Skip to main content

Socialism and Nationalism in the History of France

The collapse of French socialism at the outbreak of the First World War is considered by many historians to be the most significant case of its kind. We must go back in time to find its origins. The dramatic repression of the Paris Commune in 1871 was followed by a decade of shootings and the deportation of tens of thousands of revolutionary militants.

Reactionary monarchical legitimism attributed the decline of France to the Revolution of 1789, but by then the nouvelles couches sociales, the new classes produced by capitalism, as Leon Gambetta defined them, demanded a politics free from economic, social and clerical ties. The Radical Party, a turning point of French politics, was its expression.

The same taditional Catholic Judeophobia dating back to the Middle Ages — according to Michel Dreyfus’, research director at the CNRS in Paris, Anti-Semitism on the Left in France [Paris, 2009] — gradually transformed into the image of the Jews associated with money and modernity who destroyed national traditions.

The French historian reports some facts regarding this: in 1870, out of 36 million inhabitants, France had 35.4 million Catholics, 600,000 Protestants, 50,000 Jews and 60,000 freethinkers. Jews therefore made up just under 0.2% of the population, concentrated largely in Paris, and accounted for no more than 45 to 50 of the top 300 bankers of the time, even if their presence has been historically consolidated.

Recovery and limits of socialism in France

After they had been given amnesty, in 1879, the Communards began to return to France, bringing with them the divisions created during their exiles. Jules Guesde, an ex-anarchist turned socialist, went to London in 1880 to draw up a program for the French proletariat, with Marx, Engels and Paul Lafargue, who then moved to Paris. Engels, in a letter to Eduard Bernstein on October 25th, 1881, informed him that the program, dictated by Marx, while Guesde was writing, was a masterpiece of stringent argumentation that in a few sentences clarifies things for the masses, in a way that I have rarely seen and which, even in such a concise version, has left me amazed, although Guesde added some extravagance more suitable, in his opinion, for French workers.

The following year, the Parti Ouvrier Français (POF) [French Workers’ Party] lost Paul Brousse, who left the party wanting to put himself at the head of a demand for what he called possibilisme — that is, for taking such chances as offered to secure practical advances towards Socialism, by the promotion of social legislation and of progressive municipal policies, summaries G.D.H. Cole in the second volume of A History of Socialist Thought page 326 [MacMillan, 1957]. Guesde, remaining in the minority, instead supported a centralised and organised party, without alliances with bourgeois parties, which was however only well established in the North.

The ‘populist’ Boulanger

From 1885 France was prey to an economic and political crisis, marked by scandals and financial corruption, which the opposition blamed on the swamp of parliamentary mercantilism [Wolfgang Schivelbusch, La cultura dei vinti, (The culture of defeat) Il Mulino, 2006]. Then the figure of General Georges Boulanger (1837-1891), who in 1886 was appointed by the Radicals as minister of war, emerged. As one of his colleagues said: he was a man whose most insignificant action seemed to be of enormous importance. The new minister was perceived as the bearer of national stability and security, while the others found themselves representing laziness, cowardice and scandal. Boulanger, however, knew how to create a symbolic and rhetorical reality and use it to guide politics, but he lacked the ability to distinguish between the two.

Fearing his authoritarian populism (for example, inviting soldiers to divide their rations with strikers) the Radicals distanced him from the government, thereby offering him a wider space and role, as Sergio Romano wrote [La Franca dal 1870 ai nostri giorni, (France from 1870 to today) Mondadori, 1981]. Ousted, he gathered a heterogeneous coalition of Catholics and radicals, Jacobin socialists and nationalists from the Ligue des Patriotes, who provided the assault troops, usually recruited in popular neighbourhoods, before the government dissolved them.

The General pushed through local elections, up to Paris, where he received the votes of the working-class fanbourg (suburbs). Boulanger’s political battle ended in April of 1889 with his impeachment, the failure of his offensive, and his escape to Brussels, where he committed suicide.

Engels, Lafargue and Boulanger

The historian Zeev Stemhell, in Né destra né sinistra. L’ideologia fascista in Francia (Neither right nor left. Fascist Ideology in France) of 1983 [Baldini and Castoldi, 1997], believes that Boulangism was the first expression of the crisis of the liberal order to have assumed mass dimensions; the first meeting point between nationalism and a form of non-Marxist socialism, which later became anti-Marxist and flowed into fascism. This was countered by a broad coalition of moderates, which the most moderate wing of socialism had already joined.

