Skip to main content

Socialism and Nationalism in the History of France

The collapse of French socialism at the outbreak of the First World War is considered by many historians to be the most significant case of its kind. We must go back in time to find its origins. The dramatic repression of the Paris Commune in 1871 was followed by a decade of shootings and the deportation of tens of thousands of revolutionary militants.

Reactionary monarchical legitimism attributed the decline of France to the Revolution of 1789, but by then the nouvelles couches sociales, the new classes produced by capitalism, as Leon Gambetta defined them, demanded a politics free from economic, social and clerical ties. The Radical Party, a turning point of French politics, was its expression.

The same taditional Catholic Judeophobia dating back to the Middle Ages — according to Michel Dreyfus’, research director at the CNRS in Paris, Anti-Semitism on the Left in France [Paris, 2009] — gradually transformed into the image of the Jews associated with money and modernity who destroyed national traditions.

The French historian reports some facts regarding this: in 1870, out of 36 million inhabitants, France had 35.4 million Catholics, 600,000 Protestants, 50,000 Jews and 60,000 freethinkers. Jews therefore made up just under 0.2% of the population, concentrated largely in Paris, and accounted for no more than 45 to 50 of the top 300 bankers of the time, even if their presence has been historically consolidated.

Recovery and limits of socialism in France

After they had been given amnesty, in 1879, the Communards began to return to France, bringing with them the divisions created during their exiles. Jules Guesde, an ex-anarchist turned socialist, went to London in 1880 to draw up a program for the French proletariat, with Marx, Engels and Paul Lafargue, who then moved to Paris. Engels, in a letter to Eduard Bernstein on October 25th, 1881, informed him that the program, dictated by Marx, while Guesde was writing, was a masterpiece of stringent argumentation that in a few sentences clarifies things for the masses, in a way that I have rarely seen and which, even in such a concise version, has left me amazed, although Guesde added some extravagance more suitable, in his opinion, for French workers.

The following year, the Parti Ouvrier Français (POF) [French Workers’ Party] lost Paul Brousse, who left the party wanting to put himself at the head of a demand for what he called possibilisme — that is, for taking such chances as offered to secure practical advances towards Socialism, by the promotion of social legislation and of progressive municipal policies, summaries G.D.H. Cole in the second volume of A History of Socialist Thought page 326 [MacMillan, 1957]. Guesde, remaining in the minority, instead supported a centralised and organised party, without alliances with bourgeois parties, which was however only well established in the North.

The ‘populist’ Boulanger

From 1885 France was prey to an economic and political crisis, marked by scandals and financial corruption, which the opposition blamed on the swamp of parliamentary mercantilism [Wolfgang Schivelbusch, La cultura dei vinti, (The culture of defeat) Il Mulino, 2006]. Then the figure of General Georges Boulanger (1837-1891), who in 1886 was appointed by the Radicals as minister of war, emerged. As one of his colleagues said: he was a man whose most insignificant action seemed to be of enormous importance. The new minister was perceived as the bearer of national stability and security, while the others found themselves representing laziness, cowardice and scandal. Boulanger, however, knew how to create a symbolic and rhetorical reality and use it to guide politics, but he lacked the ability to distinguish between the two.

Fearing his authoritarian populism (for example, inviting soldiers to divide their rations with strikers) the Radicals distanced him from the government, thereby offering him a wider space and role, as Sergio Romano wrote [La Franca dal 1870 ai nostri giorni, (France from 1870 to today) Mondadori, 1981]. Ousted, he gathered a heterogeneous coalition of Catholics and radicals, Jacobin socialists and nationalists from the Ligue des Patriotes, who provided the assault troops, usually recruited in popular neighbourhoods, before the government dissolved them.

The General pushed through local elections, up to Paris, where he received the votes of the working-class fanbourg (suburbs). Boulanger’s political battle ended in April of 1889 with his impeachment, the failure of his offensive, and his escape to Brussels, where he committed suicide.

Engels, Lafargue and Boulanger

The historian Zeev Stemhell, in Né destra né sinistra. L’ideologia fascista in Francia (Neither right nor left. Fascist Ideology in France) of 1983 [Baldini and Castoldi, 1997], believes that Boulangism was the first expression of the crisis of the liberal order to have assumed mass dimensions; the first meeting point between nationalism and a form of non-Marxist socialism, which later became anti-Marxist and flowed into fascism. This was countered by a broad coalition of moderates, which the most moderate wing of socialism had already joined.

