Skip to main content

The Winds of the Crisis in the World Order Drive London Towards the EU

From the series European news

Ending the chaos and decline caused by Conservative governments, with their succession of four prime ministers between 2016 and 2024, and rebuilding the country: this is how Keir Starmer described his commitment to national renewal in Labour’s 2024 election manifesto. A year and a half after the clear victory that delivered Labour 411 of the 650 seats in the House of Commons, YouGov figures [December 16th] show the current prime minister’s approval rating has fallen from 44% to 18%. The political landscape is fragmenting, with the two traditional mainstream parties being overwhelmed by the rise of fringe parties.

The government has been marred by minor scandals, muddled communications, statements followed by U-turns, and a chaotic run-up to the announcement of the new budget on November 26th. With defeat anticipated in the local elections in May, frustration is spreading through the ranks of the Labour Party, fuelling centrifugal forces and even speculation about the possible replacement of the prime minister.

Turning against migrants

If the election were held today, several polls predict that Reform UK would win 27-33% of the vote (up from 14% in the July 2024 election); Labour would win 14-20% (down from 34%), the Conservative Party 16-21% (24%), the Green Party 10-18% (6%), and the Liberal Democrats 11-14% (12%). The trend highlighted by the polls is confirmed by party membership figures. With 268,918 members, Nigel Farage’s right-wing populist party, Reform UK, claims to have become the largest party, overtaking Labour, whose membership has fallen from half a million in 2020 to fewer than 250,000. The Green Party is seeing the popularity of its new leader, the self-declared eco-populist Zack Polanski, translate into a surge to 180,000 members, while the Tories are falling further behind, with 123,000 members counted in July, making them now the fourth largest party. There has also been a slight decline for the Liberal Democrats, who stand at just over 83,000 members. Finally, the New Your Party, founded by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana, has now surpassed the threshold of 50,000 members [The Times, December 13th].

Although Reform UK holds only five seats in the House of Commons, it has managed to dominate the political and media debate with its relentless campaign against immigration. In an attempt to stem the haemorrhage of support, the Labour government carried out a reshuffle in September and adopted a fierce anti-immigrant posture. The new Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, the first Muslim woman to hold that position, is a member of the conservative Blue Labour faction of the party, and has imposed a hardening of refugee reception policies, inspired by the Danish model.

Mahmood explained that it is necessary to restore order and control to avoid losing popular consent for having an asylum system at all and to stop the dark forces that seek to stir up anger and hate. For Mahmood, born in Birmingham to parents with Pakistani roots, this is a moral mission, because a country without secure borders is a less safe country for those who look like me [The Guardian, November 17th]. With this shift to the right on immigration, however, Labour is exposing its left flank; the Green Party, in particular, with its pro-asylum seeker stance, is taking full advantage.

Empty coffers

Underlying the disappointment with the Labour government is also the fact that the executive is squeezed between the bond markets and the desiderata of its MPs and electorate, owing to its very limited room for manoeuvre on the budget and a growth forecast of only 1.2% for 2026. The country has become a zero-sum economy, wrote Financial Times columnist Martin Wolf. Now, more for some means less for others, because in the absence of serious efforts to cut spending, which seem to be politically impossible, taxes must be raised. The result is a chronic fiscal problem that is almost impossible to manage politically [Financial Times, October 29th].

After reaching 5.3% of GDP in the 2024-25 fiscal year, the budget deficit is expected to fall to 4.5% in 2025-26, with the goal of reaching 1.9% by 2030-31. It is instructive to compare this with France, which had a deficit of 5.8% of GDP in 2024 and aims to reduce it to below 3% by the end of the decade. One difference between the two countries is that the UK does not enjoy the shield of the single currency and of the European Central Bank, protections from which France benefits. As a result, even though the UK’s debt-to-GDP ratio is lower than France’s (95% versus 116%), higher interest rates mean that the cost of servicing British debt is higher: 3.7% of GDP in 2025, versus 2.2% for Paris.

