Skip to main content

Indo-African Opposition at the WTO

Since March 1st, the Nigerian economist Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala has been the new director general of the World Trade Organization. Like a coach hired by a team languishing at the bottom of its league — writes Larry Elliott of The Guardian — Okonjo finds herself in the happy position of taking over at the WTO when the only way is up, This historic international institution is unlikely to experience extinction or irrelevance. However, the appointment of Okonjo does not in itself remedy WTO’s deep troubles.

An alternative in plurilateralism

The negotiating function of the WTO has been lacking for twenty years now. The latest ambitious goal of liberalising trade in goods and services, announced in Doha in November 2001, became bogged down by the impossibility of a general compromise between old powers and large emerging economies.

In 2015 Michael Froman, President Barack Obama’s Trade Representative (USTR), officially called for the abandonment of the Doha Round. Froman’s alternative proposal was a pragmatic multilateralism, which would allow the WTO to host so-called plurilateral negotiations, limited in scope by the issues involved and the participating states. That year the WTO ministerial conference in Nairobi closed with the unprecedented admission of different views on the future of the Doha Round. Froman claimed a turning point representing the possibility of tackling new issues with a plurilateral approach, had been achieved between subsets of WTO member states, overcoming the practice of multilateral consensus. The same position was held by Robert Lighthizer, USTR of President Donald Trump.

The subsequent 2017 WTO Conference, in Buenos Aires, closed for the first time without a shared final declaration. The Doha Round seems definitively shelved. Lighthizer celebrates the moment when the impasse at the WTO was broken, in favour of plurilateral solutions, which disarm the veto power of individual nations. Some initiatives, such as the Joint Statement Initiative (SI), are launched from the Argentine capital, with the participation of about half of the 164 member states of the WTO and dedicated to specific topis, including the increasingly important e-commerce sector.

Delhi-Cape Town axis

Okonjo’s debut at the WTO General Council in early March was greeted by a combative stance from India and South Africa against the aforementioned JSIs. A document expressing the Indo-African position defends the multilateral underpinnings of the WTO and consensus based decision-making. The crucial point is that to introduce new rules in the WTO, it is necessary to involve all member states in the decision-making process. The Indian representative Brajendra Navnit explains that renouncing the tradition of unanimity will create a precedent for any group of Members to bring any issue into the WTO [...] undermining balance in agenda setting, negotiating processes and outcomes. The issue on the table is who makes decisions, how and on what matters. In the form of an abstruse legal dispute, via articles and treaty clauses, a political battle is being waged over the functioning and the very nature of the WTO.

The position held by India and South Africa in the course of the discussion in Geneva was criticised by the delegates of many capitals. The representative of the European Union, the Portuguese João Aguiar Machado, affirms that the WTO’s negotiating arm has not been able to deliver [many of the significant improvements in the multilateral trade rulebook, therefore it is vital to maintain the option of developing rules that correspond to the economic and trade realities of the 21st century through plurilateral agreements. Otherwise, there would be no other option than developing such rules outside the WTO framework. This would increase fragmentation and risk eventually condemn the WTO to irrelevance, As already demonstrated at the Nairobi and Buenos Aires Conferences, in substantial alignment with the White House, the EU takes sides in favour of open plurilateral negotiations.

A realist genesis

Within the WTO there are two plurilateral agreements - on public procurement and civil aviation - which are referred to as closed, because their benefits are accessible only by the participating states. These two agreements, negotiated under the terms of the GATT back in the 198os, are the only plurilateral agreements which survived the transition to the WTO. The ITA agreement on information technologies, however, is an example of an open plurilateral agreement. Its benefits also extend to non-signatory states, based on the ‘most favoured nation’ mechanism. According to historian Craig VanGrasstek, WTO rules show an ambivalent view towards plurilateral agreements. On the one hand, they recognise plurilateral agreements, which are considered binding only for the participating states. On the other hand, they consider the consensus of all member states as necessary to integrate a new plurilateral agreement into WTO rules. The consensus of all member states is indeed one of the legal arguments used by India and South Africa.

