Skip to main content

The ‘Dividends of War’ of Middle Eastern Manufacturers

From the series The arms industry in the Middle East

Europeans started selling weapons to the Middle East a century and a half ago, recalls the Economist. At the time, European armies began to adopt the breech-loading tifle and to sell the surplus of rifled muskets to rival Arab tribes. The fow of arms has never stopped since, but in the meantime the importance of the area has grown, attracting new sellers: Americans, Russians, Chinese and also emerging local groups. The United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) EDGE conglomerate, with 12,000 employees and sales worth $4.7 billion, recently entered the SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute) top 25 arms-producing companies in the world for the first time.

An unstable but enormous market

In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) there are three ongoing conflicts (Syria, Libya, and Yemen) and a heated dispute over gas resources in the easter Mediterranean. Recent diplomatic moves, such as the agreements between Israel and the UAE or the reconciliation between Qatar and Saudi Arabia, are the result of de facto alliances in this context. However, these ties will need to stand the test of the new American administration’s decisions concerning Iran.

This part of the world remains a crossroads where a plurality of interests and tensions meet, a situation reflected in the decisions of Europe. Europe is forced, at times, to drop the pacifist and democratic mask it likes to wear for the sake of economic and diplomatic considerations. The UK has been trying for the last two years to conclude an agreement for the sale of 48 more Eurofighter Typhoon planes to Saudi Arabia. However, Germany (which participates in the production of the plane along with the French company Airbus) is against the sale as long as the war in Yemen lasts. Egypt proposes an agreement of the century to Italy to buy €9 billion worth of weapons systems, but the murder case of the Italian student Giulio Regeni in Egypt has started a hypocritical debate over whether the Egyptian military is, or is not, a factor of stability in the area.

In debates and diplomatic masquerades SIPRI’s figures count. In the fiveyear period from 2015-2019, armament exports in the world rose by 5.5% compared to the previous 5 years, but European exports rose by 9%. The Middle East imported 61% more, Egypt 212% more, and Algeria 71% more. Of the total world arms trade, the USA accounts for 36% and Europe for 27%, ahead of Russia’s 21% share and China’s 5.5% share.

The French Defence Ministry’s report to parliament gives a detailed picture of the weapons trade in the decade from 2010-2019. For the MENA region orders received were worth €38.3 billion and deliveries were worth €25.9 billion, equivalent to almost half of France’s weapon systems. Alongside this we will consider an overview of the major European contracts in the Middle East.

There’s no such thing as a peace dividend

Defence industries in Arab states: players and strategies by Florence Gaub and Zoe Stanley-Lockman is a study by the European Union Institute for Security Studies published in March 2017, an analysis of the markets and attempts at local development of the weapons industry.

The authors recall that it is common practice to refer to the 1990s (the decade following the end of the Cold War) as those of the peace dividend, but this does not apply to North Africa and the Middle East, which in that same period increased their military spending by 27% and 15% respectively.

The invasion of Kuwait in 1990, its libcration and the beginning of terrorism in Algeria as well as in the Sinai region were occasions that created a demand for weapons in the MENA area, where Western industries, penalised by national disarmament, could find an outlet. A case in point is the 1993 sale of 400 Leclerc battle tanks to the UAE, i.e., half of the tanks that GIAT (today Nexter) had previously planned to produce for the French Army.

In the same period the offset (compensation) agreements were born, with the great arms industries of the West binding themselves to their client countries through investment for the production of parts and servicing. This mechanism functioned poorly due to a widespread lack of local industrial development. This in turn is the result of oil and gas revenues. Today, that income is destined to gradually diminish and this diminution is fulling a trend of economic diversification, which is illustrated by the ‘Vision 2030’ plan launched by Saudi Arabia. This plan includes domestic arms production.

The financial and economic dimensions are not the only ones present, reads a document written by the Foundation for Strategic Research. Faced with US presidents who speak of the ‘strategic pivot’ of Asia, the major Arab states are pushed to give more thought to how to develop their means of defence.

Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s plan foresees an increase of domestic weapons production to cover for 50% of Saudi Arabia’s military needs, up from the current 2% figure, an objective considered unrealistic by experts. The Saudi Public Investment Fund is worth $224 billion, but only one young person in a thousand in the country has a degree in technical-scientific subjects. The failure to reach planned objectives would be far from the first failure of the Arab countries.

