Skip to main content

Crisis in Europe’s Auto Industry: Labour Struggles, Class Conflict, and the End of Social Partnership

We have on several occasions pointed to the automobile manufacturing sector as an indicator of the shifting economic and, consequently, political balance of power between States. It is inevitable that this also applies to the dynamics of the labour market and therefore to the balance of power between classes.

A new social cycle

The emergence of the Chinese imperialist giant is also shaking up social relations in the old metropolises. We have defined this moment as the descending phase of social-democratisation, the era in which the “conquests” of the previous ascending cycle are called into question. It is the phase in which what was believed to be guaranteed, including in terms of employment relationships, is in danger of being lost. What appears at first glance as merely an effect of technology (in this sector, specifically the development of the electric car) in fact reflects a more general shift in influence between States and between classes.

These changes leave their mark especially where those guarantees were perceived as a constitutive part of the employment relationship. Once again, Germany is the clearest test of the new cycle. This is evidenced by the alarm over the paralysis of the social partnership, that is, of that perennial illusion of being able to co-manage an unmanageable reality such as the capitalist world market. The business daily Handelsblatt [October 31] writes: just when “the hour of social partnership — the balance between the interests of employees, companies, and shareholders — should be ringing, [...] conflicts are escalating [...] and collaboration is in danger”.

The Volkswagen affair appears to be the paradigm of this reality, but it is the world that has changed, not just Germany, notes Die Zeit [November 28th]: “It is true, Germany is no longer as attractive as it used to be”, but global technological and commercial upheavals cannot be ignored. It is also true, however, that “German managers are too lazy and too self-confident”.

Defensive struggle at Volkswagen

The employers’ demands in the Volkswagen crisis were summarised in the “poison list”, as IG Metall christened it: a reduction of employees (up to 55,000), with plant closures (two or three), and a 10% wage cut. The union has reacted by organising strikes, but also by putting forward a counter-proposal: the postponement of the 7% wage increase contained in the framework for the renewal of the company contract, in order to allocate the corresponding amount to a fund to cover the reductions in working hours imposed by the drop in sales.

Meanwhile, parallel to this dispute, IG Metall signed an agreement for the contract of the entire metalworkers sector (which does not include VW), reaching a compromise. On the plus side is a wage increase of 5.1%, in two instalments, with a one-off payment of €600; including other benefits, the real increase is 5.5%. On the downside, however, is an extension of the contract term to 25 months, as well as a rule allowing struggling companies to avoid applying the wage increase in full, a derogation which had been included in the previous contract.

After 70 hours of negotiations, a compromise was also reached at Volkswagen: the union can count among its achievements that no factory will be closed, but on the negative side, there will be 35,000 fewer workers by 2030; the reduction will take place in “socially acceptable” ways, meaning no layoffs, but through voluntary redundancies and freezing recruitment. Some production lines will be closed, including at the Wolfsburg headquarters, to reduce production capacity by 734,000 units per year. Also included in the agreement is the union’s counter-proposal to postpone the wage increase (the “good 5%” won by the metalworkers) until 2030, in order to finance reductions in working hours in the meantime.

In short, this was a defensive struggle in which IG Metall had to accept “painful contributions from the employees”, as chief negotiator Thorsten Gröger put it. In “historically adverse economic conditions”, with several companies expecting reductions in employment (from ThyssenKrupp to Bosch, from Ford to Schaeffler, and so on), the union had to deploy all of its organised strength to limit the retreat. This is worth considering, because similar conditions affect the whole of Europe.

A European cycle

Italy is no exception: the Stellantis case is the most glaring example of this. After the resignation of Carlos Tavares, the question remains as to who will be the next head of the group, but the real issue is the gradually shrinking workforce, which is a quarter smaller today compared to the birth of the group in January 2021, with a reduction of 53,000 to 40,000 [Corriere della Sera, December 5]. These are incentivised redundancies, to mitigate social repercussions, accompanied by the use of redundancy funds and furlough schemes, which still reduce wages. Other disputes have opened up in the supply chain, where the link with Germany and its demand of components also weighs heavily.

At the same time, the struggle for the renewal of the metalworkers’ contract is underway in Italy too, with the first strikes in response to the employers’ refusal to take into consideration the trade unions’ demands regarding wages, working hours, job security, and procurement. Yet, according to ISTAT data, the contractual real wage of a metalworker declined by 7.3% between 2021 and 2023 alone. And it took Mario Draghi, former governor of the ECB, to state that a model reliant upon “low wage growth to increase external competitiveness” today “is no longer sustainable” [Corriere, December 16].

The Stellantis affair also affects Paris, where FCA’s partner Peugeot is based. Moreover, many companies in France are expressing their intention to reduce employment, starting with the automotive sector: Michelin, Valeo, and Forvia. Then there is the steel industry, commerce (Auchan), chemicals (Vencorex), and even Airbus. According to the General Confederation of Labour (CGT), there are 200 crisis plans with 150,000 jobs at risk.