Engels held the strategic compass based on class autonomy, oriented towards two fundamental issues: international unity and war. In a letter dated June 3-rd-, 1888 [MECW vol. 48], he demolishes Lafargue’s idea that Boulangism was a mouvement populaire to be supported, precisely because it was directed by an ass, and concludes that, if the French see no other issue than either personal government, or parliamentary government, they may as well give it up.

Engels urged action in light of the coming POF congress, in preparation of the constitution of the Second International in 1889, given the competition from Brousse’s Possibilists. He therefore urged make a clean break with the Boulangists, otherwise no one will come.

PAUL LAFARGUE: THE LIMITS OF A GENEROUS REVOLUTIONARY

Paul Lafargue, born in Santiago de Cuba in 1842, expelled from French universities, frequented Marx in London and became a socialist, in addition to marrying his daughter Laura, with whom he had three children who died at an early age. After various assignments for the First International and the Paris Commune, he participated with Jules Guesde in the founding of the Parti Ouvrier Français (POF) and was more active than any other in spreading Marxist positions. He took advantage of his parliamentary mandate to make himself a committed salesman of socialism, unlike the other elected officials, including Guesde, who were slipping into reformism. Lafargue, together with his wife, decided to commit suicide on November 26th, 1911, at the age of seventy, to avoid the degradation of old age. This was a controversial decision, because the two could still have contributed much to the revolutionary movement; however Lenin, at the funeral, called Lafargue one of the most intelligent and profound propagators of Marxism.

In The Right to be Lazy of 1880, Lafargue writes that in capitalist society work is the cause of all intellectual degeneracy, of all organic deformity. And yet, even the proletariat, […] has let itself be perverted by the dogma of work. Lafargue’s denunciation of work for the benefit of others is in line with Marxism, but the forced tone also carries errors with it. For example, when he rejects the idea to erect a capitalist factory in the midst of a rural population because it would mean farewell joy, health and liberty; farewell to all that makes life beautiful and worth living. It is not his intention, but he left openings for the residues of utopian socialism, which, taken up today by some, can become reactionary.

The proletariat must trample underfoot the prejudices of Christian ethics, economic ethics and free-thought ethics. It must return to its natural instincts, it must proclaim the Rights of Laziness and it must accustom itself to working but three hours a day, reserving the rest of the day and night for leisure and feasting. In the abstract, this solution could also be in line with Marxism: social work and shorter hours; the problem is always the deliberately exaggerated tone. Lafargue wants to shake the proletarians but, without realising it, delays their scientific awareness of class problems with outbursts against the world. The irony about the bourgeoisie, however, hit the mark: a century or two ago, the capitalist was a steady man of reasonable and peaceable habits. He contented himself with one wife or thereabouts. He drank only when he was thirsty and ate only when he was hungry. He left to the lords and ladies of the court the noble virtues of debauchery. Today every son of the newly rich makes it incumbent upon himself to cultivate the disease. He even anticipated today’s issues: the great problem of capitalist production is no longer to find producers and to multiply their powers but to discover consumers, to excite their appetites and create in them fictitious needs, also our products are adulterated and shorten their life. Our era will be named the age of adulteration.

Two letters to Laura Lafargue, sent sequentially on the 14th and 15th of December 1882 [MECW vol. 46], confirm these limits and these merits. The first is from Marx: Paul has latterly been writing his best stuff with humour, impudence, and solidity combined with verve, whereas before that I had been troubled by certain ultra-revolutionary turns of phrase, having always regarded these as ‘hot air’. The second is from Engels: Whether it is the cumulative effect of Parisian life and journalistic activity, Paul’s articles lately have been very much better, since he dropped the dogmatism of the scientific oracle.

Two strategic knots

Writing to Lafargue on March 25th, 1889, Engels saw in Boulanger a chauvinist, who fostered war in order to recover Alsace, but would fall into Bismarck’s web and be forced into a disastrous alliance with Tsarist Russia. This would be the most terrible of eventualities. Otherwise I shouldn’t give a fig for the whims of Mme la France. But a war in which there will be 10 to 15 million combatants, unparalleled devastation simply to keep them fed, universal and forcible suppression of our movement, a recrudescence of chauvinism in all countries […] and, withal, only a slender hope that that bitter war may result in revolution — it fills me with horror.

Engels was well aware of the military outcome that would finally materialise in August of 1914: this was not a lucky intuition. Regardless of Boulanger’s actual will to go to war at that stage — which Sternhell denies for example — the strategic framework was the one Engels outlined.