Engels held the strategic compass based on class autonomy, oriented towards two fundamental issues: international unity and war. In a letter dated June 3-rd-, 1888 [MECW vol. 48], he demolishes Lafargue’s idea that Boulangism was a mouvement populaire to be supported, precisely because it was directed by an ass, and concludes that, if the French see no other issue than either personal government, or parliamentary government, they may as well give it up.

Engels urged action in light of the coming POF congress, in preparation of the constitution of the Second International in 1889, given the competition from Brousse’s Possibilists. He therefore urged make a clean break with the Boulangists, otherwise no one will come.

PAUL LAFARGUE: THE LIMITS OF A GENEROUS REVOLUTIONARY

Paul Lafargue, born in Santiago de Cuba in 1842, expelled from French universities, frequented Marx in London and became a socialist, in addition to marrying his daughter Laura, with whom he had three children who died at an early age. After various assignments for the First International and the Paris Commune, he participated with Jules Guesde in the founding of the Parti Ouvrier Français (POF) and was more active than any other in spreading Marxist positions. He took advantage of his parliamentary mandate to make himself a committed salesman of socialism, unlike the other elected officials, including Guesde, who were slipping into reformism. Lafargue, together with his wife, decided to commit suicide on November 26th, 1911, at the age of seventy, to avoid the degradation of old age. This was a controversial decision, because the two could still have contributed much to the revolutionary movement; however Lenin, at the funeral, called Lafargue one of the most intelligent and profound propagators of Marxism.

In The Right to be Lazy of 1880, Lafargue writes that in capitalist society work is the cause of all intellectual degeneracy, of all organic deformity. And yet, even the proletariat, […] has let itself be perverted by the dogma of work. Lafargue’s denunciation of work for the benefit of others is in line with Marxism, but the forced tone also carries errors with it. For example, when he rejects the idea to erect a capitalist factory in the midst of a rural population because it would mean farewell joy, health and liberty; farewell to all that makes life beautiful and worth living. It is not his intention, but he left openings for the residues of utopian socialism, which, taken up today by some, can become reactionary.

The proletariat must trample underfoot the prejudices of Christian ethics, economic ethics and free-thought ethics. It must return to its natural instincts, it must proclaim the Rights of Laziness and it must accustom itself to working but three hours a day, reserving the rest of the day and night for leisure and feasting. In the abstract, this solution could also be in line with Marxism: social work and shorter hours; the problem is always the deliberately exaggerated tone. Lafargue wants to shake the proletarians but, without realising it, delays their scientific awareness of class problems with outbursts against the world. The irony about the bourgeoisie, however, hit the mark: a century or two ago, the capitalist was a steady man of reasonable and peaceable habits. He contented himself with one wife or thereabouts. He drank only when he was thirsty and ate only when he was hungry. He left to the lords and ladies of the court the noble virtues of debauchery. Today every son of the newly rich makes it incumbent upon himself to cultivate the disease. He even anticipated today’s issues: the great problem of capitalist production is no longer to find producers and to multiply their powers but to discover consumers, to excite their appetites and create in them fictitious needs, also our products are adulterated and shorten their life. Our era will be named the age of adulteration.

Two letters to Laura Lafargue, sent sequentially on the 14th and 15th of December 1882 [MECW vol. 46], confirm these limits and these merits. The first is from Marx: Paul has latterly been writing his best stuff with humour, impudence, and solidity combined with verve, whereas before that I had been troubled by certain ultra-revolutionary turns of phrase, having always regarded these as ‘hot air’. The second is from Engels: Whether it is the cumulative effect of Parisian life and journalistic activity, Paul’s articles lately have been very much better, since he dropped the dogmatism of the scientific oracle.

Two strategic knots

Writing to Lafargue on March 25th, 1889, Engels saw in Boulanger a chauvinist, who fostered war in order to recover Alsace, but would fall into Bismarck’s web and be forced into a disastrous alliance with Tsarist Russia. This would be the most terrible of eventualities. Otherwise I shouldn’t give a fig for the whims of Mme la France. But a war in which there will be 10 to 15 million combatants, unparalleled devastation simply to keep them fed, universal and forcible suppression of our movement, a recrudescence of chauvinism in all countries […] and, withal, only a slender hope that that bitter war may result in revolution — it fills me with horror.