MAJOR EUROPEAN CONTRACTS IN THE MIDDLE EAST


Type year of deal value supplier

— Italy




Qatar 28 helicopters
NH90 2018 3.00 Leonardo(1)

2 patrol vessels
OPV



1 amphibious vessel
PDP
2017 4.00 Fincantieri(2)

4 corvettes




Kuwait 28 fighters
Typhoon 2016 7.00 Leonardo
Egypt 2 frigates
FREMM 2020 1.10 Fincantieri

32 helicopters
AW 149 2020 0.90 Leonardo
— France




Egypt 2 helicopter carriers Mistral 2015 0.95 Naval Group

1 frigate FREMM 2015 0.75 Naval Group

24 fighters Rafale 2015 4.50 Dassault

4 corvettes
Gowind 2014 1.00 Naval Group(3)
Qatar 36 fighters Rafale 2015 6.30 Dassault(4)
UAE 2 corvettes Gowind 2019 0.75 Naval Group
— Germany




Egypt 4 submarines
U209 2011-15 TKMS

4 frigates
MEKO 2019 2.30 TKMS(5)
Israel 4 corvettes
Sa’ar 2015 0.45 TKMS

1 submarine
U209
TKMS
— UK




Saudi Arabia
72 fighters Typhoon 2007 15.30 BAE Systems

22 trainer aircrafts
Hawk 2015 BAE Systems(6)
Oman 12 fighters
Typhoon 2012 3.00 BAE Systems
Qatar 24 fighters
Typhoon 2017 7.40 BAE Systems

Note: values in billions of euros 1) Leonardo prime-contractor in NHIndustries under Airbus Helicopters 2) Leonardo systems 3) three built in Egyptian shipyards in Alexandria 4) including MBDA missiles 5) one built in the Egyptian shipyard in Alexandria 6) partly assembled in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Sources: RID, Analisi Difesa, Le Point, Fincantieri, Leonardo.

The Egyptian attempt

Gamal Abdel Nasser, head of State in Egypt following the overthrow of the monarchy, recalls in his book The philosophy of revolution his participation as a young officer in the anti-Israel war of 1948: we were cheated into a war unprepared and our destinies have been the plaything of passions, plots and greed. Here we lie under fire unarmed.

The Egypt of Nasser and of his successors tried unsuccessfully to grow as a producer of weapon systems. In 1975 Egypt led a ‘pan-Arab’ federation of 18 countries pledging to devote 2% of GDP to this end. This federation was reduced to only four countries the following year (with Egypt, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE remaining). The AOI (Arab Organisation for Industrialisation) was finally limited to Egypt alone, when in 1979 it decided to sign a peace treaty with Israel.

In 2007, the AOI signed an agreement with the American firm General Dynamics for the production under license of more than one thousand M1A1 Abrams heavy battle tanks and for the supply of parts to tanks in service in Morocco, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia. AOI also produces helicopters, armoured vehicles, corvettes, and frigates of French and German designs, but in limited quantities.

Egyptian military factories produce equipment under licence, assemble equipment based on imported kits, or produce equipment with little or no military relevance write Gaub and Stanley-Lockman. Still according to these analysts, the US considered that only 24% of the end items produced in Ministry of Military Production factories were actually military. Indeed only two of the 16 Ministry factories exclusively produced military items […].

The UAE Tactics

In November 2019 EDGE was born, a conglomerate of twenty companies based in the UAE and some holding companies (including Mubadala). The group’s strategy is to grow by specialising in niche sectors (armored vehicles, small ships, aircraft, and light drones) which can also be exported. A strategy which, the US thinktank CSIS says, is pragmatic and realistic. A little cynical, we might add.

The confit in Yemen has showcased the NIMR (Tiger) armoured vehicles of Tawazun. Tawazun merged into EDGE and has produced 2,500 of these units for Algeria too. Off the coast of Yemen there are Baynunah corvettes, 8 units of which were recently sold to Kuwait. The Calidus B-250 light fighter has also been sold to and used by Saudi Arabia. Emirati arms industries acquired the technology from the Russian GAZ and the South African Denel for armored vehicles, from the French CMN for corvettes, from the Brazilian Novaer for fighters; it has begun production, testing, and selling.