Finally, in a letter to Laura Lafargue on February 4th, 1889, Engels was looking to the future: when Paul gets to work at a paper again, he will brace himself up for the fight and no longer say despondingly: il n’y a pas à aller contre le courante. Nobody asks of him to stop the current, but if we are not to go against the popular current of momentary tomfoolery, what in the name of the devil is our business?

Lotta Comunista, June 2020

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Uneven Development, Job Cuts, and the Crisis of Labour Under Global Capitalism

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 16 Uneven development is a fundamental law of capitalism. We have a macroscopic expression of this in the changing balance of power between States: Atlantic decline and Asian rise are the key dynamics behind the political processes of this era, including wars caused by the crisis in the world order. But behind all this there is a differentiated economic trend, starting from companies and sectors: hence the differentiated conditions for wage earners. And this is the element to keep in mind for an effective defensive struggle. It’s only the beginning The electrical and digital restructuring imposed by global market competition affects various production sectors. The car industry is the most obvious, due to the familiarity of the companies and brands involved. We have already reported on the agreement reached before Christmas at Volkswagen, which can be summarised as a reduction of 35,000 employees by 2030. Die Zeit [De...
Read more

In the Depth of Our Class

The pandemic of the century is a storm that does not subside; it returns to its rampage after 40 million infections and more than a million official victims, perhaps two million according to estimates on the excess deaths. In the contention between powers, China stands as the winner: it seems to have tamed the virus, and industry and services are up and running; the USA and Europe, on the other hand, are moving towards a new wave of infections that casts yet more shadows on the economic cycle. Political structures and health systems are at the height of tension. In America, the elections have judged Donald Trump’s rash demagogy on the basis of the opposite reasons for containing the pandemic and the intolerance of small and large producers; in Europe the executives are attempting to steer between the surge in infections, increasingly stringent confinement measures and the threats of fiscal jacquerie in the tourism and catering sectors. Almost everywhere, in the Old Continent, governm...
Read more

Bolsonaro Squeezed between Pandemic, Lula Card and Armed Forces

This article is taken from Intervenção Comunista — the journal of our Brazilian comrades We wrote in May last year that the ‘tropical Trump’ causes a perfect storm . This first quarter of the year seems to demonstrate this clearly: GDP decline (-4.1%) and increased unemployment (14.2%); an end to emergency aid and a delay in the resumption of a new, much leaner aid plan; a record number of deaths and Covid infections. With 2.7% of the world’s population, the country accounts for about 12% of Covid-19 deaths. In March alone, Brazil recorded an increase of about 33% in its daily deaths. The pandemic crisis, coupled with historical imbalances, is shaking up the dysfunctional government of Jair Bolsonaro, who has just appointed his fourth health minister in a year. Increased dependence on the Centrão The second half of Bolsonaro’s term began — for their politics — with the election of Arthur Lira (Progressive Party-Alagoas) as president of the Chamber of Deputies, and Rodrigo Pac...
Read more

Forces and Consequences of the New Strategic Phase

The new strategic phase in the world balance, with its new corresponding political cycles within powers, requires attention to the materialistic, historical and dialectical method of political analysis itself. The changing forces and basic trends need to be identified; we can make conjectures about the developments in single political battles, but the outcome of these battles will always require us to contemplate a plurality of solutions: some more probable. others less. but never Just a mechanical consequence of long-term economic movements. Many fixed points of the method of political analysis are usual tools in our Marxist elaboration, but this does not mean they must be taken for granted: it is of use to recall them, in relation to the new unknowns of the political battle. Men make their own history, but they do not make it just as they please; they do not make it under circumstances chosen by themselves, but under circumstances directly encountered, given and transmitted from t...
Read more

The New Energy Shock

Internationalism No. 33, November 2021 Page 6 Can a good recovery do damage? The answer is: yes, sometimes it can, if it triggers major imbalances. The capitalist mode of production is a source of imbalances, inequalities and asymmetries. This time, the imbalance is largely due to the states which have concocted an unexpectedly strong recovery, pulled along by private consumption, with their stimuli, subsidies, relief, tax cuts and zero-rate credits. According to The Economist , the stimuli handed out by governments during the pandemic amounted to about $10,400 billion in the world, equal to one eighth of the 2020 gross world product in current dollars. According to the April IMF Fiscal Monitor , governments, additional expenditure and lost revenue in the advanced economies were equal to 16% of the sum of their GDPs, in the face of losses which, in the final balance sheets, amounted to 4.5% of it. A good part of this went on governmen...
Read more