In general, VanGrasstek highlights the contradiction between the fundamental WTO principle of non-discrimination and an international reality divided by hundreds of preferential trade agreements, bilateral and regional Agreements, customs unions and even the European single market, In VanGrasstek’s interpretation of WTO history [The History and Future of the World Trade Organization, WTO Publications, 2013], the winning states of the Second World War, under the direction of Washington, established the GATT with the ambition of creating a multilateral system, but had a realistic awareness that the international order’s needs for discriminatory instruments. Therefore, they foresaw that the GATT could coexist with preferential agreements, under certain conditions (article XXIV), and allow protectionist measures motivated by national security (article XXI). This is the legal loophole which was abused in recent years by the tariff offensives of the Trump presidency.

The GATT precedent

Attacking the Indo-African position, the European ambassador Machado recalls that plurilateral agreements have been a driving force under the GATT and beyond and paved the way for many of the multilateral agreements that are today an integral part of the WTO agreement. In fact, as Bernard Hockman and Petros Mavroidis argue for the European University Institute, PAs were quite prevalent under the pre-WTO GATT regime, The Kennedy Round and the Tokyo Round, spanning the 196os and 19705, created a series of plurlateral agreements, at the time defined as ‘codes of conduct’, binding only the few signatory states [WTO ‘a la carte’ or WTO ‘menu du jour’? Assessing the care for plurilateral agreements, EUI, 2013].

German academic Nicolas Lamp adds lesser-known historical detail: during the Tokyo Round, least-developed countries (LDCs) asked in vain that the adoption of such plurilateral ‘codes’ be subject to decision by consensus or at least by a broad majority. That initiative, led by Yugoslavia, challenged the lack of transparency and In inclusiveness in the Tokyo Round negotiations. In many cases, for example for the anti-dumping agreement, LDCs were invited to negotiation tables only when the general form of the ‘code’ had been determined by the United States and European countries (The club approach to multilateral trade lawmaking, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 2016. Above all, writes Lamp, when the advanced countries agree separately on their priority issues, the LDCs fear that they will lose control of the agenda at the GATT. This is the same political issue raised by India and South Africa today at the WTO.

Imposed agreements

In the transition from the GATT to the WTO, many plurilateral ‘codes’ of the Tokyo Round were made multilateral. This was possible, explains Hockman, because the dominant states of the GATT inserted the ‘codes’ in a take it or leave it package deal, that is, as part and parcel of accession to the WTO. In Hockman’s retrospective opinion, this stratagem looks much less strategic The fear of being forced to adhere to these agreements, in fact, has motivated a many LDCs to use unanimity to oppose any WTO decision on new issues.

In line with Brussels’ position, Hockman proposes returning to the GATT model and carrying forward the JSI as open plurilateral agreements [Plurilateral cooperation as an altemative to trade agreements: innovating one domain at a time, BUT, 202 1). Lamp argues this compromise should be accepted by India and South Africa for two reasons. First, if the Indo-African duo would veto the JSI, albeit with good legal reasons, they would risk finding themselves in an isolated, politically unsustainable position. Further, even a successful veto could not prevent the JSIs from materialising, as preferential agreements outside the WTO, unnecessarily damaging the multilateral institation. Second, the current fault in the WTO does not clearly divide old and new powers. Comments on the March WTO Council include a notable Chinese silence. On the one hand, China speaks out on every occasion in defence of multilateralism, in line with President Xi Jinping’s speech at the Davos forum. On the other hand, Beijing participates in the contested JSIs, along with many other emerging countries and LDCs.

Functional fragmentation?

The evolution of the WTO is matter of international economics and politics, not a matter of law. VanGrasstek highlights the real change that, in the decades after the Second World War, enormously expanded world trade and transformed the balance of power between powers. Industrial production is increasingly international and the global political order is increasingly multipolar. Starting with customs duties alone, the scope of issues under discussion has expanded to include non-tariff barriers, intellectual property rights, trade in services and so on. From the 23 founders of the GATT, the states involved increased to about fifty in the 1960s, a hundred in the 19705, up to the current 164 members of the WTO.

These objective complications are reflected in the timing of the liberalisation processes, In the first fifteen years of the GATT system [1947-1962], 5 rounds of tariff reduction were completed, lasting an average of 7 months each. After that, the Kennedy Round was extended to 37 months [19641967], the Tokyo Round doubled to 74 months [1972-1979], and the Uruguay Round took 87 months [1986-1994] to negotiate the switch from GATT to the WTO. The Doha Round, the first and last major multilateral negotiation of the WTO era, has not been closed since 2001.