Engels was well aware of the military outcome that would finally materialise in August of 1914: this was not a lucky intuition. Regardless of Boulanger’s actual will to go to war at that stage — which Sternhell denies for example — the strategic framework was the one Engels outlined.

Finally, in a letter to Laura Lafargue on February 4th, 1889, Engels was looking to the future: when Paul gets to work at a paper again, he will brace himself up for the fight and no longer say despondingly: il n’y a pas à aller contre le courante. Nobody asks of him to stop the current, but if we are not to go against the popular current of momentary tomfoolery, what in the name of the devil is our business?

Lotta Comunista, June 2020

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Chinese Rearmament Projects Itself in Asia

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 5 From the series Asian giants Trends in rearmament spending and comparisons of military equipment are increasingly set to dominate coverage of the contention between powers in the crisis in the world order . The military factor has entered the strategic debate, accompanied by a wealth of figures and technical details. The increase in military spending as a percentage of GDP represents a widespread sign of the rearmament cycle at this juncture, but spending alone cannot entirely explain the situation, given the qualitatively different natures of the arsenals being compared. Nor are comparisons between this or that type of weapon useful in themselves, because ultimately all weapons are only ever used in combination with the complex military means available to a power, either in alliance or in conflict with other powers in the system of States. Therefore, while it is difficult to assess the real significa...
Read more

Uneven Development, Job Cuts, and the Crisis of Labour Under Global Capitalism

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 16 Uneven development is a fundamental law of capitalism. We have a macroscopic expression of this in the changing balance of power between States: Atlantic decline and Asian rise are the key dynamics behind the political processes of this era, including wars caused by the crisis in the world order. But behind all this there is a differentiated economic trend, starting from companies and sectors: hence the differentiated conditions for wage earners. And this is the element to keep in mind for an effective defensive struggle. It’s only the beginning The electrical and digital restructuring imposed by global market competition affects various production sectors. The car industry is the most obvious, due to the familiarity of the companies and brands involved. We have already reported on the agreement reached before Christmas at Volkswagen, which can be summarised as a reduction of 35,000 employees by 2030. Die Zeit [De...
Read more

Political Battles of European Leninism

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 1 Thirty years after the death of Arrigo Cervetto , we are publishing here the concluding passages of the introduction to his Opere Scelte (“Selected Works”) for the series Biblioteca Giovani (“Publications for young people”), soon to be published in Italian. The 1944-45 partisan war in Italy. The political battle within libertarian communism. The Korean War, and the watchword of “neither Washington nor Moscow”. The layoffs at the Ilva and Ansaldo factories, the political battle and trade union defence in the struggles of post-war restructuring. From 1953 onwards, the crisis of Stalinism, the 1956 Suez crisis, the Hungarian uprising, the 1957 Theses and the challenge of theory and strategy vis-à-vis the tendencies of unitary imperialism. The political struggle within Azione Comunista (“Communist Action”) and the Movimento della Sinistra Comunista (“Movement of the Communist Left”). From the 1950s to the early 1970s, t...
Read more

German Socialism in 1917

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 6 From the series Pages from the history of the worker’s movement  According to Arrigo Cervetto [ Opere , Vol. 7], “paracentrism” is “the biggest obstacle to the formation of the worldwide Bolshevik party”. The Spartacists at Zimmerwald and Kiental Cervetto was analysing Lenin’s battle against centrism for the creation of the Third International, a battle which saw him isolated at Zimmerwald. He wrote down one of Zinoviev’s quotations from Histoire du parti communiste russe . “We were in the minority at Zimmerwald [1915]. […] In the years 1915 and 1916, we were nothing but an insignificant minority”. “But what is more serious?” – observed Cervetto – “is that the Zimmerwald Spartacists also said they were opposed to us”. In the strategic perspective of the “two separate halves” of socialism – the political conditions in Russia and the economic, productive, and social conditions in Germany – “for ...
Read more

Class Consciousness and Crisis in the World Order

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Pages 1 and 2 The consciousness of the proletariat “cannot be genuine class-consciousness, unless the workers learn, from concrete, and above all from topical, political facts and events to observe every other social class in all the manifestations of its intellectual, ethical, and political life; unless they learn to apply in practice the materialist analysis and the materialist estimate of all aspects of the life and activity of all classes, strata, and groups of the population”. If it concentrates exclusively “or even mainly” upon itself alone, the proletariat cannot be revolutionary, “for the self-knowledge of the working class is indissolubly bound up, not solely with a fully clear theoretical understanding or rather, not so much with the theoretical, as with the practical, understanding — of the relationships between all the various classes of modern society”. For this reason, the worker “must have a clear picture in ...
Read more

