Skip to main content

States and Courts Counterbalance Trump

From the series Chronicles of the new American nationalism

Donald Trump’s political agenda has been dictated by the tempo of the dozens of executive orders, memoranda, and proclamations he has signed, challenging international partners abroad, and Congress, the States of the Union, and the bureaucracy at home. The execution of some orders has already been temporarily suspended by federal judges, while the chaos caused by a memorandum led the administration itself to withdraw it. Other rulings are expected from the courts at the request of citizens, NGOs, and States.

Furthermore, as James Politi of the Financial Times notes, “the result of his political success” in the elections is that Trump will have to satisfy “a much more diverse political coalition” than in his first term. Ross Douthat, a conservative commentator for The New York Times, also believes that “at least until the Democratic Party gets up off the mat, this means the most important conflicts in American politics are happening within the court of Trump”.

Conflicting Factions

An “obvious” conflict for Douthat is the one between MAGA (Make America Great Again) “populism” and “Silicon Valley libertarianism”. Elon Musk said he is ready for “war” to defend the visas with which many companies import skilled workers. Steve Bannon, one of Trump’s main strategists during his first term, has pledged to “take down” Musk and the “broligarchs” of the PayPal Mafia, who do not defend the “Nation-State”.

Additionally, according to Douthat, a clash over foreign policy could arise in the executive. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and National Security Advisor Mike Waltz are considered to be “hawks” on the Middle East. The Pentagon top brass, however, includes Michael DiMino, a CIA analyst who is cautious towards Tehran, and Elbridge Colby, head of policy planning and author of the first Trump presidency’s National Defense Strategy. Colby considers China to be the main threat and the Middle East a secondary theatre and he does not want the US to be distracted by a war there.

However, there are “a few more internal wars to watch”, continues Douthat. Trump’s “court” is full of financiers from the “elite”, such as Scott Bessent at the Treasury and Howard Lutnick at Commerce, for the likes of whom Wall Street should not be disturbed by an excess of protectionism.

According to the Financial Times, Bessent had prepared a gradual monthly increase in tariffs of 2.5%, to give companies time to adapt and offer partners the opportunity to negotiate. But Trump, with emergency powers, imposed a sharp increase in levies on goods from China (10%) and from Mexico and Canada (25%).

The reaction of the markets and partners constituted a natural counterweight, provoking a reaction from the members of the administration. Peter Navarro, senior advisor to the White House and a strong supporter of tariffs, emerged as a “key figure” working with Trade Representative (USTR) Jamieson Greer. Lutnick, playing a “starring role”, apparently met with Canadian and Mexican officials even before the tariffs were imposed. When the tariffs were suspended by Trump, Navarro praised both Lutnick and Bessent, pointing to the “immediate results” obtained in the negotiations.

Challenges from the States

Rana Foroohar, a commentator at the Financial Times, writes: “As fast as the new president can sign executive orders, individual state governments are stepping up to challenge them in court. The upshot will be a more confusing environment for business and a richer one for lawyers”. The States governed by the Democrats “look for ways to shield themselves” from the incursions with which the federal power would like to change their regulations on immigration, production, and “monopoly power”, or make “massive cuts” to subsidies for businesses, health, and emergency services.

Moreover, Foroohar notes, the Democrats govern some of the States with the highest levels of consumption. California, Illinois, Massachusetts and New York “can create strong demand signals for the rest of the country” in favour of certain production standards, which companies adapt to despite the costs, “even if the president doesn’t like it”.

Opposition in the Senate

Former Republican leader Mitch McConnell has retired, but his term has not expired. He outlined a foreign policy strategy with an essay in Foreign Affairs and opposed some of Trump’s nominations. The GOP holds a slim majority (53-47) and the shift of a handful of them can make all the difference.

Matt Gaetz, Trump’s choice for the Justice Department, avoided Senate scrutiny by withdrawing his nomination. Deeming Peter Hegseth unsuitable as head of the Pentagon, McConnell voted against his nomination, together with Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Susan Collins (Maine), forcing Vice-President J. D. Vance to cast a tie-breaking vote. Finally, McConnell, a man who survived polio in the years before the vaccine, was the only GOP senator to vote against Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the vaccine sceptic who has become Secretary of Health and Human Services.

Chuck Schumer, leader of the Democratic senators, urged by six governors, some of them of national fame such as Tim Walz (Minnesota), asked Trump to withdraw the nomination of Russ Vought as head of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

Vought believes that the 1974 Impoundment Control Act, which reaffirmed the power of Congress over public spending, is “unconstitutional”. He supports the idea that the executive branch has the power to seize funds approved by Congress and to reform the so-called administrative state. “We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically affected”, he said in 2024, and that “when they wake up in the morning, we want them to not want to go to work”. In an essay for Project 2025 of the Heritage Foundation, he called for a president with the “boldness to bend or break the bureaucracy” and the “self-denial to [...] send power away from Washington” and “back to America’s families, faith communities, local governments, and States”.