Five years ago, commenting on the Euro-American proposals for plurilateral ‘clubs’ within the WTO, we wondered if they would mark growing fragmentation and dysfunctionality for the institution or, on the contrary, if they would facilitate a dialectic among coalitions and the definition of new balances, helping to safeguard the unitary sign of the WTO. We can reassert that question, as ambivalent as the WTO itself, guarantor of the general interest of capital in an open world market and, at the same time, arena for the irreconcilable clash of infinite particular interests.

Lotta Comunista, March 2021

Labels:

Popular posts in the last week

Reckless Bets on Migrants in California

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 11 From the series Chronicles of the new American nationalism The tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump on allies, partners and opponents of the United States have opened a phase of negotiations with the affected countries and caused reactions from some key States. The legal opposition from almost all areas of the US poses a test: whether States, courts, and Congress can influence trade policy and constrain the expansion of executive powers. Amid conflicting rulings, the tariffs have been reinstated – an outcome that, The New York Times remarks, has “left Washington, Wall Street, and much of the world trying to discern the future of US trade policy”. California’s dispute with the federal government has expanded to immigration policy and the domestic use of military force. The political, economic, and power struggles overlap with the electoral dimension. The establishment remains critical of or ...
Read more

The EU Commission Plans for Rearmament and a Clean Industrial Deal

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series European news Following the European elections which took place on June 6th - 9th, the leaders of the Member States met on June 27th at the European Council. Ursula von der Leyen was nominated as president of the next European Commission, after she was chosen as the European People’s Party’s (EPP) Spitzenkandidat (“leading candidate”). The agreement also included the election of former Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio Costa as president of the European Council, and the appointment of former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas as High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Subsequently, on July 18th, Parliament elected von der Leyen as president of the Commission by an absolute majority, with 401 votes out of 719 MEPs. On September 17th, von der Leyen presented her team of commissioners to the European Parliament and, two days later, the Council adopted this list of...
Read more

THE UNITARY IMPERIALISM ISSUE

Chapter Six   In 1951 Europe, and the world, was shrouded in mist. The ‘Cold War’ ideology ruled, and the war in Korea made a world conflict between the USA and the USSR seem a real possibility. In France, Great Britain, Germany and Italy, the talk was of rearmament. Europe, at that time urged by the USA, was planning the EDC (European Defence Community) to keep step with German rearmament. The concept of a ‘ unitary imperialism ’ was the strategic choice that helped the small GAAP group remain politically independent. But translating this into an ‘Internationalist Third Front’ slogan was unfortunate. It facilitated a link with French libertarian communists, but could also cause confusion with its suggestion of a ‘Third Force’ between the USA and the USSR, which in Europe was supported by important bourgeois currents. Although opposition to unitary imperialism consolidated the internationalist struggle, the theory required to be developed and per...
Read more

Show Warfare?

Internationalism No. 86, April 2026 Page 16 After show politics and show diplomacy , have we sunk to the obscenity of show warfare ? On the surface, this is true. The Pentagon’s video game-style communications, where airstrikes, missile launches, and deadly explosions are set to music for social media clips, certainly suggest so. It matters little that a hundred schoolgirls were also blown to bits as artificial intelligence took centre stage on the battlefield. In reality, war propaganda has always showcased destruction and mocked the enemy; today in Washington, in the era of the high-tech groups of television and social media democracy , the only thing that has changed is the style and the means used to inflame fanaticisms and stuff people’s brains. In Tehran, dominated by a parasitic bourgeoisie that feeds on oil revenues and is intertwined with the militias and hierarchies of t...
Read more

LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM

Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM   An examination of the debate within the groups that were to create GAAP (Anarchist Groups of Proletarian Action) gives a vivid picture of the problems that between 1948 and 1951 had to be slowly and painfully faced. Three major confrontations, progressively more serious, took place between Cervetto and Masini in the autumn of 1949 and again in the spring and autumn of 1950. As preparations were being made for the National Conference at Pontedecimo – from which GAAP would be born – debate on the nature of the organisation and on theories of the State and imperialism began to define the characteristics of the new political group, but also revealed the differences. The first step had been to look for ‘a different kind’ of communism in anarchism. Along this road Cervetto , with an ever-surer grasp, would raise the issue that had been first posed by Marx and Lenin : our militant...
Read more

