Skip to main content

Toyota Chases Tesla and Aims for Supremacy


From the series The world car battle


On September 6th, Toyota, the world's largest car manufacturer, an nounced a revised target of building I million electric vehicles by 2026, lowering its previous goal by 1.5 million, according to Automotive News.

Difficulties of the electric sector

A key driver behind the energy transition, particularly as regards vehicle electrification, is that countries which lack oil and natural gas resources need to reduce their reliance on regions prone to political instability and conflict. China has taken on the challenge of large-scale electrification, even though the electric car was pioneered by US manufacturers like Tesla and the Franco-Japanese Renault-Nissan alliance. Other nations have followed suit out of necessity. By focusing solely on environmental concerns, without factoring in China’s role, it is impossible to understand the impetus behind the global energy transition.

The challenges involved in the transition are enormous, but the intensifying global competition between major powers, particularly with the historically unprecedented rise of a power with the dimensions of China, is driving it forward. This has forced both the EU and the US to change course in their economic policy, with their political powers making dirigiste decisions. In its Electrit Vebicle Outlook 2024 report, BloombergNEF revised its forecasts for battery electric vehicle sales through 2026, with China continu ing to lead in electric car production, battery manufacturing, and the global supply chain for essential raw materi als and components [June 12th]. The challenge from Chinese electrification remains ever-present, and, despite its obstacles, the trend towards electrification is irreversible.

Volkswagen’s current difficulties slot into this broader context, with Ford, General Motors, Stellantis, and other car manufacturers also reassessing their electric vehicle ambitions in recent months. Even Volvo has postponed its goal of ending the production of combustion engine cars by the end of 2030 Automotive News, September 12th). In light of BloombergNEF’s assessments, it is worth examining Toyota’s strategy.

Toyota’s multi-pathway approach

On June 13th, 2023, Toyota Motor Corporation held a “Toyota Technical Workshop” in Toyota City, Japan, with the theme “Let’s Change the Future of Cars”. In the field of electrification, Toyota has adopted a “multi-pathway” strategy to avoid the “pioneer’s trap” [Internationalism, October 2024]. Unlike Volkswagen and Volvo, which have committed to going fully electric, Toyota has opted for a more diversified approach. While battery-only electric vehicles (BEVS) will be introduced, they will not replace internal combustion engine, hybrid, and hydrogen-powered cars. This decision reflects Toyota’s great confidence in its industrial and finan cial resources. A key goal will be to bring the production costs of electric vehicles in line with those of internal combustion engine cars. To achieve this, the company plans to focus not only on reducing battery costs, bur also on improving the manufacturing process of electric vehicles.

Takero Kato, president of the BEV Factory which will produce Toyota’s battery-powered cars, outlined the company’s strategy of combining next-generation vehicles with solid-state batteries, which are expected to give BEVs a range of 1,000 km by 2028, together with the transformation of production processes. Unfortunately, we do not have detailed information on how the production processes are organised within Chinese automobile companies, particularly at BYD.

From books and newspapers, we have more information about Tovo ta, although this should be taken with a grain of salt, as many announcements contain a propagandistic component aimed at influencing inf stock market prices. The study of production processes in the automotive industry brings us in line with Karl Marx’s description in “Machinery and Modern Industry” [Capital, Vol. 1, Chapter 15].

In his analysis of heavy industry, Marx delves into the core of productive operations that generate wealth. It is within the factory that production costs — and ultimately, the final price — are determined. This is where we must begin, even before the end product, to understand where the crux of competition lies between large automobile companies during this phase of vehicle electrification.

Toyota’s new mode of production

In the planned Toyota plant for producing electric cars, the vehicle underbody will be divided into three sections (modules): front, middle, and rear, each with its own parts (see diagram). This approach allows for unprecedented labour efficiency, as workers no longer have to climb inside the vehicles during assembly. Tesla is trying to do the same.

This innovation will allow seats and other components to be fitted before the roof and side panels are fixed, simplifying the entire process and improving the efficiency of robots and equipment. Once the parts are assembled on each module and the three sections are completed and joined together, the car can proceed autonomously to finish the assembly. In this innovative self-propelled production line, the electric vehicles are guided by sensors and operate without a driver.

Toyota will also introduce “gigacasting”, the use of a giant press pioneered by Tesla [Internationalism, December 2023]. Its adoption will lead to a significant reduction in vehicle development costs and capital expenditure. The self-propelled production technology will cut the number of processes and investment costs by half. Vehicle development time will be reduced to 20 months, compared to the current average of 30. In the past, Toyota revolutionised modern production with its lean, just-in-time production system. Since then, its methods have been adopted worldwide, from hospitals to software companies, and have been studied extensively in business schools and boardrooms. However, in the realm of battery-powered electric vehicles, the Japanese manufacturer has been overtaken by Tesla.