It is notable that in both cases the cost of debt exceeds defence spending. The comparison should also take into account that the UK Treasury must bear the losses accumulated under the Bank of England’s asset purchase programme (Asset Purchase Facility), estimated at £164 billion by the end of 2035. This figure is highly sensitive to changes in interest rates: a one percentage point increase from 2026 onward would add £39 billion to the bill [Office for Budget Responsibility, Economic and Fiscal Outlook, November 2025]. Without the single currency, wrote Stéphane Lauer of Le Monde, the French situation would already have led to devaluation, a large-scale attack by the financial markets, and drastic cuts to our social model; instead, in the event of an acute crisis, investors remain convinced that the ECB will come to our rescue [Le Monde, November 25th]. The British government, by contrast, is under constant scrutiny by the markets, and any ill-judged budgetary manoeuvre would have immediate repercussions, as Liz Truss’s government demonstrated in 2022.

Rapprochement with the EU

In an international context marked by trade wars and protectionism, the British government sees few options other than rapprochement with Europe as a path to economic growth. In early December, Starmer stated: There is no credible economic vision for Britain that does not position us as an open, trading economy. We must confront the reality that the botched Brexit deal significantly hurt our economy. You do not need to have a PhD in economics to know that erecting unnecessary trade barriers with your biggest trading partner will hurt growth and raise the cost of living. So one element of our economic renewal will be continuing to move towards a closer trading relationship with the EU [The Guardian, December 1st].

This has sparked speculation about the possibility of a British return to the EU. After the prime minister’s economic adviser, Minouche Shafik, and Deputy Prime Minister, David Lammy, suggested a return to the European customs union, Starmer said in an interview with The Economist that he could see scope for moving forward as an iterative process on the relationship with the EU [December 6th]. While the prime minister later reiterated that a return to the customs union remains a red line, the Health Secretary, Wes Streeting, suggested crossing this line, perhaps in an attempt to position himself as a future challenger to Starmer.

Unsurprisingly, such openness towards the EU has been fiercely criticised by the Eurosceptic press – led by The Daily Telegraph, The Sun, and the Daily Mail – as a betrayal of Brexit.

In May 2025, the British government initiated a reset with the EU, which also involves renegotiating certain elements of the EU-UK trade agreement reached after Brexit. The first concrete result was the announcement of the UK’s return to the Erasmus student exchange programme. However, there have also been setbacks in London’s European turn. The UK failed to reach an agreement with Brussels to join the EU’s SAFE scheme, a €150 billion programme of soft loans for joint military procurement. The stumbling block, which recalls the terms of the disputes over the UK rebate during Margaret Thatcher’s time, was the contribution to the European budget demanded by Brussels in exchange for British participation in the programme. This will certainly not be the end of the debate on military cooperation, not least because it remains unclear how the UK intends to finance the announced increase in its military spending from the current 2.3% of GDP to 2.6% by 2027, targeting 3% in the next parliamentary term.

London in the European camp

Since the Trump administration called into question its support for Ukraine, even signalling its willingness to conclude an agreement with Moscow over the heads of the Europeans, it has become clear that, even in the field of foreign and security policy, London has few alternatives to its alliance with the continent. While The Times argues that Britain, France, and Germany must assume responsibility for the defence of the continent, shielding Ukraine in a way that keeps the US on side and Russia at bay [November 25th], The Guardian believes that it would now be unwise for any European country to bet its national interest on transatlantic partnership and is therefore calling on the prime minister to accelerate his claimed ambition of restored closeness to Europe [December 4th].

However, according to The Times [December 20th], the fact that the EU agreed at the European Council on December 18th to a joint loan of €90 billion to support Ukraine put[s] Sir Keir Starmer in a quandary. London is under pressure from the EU to contribute to the loan, but it would be hard to persuade British voters to use taxpayers’ funds for a loan; this leaves the option of using the approximately £8 billion of Russian assets frozen in the UK. By leveraging the EU budget to take on a common debt for Ukraine, EU member States have been able to avoid both drawing on their national budgets and pursuing the use of frozen Russian funds, which the ECB had warned against. If London wants to maintain its credibility as a driving force behind European defence and as a protector of Ukraine – as it has so far done within the E3 (a group comprising France, the UK, and Germany) and through the coalition of the willing – it will have to find a way out of this impasse. Brexit has also damaged the UK’s strategic capacity to act.

