Skip to main content

Tokyo’s Balancing Act over Rearmament for a Stormy Fifteen Years

The taifu shizun, Japan’s typhoon season, last from May to October and is especially intense between August and September. Straits Times, a prestigious Singaporean newspaper, recently used the metaphor, invoking the rumbling of thunder and lightning bolts in relation to the announcement of the AUKUS deal (Washington’s strategic relaunch in the Indo-Pacific), and the immediate Chinese economic response, with China applying to join the CPTPP, the equivalent trading bloc to the RCEP in the Pacific.

A hot autumn in the Indo-Pacific

Other events have contributed to upsetting the Asian waters: the American withdrawal from Kabul, which has raised doubts about American credibility among its allies and Asian partners; a succession of North Korean ballistic tests, with the novelty of a Pyongyang cruise missile being deployed; the test conducted by Seoul of a ballistic missile aboard a conventional submarine, with South Korea blatantly flaunting its ambitions to equip itself with nuclear-powered vessels. The region is also experiencing renewed militry tensions between China and Taiwan over Taipei’s Air Defence Identification Zone (ADIZ), accompanied by massive naval manoeuvres by the Quad countries — the USA, Australia, Japan and India between Okinawa and the Bay of Bengal.

Tokyo has taken the opportunity to test its Izumo-class helicopter carriers — which were converted to de facto aircraft carrier[s], in the Global Times description — by having the marines’ F-34Bs aircraft take off from their decks. In , Japan approved the purchase of a batch of 42 F-35B aircraft; some will be deployed on the two converted carriers, the Izumo and the Kaga. In mid-October Russia and China held naval exercises in the Sea of Japan, with Beijing deploying some of its most modern and powerful units.

The Financial Times speaks of a hot autumn in Asian waters. Washington and its various allies are flexing their muscles in what Beijing views as its backyard, a harbinger of the region’s future in which east and south-east Asia is becoming the world’s busiest staging ground for military rivalry between Beijing and liberal democracies []. On the Financial Times front page carried the news of the Chinese test, which took place at the start of August, of a hypersonic missile with a very long range, which caught US intelligence by surprise. The USA underestimated China’s astounding progress, not only in hypersonic technology, but also in orbital weapons, or FOBS (Fractional Orbital Bombing System). A similar system was developed and tested by the USSR between and , to close the gap with the USA in intercontinental missiles (ICBMs). In this way the USSR equipped itself with nuclear warhead launchers with a theoretical range of 40,000 km [Hugh Harkins, The Soviet Globalnaya Raketa, Centurion Publishing, ].

The changing of the LDP guard amid Covid-19, China, and missiles

This is the geopolitical context in which the elections for the presidency of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) were held in Japan following Yoshihide Suga’s resignation on . Suga had previously succeeded Shinzo Abe in . The internal electoral rounds, equivalent to America’s presidential primaries, saw the victory in the second round of Fumio Kishida, who rose to the premiership as a candidate in the legislative elections of .

Suga’s downfall, according to the Japanese press, was caused by his lack of appeal to the electorate, following his defeat in the municipal elections in Yokohama, his electoral fiefdom, combined with a spike in Covid-19 infections over the summer. While his government achieved a vaccination rate of about 67% of the population [as per mid-October] — on par with France and above the USA — it has given mixed signals, particularly in applying emergency health regulations, with sectors of the economy, especially small businesses, suffering.

The conversion of the dove Kishida

Based on the narrative circulated at the time of Abe’s succession, Suga was seen by the LDP as an interim solution to avoid early elections in the midst of a health emergency. Suga was elected in large part thanks to the LDP’s Chinese faction, led by Secretary General Toshihiro Nikai. He ultimately proved to be the lightning rod in a struggle to succeed Abe and, according to Japanese reports, was unfit to lead the party in national elections as well as unable manage the internal confrontation over relations with Beijing, Taipei and Washington.

Even Nikai, who had to leave the secretariat, emerged weakened from the internal confrontation, and eventually resolved to support Kishida. According to the Japanese press, this affair has confirmed that Abe is the liberal-democratic kingmaker: if Kishida, foreign minister from to , had always been considered by the former premier as a potential successor, he was also judged as still immature, not very suitable to face a crisis, being considered by the LDP right wing as having pro-China dovish […] views. Along with his faction (the Kochikai), and in combination with Kakuei Tanka’s centrist faction (the Keiseikai), he supported the Yoshida consensus of pursuing a slow post-war Japanese rise, privileging the exercise of economic force and limiting the recovery of political-military instruments.

