Skip to main content

Crisis in Europe’s Auto Industry: Labour Struggles, Class Conflict, and the End of Social Partnership

We have on several occasions pointed to the automobile manufacturing sector as an indicator of the shifting economic and, consequently, political balance of power between States. It is inevitable that this also applies to the dynamics of the labour market and therefore to the balance of power between classes.

A new social cycle

The emergence of the Chinese imperialist giant is also shaking up social relations in the old metropolises. We have defined this moment as the descending phase of social-democratisation, the era in which the “conquests” of the previous ascending cycle are called into question. It is the phase in which what was believed to be guaranteed, including in terms of employment relationships, is in danger of being lost. What appears at first glance as merely an effect of technology (in this sector, specifically the development of the electric car) in fact reflects a more general shift in influence between States and between classes.

These changes leave their mark especially where those guarantees were perceived as a constitutive part of the employment relationship. Once again, Germany is the clearest test of the new cycle. This is evidenced by the alarm over the paralysis of the social partnership, that is, of that perennial illusion of being able to co-manage an unmanageable reality such as the capitalist world market. The business daily Handelsblatt [October 31] writes: just when “the hour of social partnership — the balance between the interests of employees, companies, and shareholders — should be ringing, [...] conflicts are escalating [...] and collaboration is in danger”.

The Volkswagen affair appears to be the paradigm of this reality, but it is the world that has changed, not just Germany, notes Die Zeit [November 28th]: “It is true, Germany is no longer as attractive as it used to be”, but global technological and commercial upheavals cannot be ignored. It is also true, however, that “German managers are too lazy and too self-confident”.

Defensive struggle at Volkswagen

The employers’ demands in the Volkswagen crisis were summarised in the “poison list”, as IG Metall christened it: a reduction of employees (up to 55,000), with plant closures (two or three), and a 10% wage cut. The union has reacted by organising strikes, but also by putting forward a counter-proposal: the postponement of the 7% wage increase contained in the framework for the renewal of the company contract, in order to allocate the corresponding amount to a fund to cover the reductions in working hours imposed by the drop in sales.

Meanwhile, parallel to this dispute, IG Metall signed an agreement for the contract of the entire metalworkers sector (which does not include VW), reaching a compromise. On the plus side is a wage increase of 5.1%, in two instalments, with a one-off payment of €600; including other benefits, the real increase is 5.5%. On the downside, however, is an extension of the contract term to 25 months, as well as a rule allowing struggling companies to avoid applying the wage increase in full, a derogation which had been included in the previous contract.

After 70 hours of negotiations, a compromise was also reached at Volkswagen: the union can count among its achievements that no factory will be closed, but on the negative side, there will be 35,000 fewer workers by 2030; the reduction will take place in “socially acceptable” ways, meaning no layoffs, but through voluntary redundancies and freezing recruitment. Some production lines will be closed, including at the Wolfsburg headquarters, to reduce production capacity by 734,000 units per year. Also included in the agreement is the union’s counter-proposal to postpone the wage increase (the “good 5%” won by the metalworkers) until 2030, in order to finance reductions in working hours in the meantime.

In short, this was a defensive struggle in which IG Metall had to accept “painful contributions from the employees”, as chief negotiator Thorsten Gröger put it. In “historically adverse economic conditions”, with several companies expecting reductions in employment (from ThyssenKrupp to Bosch, from Ford to Schaeffler, and so on), the union had to deploy all of its organised strength to limit the retreat. This is worth considering, because similar conditions affect the whole of Europe.

A European cycle

Italy is no exception: the Stellantis case is the most glaring example of this. After the resignation of Carlos Tavares, the question remains as to who will be the next head of the group, but the real issue is the gradually shrinking workforce, which is a quarter smaller today compared to the birth of the group in January 2021, with a reduction of 53,000 to 40,000 [Corriere della Sera, December 5]. These are incentivised redundancies, to mitigate social repercussions, accompanied by the use of redundancy funds and furlough schemes, which still reduce wages. Other disputes have opened up in the supply chain, where the link with Germany and its demand of components also weighs heavily.

At the same time, the struggle for the renewal of the metalworkers’ contract is underway in Italy too, with the first strikes in response to the employers’ refusal to take into consideration the trade unions’ demands regarding wages, working hours, job security, and procurement. Yet, according to ISTAT data, the contractual real wage of a metalworker declined by 7.3% between 2021 and 2023 alone. And it took Mario Draghi, former governor of the ECB, to state that a model reliant upon “low wage growth to increase external competitiveness” today “is no longer sustainable” [Corriere, December 16].

