since the 1920s, and its magazine Foreign Affairs have offered to act as a platform for this view. Froman also announced the publication of the main report of the CFR-sponsored Task Force on Economic Security, led by Gina Raimondo, Joe Biden’s former secretary of commerce, Justin Muzinich, Steven Mnuchin’s deputy at the Treasury during Trump’s first term, and James Taiclet, president and CEO of Lockheed Martin.

There is no going back

Froman, former trade representative (USTR) under Barack Obama, wrote in Foreign Affairs that the global trading system managed through the WTO is dead. The United States is acting unilaterally because, as the largest economy and consumer market in the world, it can. And China, lip service to multilateralism notwithstanding, is increasingly doing the same. The European Union and other governments, lacking power and leverage, may try to maintain the old order. But, according to the president of the CFR, even if the institutions of the old order survive the trade war, there is no going back.

In the new international system, coalitions of countries that share interests and come together to adopt high standards will form. Froman explicitly echoes the line that Campbell and Rush Doshi had pursued under the Biden administration and reaffirmed in a recent essay. They suggest that Washington’s interest will be to forge a coalition that aims at building a competitive, collective industrial base to meet the challenge posed by China’s scale.

Encouraging membership of these coalitions by offering free trade agreements appears to be off the table politically, at least for now. Threatening tariffs may work in the short term. To establish lasting support, however, coalition members need to feel that aligning themselves with the United States is in their own interests, more so than the option to hedge their bets with China or remain on the sidelines. The best option available is therefore to offer them access to America’s deep capital markets, its innovation ecosystem, and the rule of law that guarantees them. Trump has also included the American market in his deals, but with his policies, Froman writes, he has also put many of its assets under threat.

Outlines of a strategy

The CFR president clarified his position after Trump’s trip to Asia, on the margins of the ASEAN and APEC meetings.

After ten months of Trump’s grand experiment, Froman sees the contours of a trade strategy emerging, in which the administration is open to negotiating lower tariff rates to break down non-tariff barriers and advance national security priorities.

In the negotiations with Malaysia, the deal closest to a traditional trade agreement, and in the negotiations with Australia, focused on rare earths and resources needed for the defence and technology industries, Froman sees a broader design: a world in which access to the US market is coupled with participation in a coordinated architecture of economic security. To these agreements, Froman adds the attempt to secure critical minerals from Congo and the Central Asian republics (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan); agreements in Latin America with Guatemala, Argentina, Ecuador, and El Salvador; and deals in the Indo-Pacific with Japan and South Korea. He comments: We are beginning to see a concerted effort to pull countries together around a common set of high standards and secure supply chains. This is the line he had taken in his essay in Foreign Affairs, based on Campbell’s work.

Leading partners

As Froman explains, the heart of the Malaysian agreement is Article 5, which commits Kuala Lumpur to adopt equivalent restrictive measures whenever Washington imposes tariffs, quotas, or import restrictions on third countries — read China — for reasons of national security. This obligation is strengthened by controls on exports, the origin of goods, and investments, similar to the controls carried out in the United States by the Committee on Foreign Investment (CFIUS). This allows Washington to project parts of its tariff, technology, and security strategy onto a partner’s foreign policy. Similarly, the deal with Australia ties one of the richest holders of critical resources to US industrial strategy.

According to Froman, the Trump administration sees the Malaysian framework as a template. If a handful of countries accepted similar conditions, Washington could assemble a network of similar bilateral agreements to form a wall of tariffs and technology restrictions around countries of concern, including and especially China.

New geoeconomics

One thing is clear, according to Froman. In the context of its unprecedented competition with Beijing, over the past decade Washington has increasingly intervened in the economy, using tariffs, trade controls, and investments as offensive and defensive tools. Although efficiency remains the goal, economic security, or the convergence of national security and economics, is now the north star of US policy. Any administration — current or future — will be called on to determine under what circumstances the government should intervene in the market.

