Skip to main content

Digital Monetary Weapons

On August 15th, 1971 (50 years ago) US President Richard Nixon declared that the ‘gold window’ was closed. The era of the convertibility of the dollar to gold was over, and the system that had been agreed upon by the victors of the war at Bretton Woods in 1944 collapsed: the regime of fixed but subject to periodical reviews exchange rates had lasted a quarter of a century.

Jeffrey Garten, Bill Clinton’s former Undersecretary of Commerce for International Trade and managing director of the Blackstone Group and Lehman Brothers, is now a historian who has written about Nixon’s decision. He recalls that the turnaround came at a time when the amount of dollars in circulation in the world was four times the amount of gold held in reserve, inflation was rising, Washington was withdrawing troops from Vietnam, and Nixon, the month before, had announced his visit to Beijing, a historic event.

In 1959, the economist Robert Triffin had explained to Congress that there were absurdities associated with the use of national currencies as international reserves and that the contradiction was a built-in de-stabilizer of the national monetary system. The end of convertibility did not eliminate these absurdities; instead, it removed the only limit its creators had provided: the gold standard.

The power of inertia

Over the next 50 years, during which the Bretton Woods system was replaced by floating exchange rates, Triffin’s denunciation resonated on dozens of occasions and in many variations. The dollar’s dominance was undermined in a few moments of crisis — for example, when the US credit rating was downgraded in 2011 — but more often, crises increased its appeal as a safe-haven currency, like the umbrella most able to weather a storm.

Monetary historians derive a lesson from the resilience of the dollar and, before that, from the long persistence of the monetary system based on the pound sterling well beyond the UK’s relative decline compared to a rising United States (which had surpassed the UK’s output by around 1870). The key factor explaining the resilience of monetary systems to setbacks and the loss of economic clout is the enormous inertia of the systems that govern the daily lives of billions of people as well as millions of businesses and institutions. This includes the persistent reluctance of the rising powers to claim the driver’s seat. This does not reduce the negative effects of Triffin’s absurdities, or the attempts of other powers to reduce or constrain the hegemony of the dominant currency by demanding that the global monetary system be adapted to a multipolar world.

The most important operation since 1971 in reducing the damages of currency fluctuations, of devastating devaluations and revaluations, has been the creation of the single European currency. The ongoing Next Generation EU project for Europe’s energy and digital restructuring will also constitute a decisive step in elevating the euro from an essentially regional to a world currency if it succeeds in stabilising and permanently establishing a common debt market.

A sheriff dollar and speculative currencies

An idea has emerged in recent years, and has been strengthened as a result of pandemic of the century: new digital technologies which expand the online purchasing of goods, services, and securities, and simplify payments and monetary transfers — may be the shortcut to reforming the international monetary system.

This hypothesis has found a foothold and impetus in two main events. On the one hand, the use of the dollar as a surgical weapon in power relations. The weaponization of the US currency, tested during the strategic dispute with Iran and contested in the tensions with Russia and China, has even been deployed against the banks and companies of allied countries that violated Washington’s sanctions. On the other hand, an unexpected and revealing shock came from Facebook’s attempt to launch its own private and international digital currency, Libra, tapping into its social network of about 3 billion users. The highest institutions have closed ranks against the irruption of private capital in the field of monetary sovereignty. Mark Zuckerberg’s operation has been suspended but not abandoned: renamed Diem, it seems to be waiting for an opportunity to re-emerge.

The phenomenon of private digital currencies, which are not currencies but speculative bets, has grown stronger during the pandemic, reaching dizzying heights and falls, depending on the sponsors who indulge their adventures (such as Bitcoin, inflated or deflated by Elon Musk, Amazon or JPMorgan) or the severity of the regulators (as in the case of Binance, banned in the UK).

Sovereign digital coins

Plans by some central banks to launch or accelerate the issuance of their own digital currencies, which are referred to by the acronym CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency), were initially motivated by the need to provide a service which makes use of the most prevalent payment technologies, and to deny any ground to dangerous private currencies. Worldwide, according to Maria. Demertzis of the Bruegel Institute, only one-fifth of payments are made in cash, with large differences between countries.

Gillian Tett, of the Financial Times, thinks central banks are getting on the digital currency bandwagon for two reasons: they fear that, because of the abnormal issuance of trust money to finance quantitative easing, the monetary system has become unbalanced; and they think this has been excessively overburdened during the pandemic. The journalist is sceptical about the ability of central banks to make digital currencies work, mainly because of the risk of displacing the banking system, which is the manager and beneficiary of most payments and transfers. A slice of bank fees is now shared with mobile phone operators, which have an increasing weight in the transactions of younger generations. The global income of these fees is estimated by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) at about 1% of GWP.