The Stellantis affair also affects Paris, where FCA’s partner Peugeot is based. Moreover, many companies in France are expressing their intention to reduce employment, starting with the automotive sector: Michelin, Valeo, and Forvia. Then there is the steel industry, commerce (Auchan), chemicals (Vencorex), and even Airbus. According to the General Confederation of Labour (CGT), there are 200 crisis plans with 150,000 jobs at risk.

In the automotive components industry, according to CLEPA, the European industry association, 56,000 jobs have been lost since 2020, and another 32,000 redundancies have been announced for the first half of 2024 [La Stampa, November 21].

There are two classes

It is precisely the vast scale of the restructuring processes and their connection to the world contention between the powers that opens the door to the potential instrumentalisation of workers in social-imperialist campaigns. This is why it is crucial to leverage one simple and firm point: there is a European bourgeoisie, and there is a European proletariat. There are classes, a reality that sharply re-emerges from the ideological fog of interclassism during crises. And they are just as Marx defined them: those who own the means of production, and those who have nothing but their labour-power. Even eschewing demagogic visions, the juxtaposition of the accumulation of dividends on the one hand, and redundancies on the other, makes the existence of classes self-evident. But that is capitalism, and in capitalism it is always the wage earners who pay for crises, be they factory workers, technicians, or office workers. This is the case in every crisis, whether it is an economic crisis or, even more so, a military one.

A class-based response must start from this simple fact. On the trade union front, by organising a defence as best as possible. On the political front, by presenting a class perspective in opposition to the national, now Europeanist, interclassist ideologies, offering an antidote to the poisons of protectionism and social-imperialism. This already applies to trade union struggles, but it does so above all in the internationalist battle against the wars of the crisis in the world order.

Lotta Comunista, December 2024

Labels:

Popular posts in the last week

Collaboration and Nationalism in Ukraine and Belarus

Internationalism No. 88, June 2026 Page 8 In her essay Economia di guerra e inquadramento della società in URSS ( The War Economy and Social Control in the USSR ), Rebecca Manley writes that initially the German advance in Russia was welcomed by the local population and threatened the legitimacy of the reigning power , while party leaders, officials, and factory managers often jumped ship , with the abandoned populace openly cursing them [A. Aglan and R. Frank, La guerra-mondo 1937-1947 ( The World War 1937-1947 ), Einaudi, 2015-16]. Her account goes on to describe the government's gradual reassertion of control: The cost in human lives was increasing and shortages were continuing to worsen [...] it was only with the victory of Stalingrad that Stalin and the Soviet system recovered a central role in war propaganda . Overall, according to this author, the war years saw a surge of popular patr...
Read more

Beijing, Ambivalent About the G2, Opts for Temporary Stability

Internationalism No. 88, June 2026 Pages 4 and 5 Kolkata's The Telegraph announces "a rupture with the principle of post-War pacifism: that Japan and Germany had adhered to for decades". The West Bengal-based newspaper was founded in 1982 by Aveek Sarkar, a former protégé of Harold Evans at The Sunday Times in London. The editorial highlights certain aspects worth noting. First and foremost, there is a psychological dimension to the crises in the world order . The ideologies of the post-war order, imposed on the defeated bourgeoisies of Germany and Japan for decades, have permeated the whole of society to the point of becoming second nature that shape the German and Japanese ruling classes themselves. But today, a re-evaluation of these ideologies is in turn being imposed by an uneven development that, over the long term, has been economic, political, and military. This is a Z...
Read more

Multiple Games in the Third Gulf War

Internationalism No. 88, June 2026 Page 6 The conflict in the Gulf has entered its third month, marked by a precarious truce that reflects a strategic stalemate, with Tehran’s “selective blockade” of Hormuz and the US Navy’s “counter-blockade” of Iranian ports. According to the Pakistani daily Dawn , bilateral negotiations — mediated by Islamabad with the explicit support of Riyadh and the “discreet and indirect” backing of Beijing — appear to centre on the price of reopening the energy artery. For Washington, writes the Saudi newspaper Asharq al-Awsat , the negotiations should yield some kind of “tangible result” on the nuclear issue, allowing both sides to “claim victory”, given that the priority is resuming commercial traffic. To this end, granting Tehran the opportunity to collect some form of revenue has not been ruled out. Iranian “pragmatic” factions are raising the idea of maritime tr...
Read more

The KPD After January 1919

Internationalism No. 88, June 2026 Page 9 From the series Pages from the history of the workers’ movement The Weimar Republic took shape in the first six months of 1919, as Gustav Noske's Freikorps suppressed the revolution. The bourgeois parties of Weimar In the elections for the Constituent Assembly on January 19 th , 1919, the large corporate groups of German capital financed and steered the political forces. The four major banks alone contributed at least 30 million marks to the election funds of the various parties. At the head of the bourgeois forces were the great electricity magnates Walther Rathenau of AEG and Carl Friedrich von Siemens for the Democrats; Karl Helfferich of Deutsche Bank and Alfred Hugenberg of Krupp for the far-right nationalists; and major industrialists such as Hugo Stinnes for Gustav Stresemann's People's Party. Th...
Read more