We are heading toward a less efficient, more expensive global economy in order to address national security interests. The environment in which policymakers operate and businesses compete will change. It is, therefore, important to understand when, how, and to what extent national security should trump economics.

The aforementioned bipartisan CFR task force, in its report US Economic Security, focused on dual-use civil-military technologies that are critical to economic security: biotechnology, artificial intelligence, and quantum communications. Thomas Donilon, vice president of BlackRock and former national security advisor to Obama, and Michèle Flournoy, cofounder (with Campbell) of the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), are two of the contributors to the project, which includes representatives from technology, finance, and consulting groups (Dell, JPMorgan, Citigroup, Bridgewater, Mundie, Ribbit, I Squared, Wiley, and McKinsey).

Froman recalls how, in the 1990s, the CFR developed the concept of geoeconomics, which guided the debate after the collapse of the USSR and accompanied the flow of American capital into China. Today, Froman offers the think tank to policymakers and business leaders as a forum for meeting and analysis in the face of a significant change in international relations. The task force recommends that each presidency build on the industrial policies of Biden and Trump.

Lotta Comunista, December 2025

THE HOUSE OF MARKETS

The stock and Treasury markets have been a real check and balance on Trump’s tariff policy. The Financial Times’ front page featured a warning given to Trump by the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee (TBAC). The TBAC brings together Wall Street’s most prominent financiers of US debt and meets with the Treasury Department every three months to provide recommendations on the economic situation and debt management. The Committee warned Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that the appointment of a compliant Fed chair is not welcome among Washington’s lenders: no one wants to be hit by a shock like the one triggered in 2022 in Britain by Prime Minister Liz Truss’s unfunded tax cut plans. To avoid Trussification, Trump should listen to the TBAC, a body regulated by Congress under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (1972) and the Government Securities Act (1993). Kenneth D. Garbade, former senior vice president of the New York Fed’s research group and associate of Paul Volcker, writes in Treasury Debt Management Under the Rubric of Regular and Predictable Issuance: 1983-2012 [2015], that the TBAC’s quarterly meetings produce relatively substantial documentation of the advice provided by investors to administrations. The advisory committee of big financial groups regularly comments on the choices made by the US government.

The TBAC is currently chaired by Deirdre Dunn of Citigroup and has Mohit Mittal of PIMCO, a Californian investment manager controlled by the German company Allianz, as its vice president. Its members include Jill Funkman of JPMorgan, Anshul Sehgal of Goldman Sachs, Jason Granet of Bank of New York, Ellen Zentner of Morgan Stanley, Gagan Singh of PNC Financial Services Group, Chris Leonard of Deutsche Bank, Alex Schiller of Bridgewater, Sara Devereux of Vanguard, Kevin Gaffney of Fidelity, Gregory Peters of Prudential Global Investment Management, Joe Demetrick of MetLife, Anastasia Titarchuk of New York State Common Retirement Fund, Scott Rofey of Millennium, and Lewis Alexander of Rokos.

The list includes five of the eight largest American financial institutions and one of the eleven European financial institutions that are too big to fail, i.e., considered important for global stability by the Financial Stability Board, the commission set up by the G20 after the 2008 crisis. JPMorgan and Citigroup are also among the four banks that hold the most assets and at the same time collect 45% of the value of deposits in America, known as the Big Four. They are also the institutions most interested in and exposed to the Asian market, including China, along with MetLife, investment managers on both coasts, and the British company Rokos [American Business Stalls in China, The Wall Street Journal, March 27th, 2024]. The list is completed by public and private pension fund collectors and insurance holding companies. In the house that finances Washington’s debt, the markets of Asia and Europe meet with the centralisation of savings and capital from the American continent.