Toyota executives not only claim that they will catch up, but also aim to achieve a leading position in the sector with their next generation of electric vehicles, set to debut in 2026. The company plans to sell 3.5 million electric vehicles annually by 2030, which would represent 30% of its total production. In an interview this year with the Japanese newspaper Nikkei, Honda Motor Co. CEO Toshihiro Mibe spoke about the “Tesla shock” affecting the entire automotive industry. Sandy Munro, CEO of Munro & Associates (Michigan), which specialises in vehicle dismantling and consulting on improvements for car manufacturers, stated that many of Toyota’s new production ideas mirror those developed by Tesla.

Toyota’s new approach will be embodied in its factory for producing battery-powered cars: it will not simply be a physical plant, but an integrated organisation that unites all functions, from design and engineering to production and sales. According to Kato, with the BEV Factory, the future of battery electric vehicles will involve a transformation not only of the product itself, but also of the entire production process. For Conrad Layson, senior alternative propulsion analyst at AutoForecast Solutions, the new factory will position Toyota as one of the leading traditional car manufactur ers in the transition to electric vehicles. The Toyota Production System needed an upgrade, and upgrading production methods is precisely the challenge that all car manufacturers will need to face.

Lotta Comunista, October 2024

Popular posts in the last week

The EU Commission Plans for Rearmament and a Clean Industrial Deal

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series European news Following the European elections which took place on June 6th - 9th, the leaders of the Member States met on June 27th at the European Council. Ursula von der Leyen was nominated as president of the next European Commission, after she was chosen as the European People’s Party’s (EPP) Spitzenkandidat (“leading candidate”). The agreement also included the election of former Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio Costa as president of the European Council, and the appointment of former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas as High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Subsequently, on July 18th, Parliament elected von der Leyen as president of the Commission by an absolute majority, with 401 votes out of 719 MEPs. On September 17th, von der Leyen presented her team of commissioners to the European Parliament and, two days later, the Council adopted this list of...

Libertarian Communism: A Different Kind of Communism

Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM   An examination of the debate within the groups that were to create GAAP (Anarchist Groups of Proletarian Action) gives a vivid picture of the problems that between 1948 and 1951 had to be slowly and painfully faced. Three major confrontations, progressively more serious, took place between Cervetto and Masini in the autumn of 1949 and again in the spring and autumn of 1950. As preparations were being made for the National Conference at Pontedecimo – from which GAAP would be born – debate on the nature of the organisation and on theories of the State and imperialism began to define the characteristics of the new political group, but also revealed the differences. The first step had been to look for ‘a different kind’ of communism in anarchism. Along this road Cervetto , with an ever-surer grasp, would raise the issue that had been first posed by Marx and Lenin : our militant...

Battle Over Times for European Rearmament

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Pages 1 and 2 In current Anglo-Saxon vocabulary, appeasement stands for cowardly and illusory pacification, as exemplified by the Munich Agreement of 1938, which conceded to the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia without stopping the march towards world war. Were Shigeru Ishiba, Ursula von der Leyen, Emmanuel Macron, and Friedrich Merz really, as has been said, the Neville Chamberlains of the tariff war, accepting appeasement on the 15% tariff in an ignominious surrender to Donald Trump's blackmail? And has Trump really revealed himself in Anchorage, Alaska, to be an appeaser towards Vladimir Putin? Was it, finally, only the firmness of the Europeans at the Washington summit which convinced Trump to remain as one of the guarantors of Ukraine's security? The plague of television and social media diplomacy feeds on simplistic and propa...

“Polish Moment” at Risk

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 3 From the series European news In July, the strategic triangle of London-Paris-Berlin was strengthened with the Northwood Declaration, in which the United Kingdom and France signalled the possibility of coordinating the use of their nuclear weapons through the creation of a “Nuclear Steering Group”, and with the Kensington Treaty, an Anglo-German defence pact. These agreements complement the Franco-British agreements of Lancaster House and the Franco-German Treaty of Aachen. Although Poland signed the Treaty of Nancy with France in May 2025, it was excluded from the recent “E3” consultations, in which only the United Kingdom, France, and Germany participated. Nevertheless, the establishment of the new government led by Donald Tusk, the Civic Platform (PO) leader, in the October 2023 elections, after eight years of anta...