Kishida, 64 years old, is a native of Hiroshima and an anti-nuclearist with a technocratic background. He was deemed more suitable than Taro Kono, former defence and foreign minister, who was responsible for the vaccination programme under Suga Kono, who is very popular among LDP members but is considered not very controllable by the party establishment, is disliked by the national-conservative right because of positions that are too liberal on the social level, and because he favours abandoning nuclear energy. Abe did not directly back Kishida for the presidency, supporting the candidacy of Sane Takaichi, a former interior minister with strongly nationalist views. Takaichi’s share of the votes, which placed her in third position after the first round, was swung by Abe to Kishida in the second round. The last televised debate between candidates, following the AUKUS announcement, was characterised by anti-Chinese overtones, with Kono and Takaichi arguing for Tokyo’s acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines: on this point Kishida broke away, saying he was against a Japanese AUKUS solution.

A force de frappe in the making?

However, in an interview with the Wall Street Journal on and reiterated a few days later in Nikkei, Kishida argued in favour of implementing the Abe line on a Japanese missile counterattack capability. If Japan couldn’t attack potential enemies first, […] it needed to be prepared for a scenario in which it was struck first and expecting further missile attacks. In such a scenario, Can we protect the lives of the people by watching silently as Japan gets hit? […] Don’t we need to have the ability to block the other side’s missile attack capability? In essence: the missile arsenal would not be used for a pre-emptive strike, but as a second-strike, retaliatory tool, as part of a defensive deterrence posture.

In many ways this echoes Tokyo’s position since the 1950s regarding the possession of an autonomous nuclear deterrent, considered constitutionally legitimate under the right to self-defence. In , Nikkei intervened in this debate by underlining how a static missile defence and enemy-base strikes were not mutually exclusive and should be considered within a broader concept of deterrence. The American, French and British concepts emphasised three dimensions: retaliating with nuclear or conventional weapons; a preemptive strike on an enemy base in the event of an imminent attack; and the use of anti-missile systems to parry an attack. Even neutral Finland, he added, has a strong deterrent plan, with the ability to attack Russian industrial areas near the border with precision munitions According to Kishida, Tokyo needs to overcome the false dichotomy between shield and spear and equip itself not only with cruise missiles, but also with a counterforce of ballistic missiles, in order to strike the adversary’s launching bases in a few minutes. A sort of force de frappe that, in Kishida’s formulation, is presented as self-sufficient defensive deterrence.

Stable realism and the rearmament perspective

Kishida came off in the Japanese mainstream press as a the status quo candidate and a stable realist, a balance between the normal-nationalism of Abe and the right-wing LDP and the Yoshida school. In , his apointment as foreign minister was interpreted as a signal to Beijing of the pragmatic political mix of Abe’s tempered revisionism [Japan’s Cautious Turn to Nationalism, Internationalist Bulletin, ]. The support of the right, with Takaichi elevated to the third executive position of the party, means that Japanese rearmament is now for the first time part of a liberal-democratic electoral platform. This platform plans to raise defence spending even above 2% of GDP, breaking the ceiling of 1%, which was introduced in . Essentially, this would be a jump in military spending from $50 to $100 billion. According to the Asahi Shimbun, it is an unprecedented commitment, which highlights Japan’s haste to acquire missiles, stealth fighters, drones and other weapons systems to deter the PLA [Chinese armed forces] in the disputed East China Sea. The time horizon, according to Kishida’s first measures, seems to be that of the next fifteen years, overlapping with the implementation timeline of the AUKUS agreements.

A more immediate dimension is that of economic rearmament. In an interview with the Financial Times, the new prime minister spoke of deeper collaboration between the state and the private sector to secure strategic assets and technologies such as chips and rare earths. which will be pivotal for economic security, and to ensure that Japan has a self-sufficient economy and indispensability in creating stable global supply chains. Japan, he said, has no specific plans to join the [AUKUS] framework but believes it is of the utmost importance for European and US countries to be interested and involved in Asia’s security environment. Economic relations with China should be stabilised but, at the political level, Japan must be able to firmly assert itself against China [].