Historical Constants and Strategic Surprise

The Strategic Surprise of the Agreement between Beijing and Tehran and the Suggestion of a Six-Power Concert The agreement between Beijing and Tehran falls under the definition of strategic surprise , i.e., events that entirely appertain to the political realm and mark a change or an about-turn in the balance among the powers. New alliances, the breakdown of alliances, the overturning of coalitions, diplomatic openings or unexpected military sorties: these are the regular novelties of international politics that Arrigo Cervetto wrote about. However, if the agreement was an unforeseeable event in itself, the long-term objective economic and political trends. that have determined it and made it possible are entirely investigable. The invasion of Afghanistan by the USSR at the end of December 1979 was interpreted by the United States as a potential threat to the oil routes of the Persian Gulf, and it was a contemporary revival of the Great Game , which had set the British Empire agai...
Read more

Bolsonaro Squeezed between Pandemic, Lula Card and Armed Forces

This article is taken from Intervenção Comunista — the journal of our Brazilian comrades We wrote in May last year that the ‘tropical Trump’ causes a perfect storm . This first quarter of the year seems to demonstrate this clearly: GDP decline (-4.1%) and increased unemployment (14.2%); an end to emergency aid and a delay in the resumption of a new, much leaner aid plan; a record number of deaths and Covid infections. With 2.7% of the world’s population, the country accounts for about 12% of Covid-19 deaths. In March alone, Brazil recorded an increase of about 33% in its daily deaths. The pandemic crisis, coupled with historical imbalances, is shaking up the dysfunctional government of Jair Bolsonaro, who has just appointed his fourth health minister in a year. Increased dependence on the Centrão The second half of Bolsonaro’s term began — for their politics — with the election of Arthur Lira (Progressive Party-Alagoas) as president of the Chamber of Deputies, and Rodrigo Pac...
Read more

Price War in the US and EU

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 7 From the series Industry and pharmaceuticals The contention in the biopharmaceutical field between the two sides of the Atlantic addresses the issue of costs, in two different ways. In a letter to the Financial Times published on April 23rd, Vas Narasimhan and Paul Hudson, the CEOs of Swiss company Novartis and French company Sanofi respectively, presented a harsh diagnosis of the state of European biopharmaceuticals compared to their major competitors, the United States and China. Narasimhan, an American son of immigrants from Tamil Nadu, and Hudson, a Briton, head two of the world's ten largest pharmaceutical multinationals. The two executives see "a strong outlook for the US – thanks to policies and regulations conducive to fast and broad patient access to innovative medicines". In contrast, Europe, "while home to some of the most important biopharma companies in the world"...
Read more

Forces and Consequences of the New Strategic Phase

The new strategic phase in the world balance, with its new corresponding political cycles within powers, requires attention to the materialistic, historical and dialectical method of political analysis itself. The changing forces and basic trends need to be identified; we can make conjectures about the developments in single political battles, but the outcome of these battles will always require us to contemplate a plurality of solutions: some more probable. others less. but never Just a mechanical consequence of long-term economic movements. Many fixed points of the method of political analysis are usual tools in our Marxist elaboration, but this does not mean they must be taken for granted: it is of use to recall them, in relation to the new unknowns of the political battle. Men make their own history, but they do not make it just as they please; they do not make it under circumstances chosen by themselves, but under circumstances directly encountered, given and transmitted from t...
Read more

The Defeat in Afghanistan — a Watershed in the Cycle of Atlantic Decline

In crises and wars there are events which leave their mark on history because of how they make a decisive impact on the power contention, or because of how, almost like a chemical precipitate, they suddenly make deep trends that have been at work for some time coalesce. This is the case of the defeat of the United States and NATO in Afghanistan, which is taking the shape of a real watershed in the cycle of Atlantic decline. For the moment, through various comments in the international press, it is possible to consider its consequences on three levels: America’s position as a power and the connection with its internal crisis; the repercussions on Atlantic relations and Europe’s dilemmas regarding its strategic autonomy; and the relationship between the Afghan crisis and power relations in Asia, especially as regards India’s role in the Indo-Pacific strategy. Repercussions in the United States Richard Haass is the president of the CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations; despite having ...
Read more