Bureaucratic-media tangle

Through the president’s executive orders and the actions of the Department of Government Efficiency led by Musk in liaison with the OMB, the administration is attacking the prerogatives of departments and their officials, even at senior levels. An executive order has frozen the funding of USAID, the foreign development agency, whose goal, writes the Wall Street Journal, is “to make friends and influence countries in the American interest”, through funding and NGOs.

The attack on USAID has been toned down by Marco Rubio, the head of the State Department on which the agency depends. Moreover, USAID was founded by an act of Congress, and in the controversy one of the claims is that it would be unconstitutional to dissolve it and to cut its programmes, which are mostly financed by other acts of Congress. The WSJ “wouldn’t mind” if USAID “vanished” but warns that the “uproar” around the operation “is a taste of the pushback that Messrs. Musk and Trump are going to face as they work to shrink and reform the executive branch”. The conservative newspaper predicts a revolt of the departments, hand in hand with the opposition newspapers.

Lotta Comunista, February 2025

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

German Socialism in 1917

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 6 From the series Pages from the history of the worker’s movement  According to Arrigo Cervetto [ Opere , Vol. 7], “paracentrism” is “the biggest obstacle to the formation of the worldwide Bolshevik party”. The Spartacists at Zimmerwald and Kiental Cervetto was analysing Lenin’s battle against centrism for the creation of the Third International, a battle which saw him isolated at Zimmerwald. He wrote down one of Zinoviev’s quotations from Histoire du parti communiste russe . “We were in the minority at Zimmerwald [1915]. […] In the years 1915 and 1916, we were nothing but an insignificant minority”. “But what is more serious?” – observed Cervetto – “is that the Zimmerwald Spartacists also said they were opposed to us”. In the strategic perspective of the “two separate halves” of socialism – the political conditions in Russia and the economic, productive, and social conditions in Germany – “for ...
Read more

The Unstoppable Force: Capital’s Demand for Migrant Labour

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 16 “Before Giorgia Meloni became Italy’s prime minister, she pledged to cut immigration. Since she has been in government the number of non-EU work visas issued by Italy has increased”. This is how The Economist of April 26th summarises the schizophrenia of their politics; and this is not only true in Italy: “Net migration also surged in post-Brexit Britain”. The needs of the economic system do not coincide with the rhetoric of parliamentarism. And vice versa. Schizophrenia and imbalances in their politics Returning to Italy, the Bank of Italy has pointed out that by 2040, in just fifteen years, there will be a shortage of five million people of working age, which could lead to an estimated 11% contraction in GDP. This is why even Italy’s “sovereignist” government is preparing to widen the net of its Immigration Flow Decree. The latest update, approved on June 30th, provides for the entry of almost ...
Read more

The Theoretical and Political Battles of Arrigo Cervetto II

From the introduction to Arrigo Cervetto’s Opere Scelte (“Selected Works”), soon to be published in Italy by Edizioni Lotta Comunista. II “Neither Washington nor Moscow”, “Neither Truman nor Stalin”. These were slogans sufficient to rally the internationalist cause, not only against the influence of the Stalinist Italian Communist Party (PCI) on one front, but also, on the opposite side, against the pro-American, “Westernist” leanings present in certain political currents of anarchist individualism. There was a unitary imperialism to be fought, of which the US and the USSR were both expressions. 1951, Genoa Pontedecimo In the ideological climate of the Cold War, heightened by the Korean War, a third world conflict was considered imminent; La guerra che viene (“The coming war”) was the title of a Trotskyist-inspired pamphlet that ultimately leaned in favour of the USSR, but reflected a widespread perception. The internation alist principle alone proved insufficient. To maintain...
Read more

Reckless Bets on Migrants in California

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 11 From the series Chronicles of the new American nationalism The tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump on allies, partners and opponents of the United States have opened a phase of negotiations with the affected countries and caused reactions from some key States. The legal opposition from almost all areas of the US poses a test: whether States, courts, and Congress can influence trade policy and constrain the expansion of executive powers. Amid conflicting rulings, the tariffs have been reinstated – an outcome that, The New York Times remarks, has “left Washington, Wall Street, and much of the world trying to discern the future of US trade policy”. California’s dispute with the federal government has expanded to immigration policy and the domestic use of military force. The political, economic, and power struggles overlap with the electoral dimension. The establishment remains critical of or ...
Read more