For Global Times, Kishida’s conversion to hawkishness can also be read as an election tactic. But the fact that he was hand-picked by Abe indicates that he will try to define China-Japan relatons within the framework of [Japan’s] alliance with the US [].

This is an assessment echoed by Dimitri Trenin, director of the Carnegie Foundation in Moscow: Kishida must manage geopolitical fault lines in the Indo-Pacific region […] turning into frontlines the Sino-American rivalry has generated two poles in the global system, but not […] yet two blocs. Within the Sino-American rivalry, the Russian power seeks to maintain an equilibrium. This is different from equidistance, and Russia’s focus is on promoting its own national interests. For Trenin, Moscow’s position is a mirror image of Tokyo’s. In the game of multipolar balances, caught between prospective and real rearmaments, all players find themselves handing sticks of dynamite.

De Simone, Gianluca. Equilibri di Tokyo nel riarmo per un quindicennio tempestoso Lotta Comunista, , p. 13

Popular posts from this blog

Cryptocurrencies, Tariffs, Oil and Spending in Trump’s Executive Orders

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 8 Douglas Irwin, economist and historian of American trade policy, writes for the Peterson Institute that the tariffs announced by Donald Trump, if implemented, would constitute a “historic event in the annals of US trade policy” and “one of the largest increases in trade taxes in US history. One has to go back almost a century to find tariff increases comparable”. Irwin limits himself to providing us with a historical dimension to the planned duties. But the bewilderment and turmoil created, especially among Washington’s allies, derives from the fact that the tariffs being brandished are accompanied by a hail of presidential decrees and declarations that mark a profound political discontinuity, both in the balance of internal institutional powers and in the balance of power between nations. The watershed was expected, but the speed and vehemence of the White House’s assaults are setting the scene for a change of era i...

The future of work in Europe

Every moment of transition presents its own complexities: for our class this means that further divisions are sown within it. Such is the present moment — one when different dynamics stack up and intertwine. Past, present and future On the one hand, there is the troubled exit from the pandemic crisis, still under the threat posed by the emergence of new Covid-19 variants. The pause on redundancies has come to an end in Italy. This, albeit partially, would have spared about 520,000 jobs in Italy up until now, according to Centro Einaudi’s estimates [ 25 th Annual Report on Global Economy and Italy , June 2021]. Company closures and staff reductions (in a mixture of arrogance and callousness) have marked the summer months, only to announce a difficult autumn, when the redundancy ban will be lifted also for small businesses and services. However, it is clear how uncertain the workers’ condition remains, regardless of any collective agreement signed, and how necessary it is always to ...

Marx’s Logic

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 7 From the series Principles of Marxism The method of exposition in Marx’s economic analysis, which he summarised on various occasions, adopts the progression from the simplest to the most complex concepts. It is a method that, at first glance, appears to correspond to common sense — from easy to difficult — but which Marx explains by contradicting common sense. Common sense distorts knowledge, starting right from the elementary building blocks of the representation of reality, which requires scientific abstraction to understand. Opportunism will always set the prejudices of common sense against the science-party . Marx writes, introducing Volume I of Capital : “The value-form , whose fully developed shape is the money-form , is very elementary and simple. Nevertheless, the human mind has for more than 2,000 years sought in vain to get to the bottom of it, whilst on the other hand, to the successful analysis of ...

Uneven Development, Job Cuts, and the Crisis of Labour Under Global Capitalism

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 16 Uneven development is a fundamental law of capitalism. We have a macroscopic expression of this in the changing balance of power between States: Atlantic decline and Asian rise are the key dynamics behind the political processes of this era, including wars caused by the crisis in the world order. But behind all this there is a differentiated economic trend, starting from companies and sectors: hence the differentiated conditions for wage earners. And this is the element to keep in mind for an effective defensive struggle. It’s only the beginning The electrical and digital restructuring imposed by global market competition affects various production sectors. The car industry is the most obvious, due to the familiarity of the companies and brands involved. We have already reported on the agreement reached before Christmas at Volkswagen, which can be summarised as a reduction of 35,000 employees by 2030. Die Zeit [De...