Strikes at Samsung

Internationalism No. 88, June 2026 Page 7 From the series Workers’ struggles in the world The struggle waged by Samsung Electronics workers over the last three years has a particular significance in the panorama of workers’ struggles around the world. A great deal of this significance undoubtedly derives from its having been the first ever strike at the South Korean company where, moreover, no trade union existed until a few years ago: until 2020, Samsung was strictly non-union. But it is also important because, according to trade-union sources, it was the world’s first strike in the crucial chip-production sector. Today these are fundamental and indispensable components for a myriad of products, for both civilian and military use, and they are becoming even more important with the increasing hardware needs of artificial intelligence. This struggle therefore concerns a prod...
Read more

The EU Commission Plans for Rearmament and a Clean Industrial Deal

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series European news Following the European elections which took place on June 6th - 9th, the leaders of the Member States met on June 27th at the European Council. Ursula von der Leyen was nominated as president of the next European Commission, after she was chosen as the European People’s Party’s (EPP) Spitzenkandidat (“leading candidate”). The agreement also included the election of former Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio Costa as president of the European Council, and the appointment of former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas as High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Subsequently, on July 18th, Parliament elected von der Leyen as president of the Commission by an absolute majority, with 401 votes out of 719 MEPs. On September 17th, von der Leyen presented her team of commissioners to the European Parliament and, two days later, the Council adopted this list of...
Read more

Electoral Upheaval and Turmoil Inside Labour

Internationalism No. 88, June 2026 Page 3 From the series European news As Henry Kissinger wrote in his book Leadership (Penguin, 2022), in the British political system, parties are "rigorously institutionalized": "An electoral victory functions first to empower a party in parliament and, as a consequence of that, to install a new premier". Unlike presidential systems such as the American one, "the British system elevates members of the cabinet to the highest echelons of their party". The prime minister's authority "rests primarily on the maintenance of party discipline" because "the dissent of an influential clique, or the machinations of a single magnetic personality, can limit the premier's ability to pursue desired political objectives". "In extraordinary circumstances", warns Kissinger, ...
Read more

An Italianised Europe

Internationalism No. 88 - June 2026 Page 2 In almost four years in government, Italy’s renewed stability has been a key asset for Giorgia Meloni, also encouraging the European adaptation of the italian-style immigrants . However, the backlash from the referendum defeat, a real own goal, has opened a glaring rift that runs through both the end of the current legislature and the prospects for the next. There is debate over the political exhaustion of her government, forced to navigate the narrow path of budgetary statistics and under the threat of what the Financial Times has termed a “coming energy crisis” triggered by the blockade of the strait of Hormuz. At the referendum polls, the left-wing broad coalition “discovered” that it could compete with the centre-right, but no poll shows any substantial changes in the balance of power. The scenario of a “deadlock”, or a narrow majority for one...
Read more

Lotta Comunista: The Origins 1943-1952

Guido La Barbera Contents 9. Preface to the English Edition 13. Preface 19. Useful dates 21. Chapter One «ONE OUGHT TO KNOW WITH WHOM ONE IS DEALING» 25. The balance-of-power theory 27. Theory and the ‘strategy-party’ 29. Chapter Two THE FOUNDRY AND THE PARTISAN STRUGGLE 31. The Savona group 39. Passion disciplined by reason 40. Never again a tool in the hands of others 41. The Genoa group 46. The Sestri Ponente group 48. The groups in Rome and Tuscany 52. The strength of GAAP: ‘only a handful’ 55. Chapter Three LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM: A DIFFERENT KIND OF COMMUNISM 58. Reckoning with Bordiga...
Read more

Missiles, Drones, and Artificial Intelligence

Internationalism No. 88, June 2026 Page 10 From the series The arms industry put to the test in the Gulf The Pentagon has dubbed the US war against Iran Epic Fury . An assessment after about 40 days into the attacks, coordinated with Israel, indicates that the Iranian political and military leadership has been decimated, nuclear programs further compromised, the Navy hit, air defence capabilities reduced, and significant damage caused to Tehran's missile and drone factories. Yet, according to The Economist , it would have been better to call the operation Blind Fury because the war did not lead to the fall of the regime, and because it allowed the closure of the Strait of Hormuz (where the daily passage of ships collapsed from 135 to 4), thus greatly harming the European and Asian allies of the US. We will not deal here with the roles of those who sought and supp...
Read more