Leapfrogging: The Chinese Auto Industry’s Leap Forward

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 15 From the series The world car battle It is predicted that next year in China the sales of electrified vehicles (mainly battery-powered or hybrid) will for the first time overtake those of cars with an internal combustion engine. This development will mark a historic about turn which will put the world's biggest auto market years ahead of its Western rivals [Financial Times, December 26th]. Meanwhile, the growth in sales of electric vehicles in Europe and the United States has slowed. BYD's leap forward Another important development in 2024 was the record sales of Chinese brands in China: they rose from 38% of the total in 2020 to 56%, a sign of the maturation of the national auto industry which is now able to challenge the Japanese, American, and European manufacturers. BYD's leap forward is impressive, comparable to that of Ford Motors after the First World War, when with the Model T, introduc...
Read more

The Defeat in Afghanistan — a Watershed in the Cycle of Atlantic Decline

In crises and wars there are events which leave their mark on history because of how they make a decisive impact on the power contention, or because of how, almost like a chemical precipitate, they suddenly make deep trends that have been at work for some time coalesce. This is the case of the defeat of the United States and NATO in Afghanistan, which is taking the shape of a real watershed in the cycle of Atlantic decline. For the moment, through various comments in the international press, it is possible to consider its consequences on three levels: America’s position as a power and the connection with its internal crisis; the repercussions on Atlantic relations and Europe’s dilemmas regarding its strategic autonomy; and the relationship between the Afghan crisis and power relations in Asia, especially as regards India’s role in the Indo-Pacific strategy. Repercussions in the United States Richard Haass is the president of the CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations; despite having ...
Read more

Science Against Time

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 14 From the series Industry and pharmaceuticals The surge in China’s biopharmaceutical industry over the last decade is part of its broader scientific and technological ascent and therefore deserves our attention. Such growth presents a challenge to other imperialist powers. The Biosecure Act’s intention, to reduce the ties between American and Chinese biotech firms, has been branded by The Economist as “old-fashioned protectionism”. The British weekly recognises, however, that the clash goes well beyond a trade war. The stakes are higher. In a lengthy cover story [“The rise of Chinese science”], it writes that “China is now a leading scientific power”. Just five years ago, this was still considered only a possibility. The current question is whether this is “welcome or worrying” [June 15th, 2024]. Unity and scission The viewpoint of that publication, an authoritative voice of one of the power-houses of imperia...
Read more

Class Consciousness and Crisis in the World Order

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Pages 1 and 2 The consciousness of the proletariat “cannot be genuine class-consciousness, unless the workers learn, from concrete, and above all from topical, political facts and events to observe every other social class in all the manifestations of its intellectual, ethical, and political life; unless they learn to apply in practice the materialist analysis and the materialist estimate of all aspects of the life and activity of all classes, strata, and groups of the population”. If it concentrates exclusively “or even mainly” upon itself alone, the proletariat cannot be revolutionary, “for the self-knowledge of the working class is indissolubly bound up, not solely with a fully clear theoretical understanding or rather, not so much with the theoretical, as with the practical, understanding — of the relationships between all the various classes of modern society”. For this reason, the worker “must have a clear picture in ...
Read more

The Works of Marx and Engels and the Bolshevik Model

Internationalism Pages 12–13 In the autumn of 1895 Lenin commented on the death of Friedrich Engels: "After his friend Karl Marx (who died in 1883), Engels was the finest scholar and teacher of the modern proletariat in the whole civilised world. […] In their scientific works, Marx and Engels were the first to explain that socialism is not the invention of dreamers, but the final aim and necessary result of the development of the productive forces in modern society. All recorded history hitherto has been a history of class struggle, of the succession of the rule and victory of certain social classes over others. And this will continue until the foundations of class struggle and of class domination – private property and anarchic social production – disappear. The interests of the proletariat demand the destruction of these foundations, and therefore the conscious class struggle of the organised workers must be directed against them. And every class strugg...
Read more

Price War in the US and EU

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 7 From the series Industry and pharmaceuticals The contention in the biopharmaceutical field between the two sides of the Atlantic addresses the issue of costs, in two different ways. In a letter to the Financial Times published on April 23rd, Vas Narasimhan and Paul Hudson, the CEOs of Swiss company Novartis and French company Sanofi respectively, presented a harsh diagnosis of the state of European biopharmaceuticals compared to their major competitors, the United States and China. Narasimhan, an American son of immigrants from Tamil Nadu, and Hudson, a Briton, head two of the world's ten largest pharmaceutical multinationals. The two executives see "a strong outlook for the US – thanks to policies and regulations conducive to fast and broad patient access to innovative medicines". In contrast, Europe, "while home to some of the most important biopharma companies in the world"...
Read more