Another Kind of Politics

Donald Trump has said goodbye as befits his fame, with a tragic riotous revelry. A crowd with improbable disguises took its cue from the fake news on the Internet fomented by the presidency, assaulted the Capitol and wandered around its rooms and corridors with the aim of intimidating representatives and senators. All of this, however, taking selfies: a moment of fame on Facebook or YouTube and a trophy to show off back home in deepest America, while carousing in the local pub. His successor Joe Biden will seek a rebalance in a bipartisan collaboration, but he cannot escape from the dominant trait now characterising the political show . The swearing-in ceremony was the enthronement of a republican king, according to the rites of Hollywoodian show business: pop singers, actors, directors, and rock stars, and the new reigning couple hand in hand as they admired the fireworks in the night. Meanwhile, on the other shore of the Atlantic, a similar depressing show is going on the air with ...
Read more

British Nostalgia

From the series European News In his book Britain Alone , the Financial Times columnist Philip Stephens argues that David Cameron’s decision to hold the Brexit referendum in 2016 was self-serving […] The prime minister wanted to snuff out a Tory rebellion and to give himself a quieter life in 10 Downing Street . For short term tactical reasons, Cameron gambled on the strategic issue of Britain’s link to Europe. As for Boris Johnson, backing Brexit had been about personal ambition: establishing his claim to the leadership . In Stephens’ reconstruction of events, Brexit was an unwanted outcome for the leaders of the Leave campaign: When Boris Johnson and Michael Gove, […] appeared before the cameras on the morning of 24 June, they looked shell-shocked rather than triumphant. […] Winning was not part of the plan. However, once Brexit had been set in motion, Johnson pursued it with wild abandon and made it the cornerstone of his bid for No. 10. According to Stephens, there was no und...
Read more

The future of work in Europe

Every moment of transition presents its own complexities: for our class this means that further divisions are sown within it. Such is the present moment — one when different dynamics stack up and intertwine. Past, present and future On the one hand, there is the troubled exit from the pandemic crisis, still under the threat posed by the emergence of new Covid-19 variants. The pause on redundancies has come to an end in Italy. This, albeit partially, would have spared about 520,000 jobs in Italy up until now, according to Centro Einaudi’s estimates [ 25 th Annual Report on Global Economy and Italy , June 2021]. Company closures and staff reductions (in a mixture of arrogance and callousness) have marked the summer months, only to announce a difficult autumn, when the redundancy ban will be lifted also for small businesses and services. However, it is clear how uncertain the workers’ condition remains, regardless of any collective agreement signed, and how necessary it is always to ...
Read more

The Syrian Crisis Reveals the Limits of the Russian Power

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 5 When, in 2015, Moscow initiated direct military intervention in Syria against ISIS bases and in support of Bashar al-As-sad's regime, this was seen as a signal of Russia’s resurgence as a great power: it was its first deployment in a war zone outside the territory of the former USSR since its withdrawal from Afghanistan in 1989. Singers of the resurrection Sergey Karaganov, honorary chairman of the Council on Foreign and Defence Policy, and currently one of the most fervent supporters of the war in Ukraine, wrote that this action “has strengthened Russia’s international position”, to the point of making 2015 “one of the most successful years in the history of Russian foreign policy” [Russia in Global Affairs, February 23, 2016). Dmitri Trenin, then head of the Carnegie Center in Moscow, which was later closed by the authorities in 2022, revisited this in his 2018 book What is Russia up to in the Middle East?, ...
Read more

Crisis in Europe’s Auto Industry: Labour Struggles, Class Conflict, and the End of Social Partnership

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 16 We have on several occasions pointed to the automobile manufacturing sector as an indicator of the shifting economic and, consequently, political balance of power between States. It is inevitable that this also applies to the dynamics of the labour market and therefore to the balance of power between classes. A new social cycle The emergence of the Chinese imperialist giant is also shaking up social relations in the old metropolises. We have defined this moment as the descending phase of social-democratisation , the era in which the “conquests” of the previous ascending cycle are called into question. It is the phase in which what was believed to be guaranteed, including in terms of employment relationships, is in danger of being lost. What appears at first glance as merely an effect of technology (in this sector, specifically the development of the electric car) in fact reflects a more general shift in influenc...
Read more