From the series Workers’ struggles in the world
The struggle waged by Samsung Electronics workers over the last three years has a particular significance in the panorama of workers’ struggles around the world. A great deal of this significance undoubtedly derives from its having been the first ever strike at the South Korean company where, moreover, no trade union existed until a few years ago: until 2020, Samsung was strictly non-union. But it is also important because, according to trade-union sources, it was the world’s first strike in the crucial chip-production sector. Today these are fundamental and indispensable components for a myriad of products, for both civilian and military use, and they are becoming even more important with the increasing hardware needs of artificial intelligence. This struggle therefore concerns a product, an industry, and consequently a body of wage-earners growing in number, economic weight, and importance on the world market.
Furthermore, as we have analysed in this newspaper, the chip war has become a front in the struggle between the powers
, in which Samsung and SK Hynix together have a majority share of global production. This is strongly connected to South Korea, Taiwan, and China – an absolutely uncontrollable
market [Lotta Comunista, January 2023 and January 2025].
Samsung’s brand is known all over the world, above all for its smartphones, which rival Apple’s iPhones for the lead in global sales. But it is also known as the world’s main producer of chips.
The industrial dispute, or rather series of disputes, began in the spring of 2024 and lasted over a year before reaching a provisional conclusion. It then restarted in the first months of this year.
Chronicle of an unprecedented struggle
In June 2024, there was the historic first-one-day strike. This was followed by a further three-day strike in July, after which it transformed into an open-ended strike which was interrupted after 25 days and replaced by other forms of struggle. Agreement was reached after lengthy negotiations, suspended and resumed several times, in March and November 2025. The industrial dispute began again in March of this year, with declarations of the intention to strike in the following months. Strike action has already been approved by the workers, with an overwhelming majority (93% in favour), and may be carried out in the course of the next few months, depending on the negotiations. About 6,000 workers at the factory which produces chips in Pyeongtaek, in the province of Gyeonggi, participated in the struggle.
At the heart of the industrial dispute is the wage issue: not the actual salary itself, but above all the variable component linked to the company’s productive results, i.e., the bonuses distributed to the workers, which, in some cases, can amount to as much as 50% of the overall wage. Historically, this is a tool that has been used widely by the company; the trade union now wishes to see it regulated rather than being left to the management’s sole discretion. However, the results gained did not correspond to the union’s demands, with the result that the industrial dispute was resumed just a few months after its initial conclusion. The rigid application of a no labour, no wages
rule – i.e., the company’s refusal to consider paying any form of bonus to compensate for the wages lost during the days on strike (a widespread practice in the United States, for example) – has contributed to weakening the workers’ position.
A negotiation equal to the times and challenges
In March of this year, strikes in another South Korean division of the company, Samsung Biologics (in the biopharma and bio-manufacturing sector) involved about 4,000 workers, 90% of whom voted to go on strike if the negotiations fell through. A strike was also unannounced for this division, established in 2011.
In summary, this is the timeline of the still-ongoing industrial dispute which has historical significance for our class and concerns crucially important production centres.
Samsung was one of the pillars of the South Korean economic boom. Its wage-earners, who today number about 125,000 in the country, are mainly among the higher strata of the manufacturing working class. This is partly because the decision of the big conglomerates, the chaebol, to invest heavily in high value-added sectors, especially in electronics and the production of semiconductors, has gradually required an increasingly qualified workforce. The emphasis on Research and Development is considerable, as is the proportion of company technicians employed in this area, not only in Korea but also in various other countries around the world, including the United States.
Until a few years ago, the Samsung chaebol grew by practising a rigid no-union policy, succeeding in keeping the trade unions out of its Korean factories and many of its overseas plants. The unions only managed to gain entry in the form of a company union in 2020, achieving great success in terms of members. The working conditions in these factories, especially working hours, have always been described as particularly onerous and even dangerous. The International Labour Organization (ILO) intervened in 2017, condemning Samsung’s anti-trade union policies, and also the Korean government’s failure to intervene promptly against the serious anti-union actions
.
Samsung
, which means three stars
in Korean, is the name that Lee Byung-chul chose for the company when he founded it shortly before the Second World War: the three stars were to shine always, like the stars in the sky, and were meant to refer to the concepts of greatness, abundance, and power. After more than 80 years, it cannot be denied that the project has been a brilliant success. Samsung, South Korea’s leading chaebol, controls about 80 companies, and is now the world leader in the production of smartphones (in fierce head-to-head competition with Apple) and chips, and is the only company in the world which produces both smartphones and chips. The 260,000 workers in the group’s various companies, more than half of them outside South Korea, make it one of the world’s major companies; in comparison, Boeing, the American aerospace and military group, has 170,000 employees, 20,000 of them outside the US.
The diversification of its production – which covers many sectors, from shipyards to chemistry, consumer electronics and white goods, as well as smartphones and chips – and investment abroad have been the dominant themes in Samsung’s strategy in the last 30-40 years. Among the main production centres outside South Korea are: Vietnam and India for smartphones – the biggest factory of these products in the world was opened in 2018 in New Delhi – the United States (semiconductors), and Mexico (electrical appliances). Its production activity in China has recently fallen significantly in favour of investment in nearby Vietnam. Research & Development is also significant, carried out in a number of veritable R&D factories
across various countries where tens of thousands of wage-earning technicians are concentrated.
Behind the world-famous brand lay a workplace culture
. For a long time, the company succeeded in controlling the workers by making extensive use of the tool of wage bonuses. It also employed vindictive, repressive measures that appeared anachronistic but which in practice were applied until very recently. The US Labor Notes summarises the situation as follows: Samsung’s brutal anti-union history and the sacrifices of many of its workers should shatter the myth that good benefits and pay alone can substitute for labour’s own collective bargaining power
. Commenting on the 2024 strikes, East Asia Forum observes that South Korea’s cultural characteristics may have also influenced acceptance of such labour systems
[Samsung Electronics Union Strikes a Chord With South Korean Society
, October 25th, 2024].
A recent analysis of South Korean industrialisation and industrial relations reaches similar conclusions: South Korea’s labour system has evolved significantly from traditional paternalistic models to more structured frameworks, emphasising workers’ rights and collective bargaining
. Hence, the old way of managing relations between companies and employees, organisations no longer meets the demands of the new information society era
[European Research Studies Journal, Issue 2, 2025].
A history of strong strike action
As an analyst in East Asia Forum observes: The strike […] challenged what was for decades a strictly non-union company and may foreshadow changes to the country’s labour movement. […] Updating the country’s company-union relationships would be beneficial for both parties in the long term
[October 25th, 2024]. But this is no novelty: in spite of State repression and the overwhelming weight of the chaebol, the process of industrialisation of South Korea in the postwar period was accompanied by long, violent, and regular strike actions.
Today, even at this South Korean giant in the fast-growing field of electronics, embroiled in the chip war in the anarchic world market, workers’ demands have found expression in the form of strikes. This is an issue that will merit further discussion.