The Economist sees govcoins as a giant risk, but one that must be taken. The new incarnation of money, by creating a direct interface between citizens and the Fed or ECB, will be safer and cheaper. But there is a risk of losing control of the banking system, especially in times of crisis; or govcoins may even become the state’s panopticons to control the population; finally, there is the fear that they will alter the games of geopolitics, offering an alternative to the dollar and open markets. Either way, this will be the next great experiment in finance and promises — writes The Economist — to be a lot more consequential than the humble ATM.

The BIS, in its 2021 Annual Economic Report, called central bank digital currencies an opportunity for the monetary system to ensure its systemic risk regulation, liquidity and integrity. The real challenge, the BIS notes, will be the creation of a huge amount of personal data, which poses management and protection problems.

Two opposing positions emerge among monetary historians. Berkley’s Barry Eichengreen is the main exponent of the sceptical point of view: CBDCs are coming. But they won’t change the face of international payments. And they won’t dethrone the dollar. Princeton economic historian Harold James, however, sees a turning point in monetary history: As the digital revolution accelerates, the national era in money is drawing to a close. […] we are moving toward another new monetary order, The process is just beginning. Technological determinism applied to power relations monetary relations being one of them — is imprudent. On the contrary, it is certain that these new monetary battles will contribute to the unprecedented tensions of the contention between powers.

About 50 central banks are studying digital currencies. Some intend to distribute their future digital currencies through national banking systems (the wholesale model), while others are considering a direct relation with their citizens (the retail model), The burning issue is the cross-border use of digital currencies.

The challenge of the digital yuan

A joint report by the BIS, the IMF and the World Bank for the upcoming G20 gives an account of a survey conducted in early 2021 among 50 central banks, 18 in advanced countries and 32 in emerging countries: only 8% of them are willing to also use their currencies abroad from the outset, both wholesale and retail. There are four countries, China being one of them, which intend to reach monetary agreements with their trading partners. For China, this will first and foremost be with emerging markets along the new Silk Roads and beneficiaries of Beijing’s investments and loans.

China has been conducting a pilot experiment for a year, in some provinces. The weekly Nikkei writes that initially the Chinese idea was of a digital yuan for domestic use, but in July a government white paper announced that its use in cross-border payments was being considered. Beijing thus confirms the strategic objective of the internationalization of its currency, currently underrepresented at 2.5% in the world’s foreign exchange reserves and cross-border payments, while China has exceeded 12% of world exports of goods and services, according to the IMF’s figures. The Nikkei article gives both a defensive version of the Chinese line (there are concerns that Washington is weaponizing the dollar to impose sanctions on China) and an offensive one (China’s race to develop a central bank digital currency has to be seen in the context of Beijing’s efforts to wrest global influence and power from the US).

First sparks between the two shores of the Atlantic

Within the Fed there are positions against sovereign digital currency, while they re-evaluate the role of private ones that call themselves stablecoins because they guarantee their legal tender with reserves of conventional currencies.

In late June, Vice President Randal Quarles spoke out against the adoption of a digital currency by the Fed, questioning its legal authority. Quarles considers it unlikely that the dollar’s role as the dominant currency in international financial transactions will be threatened by a foreign CBDC. The dollar has nothing to fear from competition from stablecoins, and indeed a global US dollar stablecoin network could encourage use of the dollar by making cross-border payments faster and cheaper, and it potentially could be deployed much faster and with fewer downsides than a CBDC.

Christopher Waller, a member of the Fed executive, also stands firmly on Quarles’ side. Facebook’s rehabilitation after the condemnation in 2019 iS evident. Diem, the upgraded version of Libra, offered the Fed and ECB its infrastructure to distribute their future digital currencies. Fabio Panetta, member of the ECB executive, replied: This is the opposite of the line from ‘The Godfather’: it’s an offer that can’t be accepted. […] There are tasks and functions that the central bank cannot relinquish.

The Governor of the Bank of France François Villeroy de Galhau considers a European digital currency to be an urgent issue for three reasons. The share of dematerialised payments during the pandemic rose from 51% to 70%: We, as a central bank shall never abandon cash; but this commitment cannot be our sole response to technological change. The emergence of new instruments of Big Tech, the crypto-assets and stablecoins, could threaten our monetary sovereignty and our mandate to safeguard financial stability. Finally, the launch of foreign CBDCs, and in particular the digital yuan which is already accessible in the major Chinese cities, means that the international role of the euro may risk losing momentum. The ECB’s digital currency should be launched in partnership with commercial banks, not against them.