In the automotive components industry, according to CLEPA, the European industry association, 56,000 jobs have been lost since 2020, and another 32,000 redundancies have been announced for the first half of 2024 [La Stampa, November 21].

There are two classes

It is precisely the vast scale of the restructuring processes and their connection to the world contention between the powers that opens the door to the potential instrumentalisation of workers in social-imperialist campaigns. This is why it is crucial to leverage one simple and firm point: there is a European bourgeoisie, and there is a European proletariat. There are classes, a reality that sharply re-emerges from the ideological fog of interclassism during crises. And they are just as Marx defined them: those who own the means of production, and those who have nothing but their labour-power. Even eschewing demagogic visions, the juxtaposition of the accumulation of dividends on the one hand, and redundancies on the other, makes the existence of classes self-evident. But that is capitalism, and in capitalism it is always the wage earners who pay for crises, be they factory workers, technicians, or office workers. This is the case in every crisis, whether it is an economic crisis or, even more so, a military one.

A class-based response must start from this simple fact. On the trade union front, by organising a defence as best as possible. On the political front, by presenting a class perspective in opposition to the national, now Europeanist, interclassist ideologies, offering an antidote to the poisons of protectionism and social-imperialism. This already applies to trade union struggles, but it does so above all in the internationalist battle against the wars of the crisis in the world order.

Lotta Comunista, December 2024

Popular posts from this blog

Chinese Rearmament Projects Itself in Asia

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 5 From the series Asian giants Trends in rearmament spending and comparisons of military equipment are increasingly set to dominate coverage of the contention between powers in the crisis in the world order . The military factor has entered the strategic debate, accompanied by a wealth of figures and technical details. The increase in military spending as a percentage of GDP represents a widespread sign of the rearmament cycle at this juncture, but spending alone cannot entirely explain the situation, given the qualitatively different natures of the arsenals being compared. Nor are comparisons between this or that type of weapon useful in themselves, because ultimately all weapons are only ever used in combination with the complex military means available to a power, either in alliance or in conflict with other powers in the system of States. Therefore, while it is difficult to assess the real significa...

Uneven Development, Job Cuts, and the Crisis of Labour Under Global Capitalism

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 16 Uneven development is a fundamental law of capitalism. We have a macroscopic expression of this in the changing balance of power between States: Atlantic decline and Asian rise are the key dynamics behind the political processes of this era, including wars caused by the crisis in the world order. But behind all this there is a differentiated economic trend, starting from companies and sectors: hence the differentiated conditions for wage earners. And this is the element to keep in mind for an effective defensive struggle. It’s only the beginning The electrical and digital restructuring imposed by global market competition affects various production sectors. The car industry is the most obvious, due to the familiarity of the companies and brands involved. We have already reported on the agreement reached before Christmas at Volkswagen, which can be summarised as a reduction of 35,000 employees by 2030. Die Zeit [De...

Political Battles of European Leninism

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 1 Thirty years after the death of Arrigo Cervetto , we are publishing here the concluding passages of the introduction to his Opere Scelte (“Selected Works”) for the series Biblioteca Giovani (“Publications for young people”), soon to be published in Italian. The 1944-45 partisan war in Italy. The political battle within libertarian communism. The Korean War, and the watchword of “neither Washington nor Moscow”. The layoffs at the Ilva and Ansaldo factories, the political battle and trade union defence in the struggles of post-war restructuring. From 1953 onwards, the crisis of Stalinism, the 1956 Suez crisis, the Hungarian uprising, the 1957 Theses and the challenge of theory and strategy vis-à-vis the tendencies of unitary imperialism. The political struggle within Azione Comunista (“Communist Action”) and the Movimento della Sinistra Comunista (“Movement of the Communist Left”). From the 1950s to the early 1970s, t...

German Socialism in 1917

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 6 From the series Pages from the history of the worker’s movement  According to Arrigo Cervetto [ Opere , Vol. 7], “paracentrism” is “the biggest obstacle to the formation of the worldwide Bolshevik party”. The Spartacists at Zimmerwald and Kiental Cervetto was analysing Lenin’s battle against centrism for the creation of the Third International, a battle which saw him isolated at Zimmerwald. He wrote down one of Zinoviev’s quotations from Histoire du parti communiste russe . “We were in the minority at Zimmerwald [1915]. […] In the years 1915 and 1916, we were nothing but an insignificant minority”. “But what is more serious?” – observed Cervetto – “is that the Zimmerwald Spartacists also said they were opposed to us”. In the strategic perspective of the “two separate halves” of socialism – the political conditions in Russia and the economic, productive, and social conditions in Germany – “for ...

