Skip to main content

Biden Plan and Global Minimum Tax

Recovery from the pandemic crisis — writes the IMF in April’s World Economic Outlook — is increasingly visible due to three factors: first, hundreds of millions of people are being vaccinated; second, companies and employees have somewhat adapted to the healthcare disaster; and finally governments especially the American have pledged massive government — extra fiscal support. Governmental fiscal interventions have reached $16,000 billion worldwide, have averted collapse of the economy that would have been three times worse, blocking the 2020 recession at a 3.3% drop, and have pushed the recovery rate to 6% in 2021.

The overall recovery will be the outcome of a series of divergent recoveries. Only the United States, with a 6.4% growth rate, will exceed the GDP level predicted before the pandemic. The disparity regards healthcare first of all. High-income countries, representing 16% of global population, have already bought up half of the vaccine doses. The real estate, financial and speculative markets have expanded extraordinarily thanks to the floods of liquidity injected by the central banks and the banking system. The banking sector has been accompanied by frequent scandals and little-known financial meteors whose fragments, however, impacted much more famous creditors. Poles apart, retail trade, the catering industry and tourism with all their connected services have suffered great losses. In the industrial sectors, the recovery has been stimulated by durable goods and the automotive industry, which represented one third of the recovery in international trade. The WTO predicts a recovery in trade in goods of 8%, by volume, for the 2021, after the 2020 experienced a 5.3% reduction.

The expectation is for a re-entry into a the markets of huge sums accumulated in family deposits as a result of state aid and the forced saving imposed by the restrictions. Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Analytics, estimates there exist $5,400 billion extra savings. Still according to Zandi, this is equal to 6% of WDP, and at least one third of this amount will go in consumption, while another third will repay overdue debts.

The Biden infrastructure plan

The stabilisation of the recovery and the presence of imperialist competition, by no means dormant during the pandemic of the century, have placed on the agenda the themes of the investments and productivity of the economic systems, the public and private debts swollen by the healthcare emergency, and the economic and fiscal policies that are needed to reabsorb those debts.

After the $1,900 billion American Rescue Plan, aimed at supporting families, President Joe Biden launched from Pittsburgh, at the end of March, the American Jobs Plan. This is a plan worth about $2,300 billion, lasting eight years for the renovation of US infrastructure, and is followed by a fiscal plan to finance it in 15 years. The main items on the plan envisage investment to the tune of $621 billion in transport infrastructure (roads, motorways, bridges, airports, aqueducts, ports, etc.) which includes $174 billion in investment and subsidies for electric cars, $650 billion in domestic infrastructure (water, electricity, broad band, the construction industry and public schools), $580 billion for industrial policy (manufacturing, small-scale companies and training of the labour force) which includes $180 billion for research and development, and finally $400 billion for the healthcare and social assistance sector. According to Biden, this is a once in a generation spending plan.

The European Next Generation EU plan is, in size, one third of the American plan. If one adds the items for investment of the Union’s Multiannual Financial Framework for the period 2021-2027, it comes to 70%. With €1,000 billion over the next decade, the European- Investment Bank (EIB) will finance projects for the climate action and environment — which can be set up in every continent — and the development of European revolutionary green technologies, from clean hydrogen to offshore renewables and energy storage.

Biden’s fiscal plan

Financing the new infrastructure with taxes was not a foregone conclusion. Just : week before the Pittsburgh speech, Martin Wolf of the Financial Times considered unlikely that taxes would be extensively used and predicted that its funding would, once again, fall to the Fed. The basic principle of American fiscal reform was pointed out by the Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, who believes that the measures to stop the race to the bottom of corporate taxation cannot be postponed. This is therefore a fiscal plan that intends to orientate the fiscal policies of the OECD and the G-20 globally, further corroborating the return to Washington’ multilateralist approach.

The hasty expansion of debts obliges the states to seek resources from the big business groups and multinationals, until now greatly favoured taxwise. According to Yellen, the taxes really paid by the multinationals in almost all of the OECD economies do not exceed 7.8% of their profits. The fiscal initiative started at the beginning of March in the UK, which for the first time in almost 50 years will increase corporate tax, from 19% to 25%. Both London and Washington can use taxes as a lever thanks to the progress made by their vaccination campaigns, which have reached a number of people who had their first dose equal to two thirds of their respective populations. Europe is lagging behind with vaccines, bows its head to the American initiative, but is sticking to a line long pursued by the powers of the Franco-German axis, which could open up a pathway towards European fiscal union. The attempt is complex, if we consider that Ireland, in 2013, even though overwhelmed by the banking and real estate crisis, resisted the pressure to abandon its 12.5% corporate tax rate.