Lotta Comunista: The Origins 1943-1952

Guido La Barbera Contents 9. Preface to the English Edition 13. Preface 19. Useful dates 21. Chapter One «ONE OUGHT TO KNOW WITH WHOM ONE IS DEALING» 25. The balance-of-power theory 27. Theory and the ‘strategy-party’ 29. Chapter Two THE FOUNDRY AND THE PARTISAN STRUGGLE 31. The Savona group 39. Passion disciplined by reason 40. Never again a tool in the hands of others 41. The Genoa group 46. The Sestri Ponente group 48. The groups in Rome and Tuscany 52. The strength of GAAP: ‘only a handful’ 55. Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM 58. Reckoning with Bordiga...

Variations and Gradations of Democracy in China

Internationalism No. 50, April 2023 Page 10 From the series Giats of Asia : the dillemas of Chinese single-party pluralism Only the materialist analysis of the intraction between structure and superstructure can explain the variety of the political forms. Why did the entrenchment of the capitalist mode of production in China occur in populist and Maoist forms? Why does Chinese imperialism express itself in CP single-party pluralism and not, for example, in the classical multi-party system of imperialist democracy? This specific political analysis does not regard the study of the economic causes which determine China’s political struggles, a scientific investigation which is its premise, “but the way” in which these struggles present themselves in the superstructure. “By analysing basic economic facts, Marxism can identify at first the interests which find expression in the political struggle. The form in which these interests appear politically, however, is a qu...

European Rearmament and Nuclear Directorate

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 4 The quantity and quality of the contradictions accumulated by the crisis in the world order are fertile ground for the unprecedented attempt of European Leninism. Two passages by Arrigo Cervetto, in the Quaderni ( Notebooks ) of 1981-82 and in The Difficult Question of Times , are a compass for dealing with every aspect of uneven development, both in terms of the struggle between classes and the clash between powers in the system of States. Cervetto writes in his Quaderni that the battle to establish the Bolshevik model of party in Italy in the 1960s was based on the analysis of capitalist development. Thanks to Lenin, I could finally see the development of capitalism in Italy as a molecular process. [...] This process would create such and so many contradictions that it would allow a group, which was able to analy...

The Party and the Unprecedented crisis in the World Order: A Crucial Decade

This first quarter-century has seen an epochal turning point in inter-power relations, triggered by China's very rapid imperialist development. Arrigo Cervetto recognised this process from the very early 1990s: Today history has sped up its pace to an unpredictable extent. [...] Analysis of the sixteenth century, as the century of accelerations and rift in world history, is a model for our Marxist vision ( La mezza guerra nel Golfo [The Half War in the Persian Gulf], January 1991). The course of imperialism was speeding up, and China's very rapid rise was opening up a new strategic phase with the new century. The United States, the leading power in the world, is being challenged by an antagonist with comparable economic strength which, moreover, openly states that it wants to provide itself with a "world class" military force within the next decade. Favoured by the 2008 global crisis and also by the pandemic crisis, China has forged ahead with its rapid rise for ...

Show Warfare?

Internationalism No. 86, April 2026 Page 16 After show politics and show diplomacy , have we sunk to the obscenity of show warfare ? On the surface, this is true. The Pentagon’s video game-style communications, where airstrikes, missile launches, and deadly explosions are set to music for social media clips, certainly suggest so. It matters little that a hundred schoolgirls were also blown to bits as artificial intelligence took centre stage on the battlefield. In reality, war propaganda has always showcased destruction and mocked the enemy; today in Washington, in the era of the high-tech groups of television and social media democracy , the only thing that has changed is the style and the means used to inflame fanaticisms and stuff people’s brains. In Tehran, dominated by a parasitic bourgeoisie that feeds on oil revenues and is intertwined with the militias and hierarchies of t...

Armed Negotiations between the Gulf and the Mediterranean

David Petraeus, Commander of the US forces in Iraq and the Gulf in 2007-2008, then director of the CIA in 2011-12, described the elimination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani on January 3 rd in Baghdad as a defensive action , with which the Trump presidency restored a US deterrence , which was weakened by recent Iranian actions . This is a reference to the attacks conducted indirectly, unclaimed by Tehran, against the Saudi oil infrastructures on September 14 th 2019. In March 2008, when the forces under Petraeus’ command supported the Iraqi Army in the fight against local Shite militias, Soleimani sent a message to the American general: informing him that he was the person in charge for Iranian policies in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Gaza therefore the channel through which to define an agreement to resolve the various issues with Tehran. Petraeus holds the advisors of the Quds Force, the spearhead of the Pasdaran asymmetric operations, responsible for the killing of around 600 ...