Labels:

Popular posts in the last week

India’s Weaknesses in the Global Spotlight

Farmers’ protests around New Delhi have been going on for four months now. A controversial intervention by the Supreme Court has suspended the implementation of the new agticultural laws, but has raised questions about the dynamics between the judiciary and the executive, and has failed to unblock the negotiations between government and peasant organisations. The assault by Sikh farmers on the Red Fort during the Republic Day parade as India was displaying its military might to the outside world — the Chinese Global Times maliciously noted — paradoxically widened the protest in the huge state of Uttar Pradesh. The Modi government has been trying to revive India’s image with the 2021 Union Budget: it announced one hundred privatisations and approved the increase to 75% of the limit on direct foreign investment in insurance companies. For The Indian Express ( IEX ) this is a sign of the commitment to push ahead with reforms despite the backlash from rural India. Also for The Economi...
Read more

China’s Electromechanical Champions

Internationalism No. 85, March 2026 Page 9 From the series Major industrial groups in China Analysing the WTO data for 2023, it emerges that China exported goods worth $3,379 billion, surpassing the European Union and the United States. Industrial machinery accounted for over 7% of exports and electrical machinery 9%. In the same sectors, Chinese imports did not reach 40% of the value of exports, indicating that these are among the pillars of Beijing’s export economy. Sany Heavy Industry In this newspaper we have already examined the Chinese mechanical engineering giant Sinomach. But in the field of machine construction, Sany Heavy Industry also holds a prominent position, particularly in excavators, cranes, industrial elevators, and cement machinery. The company, based in Changsha (Hunan) since 1991, was founded by Liang Wengen, who had previously been an executive at a State-owned arms factory, and is its main shareholder. Sany had a 2023 turnover...
Read more

The Defeat in Afghanistan — a Watershed in the Cycle of Atlantic Decline

In crises and wars there are events which leave their mark on history because of how they make a decisive impact on the power contention, or because of how, almost like a chemical precipitate, they suddenly make deep trends that have been at work for some time coalesce. This is the case of the defeat of the United States and NATO in Afghanistan, which is taking the shape of a real watershed in the cycle of Atlantic decline. For the moment, through various comments in the international press, it is possible to consider its consequences on three levels: America’s position as a power and the connection with its internal crisis; the repercussions on Atlantic relations and Europe’s dilemmas regarding its strategic autonomy; and the relationship between the Afghan crisis and power relations in Asia, especially as regards India’s role in the Indo-Pacific strategy. Repercussions in the United States Richard Haass is the president of the CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations; despite having ...
Read more

Euro-solubility

Before capsules and pods, there was freeze-dried instant coffee powder, which of course tasted nothing like a real espresso. Now: for some time we have been following the vicissitudes of sovereigntists and populists with the idea that their political future depended on their Euro-solubility . Referring to the law-and-order, xenophobic and immigrant-hostile traits that have become common currency in European debates, we wrote that a Europe that protects could use the anti-immigration rhetoric of the sovereigntists to keep them on the leash of the pro-European strategic consensus. No sooner said that done. In Italy, as in France and other European countries, that phenomenon is in full swing. In Italy, the Five Star Movement has already embarked on its path to conversion a year and a half ago, entrusted with no less than the direction of Italian diplomacy. And even the Lega, believe it or not, has become a pro-European party overnight. In France, a similar process has seized Marine Le P...
Read more

The Unstoppable Force: Capital’s Demand for Migrant Labour

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 16 “Before Giorgia Meloni became Italy’s prime minister, she pledged to cut immigration. Since she has been in government the number of non-EU work visas issued by Italy has increased”. This is how The Economist of April 26th summarises the schizophrenia of their politics; and this is not only true in Italy: “Net migration also surged in post-Brexit Britain”. The needs of the economic system do not coincide with the rhetoric of parliamentarism. And vice versa. Schizophrenia and imbalances in their politics Returning to Italy, the Bank of Italy has pointed out that by 2040, in just fifteen years, there will be a shortage of five million people of working age, which could lead to an estimated 11% contraction in GDP. This is why even Italy’s “sovereignist” government is preparing to widen the net of its Immigration Flow Decree. The latest update, approved on June 30th, provides for the entry of almost ...
Read more