Burkhard Balz, a member of the Bundesbank executive, seems to be overcoming the German central bank’s traditional reluctance to measures that weaken the fiduciary currency. It is a matter of proportions: the balances of eurozone commercial banks amount to €14 trillion, about ten times the cash circulating in euros. Sovereign digital money will be a third form of money, alongside euro cash (fiduciary money) and commercial banks’ balances at the central bank (bank money). But that isn’t all: A digital euro is also seen as a great opportunity for the autonomy of Europe. […] Because payment transactions are now considered as an important factor also from a geostrategic point of view.

In the age of dirigisme rediscovered by state powers, the central bank’s digital currency has a centralizing role that China and Europe intend to wield.

Lotta Comunista, July-August 2021

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Chinese Rearmament Projects Itself in Asia

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 5 From the series Asian giants Trends in rearmament spending and comparisons of military equipment are increasingly set to dominate coverage of the contention between powers in the crisis in the world order . The military factor has entered the strategic debate, accompanied by a wealth of figures and technical details. The increase in military spending as a percentage of GDP represents a widespread sign of the rearmament cycle at this juncture, but spending alone cannot entirely explain the situation, given the qualitatively different natures of the arsenals being compared. Nor are comparisons between this or that type of weapon useful in themselves, because ultimately all weapons are only ever used in combination with the complex military means available to a power, either in alliance or in conflict with other powers in the system of States. Therefore, while it is difficult to assess the real significa...
Read more

Uneven Development, Job Cuts, and the Crisis of Labour Under Global Capitalism

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 16 Uneven development is a fundamental law of capitalism. We have a macroscopic expression of this in the changing balance of power between States: Atlantic decline and Asian rise are the key dynamics behind the political processes of this era, including wars caused by the crisis in the world order. But behind all this there is a differentiated economic trend, starting from companies and sectors: hence the differentiated conditions for wage earners. And this is the element to keep in mind for an effective defensive struggle. It’s only the beginning The electrical and digital restructuring imposed by global market competition affects various production sectors. The car industry is the most obvious, due to the familiarity of the companies and brands involved. We have already reported on the agreement reached before Christmas at Volkswagen, which can be summarised as a reduction of 35,000 employees by 2030. Die Zeit [De...
Read more

The Unstoppable Force: Capital’s Demand for Migrant Labour

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 16 “Before Giorgia Meloni became Italy’s prime minister, she pledged to cut immigration. Since she has been in government the number of non-EU work visas issued by Italy has increased”. This is how The Economist of April 26th summarises the schizophrenia of their politics; and this is not only true in Italy: “Net migration also surged in post-Brexit Britain”. The needs of the economic system do not coincide with the rhetoric of parliamentarism. And vice versa. Schizophrenia and imbalances in their politics Returning to Italy, the Bank of Italy has pointed out that by 2040, in just fifteen years, there will be a shortage of five million people of working age, which could lead to an estimated 11% contraction in GDP. This is why even Italy’s “sovereignist” government is preparing to widen the net of its Immigration Flow Decree. The latest update, approved on June 30th, provides for the entry of almost ...
Read more

The Defeat in Afghanistan — a Watershed in the Cycle of Atlantic Decline

In crises and wars there are events which leave their mark on history because of how they make a decisive impact on the power contention, or because of how, almost like a chemical precipitate, they suddenly make deep trends that have been at work for some time coalesce. This is the case of the defeat of the United States and NATO in Afghanistan, which is taking the shape of a real watershed in the cycle of Atlantic decline. For the moment, through various comments in the international press, it is possible to consider its consequences on three levels: America’s position as a power and the connection with its internal crisis; the repercussions on Atlantic relations and Europe’s dilemmas regarding its strategic autonomy; and the relationship between the Afghan crisis and power relations in Asia, especially as regards India’s role in the Indo-Pacific strategy. Repercussions in the United States Richard Haass is the president of the CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations; despite having ...
Read more

Democratic Defeat in the Urban Vote

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series Elections in the USA A careful analysis of the 2022 mid-term elections revealed the symptoms of a Democratic Party malaise which subsequently fully manifested itself in the latest presidential election, with the heavy loss of support in its traditional strongholds of the metropolitan areas of New York City and Chicago, and the State of California. A defeat foretold Republican votes rose from 51 million in the previous 2018 midterms to 54 million in 2022, a gain of 3 million. The Democrat vote fell from 61 to 51 million, a loss of 10 million. The Republicans gained only three votes for every ten lost by the Democrats, while the other seven became abstentions. In 2022, we analysed the elections in New York City by borough, the governmental districts whose names are well known through movies and TV series. In The Bronx, where the average yearly household income is $35,000, the Democrats lost 52,00...
Read more