The SPD Faces the War

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 6 From the series Pages from the history of the worker’s movement The mystification of the First World War as a defensive war was accompanied by a misunderstanding of political forms, i.e., the illusion that the struggle for a democratic national shell was already a struggle against the imperialist content of German power, as if a democracy could exist outside of or above classes. Arrigo Cervetto, in The Political Shell, spoke of “the illusion of the primacy of politics”. At the same time, however, he emphasised the dialectic between structure and superstructure: “The basic view that political power relations depend on economic relations enables the revolutionary movement to overcome the obstacle of self-delusion; on the other hand, this view remains only a general idea if it does not inspire a restless and specific analysis of the situation, and if it does not demand an attitude consequent upon this analysis”. Mar...

Class Consciousness and Crisis in the World Order

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Pages 1 and 2 The consciousness of the proletariat “cannot be genuine class-consciousness, unless the workers learn, from concrete, and above all from topical, political facts and events to observe every other social class in all the manifestations of its intellectual, ethical, and political life; unless they learn to apply in practice the materialist analysis and the materialist estimate of all aspects of the life and activity of all classes, strata, and groups of the population”. If it concentrates exclusively “or even mainly” upon itself alone, the proletariat cannot be revolutionary, “for the self-knowledge of the working class is indissolubly bound up, not solely with a fully clear theoretical understanding or rather, not so much with the theoretical, as with the practical, understanding — of the relationships between all the various classes of modern society”. For this reason, the worker “must have a clear picture in ...

The Reluctant Start of the War of 1898

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 12 From the series Political battles and political cultures in the United States In 1898, the United States went to war with the Spanish Empire over the question of Cuba, but soon found itself ruling the Philippines, the Hawaiian Islands, Guam, and Puerto Rico. A reluctant entry into the war against Spain led American imperialism, emerging from a century of vast, heterogeneous, and turbulent capitalist development, to the naval “baptism of fire” of its first war in Asia. Some representatives of “expansionism” espoused the new tendency, and their critics nicknamed them jingoes , after the term used for English nationalists. Ambassador Warren Zimmermann in First Great Triumph [2002] portrays expansionists as those whose writing or action, and often both, “made their country a world power”. Admiral A. T. Mahan considered himself a “thinker”; his books set the framework for the debate between the military and publicis...

The Drone War

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 13 From the series War industry and European defence The Economist provides an illustration of how the use of unmanned and remotely piloted systems in warfare is expanding. In Africa, 30 governments are equipped with UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles), or drones. In 2024, they were deployed 484 times in local wars in thirteen different countries, twice as frequently as the previous year, causing 1,200 deaths. The most widely used drone on the continent is the TB2, produced by the Turkish company Baykar, which has seen a decade of extensive use in conflicts across Syria, Azerbaijan-Armenia, and Ukraine. LBA Systems and MALE drones At the Paris Air Show in mid-June, an agreement was signed to establish LBA Systems, a joint venture between Baykar and Leonardo. The aim is to produce the Akinci and TB3 drones, the latter of which will be capable of taking off from helicopter carrier decks. The aircraft wil...

Toyota Chases Tesla and Aims for Supremacy

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 1 From the series The world car battle On September 6th, Toyota, the world's largest car manufacturer, an nounced a revised target of building I million electric vehicles by 2026, lowering its previous goal by 1.5 million, according to Automotive News . Difficulties of the electric sector A key driver behind the energy transition, particularly as regards vehicle electrification, is that countries which lack oil and natural gas resources need to reduce their reliance on regions prone to political instability and conflict. China has taken on the challenge of large-scale electrification, even though the electric car was pioneered by US manufacturers like Tesla and the Franco-Japanese Renault-Nissan alliance. Other nations have followed suit out of necessity. By focusing solely on environmental concerns, without factoring in China’s role, it is impossible to understand the impetus behind the global energy trans...

The Works of Marx and Engels and the Bolshevik Model

Internationalism Pages 12–13 In the autumn of 1895 Lenin commented on the death of Friedrich Engels: "After his friend Karl Marx (who died in 1883), Engels was the finest scholar and teacher of the modern proletariat in the whole civilised world. […] In their scientific works, Marx and Engels were the first to explain that socialism is not the invention of dreamers, but the final aim and necessary result of the development of the productive forces in modern society. All recorded history hitherto has been a history of class struggle, of the succession of the rule and victory of certain social classes over others. And this will continue until the foundations of class struggle and of class domination – private property and anarchic social production – disappear. The interests of the proletariat demand the destruction of these foundations, and therefore the conscious class struggle of the organised workers must be directed against them. And every class strugg...