Mubadala, before joining EDGE, was also a shareholder in 2018 in the Italian company Piaggio Aerospace. The goal was to acquire the P.1HH Hammerhead drone, partly because the USA had no intention of providing its Gulf Arab allies with unmanned aircrafts. Faced with a refusal from the Italian government to invest more into the company, Mubadala also purchased Chinese Wing Loong II drones (which are also used in conflicts in the Yemeni area), and the UAE decided to pull out of the Ligurian company Piaggio Aerospace and its administrative control.

The 2008 crash caused demand for business aircraft to crumble; the Chinese weapon industry discouraged the Italian venture in the Emirates; and the workers of Piaggio Aerospace are paying the price for it.

Lotta Comunista, January 2021

Popular posts from this blog

The British Link in the Imperialist Chain

Internationalism No. 33, November 2021 Page 8 Lenin often used the metaphor of a chain that binds the world to describe imperialism. The October Revolution of 1917 broke a first link in that chain and hoped to pull the whole thing loose. The metaphor was adopted in those years by all the Bolshevik leaders and the leaders of the newly formed Third International. Within a decade, Stalin's well-known formula of socialism in one country signified the overturning of that strategic cornerstone and the defeat of the revolution in Russia, in Europe, and in the world. Dates that have come to symbolise historical change act as the synthesis of previously accumulated contradictions, and, while such a sudden change does not exhaust the possibility of future contradictions, the concentration of events in 1926 nonetheless marked a watershed that revealed the true extent that the counter-revolution had reached. The great general strike in the United Kingdom that year, wh...

German Socialism in 1917

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 6 From the series Pages from the history of the worker’s movement  According to Arrigo Cervetto [ Opere , Vol. 7], “paracentrism” is “the biggest obstacle to the formation of the worldwide Bolshevik party”. The Spartacists at Zimmerwald and Kiental Cervetto was analysing Lenin’s battle against centrism for the creation of the Third International, a battle which saw him isolated at Zimmerwald. He wrote down one of Zinoviev’s quotations from Histoire du parti communiste russe . “We were in the minority at Zimmerwald [1915]. […] In the years 1915 and 1916, we were nothing but an insignificant minority”. “But what is more serious?” – observed Cervetto – “is that the Zimmerwald Spartacists also said they were opposed to us”. In the strategic perspective of the “two separate halves” of socialism – the political conditions in Russia and the economic, productive, and social conditions in Germany – “for ...

Militarised Scientists

Internationalism No. 71, January 2025 Page 13 From the series Atom and industrialisation of science “ The bourgeoisie has stripped of its halo every occupation hitherto honoured and looked up to with reverent awe. It has converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid wage labourers ” [Marx and Engels, The Communist Manifesto ). The Manhattan Project scientists In Brighter Than a Thousand Suns: A Personal History of the Atomic Scientists , Robert Jungk [1913-1994] writes that the Manhattan Project was a labyrinth of winding paths and dead ends. Commenting on Jungk’s romanticised account of the first phase of the history of the atomic bomb, Edward Teller [1908-2003], often called the “father” of the H-bomb, wrote: “There is no mention of the futile efforts of the scientists in 1939 to awaken the interest of the military authorities in the atomic bomb. The reader does not learn about the dismay of scientists f...

The Works of Marx and Engels and the Bolshevik Model

Internationalism Pages 12–13 In the autumn of 1895 Lenin commented on the death of Friedrich Engels: "After his friend Karl Marx (who died in 1883), Engels was the finest scholar and teacher of the modern proletariat in the whole civilised world. […] In their scientific works, Marx and Engels were the first to explain that socialism is not the invention of dreamers, but the final aim and necessary result of the development of the productive forces in modern society. All recorded history hitherto has been a history of class struggle, of the succession of the rule and victory of certain social classes over others. And this will continue until the foundations of class struggle and of class domination – private property and anarchic social production – disappear. The interests of the proletariat demand the destruction of these foundations, and therefore the conscious class struggle of the organised workers must be directed against them. And every class strugg...

Science Against Time

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 14 From the series Industry and pharmaceuticals The surge in China’s biopharmaceutical industry over the last decade is part of its broader scientific and technological ascent and therefore deserves our attention. Such growth presents a challenge to other imperialist powers. The Biosecure Act’s intention, to reduce the ties between American and Chinese biotech firms, has been branded by The Economist as “old-fashioned protectionism”. The British weekly recognises, however, that the clash goes well beyond a trade war. The stakes are higher. In a lengthy cover story [“The rise of Chinese science”], it writes that “China is now a leading scientific power”. Just five years ago, this was still considered only a possibility. The current question is whether this is “welcome or worrying” [June 15th, 2024]. Unity and scission The viewpoint of that publication, an authoritative voice of one of the power-houses of imperia...