Democratic Defeat in the Urban Vote

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series Elections in the USA A careful analysis of the 2022 mid-term elections revealed the symptoms of a Democratic Party malaise which subsequently fully manifested itself in the latest presidential election, with the heavy loss of support in its traditional strongholds of the metropolitan areas of New York City and Chicago, and the State of California. A defeat foretold Republican votes rose from 51 million in the previous 2018 midterms to 54 million in 2022, a gain of 3 million. The Democrat vote fell from 61 to 51 million, a loss of 10 million. The Republicans gained only three votes for every ten lost by the Democrats, while the other seven became abstentions. In 2022, we analysed the elections in New York City by borough, the governmental districts whose names are well known through movies and TV series. In The Bronx, where the average yearly household income is $35,000, the Democrats lost 52,00...
Read more

In the Depth of Our Class

The pandemic of the century is a storm that does not subside; it returns to its rampage after 40 million infections and more than a million official victims, perhaps two million according to estimates on the excess deaths. In the contention between powers, China stands as the winner: it seems to have tamed the virus, and industry and services are up and running; the USA and Europe, on the other hand, are moving towards a new wave of infections that casts yet more shadows on the economic cycle. Political structures and health systems are at the height of tension. In America, the elections have judged Donald Trump’s rash demagogy on the basis of the opposite reasons for containing the pandemic and the intolerance of small and large producers; in Europe the executives are attempting to steer between the surge in infections, increasingly stringent confinement measures and the threats of fiscal jacquerie in the tourism and catering sectors. Almost everywhere, in the Old Continent, governm...
Read more

Armed Negotiations between the Gulf and the Mediterranean

David Petraeus, Commander of the US forces in Iraq and the Gulf in 2007-2008, then director of the CIA in 2011-12, described the elimination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani on January 3 rd in Baghdad as a defensive action , with which the Trump presidency restored a US deterrence , which was weakened by recent Iranian actions . This is a reference to the attacks conducted indirectly, unclaimed by Tehran, against the Saudi oil infrastructures on September 14 th 2019. In March 2008, when the forces under Petraeus’ command supported the Iraqi Army in the fight against local Shite militias, Soleimani sent a message to the American general: informing him that he was the person in charge for Iranian policies in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Gaza therefore the channel through which to define an agreement to resolve the various issues with Tehran. Petraeus holds the advisors of the Quds Force, the spearhead of the Pasdaran asymmetric operations, responsible for the killing of around 600 ...
Read more

‘Two Hands’ and ‘Two Roads’

From the series News from the Silk Road The international tensions which China will face on the seas in the next fifteen years could find a buffer in the expansion of China’s influence on land in Central, Southern and Western Asia. Wang Jisi is the dean of the School of International Studies at the University of Beijing and a major figure of the American party in China. His unexpected foray into ‘geopolitics’ has reignited the old clash between different American currents — a phenomenon we analysed more than twenty years ago. At the time, Robert Manning, the author of The Asian Energy Factor and adviser to the State Department in 1991, viewed Asia’s growing dependence on the Persian Gulf for its energy requirements in the light of geoeconomics and geostrategy and foresaw a possible convergence between the USA and China. From a geoeconomic standpoint, both trade and the funding and development of the infrastructure necessary for Asia’s energy needs were more important than terri...
Read more

The Double Nature of American Exceptionalism

Internationalism No. 85, March 2026 Special Issue, Page IV From the series Principles of Marxism Marx investigates the very complex relationship between abstractions and social development and concludes that the most general abstractions arise on the whole only with the most profuse concrete development, when one phenomenon is seen to be common to many, common to all . The abstraction of labour , as labour in general , is very ancient, but is just as modern a category as the relations which give rise to this simple abstraction . When the main activity is commerce, labour overlaps with the idea of making money. The physiocratic system, which sees land as the central source of wealth, instead points to agriculture as the form of labour par excellence (productive labour). Only with Adam Smith was there an immense advance , because he discarded any definiteness of the wealth-producing activity — for him it was labour as such...
Read more