Marx’s Political Method

Internationalism No. 85, March 2026 Special Issue, Page II From the series Principles of Marxism The Grundrisse require a sustained effort of attention from the reader. Marx uses scientific abstractions and conceptual connections as analytical tools. In the Grundrisse , we shall follow the guiding thread of Marx’s method. Some critics, including those within the Marxist camp, see traces of Hegelian thought in Marx’s procedures in this work. Marx and Engels responded to these jibes, clarifying their relationship with Hegel. In the Afterword to the second edition of Capital , Marx wrote: My dialectic method is not only different from the Hegelian but is its direct opposite. To Hegel, the [...] process of thinking, which, under the name of ‘the Idea’, he even transforms into an independent subject, is the demiurgos of the real world [...]. With me, on the contrary, the ideal is nothing else than the material world reflected by the human mind, and transl...
Read more

The National Gamble of Poland

Internationalism No. 33, November 2021 Page 3 From the series European News In a lawsuit brought by Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki, the Constitutional Tribunal, which is composed of judges chosen by the government, ruled that fundamental parts of the EU Treaty are incompatible with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. This ruling thus denies the primacy of European law over national law, undermining both the political assumption of continental integration and the supranational character of the EU . Vectors of Polish history We can shed light on this event if we consider the four field vectors that cross Poland: its traditional ethnic-religious nationalism, its marked Atlantic tropism, the objective attraction exerted by the European force field, and the looming threat of Russia. The general picture is global collisions: China’s irruption and the crisis in the world order have put pressure on Warsaw to define its st...
Read more

THE FOUNDRY AND THE PARTISAN STRUGGLE

Chapter Two   What forces were there for starting again, at the end of the 1940s? At the beginning of that road, you could count the core groups on the fingers of one hand: Genoa, its Sestri Ponente district, Savona, Rome. Of course, there were also Turin, Vicenza, Bologna, Milan, Bolzano, Trieste, Livorno, and a few sympathisers down South, but that was all it amounted to. Although there were periodic attempts at ‘linking up’ along the whole length of the peninsula, apart from the three Ligurian groups and the Tuscany-Lazio one, there wasn’t much more than a network of individual sympathisers. The Savona group Arrigo Cervetto , founder of Lotta Comunista and its undisputed leader until his death in 1995, was born in Buenos Aires in 1927, to a family who had emigrated from Savona. Returning to Liguria, he started work when still a boy, and in 1943 was taken on as an apprentice at the Ilva steel-making plant in Savona. The party ar...
Read more

Lotta Comunista: The Origins 1943-1952

Guido La Barbera Contents 9. Preface to the English Edition 13. Preface 19. Useful dates 21. Chapter One «ONE OUGHT TO KNOW WITH WHOM ONE IS DEALING» 25. The balance-of-power theory 27. Theory and the ‘strategy-party’ 29. Chapter Two THE FOUNDRY AND THE PARTISAN STRUGGLE 31. The Savona group 39. Passion disciplined by reason 40. Never again a tool in the hands of others 41. The Genoa group 46. The Sestri Ponente group 48. The groups in Rome and Tuscany 52. The strength of GAAP: ‘only a handful’ 55. Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM 58. Reckoning with Bordiga...
Read more

Supplementary Materials

BIBLIOGRAPHY 1   A. Cervetto , Class Struggles and the Revolutionary Party , éditions Science Marxiste 2000. First published as Lotte di classe e partito rivoluzionario by Lotta Comunista Editions and now in its 6 th edition (Milan 2004). The volume gathers together articles published in Azione Comunista from April to November 1964. 2  Guido La Barbera, Introduction to the 2 nd edition of A. Cervetto ’s Lotta Comunista (‘The Difficult Question of Times’), Lotta Comunista Editions, Milan 2010. Reproduced in English in Our Internationalist Struggle , éditions Science Marxiste (2011). 3  Ibid. 4  A. Cervetto , ‘The True Partition of the World between the USSR and the USA’. First published in Lotta Comunista , September-October 1968. Subsequently included in Imperialismo Unitario (Unitary Imperialism), Lotta Comunista Editions, Milan 1996. 5  A. Cervetto , ‘Eu...
Read more