The central pillars of the Yellen-Biden fiscal plan focus on: increasing the federal tax on corporate profits from 21% to 28% — halfway between the rate introduced by Donald Trump and the one previously in force (35%); doubling the global minimum tax from 10.5% to 21% and removing the tax exemption on the first tenth of foreign profits (with the aim of making tax havens less attractive); a 15% minimum book tax - this is a tax on corporations (about 200) with profits of $2 billion or more, which are recorded and notified to shareholders. These often manage to avoid paying any taxes thanks to deductions and ‘inversions’ of destination.

Daron Acemoglu, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, observes that Biden’s reform is a departure from a decades-long tendency. In the first postwar decade taxes on incomes and social security contributions provided 50% of the tax levy, while 30% arrived from companies. Since then, the former have paid more and more, to the point of contributing 85% of total taxes, while taxes on companies have fallen below 10%. Meanwhile the national share of labour income has fallen from 66% to 58%. In a communiqué the American Treasury Department has estimated that taxes paid by companies fell below 1% of GDP with Trump’s tax cuts, while their profits in the last fifteen years have grown from 5.4% to 9.7% of GDP.

Various entrepreneurial associations have fiercely attacked the tax reform on ground of losing competitiveness. The chairman and CEO of JP Morgan, Jamie Dimon, has spoken out in favour of the reform. The statements of the main exponent of financial capital need to be noted down especially when they express a certain idea of imperialist democracy.

In his April letter to shareholders, Jamie Dimon, exhilarated by the ongoing economic boom which could easily run into 2023, denounces the extraordinary number of loopholes, tax exemptions and subsidies that in every sector of finance and industry create protection from legitimate competition. Income inequalities are prevailing. Nearly 30% of American workers earn less than $15 an hour, which is barely a living wage even if two adults are working in a family of four. China belives that America is in decline. The Chinese see an America that is losing ground in technology, infrastructure and education - a nation torn and crippled by politics, as well as racial and income inequality and a country unable to coordinate government policies (fiscal, monetary, industrial, regulatory) in any coherent way to accomplish national goals. Unfortunately, recently, there is a lot of truth a to this.

A political CEO

This is an interesting game of mirrors between Wall Street and Beijing: Dimon reports the Chinese criticism - agreeing with it of the American political system, and simultaneously betrays hint of envy for the different quality of the political centralisation of the Asian giant, able to organise all the policies of an imperialist state in a coordinated way. Dimon states to The Wall Street Journal, the main critic of Biden’s fiscal plan: [Taxes] are going to have to go up; you cart run a 10% to 15% deficit forever.

The Economist distrusts the political CEO who embodies in the USA today the mixing of government and corporations. Dimon is defined as a CEO-statesman. A host of managers are politicising their aims, getting in tune with Biden’s big government agenda that is founded on an alliance with business to bring about national renewal, to fight climate change and to gird America against the rise of China. The Economist fears that, if politics asks business to help it resolve its problems, sooner or later business will use its place at the table to promote its own particular interests. Politics cannot deal with popular discontent by giving more power to an elite of unelected CEOs.

Lines for European recovery

Time will show what gradation of liberism the new state interventionism will be able to adopt, also because the divergent recovery between the two coasts of the Atlantic continues to manifest itself. The Director of the IMF’s European Department, Alfred Kammer, the former chief-of-staff of Christine Lagarde when she directed the IF, argues that Europe’s slower recovery may not bring its output back to the path expected before the pandemic, even in another five years. Kammer asks the Eurozone governments to increase their spending by additional three GDP points, in order to obtain an extra 2% growth, with additional transfers to families, subsidies for the unemployed and support for companies’ capital. This line embodies the will to accelerate recovery in order not to lose ground with respect to the competing powers and is met with the diffidence of the Nordic countries within the ECB, which are worried about the growing debt that the Central Bank itself will have to back up.