Lotta Comunista, December 2025
Labels:

Popular posts in the last week

Reckless Bets on Migrants in California

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 11 From the series Chronicles of the new American nationalism The tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump on allies, partners and opponents of the United States have opened a phase of negotiations with the affected countries and caused reactions from some key States. The legal opposition from almost all areas of the US poses a test: whether States, courts, and Congress can influence trade policy and constrain the expansion of executive powers. Amid conflicting rulings, the tariffs have been reinstated – an outcome that, The New York Times remarks, has “left Washington, Wall Street, and much of the world trying to discern the future of US trade policy”. California’s dispute with the federal government has expanded to immigration policy and the domestic use of military force. The political, economic, and power struggle...
Read more

Electoral Upheaval and Turmoil Inside Labour

Internationalism No. 88, June 2026 Page 3 From the series European news As Henry Kissinger wrote in his book Leadership (Penguin, 2022), in the British political system, parties are "rigorously institutionalized": "An electoral victory functions first to empower a party in parliament and, as a consequence of that, to install a new premier". Unlike presidential systems such as the American one, "the British system elevates members of the cabinet to the highest echelons of their party". The prime minister's authority "rests primarily on the maintenance of party discipline" because "the dissent of an influential clique, or the machinations of a single magnetic personality, can limit the premier's ability to pursue desired political objectives". "In extraordinary circumstances", warns Kissinger, ...
Read more

An Italianised Europe

Internationalism No. 88 - June 2026 Page 2 In almost four years in government, Italy’s renewed stability has been a key asset for Giorgia Meloni, also encouraging the European adaptation of the italian-style immigrants . However, the backlash from the referendum defeat, a real own goal, has opened a glaring rift that runs through both the end of the current legislature and the prospects for the next. There is debate over the political exhaustion of her government, forced to navigate the narrow path of budgetary statistics and under the threat of what the Financial Times has termed a “coming energy crisis” triggered by the blockade of the strait of Hormuz. At the referendum polls, the left-wing broad coalition “discovered” that it could compete with the centre-right, but no poll shows any substantial changes in the balance of power. The scenario of a “deadlock”, or a narrow majority for one...
Read more

The EU Commission Plans for Rearmament and a Clean Industrial Deal

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series European news Following the European elections which took place on June 6th - 9th, the leaders of the Member States met on June 27th at the European Council. Ursula von der Leyen was nominated as president of the next European Commission, after she was chosen as the European People’s Party’s (EPP) Spitzenkandidat (“leading candidate”). The agreement also included the election of former Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio Costa as president of the European Council, and the appointment of former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas as High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Subsequently, on July 18th, Parliament elected von der Leyen as president of the Commission by an absolute majority, with 401 votes out of 719 MEPs. On September 17th, von der Leyen presented her team of commissioners to the European Parliament and, two days later, the Council adopted this list of...
Read more

Multiple Games in the Third Gulf War

Internationalism No. 88, June 2026 Page 6 The conflict in the Gulf has entered its third month, marked by a precarious truce that reflects a strategic stalemate, with Tehran’s “selective blockade” of Hormuz and the US Navy’s “counter-blockade” of Iranian ports. According to the Pakistani daily Dawn , bilateral negotiations — mediated by Islamabad with the explicit support of Riyadh and the “discreet and indirect” backing of Beijing — appear to centre on the price of reopening the energy artery. For Washington, writes the Saudi newspaper Asharq al-Awsat , the negotiations should yield some kind of “tangible result” on the nuclear issue, allowing both sides to “claim victory”, given that the priority is resuming commercial traffic. To this end, granting Tehran the opportunity to collect some form of revenue has not been ruled out. Iranian “pragmatic” factions are raising the idea of maritime tr...
Read more