The Chinese Dragon Does Not Wait for American Rearmament

From the series News from the Silk Road According to The Washington Post , through the federal budget the White House has opened negotiations with the Senate that include long-term competition with China. The figures — $6 trillion, including infrastructure and family welfare plans — will vary in the negotiations, and will be centred on three directives. One demand is common to various proposals of expenditure: they must have a positive impact on the American productivity vis-à-vis China on the open fronts of industrial, energy and technological restructuring, or on the efficiency of welfare systems. In the case of welfare, the competition is also vis-à-vis Europe. Another calculation, attributed to Biden’s administration and the Democrats, is the enlargement of the electoral coalition in view of the next mid-term elections. Finally, there is a need to direct military expenditure, within the framework of a greater increase in the other items of discretionary expenditure, not absorb...

The Theoretical and Political Battles of Arrigo Cervetto II

From the introduction to Arrigo Cervetto’s Opere Scelte (“Selected Works”), soon to be published in Italy by Edizioni Lotta Comunista. II “Neither Washington nor Moscow”, “Neither Truman nor Stalin”. These were slogans sufficient to rally the internationalist cause, not only against the influence of the Stalinist Italian Communist Party (PCI) on one front, but also, on the opposite side, against the pro-American, “Westernist” leanings present in certain political currents of anarchist individualism. There was a unitary imperialism to be fought, of which the US and the USSR were both expressions. 1951, Genoa Pontedecimo In the ideological climate of the Cold War, heightened by the Korean War, a third world conflict was considered imminent; La guerra che viene (“The coming war”) was the title of a Trotskyist-inspired pamphlet that ultimately leaned in favour of the USSR, but reflected a widespread perception. The internation alist principle alone proved insufficient. To maintain...

Marx’s Logic

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 7 From the series Principles of Marxism The method of exposition in Marx’s economic analysis, which he summarised on various occasions, adopts the progression from the simplest to the most complex concepts. It is a method that, at first glance, appears to correspond to common sense — from easy to difficult — but which Marx explains by contradicting common sense. Common sense distorts knowledge, starting right from the elementary building blocks of the representation of reality, which requires scientific abstraction to understand. Opportunism will always set the prejudices of common sense against the science-party . Marx writes, introducing Volume I of Capital : “The value-form , whose fully developed shape is the money-form , is very elementary and simple. Nevertheless, the human mind has for more than 2,000 years sought in vain to get to the bottom of it, whilst on the other hand, to the successful analysis of ...

Political Battles of European Leninism

Internationalism No. 73, March 2025 Page 1 Thirty years after the death of Arrigo Cervetto , we are publishing here the concluding passages of the introduction to his Opere Scelte (“Selected Works”) for the series Biblioteca Giovani (“Publications for young people”), soon to be published in Italian. The 1944-45 partisan war in Italy. The political battle within libertarian communism. The Korean War, and the watchword of “neither Washington nor Moscow”. The layoffs at the Ilva and Ansaldo factories, the political battle and trade union defence in the struggles of post-war restructuring. From 1953 onwards, the crisis of Stalinism, the 1956 Suez crisis, the Hungarian uprising, the 1957 Theses and the challenge of theory and strategy vis-à-vis the tendencies of unitary imperialism. The political struggle within Azione Comunista (“Communist Action”) and the Movimento della Sinistra Comunista (“Movement of the Communist Left”). From the 1950s to the early 1970s, t...

Chinese Rearmament Projects Itself in Asia

Internationalism No. 78-79, August-September 2025 Page 5 From the series Asian giants Trends in rearmament spending and comparisons of military equipment are increasingly set to dominate coverage of the contention between powers in the crisis in the world order . The military factor has entered the strategic debate, accompanied by a wealth of figures and technical details. The increase in military spending as a percentage of GDP represents a widespread sign of the rearmament cycle at this juncture, but spending alone cannot entirely explain the situation, given the qualitatively different natures of the arsenals being compared. Nor are comparisons between this or that type of weapon useful in themselves, because ultimately all weapons are only ever used in combination with the complex military means available to a power, either in alliance or in conflict with other powers in the system of States. Therefore, while it is difficult to assess the real significa...