In a conference at the end of March, Bundesbank President Jens Weidmann warned against increasing false expectations that the emergency measures may persist indefinitely and called for determination to be shown when the time arrives to raise interest rates. Klaas Knot, governor of the Dutch central bank, suggested in an interview with Reuters that the gradual withdrawal of quantitative easing could be brought forward to the third quarter of this year. Shortly afterwards, Knot tempered his impatience, excluding the withdrawal of the measures until we have made a good start with the recovery. This may take us to year-end at least.

Kammer’s dramatisation of Europe’s delay offers arguments to the ECB exponents who favour continuing its expansive line and, if necessary, reinforcing it. But it also makes room for some strategic innovations, including launching the preparation of the ECB’s digital currency, in order to be ready to face the challenge of the Chinese digital currency within five years.

Lotta Comuista, April 2021

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Chinese Rearmament Projects Itself in Asia

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 5 From the series Asian giants Trends in rearmament spending and comparisons of military equipment are increasingly set to dominate coverage of the contention between powers in the crisis in the world order . The military factor has entered the strategic debate, accompanied by a wealth of figures and technical details. The increase in military spending as a percentage of GDP represents a widespread sign of the rearmament cycle at this juncture, but spending alone cannot entirely explain the situation, given the qualitatively different natures of the arsenals being compared. Nor are comparisons between this or that type of weapon useful in themselves, because ultimately all weapons are only ever used in combination with the complex military means available to a power, either in alliance or in conflict with other powers in the system of States. Therefore, while it is difficult to assess the real significa...
Read more

The Unstoppable Force: Capital’s Demand for Migrant Labour

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 16 “Before Giorgia Meloni became Italy’s prime minister, she pledged to cut immigration. Since she has been in government the number of non-EU work visas issued by Italy has increased”. This is how The Economist of April 26th summarises the schizophrenia of their politics; and this is not only true in Italy: “Net migration also surged in post-Brexit Britain”. The needs of the economic system do not coincide with the rhetoric of parliamentarism. And vice versa. Schizophrenia and imbalances in their politics Returning to Italy, the Bank of Italy has pointed out that by 2040, in just fifteen years, there will be a shortage of five million people of working age, which could lead to an estimated 11% contraction in GDP. This is why even Italy’s “sovereignist” government is preparing to widen the net of its Immigration Flow Decree. The latest update, approved on June 30th, provides for the entry of almost ...
Read more

‘Two Hands’ and ‘Two Roads’

From the series News from the Silk Road The international tensions which China will face on the seas in the next fifteen years could find a buffer in the expansion of China’s influence on land in Central, Southern and Western Asia. Wang Jisi is the dean of the School of International Studies at the University of Beijing and a major figure of the American party in China. His unexpected foray into ‘geopolitics’ has reignited the old clash between different American currents — a phenomenon we analysed more than twenty years ago. At the time, Robert Manning, the author of The Asian Energy Factor and adviser to the State Department in 1991, viewed Asia’s growing dependence on the Persian Gulf for its energy requirements in the light of geoeconomics and geostrategy and foresaw a possible convergence between the USA and China. From a geoeconomic standpoint, both trade and the funding and development of the infrastructure necessary for Asia’s energy needs were more important than terri...
Read more

Uneven Development, Job Cuts, and the Crisis of Labour Under Global Capitalism

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 16 Uneven development is a fundamental law of capitalism. We have a macroscopic expression of this in the changing balance of power between States: Atlantic decline and Asian rise are the key dynamics behind the political processes of this era, including wars caused by the crisis in the world order. But behind all this there is a differentiated economic trend, starting from companies and sectors: hence the differentiated conditions for wage earners. And this is the element to keep in mind for an effective defensive struggle. It’s only the beginning The electrical and digital restructuring imposed by global market competition affects various production sectors. The car industry is the most obvious, due to the familiarity of the companies and brands involved. We have already reported on the agreement reached before Christmas at Volkswagen, which can be summarised as a reduction of 35,000 employees by 2030. Die Zeit [De...
Read more

The Defeat in Afghanistan — a Watershed in the Cycle of Atlantic Decline

In crises and wars there are events which leave their mark on history because of how they make a decisive impact on the power contention, or because of how, almost like a chemical precipitate, they suddenly make deep trends that have been at work for some time coalesce. This is the case of the defeat of the United States and NATO in Afghanistan, which is taking the shape of a real watershed in the cycle of Atlantic decline. For the moment, through various comments in the international press, it is possible to consider its consequences on three levels: America’s position as a power and the connection with its internal crisis; the repercussions on Atlantic relations and Europe’s dilemmas regarding its strategic autonomy; and the relationship between the Afghan crisis and power relations in Asia, especially as regards India’s role in the Indo-Pacific strategy. Repercussions in the United States Richard Haass is the president of the CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations; despite having ...
Read more