Opportunities for the Euro and Yuan

Internationalism No. 77, July 2025 Page 13 Estimates by international institutions for April to June confirm the slowdown in global output and trade. The World Bank forecasts a decline in GDP growth from 2.8% in 2024, to 2.3% in 2025, and a sharp fall in trade from 3.4% to 1.8%. The main cause of the new slowdown is the tariff war declared by Donald Trump, who has so far imposed a universal minimum tariff of 10%. The uncertainty arising from his peculiar art of the deal , consisting of lunges, postponements, relaunches, U-turns, and pauses, makes the policy of the world's leading power unpredictable. It is also paying the highest price, with US growth halving, from 2.8% to 1.4%. The Eurozone has been floating at a rate of less than 1% since 2023 and, according to the World Bank, will remain below this level in 2025 and 2026, while the OECD and the ECB predict a return to 1% in 2025. Chin...
Read more

Political Battles of European Leninism

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 1 Thirty years after the death of Arrigo Cervetto , we are publishing here the concluding passages of the introduction to his Opere Scelte (“Selected Works”) for the series Biblioteca Giovani (“Publications for young people”), soon to be published in Italian. The 1944-45 partisan war in Italy. The political battle within libertarian communism. The Korean War, and the watchword of “neither Washington nor Moscow”. The layoffs at the Ilva and Ansaldo factories, the political battle and trade union defence in the struggles of post-war restructuring. From 1953 onwards, the crisis of Stalinism, the 1956 Suez crisis, the Hungarian uprising, the 1957 Theses and the challenge of theory and strategy vis-à-vis the tendencies of unitary imperialism. The political struggle within Azione Comunista (“Communist Action”) and the Movimento della Sinistra Comunista (“Movement of the Communist Left”). From the 1950s to the early 1970s, t...
Read more

Lotta Comunista: The Origins 1943-1952

Guido La Barbera Contents 9. Preface to the English Edition 13. Preface 19. Useful dates 21. Chapter One «ONE OUGHT TO KNOW WITH WHOM ONE IS DEALING» 25. The balance-of-power theory 27. Theory and the ‘strategy-party’ 29. Chapter Two THE FOUNDRY AND THE PARTISAN STRUGGLE 31. The Savona group 39. Passion disciplined by reason 40. Never again a tool in the hands of others 41. The Genoa group 46. The Sestri Ponente group 48. The groups in Rome and Tuscany 52. The strength of GAAP: ‘only a handful’ 55. Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM 58. Reckoning with Bordiga...
Read more

Libertarian Communism: A Different Kind of Communism

Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM   An examination of the debate within the groups that were to create GAAP (Anarchist Groups of Proletarian Action) gives a vivid picture of the problems that between 1948 and 1951 had to be slowly and painfully faced. Three major confrontations, progressively more serious, took place between Cervetto and Masini in the autumn of 1949 and again in the spring and autumn of 1950. As preparations were being made for the National Conference at Pontedecimo – from which GAAP would be born – debate on the nature of the organisation and on theories of the State and imperialism began to define the characteristics of the new political group, but also revealed the differences. The first step had been to look for ‘a different kind’ of communism in anarchism. Along this road Cervetto , with an ever-surer grasp, would raise the issue that had been first posed by Marx and Lenin : our militant...
Read more

Beijing, Ambivalent About the G2, Opts for Temporary Stability

Internationalism No. 88, June 2026 Pages 4 and 5 Kolkata's The Telegraph announces "a rupture with the principle of post-War pacifism: that Japan and Germany had adhered to for decades". The West Bengal-based newspaper was founded in 1982 by Aveek Sarkar, a former protégé of Harold Evans at The Sunday Times in London. The editorial highlights certain aspects worth noting. First and foremost, there is a psychological dimension to the crises in the world order . The ideologies of the post-war order, imposed on the defeated bourgeoisies of Germany and Japan for decades, have permeated the whole of society to the point of becoming second nature that shape the German and Japanese ruling classes themselves. But today, a re-evaluation of these ideologies is in turn being imposed by an uneven development that, over the long term, has been economic, political, and military. This is a Z...
Read more