Skip to main content

Ukraine Puts European Rearmament to the Test

From the series European news

On February 3rd, the new president of the European Council, António Costa, organised his first summit of the heads of State and government. It was an informal meeting dedicated to defence, with the aim of reaching a consensus on a synthesis that will be included in the new White Paper in April, and that will provide a basis for possible decisions at the official European Council in June. In the current context, however, it was also about “sending a signal to the president of the United States that the Europeans are prepared to increase military spending” [Handelsblatt, February 3rd].

British “reset”

One unusual feature of the summit was the presence of Keir Starmer. For the first time since Brexit, a British prime minister was present at a meeting of the European Council. According to Le Monde, this could signal “the start of concrete negotiations on the topic of defence, against the backdrop of Donald Trump’s return to the White House” [February 4th]. One open question is to what extent European funds can be used to purchase non-EU military equipment. For the French newspaper, British participation in EU military funding should not be ruled out, nor should the possibility that the way forward may be a military rapprochement between the UK and the EU through the creation of a European pillar in NATO.

Rumours reported by the Times [February 5th] also suggest that the issue of defence could be Britain’s opening for strengthening its European ties again. London and Brussels have reportedly formally initiated negotiations not only on military issues, but also on broader issues, including the revision of the Brexit trade agreement which has been in force since 2021. A UK-EU summit is further scheduled for May. Meanwhile, newspapers such as The Daily Telegraph, the Daily Mail, and The Sun have all criticised Starmer’s presence at the EU summit: the alarm raised by the Eurosceptic British press can be seen as indirect confirmation that the rapproche ment between Britain and the Union is not merely cosmetic.

The European agenda — already shaken by the Trump administration’s statements in the preceding weeks was further disrupted on February 12th, when the new American president, after a phone call with Vladimir Putin and without warning his allies, announced the immediate start of peace negotiations to end the war in Ukraine.

Unilateralism and American bullying

On the same day, Trump’s Defence Secretary Petr Hegseth declared that it was “unrealistne” for Ukraine to return to its pre-2014 borders or to join NATO, Europeans must now “take responsibility for the conventional security of the continent”, because any guarantees for Kyiv will have to be “backed by capable European and non-European troops”, but no American troops will be deployed to Ukraine. In addition to this, at the Munich Security Conference, Vice-President J.D. Vance made a vitriolic speech, accusing Europe of betraying freedom and democracy with its measures to obstruct far-right parties and its censorship rules on online platforms.

The European bourgeoisie has not been so brutally confronted with its military dependence on the United States since the bloody conflicts in the Balkans in the 1990s, which we defined as the “wars of European unification”. The political outcome of those massacres was to give impetus to proposals for an EU defence and rapid intervention force. But the US’ war of choice in Iraq in 2003 subsequently split the Union, freezing plans for a continental army for over two decades. It seems that the debate on military centralisation is now back to where it was before 2003. Caroline de Gruyter, columnist for the Dutch newspaper NRC [February 15th], sees the war in Ukraine as “Bosnia squared”.

Lotta Comunista, February 2025

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Leapfrogging: The Chinese Auto Industry’s Leap Forward

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 15 From the series The world car battle It is predicted that next year in China the sales of electrified vehicles (mainly battery-powered or hybrid) will for the first time overtake those of cars with an internal combustion engine. This development will mark a historic about turn which will put the world's biggest auto market years ahead of its Western rivals [Financial Times, December 26th]. Meanwhile, the growth in sales of electric vehicles in Europe and the United States has slowed. BYD's leap forward Another important development in 2024 was the record sales of Chinese brands in China: they rose from 38% of the total in 2020 to 56%, a sign of the maturation of the national auto industry which is now able to challenge the Japanese, American, and European manufacturers. BYD's leap forward is impressive, comparable to that of Ford Motors after the First World War, when with the Model T, introduc...
Read more

The Works of Marx and Engels and the Bolshevik Model

Internationalism Pages 12–13 In the autumn of 1895 Lenin commented on the death of Friedrich Engels: "After his friend Karl Marx (who died in 1883), Engels was the finest scholar and teacher of the modern proletariat in the whole civilised world. […] In their scientific works, Marx and Engels were the first to explain that socialism is not the invention of dreamers, but the final aim and necessary result of the development of the productive forces in modern society. All recorded history hitherto has been a history of class struggle, of the succession of the rule and victory of certain social classes over others. And this will continue until the foundations of class struggle and of class domination – private property and anarchic social production – disappear. The interests of the proletariat demand the destruction of these foundations, and therefore the conscious class struggle of the organised workers must be directed against them. And every class strugg...
Read more

Uneven Development, Job Cuts, and the Crisis of Labour Under Global Capitalism

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 16 Uneven development is a fundamental law of capitalism. We have a macroscopic expression of this in the changing balance of power between States: Atlantic decline and Asian rise are the key dynamics behind the political processes of this era, including wars caused by the crisis in the world order. But behind all this there is a differentiated economic trend, starting from companies and sectors: hence the differentiated conditions for wage earners. And this is the element to keep in mind for an effective defensive struggle. It’s only the beginning The electrical and digital restructuring imposed by global market competition affects various production sectors. The car industry is the most obvious, due to the familiarity of the companies and brands involved. We have already reported on the agreement reached before Christmas at Volkswagen, which can be summarised as a reduction of 35,000 employees by 2030. Die Zeit [De...
Read more

The British Link in the Imperialist Chain

Internationalism No. 33, November 2021 Page 8 Lenin often used the metaphor of a chain that binds the world to describe imperialism. The October Revolution of 1917 broke a first link in that chain and hoped to pull the whole thing loose. The metaphor was adopted in those years by all the Bolshevik leaders and the leaders of the newly formed Third International. Within a decade, Stalin's well-known formula of socialism in one country signified the overturning of that strategic cornerstone and the defeat of the revolution in Russia, in Europe, and in the world. Dates that have come to symbolise historical change act as the synthesis of previously accumulated contradictions, and, while such a sudden change does not exhaust the possibility of future contradictions, the concentration of events in 1926 nonetheless marked a watershed that revealed the true extent that the counter-revolution had reached. The great general strike in the United Kingdom that year, wh...
Read more

Return to Marx

In 1967, «Marx Is Not a Has-Been in Detroit» was a Lotta Comunista headline for a memorable event, the struggle of the black proletariat in the American automotive capital. The race issue concealed class contradiction in itself; the centre of the struggle remained the factories of the metropolises in the industrialised powers, and not the countryside which should have surrounded those cities in the then fashionable myths of Maoism and Third-Worldism. Half a century later, a lot has changed, but not that class principle. The China of Mao Zedong’s peasant populism has become an economic power playing on the same level as America and Europe; its industrial giants challenge those of the West which had once subjugated it, but hundreds of millions of Chinese proletarians have also been added to our world class. It’s been quite a while, and since the time for a modern class struggle has also come to the Asian metropolises: Marx is not a has-been in Beijing, Shanghai, Wuhan and Canton, as h...
Read more