Democratic Defeat in the Urban Vote

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 2 From the series Elections in the USA A careful analysis of the 2022 mid-term elections revealed the symptoms of a Democratic Party malaise which subsequently fully manifested itself in the latest presidential election, with the heavy loss of support in its traditional strongholds of the metropolitan areas of New York City and Chicago, and the State of California. A defeat foretold Republican votes rose from 51 million in the previous 2018 midterms to 54 million in 2022, a gain of 3 million. The Democrat vote fell from 61 to 51 million, a loss of 10 million. The Republicans gained only three votes for every ten lost by the Democrats, while the other seven became abstentions. In 2022, we analysed the elections in New York City by borough, the governmental districts whose names are well known through movies and TV series. In The Bronx, where the average yearly household income is $35,000, the Democrats lost 52,00...
Read more

India’s Weaknesses in the Global Spotlight

Farmers’ protests around New Delhi have been going on for four months now. A controversial intervention by the Supreme Court has suspended the implementation of the new agticultural laws, but has raised questions about the dynamics between the judiciary and the executive, and has failed to unblock the negotiations between government and peasant organisations. The assault by Sikh farmers on the Red Fort during the Republic Day parade as India was displaying its military might to the outside world — the Chinese Global Times maliciously noted — paradoxically widened the protest in the huge state of Uttar Pradesh. The Modi government has been trying to revive India’s image with the 2021 Union Budget: it announced one hundred privatisations and approved the increase to 75% of the limit on direct foreign investment in insurance companies. For The Indian Express ( IEX ) this is a sign of the commitment to push ahead with reforms despite the backlash from rural India. Also for The Economi...
Read more

Science Against Time

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 14 From the series Industry and pharmaceuticals The surge in China’s biopharmaceutical industry over the last decade is part of its broader scientific and technological ascent and therefore deserves our attention. Such growth presents a challenge to other imperialist powers. The Biosecure Act’s intention, to reduce the ties between American and Chinese biotech firms, has been branded by The Economist as “old-fashioned protectionism”. The British weekly recognises, however, that the clash goes well beyond a trade war. The stakes are higher. In a lengthy cover story [“The rise of Chinese science”], it writes that “China is now a leading scientific power”. Just five years ago, this was still considered only a possibility. The current question is whether this is “welcome or worrying” [June 15th, 2024]. Unity and scission The viewpoint of that publication, an authoritative voice of one of the power-houses of imperia...
Read more

Europe Follows the USA and China in the Strategic Use of Space

Internationalism No. 33, November 2021 Page 9 From the series The war industry and European defence Next Spring SpaceX will be 20 years old. The company founded by Elon Musk has rapidly achieved a key role in international space activity. The first stage of its Falcon 9 rocket has recently been recovered, reconditioned and reused for the tenth time. SpaceX has already repeated this type of reflight 70 times or so; it allows for substantial savings when compared to the losses incurred in the first stages of a traditional rocket launch. It is for this reason that it is being considered as the standard for the future. According to NASA’s calculations, the average cost of launching a satellite into orbit has fluctuated around the level of $18,500 per kilogram for the whole period between 1970 and 2000. SpaceX has reduced this figure by seven times. Internet constellations In recent missions Falcon 9 rockets have put a total of 60 Starlink satellites ...
Read more

In the Depth of Our Class

The pandemic of the century is a storm that does not subside; it returns to its rampage after 40 million infections and more than a million official victims, perhaps two million according to estimates on the excess deaths. In the contention between powers, China stands as the winner: it seems to have tamed the virus, and industry and services are up and running; the USA and Europe, on the other hand, are moving towards a new wave of infections that casts yet more shadows on the economic cycle. Political structures and health systems are at the height of tension. In America, the elections have judged Donald Trump’s rash demagogy on the basis of the opposite reasons for containing the pandemic and the intolerance of small and large producers; in Europe the executives are attempting to steer between the surge in infections, increasingly stringent confinement measures and the threats of fiscal jacquerie in the tourism and catering sectors. Almost everywhere, in the Old Continent, governm...
Read more