‘Two Hands’ and ‘Two Roads’

From the series News from the Silk Road The international tensions which China will face on the seas in the next fifteen years could find a buffer in the expansion of China’s influence on land in Central, Southern and Western Asia. Wang Jisi is the dean of the School of International Studies at the University of Beijing and a major figure of the American party in China. His unexpected foray into ‘geopolitics’ has reignited the old clash between different American currents — a phenomenon we analysed more than twenty years ago. At the time, Robert Manning, the author of The Asian Energy Factor and adviser to the State Department in 1991, viewed Asia’s growing dependence on the Persian Gulf for its energy requirements in the light of geoeconomics and geostrategy and foresaw a possible convergence between the USA and China. From a geoeconomic standpoint, both trade and the funding and development of the infrastructure necessary for Asia’s energy needs were more important than terri...
Read more

In the Depth of Our Class

The pandemic of the century is a storm that does not subside; it returns to its rampage after 40 million infections and more than a million official victims, perhaps two million according to estimates on the excess deaths. In the contention between powers, China stands as the winner: it seems to have tamed the virus, and industry and services are up and running; the USA and Europe, on the other hand, are moving towards a new wave of infections that casts yet more shadows on the economic cycle. Political structures and health systems are at the height of tension. In America, the elections have judged Donald Trump’s rash demagogy on the basis of the opposite reasons for containing the pandemic and the intolerance of small and large producers; in Europe the executives are attempting to steer between the surge in infections, increasingly stringent confinement measures and the threats of fiscal jacquerie in the tourism and catering sectors. Almost everywhere, in the Old Continent, governm...
Read more

India’s Weaknesses in the Global Spotlight

Farmers’ protests around New Delhi have been going on for four months now. A controversial intervention by the Supreme Court has suspended the implementation of the new agticultural laws, but has raised questions about the dynamics between the judiciary and the executive, and has failed to unblock the negotiations between government and peasant organisations. The assault by Sikh farmers on the Red Fort during the Republic Day parade as India was displaying its military might to the outside world — the Chinese Global Times maliciously noted — paradoxically widened the protest in the huge state of Uttar Pradesh. The Modi government has been trying to revive India’s image with the 2021 Union Budget: it announced one hundred privatisations and approved the increase to 75% of the limit on direct foreign investment in insurance companies. For The Indian Express ( IEX ) this is a sign of the commitment to push ahead with reforms despite the backlash from rural India. Also for The Economi...
Read more

Militarised Scientists

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 13 From the series Atom and industrialisation of science “ The bourgeoisie has stripped of its halo every occupation hitherto honoured and looked up to with reverent awe. It has converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid wage labourers ” [Marx and Engels, The Communist Manifesto ). The Manhattan Project scientists In Brighter Than a Thousand Suns: A Personal History of the Atomic Scientists , Robert Jungk [1913-1994] writes that the Manhattan Project was a labyrinth of winding paths and dead ends. Commenting on Jungk’s romanticised account of the first phase of the history of the atomic bomb, Edward Teller [1908-2003], often called the “father” of the H-bomb, wrote: “There is no mention of the futile efforts of the scientists in 1939 to awaken the interest of the military authorities in the atomic bomb. The reader does not learn about the dismay of scientists f...
Read more

The Comprehensive Agreement on Investment Strengthens the ‘European Party’ in China

From the series News from the Silk Road “Chinese people treat [US democracy] as a variety show which is much more interesting than House of Cards’ [...]”. Beijing does not feel the same embarrassment as the old democracies of the West faced with the grotesque scenes of demonstration against the Capitol organised by the president of the United States. Zhao Minghao from the Chongyang Institute spelled out the obvious in his analysis some time earlier: “the political farce by the incumbent president and some Republican lawmakers is reflecting the profound crisis on US domestic politics.” The Global Times is serving a hefty bill to the ideologies of liberal interventionism: “the ‘beacon of democracy’, and the beautiful rhetoric of ‘City upon a Hill’ [...]” are undergoing a serious debacle or in other words, a “Waterloo of US international image”. It will be a while before the US can “interfere in other countries’ domestic affairs with the excuse of ‘democracy’[...]”. Attention is also...
Read more