Class Consciousness and Crisis in the World Order

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Pages 1 and 2 The consciousness of the proletariat “cannot be genuine class-consciousness, unless the workers learn, from concrete, and above all from topical, political facts and events to observe every other social class in all the manifestations of its intellectual, ethical, and political life; unless they learn to apply in practice the materialist analysis and the materialist estimate of all aspects of the life and activity of all classes, strata, and groups of the population”. If it concentrates exclusively “or even mainly” upon itself alone, the proletariat cannot be revolutionary, “for the self-knowledge of the working class is indissolubly bound up, not solely with a fully clear theoretical understanding or rather, not so much with the theoretical, as with the practical, understanding — of the relationships between all the various classes of modern society”. For this reason, the worker “must have a clear picture in ...

Historical Constants and Strategic Surprise

The Strategic Surprise of the Agreement between Beijing and Tehran and the Suggestion of a Six-Power Concert The agreement between Beijing and Tehran falls under the definition of strategic surprise , i.e., events that entirely appertain to the political realm and mark a change or an about-turn in the balance among the powers. New alliances, the breakdown of alliances, the overturning of coalitions, diplomatic openings or unexpected military sorties: these are the regular novelties of international politics that Arrigo Cervetto wrote about. However, if the agreement was an unforeseeable event in itself, the long-term objective economic and political trends. that have determined it and made it possible are entirely investigable. The invasion of Afghanistan by the USSR at the end of December 1979 was interpreted by the United States as a potential threat to the oil routes of the Persian Gulf, and it was a contemporary revival of the Great Game , which had set the British Empire agai...

Bolsonaro Squeezed between Pandemic, Lula Card and Armed Forces

This article is taken from Intervenção Comunista — the journal of our Brazilian comrades We wrote in May last year that the ‘tropical Trump’ causes a perfect storm . This first quarter of the year seems to demonstrate this clearly: GDP decline (-4.1%) and increased unemployment (14.2%); an end to emergency aid and a delay in the resumption of a new, much leaner aid plan; a record number of deaths and Covid infections. With 2.7% of the world’s population, the country accounts for about 12% of Covid-19 deaths. In March alone, Brazil recorded an increase of about 33% in its daily deaths. The pandemic crisis, coupled with historical imbalances, is shaking up the dysfunctional government of Jair Bolsonaro, who has just appointed his fourth health minister in a year. Increased dependence on the Centrão The second half of Bolsonaro’s term began — for their politics — with the election of Arthur Lira (Progressive Party-Alagoas) as president of the Chamber of Deputies, and Rodrigo Pac...

Price War in the US and EU

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 7 From the series Industry and pharmaceuticals The contention in the biopharmaceutical field between the two sides of the Atlantic addresses the issue of costs, in two different ways. In a letter to the Financial Times published on April 23rd, Vas Narasimhan and Paul Hudson, the CEOs of Swiss company Novartis and French company Sanofi respectively, presented a harsh diagnosis of the state of European biopharmaceuticals compared to their major competitors, the United States and China. Narasimhan, an American son of immigrants from Tamil Nadu, and Hudson, a Briton, head two of the world's ten largest pharmaceutical multinationals. The two executives see "a strong outlook for the US – thanks to policies and regulations conducive to fast and broad patient access to innovative medicines". In contrast, Europe, "while home to some of the most important biopharma companies in the world"...

Forces and Consequences of the New Strategic Phase

The new strategic phase in the world balance, with its new corresponding political cycles within powers, requires attention to the materialistic, historical and dialectical method of political analysis itself. The changing forces and basic trends need to be identified; we can make conjectures about the developments in single political battles, but the outcome of these battles will always require us to contemplate a plurality of solutions: some more probable. others less. but never Just a mechanical consequence of long-term economic movements. Many fixed points of the method of political analysis are usual tools in our Marxist elaboration, but this does not mean they must be taken for granted: it is of use to recall them, in relation to the new unknowns of the political battle. Men make their own history, but they do not make it just as they please; they do not make it under circumstances chosen by themselves, but under circumstances directly encountered, given and transmitted from t...

The Defeat in Afghanistan — a Watershed in the Cycle of Atlantic Decline

In crises and wars there are events which leave their mark on history because of how they make a decisive impact on the power contention, or because of how, almost like a chemical precipitate, they suddenly make deep trends that have been at work for some time coalesce. This is the case of the defeat of the United States and NATO in Afghanistan, which is taking the shape of a real watershed in the cycle of Atlantic decline. For the moment, through various comments in the international press, it is possible to consider its consequences on three levels: America’s position as a power and the connection with its internal crisis; the repercussions on Atlantic relations and Europe’s dilemmas regarding its strategic autonomy; and the relationship between the Afghan crisis and power relations in Asia, especially as regards India’s role in the Indo-Pacific strategy. Repercussions in the United States Richard Haass is the president of the CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations; despite having ...